• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
213
 V. THEMES1. CITIZENSHIP
[Children] tend to be either ignored as citizens or regarded in an adult-centric fashion as citizensof the future rather than of the present.
Brian Howe
The multiple dimensions of contemporary citizenship
In a strictly legal sense, a citizen is the inhabitant o a state where laws protect people’s civic and politi-cal rights and where people have reciprocal duties to that state: to obey the laws o the country, to con-tribute to common expenses and to deend the country i attacked. Citizenship differs rom nationality or ethnic identification; in this context these two latter terms are synonymous with a grouping based ona cultural and language community. Most European states are composed o several nationalities. How-ever, people o the same nationality may live in neighbouring states. While the state is a
political
and
geopolitical
entity, the nation is a
cultural
and/or an
ethnic
entity. Citizenship is related to a state andis not dependent on nationality.oday 
citizenship’ goes beyond a simple legal relationship between people and the state. It is understoodto have not only a legal dimension, reerring to civic and political rights and duties, but also a psycholog-ical and social dimension. Being a citizen is part o one’s identity. You care or your community becauseyou are part o it, and you expect others to care or it and, with you, to seek the common good o the wholecommunity.In this broader sense, citizenship is not merely a process o socialisation. It involves eelings o identity,belonging, inclusion, participation and social commitment. As part o the community, the citizen caninfuence it, participate in its development and contribute to its well-being. Tus the citizen is both a‘receiver’ o rights and duties and also an ‘actor’ who participates within a group o which she or he eelsa part. Citizens in this sense are equal in dignity.
 
214
QUESTION:
 Besides voting in elections, what forms of involvement or participa-tion are possible for ordinary citizens? How can they be encouraged to participate?
Historical and contemporary conceptions of citizenship
Te historical development o the idea o citizenship helps to explain these multiple dimensions o cit-izenship.One o the earliest concept o citizenship can be traced back to ancient Greek city-states, where ‘citizens’were those who had a legal right to participate in the affairs o the state. However, only a small percent-age o the population were citizens: slaves and women were mere subjects and oreigners were excludedaltogether. For those ree men who did have the privileged status o being citizens, ‘civic virtue’ or beinga ‘good’ citizen was an important value. Tis tradition led to an emphasis on the
duties
that citizenshipimposed on citizens.Te association o citizenship with national identity arose in nineteenth century history, when nationstates were emerging all over Europe and the legal status o a ‘citizen’ was oten tied to a nation state,even i several ethnicities lived within its territory. Te link between citizenship and patriotism becamestronger during this period.
e liberal view of citizenship
, which originated with the French Revolution, emphasized the importanceo 
rights
or all citizens and a commitment to a constitution rather than an ethnicity. As more people becameentitled to vote, justice and political rights also became a reality or an increasing number o people.In the twentieth century, the supporters o ‘
social citizenship
’ went urther to recognize that citizensought to be able to expect civil and political rights rom the state. Te rise o the welare state in the lastcentury owed a great deal to thinkers who argued that the rights o citizens ought to include their live-lihood and working conditions.Citizenship today has various meanings which are interrelated and complementary. ‘
 Active Citizenship
implies working towards the betterment o one’s community through economic participation, public ser-vice, volunteer work and other such efforts to improve lie or all members o the community.
European citizenship
’ is understood in many different ways. Te Maastricht reaty o the EuropeanUnion laid down the concept that citizens o states belonging to the European Union (EU) increasingly have some rights rom and duties to the Union as a whole, as well as to their own states. Such rightsgranted to EU citizens include reedom o movement and the right o residence within the territory o the Member States, and the right to vote and stand as a candidate at elections or the European Par-liament. However, a ‘European society’ cannot be said to exist today in the same way as the Greek orCzech society. European citizenship today lies somewhere between a tangible reality and a distant ideal.“Te ideal understanding o European citizenship would be based on the values o Democracy, HumanRights and Social Justice.”
1
European citizenship provides a significant sense o belonging to multiplevalue systems: to human rights, to a nationality, to an ethnicity, to a local community, to a amily, to anideological group and so on. Tis multiple and dynamic system o belongings involved in European citi-zenship is not in conrontation with any national identity, but is inclusive and works on the local level.
Global citizenship
’ is a recent concept that emerged rom the idea that everyone is a citizen o theglobe. In a legal sense, however, there is no such thing as a global citizen. “Global Citizenship is aboutunderstanding the need to tackle injustice and inequality, and having the desire and ability to workactively to do so. It is about valuing the Earth as precious and unique, and saeguarding the uture orthose coming ater us. Global Citizenship lives well together with any other understanding o citizen-ships; it is a way o thinking and a commitment to make a difference.”
2
 
215
 As the terms ‘citizen’ or ‘citizenship’ have many interpretations, and as nation-state is not necessarily a relevant concept in a multicultural Europe, the Council o Europe uses the term ‘citizen’ as a ‘personco-existing in a society’. Instead o ‘nation state’, the word ‘community’ best describes the local, regionaland international environment in which an individual lives.
QUESTION:
What is your personal understanding of citizenship? What should the criteria be for citizenship inan increasingly mobile and multicultural world? Who in your society should not be entitled to citizenship rights?
oday, most people’s notion o citizenship includes elements o all these concepts, although in differ-ent proportions. Some people will emphasize the ‘duties’ elements o citizenship, while others may givemore importance to ‘rights’. For some, patriotism has key importance and a relation to one single state,while some people hold a broader understanding o what citizenship means.
Children as citizens
Te law o many countries once considered children to be their parents’ property. Although the
 patria potestas
that gave a ather every right – including that o lie and death – over his children is long gone,remnants o this traditional power remain in some countries. Te traditional understanding is that chil-dren are ‘non-citizens’ or ‘pre-citizens’ in a society. While the Convention on the Right o the Child rec-ognizes parents’ rights to their children’s custody, education and representation (Articles 5 and 18), italso introduces the principle o the child’s best interest, which establishes limits to parental rights inthe interest o their children (Article 3). According to Brian Howe, a Canadian children’s rights advocate, although children are legally citizens by birth or naturalization, they are oten neither recognized nor treated as citizens. “Tey tend to be eitherignored as citizens or regarded in an adult-centric ashion as citizens o the uture rather than o thepresent.”
3
Howe identifies two main reasons or this attitude: children’s economic dependency and psycho-logical immaturity. He points out that other economically dependent groups such as stay-at-home parents,retired people, university students or adults with disabilities are not denied their citizenship. He concludesthat children have a right to citizenship as “citizenship is about inclusion, not economic independence”.
QUESTION:
 Are children really citizens? Or are they just ‘pre-citizens’ or citizens-to-be?
Children indeed lack the cognitive development, maturity and sel-control o adults. However develop-ment is an ongoing, lielong process, and the cognitive development o children increases when they aretreated with respect and provided with age-appropriate opportunities or their autonomy and partici-pation as citizens. According to national law and to the UDHR, children have rights and responsibilities similar to thoseo adults. But they also have differentiated citizenship: the CRC recognizes children’s need or specific
 protection
(e.g. rom abuse, neglect, economic and sexual exploitation),
 provision
(e.g. o basic needs suchas health care, social security or to a quality standard o living, as well as the right to a name, identity and nationality) and to
 participation
in all decisions affecting them. Tese rights are to be exercised inaccordance with the
evolving capacities
o the child, as are the child’s responsibilities as a citizen. Chil-dren, like adults, must respect the rights o others and obey the law, but their level o responsibility ando legal accountability is age-differentiated. For the application o this principle to the right to partici-pate, see the discussion on
eme 10, Participation
below, p. 262.
.
 
.QUESTION:
What forms of citizen participation are possible and appropriate for children?
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...