You are on page 1of 2

Sample Statistical Tables

ENG 668 Spring, 2014



Table 1

Descriptive Statistics of Writing Scores by L1 Group
_______________________________________________________________________
95% CI
Group n M SD LL UL
J apanese 21 13.33 3.19 11.88 14.78
Korean 26 13.00 2.32 12.06 13.94
Chinese 29 10.72 3.71 9.31 12.14
Thai 31 13.56 2.72 12.36 14.35
Total 107 12.55 3.19 11.94 13.16
Note. CI =confidence interval; LL =lower limit; UL =upper limit

Table 2

Difference Between Pretest and Posttest Scores on Business Vocabulary Measure


Administration n k Mean SD t

Pretest 10 30 17.50 4.65
-2.47*
Posttest 10 30 19.60 5.42
Note. k =number of items; t
critical
(9 df, 2 tailed) =2.26; *p <.05; eta
2
=.40.



Table 3

One-Way ANOVA on Differences in Vocabulary Scores Between L1 Groups


Source df F eta
2


Between 4 14.35* .56

Within 44
Note. F
critical 4,44
=2.58; *p <.05.






Table 4

Intercorrelations among Subscales on PhonePass


Subscale 1 2 3 4 5

1. Listening __ .56 .27 .36 .32

2. Repeat Accuracy __ .42 .56 .44

3. Pronunciation __ .87* .64

4. Reading __ .59

5. Repeat Fluency __

Note. df =18; alpha .05 adjusted for multiple comparisons to .001; r
critical
=.68; *p <.05.

Table 5

Preference of Students with Different L1s Toward Student Centered Class


J apanese Spanish Arabic Other

For 11 30 25 21

Against 45 12 7 11

Undecided 16 8 10 11
Note. Chi-square
observed
=42.36; Chi-square
critical
, df, 6, =12.59; p <.05.


Figure 1. Effects of native language on writing score.

You might also like