Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Apple Motion to Terminate ITC Appeal

Apple Motion to Terminate ITC Appeal

Ratings: (0)|Views: 11,192|Likes:
Published by Mikey Campbell
Apple Motion with U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to Terminate ITC Appeal
Apple Motion with U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to Terminate ITC Appeal

More info:

Published by: Mikey Campbell on Jun 15, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/14/2014

pdf

text

original

 
No. 2014-1015 ______________________________________
U
NITED
S
TATES
C
OURT OF
A
PPEALS
 
FOR THE
F
EDERAL
C
IRCUIT
 
______________________________________ A
PPLE
I
NC
.,
 Appellant,
v.
 
I
NTERNATIONAL
T
RADE
C
OMMISSION
,
 Appellee,
and 
 
S
AMSUNG
E
LECTRONICS
C
O
.,
 
L
TD
.,
 
S
AMSUNG
E
LECTRONICS
A
MERICA
,
 
I
NC
.,
 
S
AMSUNG
T
ELECOMMUNICATIONS
A
MERICA
,
 
LLC,
 Intervenors.
______________________________________
 Appeal from U.S. International Trade Commission in Investigation no. 337-TA-796
____________ _______________ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. APP. P. 42(b) _____________ ______________
The United States International Trade Commission instituted this investigation based on a complaint filed by Apple Inc. (“Apple”). The Commission determined that Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“SEA”), and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (“STA”) (collectively, “Samsung”) violate 19 U.S.C. § 1337 because Samsung’s  products infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,479,949 (“’949 patent”) and
Case: 14-1015 Document: 52 Page: 1 Filed: 06/13/2014
 
7,912,501 (“’501 patent”). The Commission issued an exclusion order barring entry of Samsung articles that infringe the ’949 and ’501 patents. The Commission also issued cease-and-desist orders barring SEA and STA from importing, selling, marketing, advertising, distributing, transferring, and soliciting U.S. agents or distributors for infringing articles. Samsung appealed the Commission’s final determination and orders. Samsung’s appeal was docketed as No. 2014-1150. Apple also appealed, seeking to broaden the scope of the exclusion order and cease-and-desist orders. Apple’s appeal was docketed as No. 2014-1015. Samsung filed an unopposed motion to dismiss its appeal voluntarily,  pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and that motion has been granted. That means the Commission’s exclusion order and cease-and-desist orders will remain in place. Apple thus respectfully requests that Apple’s appeal No. 2014-1015 also be dismissed under Rule 42(b). Counsel for Samsung and counsel for the United States International Trade Commission have informed counsel for Apple that they do not oppose this motion. Upon dismissal of Apple’s appeal, each party will bear its own appeal costs and fees.
Case: 14-1015 Document: 52 Page: 2 Filed: 06/13/2014
 
 Dated: June 13, 2014 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Deanne E. Maynard D
EANNE
E.
 
M
AYNARD
 M
ARC
A.
 
H
EARRON
 D
AVID
D.
 
S
CANNELL
 M
ORRISON
&
 
F
OERSTER LLP
 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006-1888 Tel: (202) 887-8740 Fax: (202) 785-7520 H
AROLD
J.
 
M
C
E
LHINNY
 
ACHEL
REVANS
 M
ORRISON
&
 
F
OERSTER LLP
 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: (415) 268-7000 Fax: (415) 268-7522
Counsel for Appellant Apple Inc.
 
Case: 14-1015 Document: 52 Page: 3 Filed: 06/13/2014

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->