• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Choothia Akbar
Shameful Hindus who throng to watch Jodhaa-Akbar, a film which glorifies Hinduhater Cruel Akbar, are worthy of getting killed by Terrorists!
 
Hindus boycott 'JodhaAkabar' MovieEven historians have not realized piety signified in ‘marriage’ ceremony To showhistorians’
 Failure to understand the word ‘marriage’ mentioned in Islamic chronicle, Shri. Oak writes, “Shrivastava says that King Raval Hariraya of Jaisalmer married his daughter toAkbar. Here, he never realized that the word ‘marriage’ used by him is mostinappropriate.”Raja Bhagawandas went to Jaisalmer to bring his daughter. He took this helpless princessto harem of Akbar. This shows that nobody from Jaisalmer’s royal family took her toAkbar. It was like sending a man and a cartful of food for demon Bakasur to eateveryday. Every Hindu or Muslim king or Nawab had to offer his daughter to Akbar irrespective of his surrendering to or giving a fight to Akbar since Akbar was extremelylascivious. Kings like Bhagawandas and Mansingh, who had surrendered to Akbar, usedto advise other Rajputs that it was better to provide Akbar with their women and wealthrather than fight with the powerful Emperor. As per their advice, except Maharana of Udaypur, all the other kings and princes had surrendered to Akbar either by giving a fightor without fight. After their surrender, they did not get away with sending just one princess; but they had to send a carriage-full of women. How in a wedding, presents aredistributed to the people from one’s family as per their status, these Hindu women used to be sent to army personnel of Akbar as gifts. Children of these Hindu women used to getgrow up hating Hindus since very young age and after growing up, they used to carry onthe legacy of killing Hindus, converting them and raping Hindu women.On page 213-215, Shri. Shrivastava says, “King Ravalpratap of Banswada and KingRaval Asakarna of Dongarpur were induced to surrender to Akbar and since then, they
 
were known as subjugates of Akbar. The princess of Dongarpur was sent to the harem of Akbar. Lunkarna and Birbal induced both the kings to conciliate with Akbar. Both thekings brought princess of Dongarpur to Akbar’s camp. Akbar was on his way toFattehpur Sikri. Even during the journey, Hindu ladies from royal families were suppliedto satiate Akbar’s sexual desires. The princess of Dongarpur was taken to Akbar from her father’s shelter to Akbar’s camp. In Hinduism, ‘marriage’ is a rite, however, Akbar destroyed the sanctity of marriage.
Akbar used to demand Hindu women for providing to relatives and friends
 Shri. Oak has shown how to surmise the descriptions written by fanatic chronologistswho were refugees of Akbar and who believed in keeping him happy. Shri. Oak writes,“Akbar used to ask for women belonging to his enemies’ families defeated by him and heused to call for Hindu women even for his relatives and friends, e.g. the ruler of Tibet wasasked to send his daughter for Akbar’s son Shahajada Salim (Jahangir). Accordingly, shewent to the harem in Lahore on 1st January 1572. Who will be ready to send his daughter willingly to a dissipated lustful Mughal king? This shows that the king of Tibet could nothave sent his daughter along with his wealth unless he was threatened of getting hiskingdom destroyed. He had to therefore, sacrifice his daughter.On 26th June 1586 daughter of Rayasinh of Bikaner too entered the harem of Salim(Jehangir). Historians are describing these incidents as marriages which is totally wrong.Had it been ‘marriage’, the ceremony would have taken place in the palace of Bikaner.Whole of Bikaner would have strongly condemned if such ceremony would have taken place in there.There is a reference of Akbar marrying two Hindu princesses to Salim (Jahangir) in a book authored by Shallot. He says in the book that on 2nd February 1584, there was agrand celebration of Salim’s wedding with daughter of King Bhagawandas in Lahore andin the year 1596, Salim was wedded to the daughter of Rayasinh. It was natural tocelebrate for Muslims as it was their policy to defile Hindu princesses; but it was a matter of grief for Hindus. It was a hell for Hindu women to spend the rest of their lives in dark  prison like harems along with their co-wives with such dissipated and immoral Muslimhusbands. Moreover, Hindu princesses had to even take abuses hurled at them for beingHindus as Hindus were treated inferior.Bhagawandas and Mansinh, the two princes became agents of Akbar and they usedmediate and send other Rajput princesses to Mughal harems. It used to be deathly for the parents of such girls to sacrifice their daughters to Mughals; therefore, they used to avoidgoing and used to send their daughters through Bhagawandas and Mansinh with a littlesatisfaction that their daughter was sent (to hell) through a Hindu Rajput so that thedaughters would be able to hear at least a few Hindu words in that hell.
On Jodhbai’s death, Rajputs refused to perform ‘kshour’ rites
 
 
 Now we shall study an incident that took place after Jodhabai’s death from the book written by Shri. Oak. It is given in the book titled ‘Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan’(Part 2, page 385) by Colonel James Todd that Akbar ordered all Rajputs to perform‘kshour (cut hair and beard)’ after Jodhbai’s death. When the barbers reached the camp of Hada Rajput, they refused to get their hair cut and beat up the barbers. Among the protesters, there was Raja Bhoj. He was the son of Rao Surajan whose capital was FortRanathambore. Those against Raja Bhoj, informed Akbar about the incident that the barbers sent by him were beaten up by Hada Rajput and they refused to observemourning for Jodhabai.Bhoj Raja was a valiant king. He had no other option but to stay in the camp along withother Hindu Rajaput as a hostage. As Akbar heard about Bhoj’s resistance, he ordered thatRaja Bhoj should be fettered and his mustache should be cut.The news reached Hada camp and all the occupants were enraged. They took out their swords and planned to revolt. Finally, Akbar had to personally go there and made peacewith them; even he did not dare to touch a hair of Rajputs.The crux in this incident was that Jodhabai was from Jaipur’s royal family. Her name waswritten off by Rajput since she was taken to his harem by Akbar and as such she wasostracized by the Rajputs and they felt that she was not a Rajput and did not deserve to behonoured in any manner. Therefore, Rajputs were not ready to perform rites even after her death or observe mourning. King Bhoj thought that what right did Akbar has to forceupon us such rites and ask us to cut our hair.For every Rajput, mustaches was a sign of his honour, pride and manliness. They used to be ready to even sacrifice their lives to save their mustaches. On the other hand, Akbar was bent upon insulting Rajputs in every possible way and wanted to make themhelpless. Akbar was very particular about others obeying his orders and their bowing before him. Akbar thought it very insulting that Rajputs were not ready to perform ritesfor Jodhabai as she was his slave. He, therefore, tried, by hook or by crook, to makeRajputs perform the rites; but his plan did not succeed.
Even today, the thought of marrying one’s daughter to a Muslim is loathsome
 For the past 60 years, Hindi film industry has this bad habit of showing all Muslimcharacters as very chivalrous. Now even a very depraved king like Akbar is beingglorified. It has been 402 years since Akbar’s death; but even now, a Hindu father wouldnot be ready to marry of his daughter to a Muslim. Such thought is very loathsome for aHindu even today. How bad it must have been even earlier? Hindus have to now decidewhether they want to believe in a so-called love story produced by a film producer withhis eyes only on earning money or have faith in the proven history told by a virtuous person and protect our women folk.Akbar’s name was actually Jalaluddin Mohamad and as the name suggests he was fiery.When barely 18-19 years of age he got Behramkhan, the very man who had brought him
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...