-2-
Informal writing
This course also requires regular informal writing. This falls into three categories: focus papers;reading notes and discussion questions; and peer responses to formal papers. The work you doon these assignments will be reflected in your participation grade.Each week (except weeks when formal, graded papers are due) you will need to hand in a
focuspaper
(guidelines below). Since these informal writing assignments are used as preparation for in-class discussion, no late work will be accepted. Ten such papers are required over the courseof the semester.On Mondays and Wednesdays, you are asked to prepare for our meetings by bringing brief
written notes and discussion questions
to class. (By “discussion questions,” I mean questionsthat
require
discussion—such as “What was really at stake in the conflict between Luther andZwingli?” Questions that have a simple factual answer, such as “Who was Albrecht of Mainz?,”can be answered using reference books in the library, such as the
Oxford Encyclopedia of theReformation
or the
New Catholic Encyclopedia
.)Finally, you are asked to submit
peer responses
to four of your classmates’ papers (two for thefirst paper, two for the second). All papers will be available to the entire class. Within a week fromthe due date of each paper, each of you will be responsible for choosing two papers you findparticularly interesting and writing a short response (a few paragraphs) in the form of a letter tothe paper’s author. These responses will also be available to the class.
Guidelines for focus papers
The purpose of these assignments is to help you focus your reading (that’s why I call them focuspapers). A focus paper has two components. First, identify and give a precise summary of someelement of the week’s
primary-source
reading assignment (i.e., not chosen from the textbook; youmay use anything else, including materials from the sourcebook). You can choose a particular passage that struck you as interesting or problematic; you can describe a recurring theme; youcan give a capsule summary of the author’s argument; etc. Second, give your
own
perspective onwhat you have just identified and summarized: a critical analysis of what you find interesting or compelling. In writing your analysis, ask yourself questions that probe into the underlyingmeanings and problems in the texts. Examples might include:
•
What is the author’s unstated agenda? Is he/she trustworthy?
•
What is at stake in this text? Is there some underlying conflict?
•
What historical conditions or causes might explain the author’s point of view? Would
I
have written something like this given same circumstances? Why or why not?Focus on the assigned readings, not on other texts or ideas you may be aware of. Length:approx. 300 words (usually about a page or a little more).
Guidelines for in-class presentations
Everyone in the class will present twice during the semester. The presenter’s responsibilities areto (1) introduce the texts for the day and (2) act as a discussion leader and “resource person” for the rest of the hour. This can take many forms, but in general, you should plan to speak for ten tofifteen minutes at the start of class, giving a basic introduction to the day’s assigned material. Thiscan mean, among other things:
•
identifying major themes;
•
providing helpful context for understanding the reading;
•
pointing out connections between different texts or different ideas, or between theprimary sources and the textbook reading;
•
showing how the day’s readings represent a continuation of or a departure fromthemes and positions we’ve seen before;
•
drawing the class’s attention to significant, confusing, difficult, or problematic areasfor discussion.
Add a Comment
This document has made it onto the Rising list!