the melbourne review
Vol 4 Number 2 November 2008
48
a loss in productivity. Thus someof the costs are felt by the parentmaking the leave decision whilesome are incurred by their employerand co-workers. Finally, there arecosts associated with caring for achild. However, to a large extent,it is the decision to have that childthat creates those costs and not theleave choice itself.technological options that reduce theneed for 24/7 maternal availabilitymaking the individual’s ability toengage in breast-feeding easier (or atleast no harder).Thus the goal of parental leave policyis to ensure that leave, or additional
leave, is taken where the benefits
outweigh the costs and not otherwise.However, because some of these
the benefits are primarily private?
Will paid parental leave improveworkplace outcomes for families? Andwhat policy responses might balance
the difficult trade-offs that arise?
What is the goal of parental leave policy?
The starting point for any analysis
of parental leave policy is to ask:
If economics were not an issue,what would we want our parentalopportunities and activities to looklike? My examination of publicdiscussions of parental leave suggeststhat parents would like to be able tomove between work and home lives
in a frictionless manner. Specifically,
following the birth of a child, one orboth parents would like to be ableto ‘pause’ their work life, take timeoff to spend with the baby (perhapsbetween 6 and 12 months) and thento ‘resume’ their work life where theyleft off prior to the birth.There are various impediments to africtionless movement between workand home life around the birth of a child. First, if the period of leaveis long enough, a parent’s humancapital may depreciate. Second, aparent’s attitudes towards theircareer may change when a child isborn and the parent may not wishto resume work at the same level of intensity as before. Third, parental‘pauses’ may be disruptive to theworkplace. Teams may be brokenup, skilled replacements may be
difficult to find and uncertainty may
be created.Thus the goal of parental leave policymay be to create a frictionless abilityand incentive for parentsto take a break from, and thenresume, their working life around thetime of childbirth but some costs orfrictions are inevitable. From
this perspective, the first best,or most economically efficientoutcome, will arise if the benefits
accrued from parental leaveoutweigh the costs.So what are the social costs thatarise when parents take leave?First, a parent gives up any jobsatisfaction for that period of time.Second, to the extent that there isdepreciation in human capital orworkplace disruptions, there is
What of the benefits? First, thereis the raft of benefits that parents
get from spending time with theirchildren. And, to the extent that
there are developmental benefits tothe child, the parents feel that benefit
too. Second, it may be that, like the
benefits of education, the benefits
associated with child developmentalso spill over to the rest of society.That is, there could be positiveexternalities that are not capturedby the parents.However, we must take care in
understanding these benefits. After
all, many of the child development
benefits can be achieved withoutspecific parental involvement.
Indeed, parental involvement ismost likely not necessary all of thetime. Non-parent child carers cando this job and, in some cases, maydo things better because they havemore experience and formal training.Even with breast-feeding there are
Thus the goal of parental leave policy is to ensure that
leave, or additional leave, is taken where the benefits outweigh the costs and not otherwise. However,because some of these elements are incurred orbestowed on agents other than the parents, there is a
potential for a market failure.
Leave a Comment