Professional Documents
Culture Documents
the divide
MARIA HADJIPAVLOU
Department of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
Abstract Much scholarly attention has been given to the study of the gendered aspect
of ethno-national conicts trying to understand the experiences of men and women in a
conict situation and to what extent these shape different types of intervention for
peacemaking and peace-building. Are womens experiences of conict different from
mens? Do women have a different voice than the mainstream dominant discourses
produced by patriarchal systems? Do women in conict societies respond to militarism
and the violation of human rights differently from men? Are womens needs for identity
and peace different depending on which ethnicreligious group they belong to? Are their
needs different from those of men? This article will try to answer the above questions
focusing on a feminist understanding of conict in Cyprus. The main contention put
forward in the article is that gender is an important factor to take into account when
conict societies are engaging in peace processes. To this end, data are analysed from
different inter-ethnic womens workshops in which the author was either a participant
observer, or a facilitator. This analysis of the data demonstrates that Greek and Turkish
Cypriot womens voices and experiences are diverse and multiple. Both men and women
are socialised in the same nationalist paradigms, a fact that can explain how in the initial
phases of the dialogue processes both groups of women tended to reproduce ofcial
discourses. Their own experiences and differentiated voices began to emerge only after a
gendered understanding of the conict was introduced and trust and conict resolution
skills were instituted in the dialogue process. Drawing attention to the gradual shift of
perspectives in the context of inter-ethnic workshops, the article concludes by arguing that
womens dialogue can challenge the omnipotence of the state and may open up a new space
whereby a diversity of perspectives and mutual trust can emerge.
Flying Away to the Other Side
Our birthplace is split in two and we
Are caught on barbed wire-hybrids
Turk and Greek alike
Is it December is it July
Choose your Side
Are you Turkish or Greek
Correspondence: Maria Hadjipavlou, Department of Social and Political Sciences, University
of Cyprus, PO Box 20537, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus. E-mail: mariat@ucy.ac.cy
Gender, Place and Culture
Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 329351, August 2006
ISSN 0966-369X print/ISSN 1360-0524 online/06/040329-23 q 2006 Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/09663690600808429
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
Theres no Purgatory in between.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
We cannot be from both Sides
Because we are two, one and the other
You refused to believe in
We are loneliness itself (M. Yashin 2000)
Choose your Side!
In ethno-national conicts members of opposing parties are called through
dominant national narratives, which are patriarchal, militaristic and over-
simplied, to choose their side and locate themselves on the conict map.
Chronology, (December 1963, 1967, July 1974, 1983, just to mention the most
contested dates in the recent history of Cyprus) and issues, such as victimhood,
truth, human rights violations, and justice acquire a monofocal meaning
according to the processes of constructing memories and of forgetting which
enter into what Volkan (1979, p. 15) aptly termed chosen glories and chosen
traumas. What are the implications of this bipolar scenario for women and
conict resolution groups, who view political and ethno-national conicts as
having a multi-layered texture? Does a conict culture, as it is dened by
masculinist politics,
1
allowa space for the development of alternative options and
analyses? What does a feminist understanding of the Cyprus conict add and
what have been Cypriot womens interventions?
To discuss the above questions this article will present a feminist analysis of
gender and conict in Cyprus and try to determine how the inscription of conict
onto the Cypriot landscape can be changed through feminist practices such as
dialogue, perspective-taking and conict resolution workshops. The constitution
of the enemy, a practice that lies at the heart of masculinist politics, will be
presented along with ways in which, through conict resolution workshops,
Cypriots attempt to renegotiate their sense of each other, and of the conict in
which they nd themselves.
First, I will give a brief outline of the history of the Cyprus conict in order to
explain the complexities of the current situation. Secondly, I present a general
discussion on gender and conict followed by an analysis of Cypriot womens
attempts to renegotiate their sense of each other, their multiple identities and the
conict. I use data from conict resolution womens workshops and inter-ethnic
dialogues during the period 199596, 19992001 and 2003 in which I was either an
active participant or participant observer and/or facilitator. Finally, I highlight
some lessons learned and the need for future systematic research. One assumption
upon which I work is that both feminist perspectives and conict resolution
processes open spaces for mutual acknowledgement of power disparities, creation
of empathy, the need for emotionality which lead to the development of a new
shared narrative representing the whole story thus avoiding the compartmenta-
lisation of issues which constitute part of the current unresolved Cyprus problem.
History of the Cyprus Conict
The geostrategic location of Cyprus in the easternmost part of the Mediterranean
has made it vulnerable to outside conquests and interference, each leaving their
330 M. Hadjipavlou
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
imprint on the local landscape. By far the most predominant character of the
island was determined in the second millennium BC with the arrival and
settlement of the Mycenaean/Achaeans from mainland Greece. They formed city-
kingdoms on the Minoan model and introduced the Greek language, religion and
culture. To this day the Greek Cypriots (GCs), especially the nationalists, refer to
this period to stress the Hellenic heritage and its continuity to the present.
Following this period the Greek Orthodox Church, together with Byzantine
culture, constituted another strong referent point for GCs. The Turkish Cypriot
(TC) nationalists stress that it was the three centuries of the Ottoman presence
(15711878) that determined the inter-ethnic character of the island. In the
pre-nationalist era there were several uprisings by the Christian and Moslem
population of Cyprus against the ruling elites which were made up of Ottoman
administrators, landlords and the higher Orthodox clergy (Hill, 1952;
Koumoulides, 1974; Hadjipavlou-Trigeorgis, 1987; Kizilyurek, 2002). These joint
social protests are often recalled, especially by the left in each community, to stress
the past co-existence and collaborative social fabric among Greeks and Turks of
Cyprus. The fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans marked a deep historical
trauma for the Greeks, as did the decline of the Ottoman Empire for the Turks.
Such historic events gave rise to diverse patriotic myths and legends that still
appear in school textbooks.
In 1824 the emergence of the Greek nation state and the trends of modernity
impacted upon the traditional society of Cyprus as well as on the traditional
co-existence of Muslims and Christians. Religious identities were ethnicised and a
split in the co-existence fabric was introduced in the form of exclusive identities of
Greeks and Turks accompanied by the past myth of historic enmity between
Greeks and Turks. Furthermore, the British took control of the island in 1878 and
in 1925 Cyprus became a British colony. Divides between Greeks and Turks
crystallised during the anti-colonial struggle in 195559 in the context of which
the Greeks of Cyprus fought the British for Enosis (union) with motherland
Greece and the Turks of Cyprus fought the British for Taksim, that is for union of
part of the island with motherland Turkey. Therefore, the 1950s was also a period
which gave rise to intense inter-ethnic mistrust, suspicion and fears. According to
Turkish Cypriot writers (Salih, 1968; Nedjatigil, 1977; Kizilyurek, 2002), the
Turkish Cypriot leadership expected that sooner or later the Greek ghters would
terrorise the TC community, and so by 1957 the Turkish Resistance Organisation
(TMT) was formed with the goal to counteract the Greek-based National
Organisation of Cypriot Fighters (EOKA). Separation existed not only between
communities but also within each community, between right and left factions,
destroying spaces for co-existence and cooperation. The British colonialists
politicised communal differences to serve their colonial interests in the Middle
East (Pollis, 1973, 1996), and furthermore reinforced the rise of two antagonistic
nationalisms and competing visions for Cyprus based on each groups primordial
attachments to their respective motherlands.
Cyprus had a political agreement imposed upon it. A compromise settlement
was put into effect by outside stakeholdersGreece, Turkey and Britain
excluding both partition and union and instead promoting independence, which
led to the creation of the Cyprus Republic in 1960. The top-down settlement
ignored local realities (Hadjipavlou-Trigeorgis, 1987) and thus the constitutional
arrangements, that were also divisive, left no room for integrative politics. Inter-
ethnic violence broke out in December 1963 and again in 1967 (Kyriakides, 1968).
Cypriot Womens Dialogue Across the Divide 331
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
In 1963 this crisis resulted in the creation of the Green Line, a dividing line in the
capital of Nicosia to keep the two warring factions apart. TC enclaves were set up
in the major cities of the island where TCs moved for security reasons (Patrick,
1976; Attalides, 1979, Volkan, 1979). The year 1967 witnessed the rst concrete
move for the division and segregation of the two communities in the creation of a
Provisional Turkish Cypriot Administration. The TCs had withdrawn from the
government in 1963, which meant that the GCs exclusively ran the Cyprus
Republic. During these crises Turkey tried to intervene militarily but the
American administration prevented this for fear of an outbreak of a war between
her two NATO allies, Greece and Turkey.
The period between 1963 and 1974 was a time of unequal social and economic
development, a factor that drew the two communities further apart and a reality
that persists to this day. GCs experienced economic prosperity and modernisation,
whereas TCs especially in the enclaves entered a period of economic and cultural
dependency on Turkey. In July 1974 the Greek fascist junta launched a coup detat
to topple the Makarios government, accusing the GC leader of betraying the
Enosis ideal. This prompted military Turkish interventions, leading to the present
division of the island into two homogeneous spaces. A rearrangement of the
Green Line into the Attila Line (120 miles long) emerged.
A long series of inter-communal high-level negotiations have been conducted
on and off since 1975 under the auspices of the UN, but to this day no agreement
has been reached. All negotiations were conducted exclusively by male politicians
and gendered aspects of the divide have never been raised, even in the context of
the latest initiative led by the UN Secretary General in what became known as the
Annan Plan for a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus conict. This plan was
defeated in referenda on 24 April 2004, whereby 76% of GCs voted no to the Plan
and 67% of TCs voted yes. This marked a new turning-point in the recent history
of the conict pointing to the fact that the super ordinate goal (Sherif et al., 1961),
i.e. the accession of the island to the European Union, was not strong enough to
help both sides overcome past divisions and fears and imagine a shared future.
In the meantime, new generations have grown up in each community fostering
distorted information about the other and feelings of mistrust, stereotyping and
psychological distancing. Ritual commemorations, selective histories and
memories are reproduced and used as texts in our schools to dehumanise the
other and often to justify division (Bryant, 1998; Hadjipavlou, 2002). It is within
such a nationalist context that women and other social groups from both sides
have, for years, been challenging the master narratives and the enemy
construction processes. The partial opening of the Atila Line on 23 April 2003,
by the Turkish authorities, marked a historical opportunity for inter-ethnic
(re)rapprochement which now allows citizens from both communities to visit the
other side especially their homes and properties after 30 and 40 years of
separation. No violent incidents occurred; a public euphoria and a desire for
solution and reunication have been created. New personal stories evolved across
the Line. Prior to the opening, thousands of TCs, primarily women and youth,
were out in the streets promoting an end to partition and to ethnic divisions and
claiming this island is ours, meaning a fullment of the re-unication desire on
which the bi-communalist movement has been based.
Despite the cross-visits to and from the north to the south, the militaristic
environment and the enemy images are still visible in the barbed wires, the
military posts, the blue berets and the blue and green posters which read: Buffer
332 M. Hadjipavlou
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
UN Zone; Beware Mine Fields; NO Entry; Occupied Zone; Dead Zone;
No PhotographsSecurity Zone. Flags of all kinds are seen together or apart: the
Greek ag, the ag of the Cyprus Republic, the red Turkish ag, the blue UN ag,
the TRNC ag and now the EU ag, all reminding us how strong national
symbols and nationalism abound on the island.
The Line No Permit to Cross: Occupied area
By 1960 the island population comprised 18% TCs and 80% GCs, with 2%
Armenians, Maronites and Latins. The population today totals approximately
750,000 living in the south and close to 200,000 in the north; they are divided by
the Line. The Line is about 120 miles long, stretching across the island separating
the north from the south (see Figure 1). According to ones positioning in politics,
ideology and history, this line is referred to as the green line, the ceasere line, the
dead zone, the demarcation line, the partitioning line, the Attila line, the no-mans
land, or the border. These different designations of the Line constitute part of the
collective historical and political experience in each Cypriot community. This Line
has acquired both a symbolic and a physical presence in daily life. The ideology of
rapprochement after 1974 invited citizens to challenge the Line and rediscover or
discover each other through dialogue and thus explore the diverse cartography of
historical and political experiences which the Line silences. The Line also features
in the artistic and literary productions in each community and has become a
theme for art exhibitions, poetry collections and dance manifestations.
Women often feel that their bodies have been colonised by the Line.
2
Cynthia
Cockburn, in her book The Line (2004), describes the performance of a GC dancer
walking the line in her effort to converse with the partition of Cyprus in multiple
levels and she writes:
What strikes me about this scene is that the dividing line seems to be
alive. The rope slithers and slides, now one thing, now another. This
helps me to see howa geo-political partition is not just armoured fencing,
it is also a line inside our heads, and in our hearts. In fact the physical
fence is a manifestation of these more cognitive and emotional lines that
Figure 1. Map of Cyprus.
Cypriot Womens Dialogue Across the Divide 333
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
shape our thoughts and feelings . . . When we are afraid or angry at some
identiable moment, a line springs out and plants itself in the earth as a
barrier. It becomes The Line, and passage across it is controlled, by
uniformed men, at a Checkpoint.
These internal demarcation lines are indeed the most difcult to rearrange
because of the emotional and psychological baggage they carry. The new
generations under the inuence of their schooling and ofcial narratives have
formed an imaginary of the other and the inscription is often so sharp that
realities have been formed on assumptions that have never been tested. Once
these bipolar images become complex and blurred, as can happen during conict
resolution workshops, then the participants start confronting their own mental
maps. With the help of a facilitator they begin to rearrange the mapping. It is
usually a painful process but a necessary, liberating one if people want to move
beyond the conict culture which dichotomises experiences and uses hierarchies
to politically manipulate differences and undermine shared cultural experiences.
Feminist Strategies and Conict Resolution
One of the underlying principles of conict resolution is the acknowledgement
that power inequalities in all its manifestations, including socio-economic
asymmetries, constitute causes of conicts. The basic human needs (Burton, 1990)
perspective promotes the view that issues of identity, security, recognition, justice
and dignity need to be fullled in conict societies whereby no group would feel
another was dominating it. Divided societies often view conict as genderless and
leaderships (predominantly male) mobilise the polity to ascribe to the national
cause. Conict resolution and feminism converse to the extent that they share the
common goal of challenging dominant national discourses and promoting the
viewthat one of the Lines in conict societies comprises the gender order of things.
A gendered understanding and analysis of conict experience is, therefore,
necessary so as to gain new insights into the causes of conict and the kind of
conict resolution, new civic constitutional culture and social change that would
be desirable. Feminist and conict resolution perspectives promote the view that
the ways we construct ethno-national identities cannot change unless we also
change the way we construct gender identities. This includes changing all the
socialising institutions. Moreover, it is emphasised that the fears, needs, interests,
historical grievances and concerns of both sides must be accounted for and the
presence and contributions of men and women should be equally valued.
The consequences of armed conict on the lives of women and children has
been well documented by national and international organisations and academic
researchers (Enloe, 1989, 2000; Lentin, 1997). Ann Tickner wrote in 2001 about her
experiences of the war and bombing of Kosovo and how the media reports
portrayed NATO spokesmen with charts and maps brieng on bombings, targets
and the wonders of new high technology warfare:
Beyond the images of the men, we saw more chaotic images of refugees
many of them women and children being helped by aid workers, many
of them also women. All of them seemed overwhelmed by the task.
These are all gendered images: male heroes making sacrices for their
countries, women far from the centres of power, caring for the victims or
as victims themselves. (p. 39)
334 M. Hadjipavlou
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
Moreover, Coomeraswamy (2001) reminds us, victimisation of women in ethnic
conicts takes many forms, their bodies are turned into platforms for revenge and
humiliation of the enemy:
. . . it is necessary to understand that rape, sexual violence and forced
pregnancy are directly related to the male dominated social systems and
values that govern those who are ghting. A communitys honour,
especially at times of conict, often rests on the bodies of women. To
dele that honour is to humiliate the whole community. Womens bodies
become the battleeld, the point of communication between men. . .
(Coomeraswamy, 2001, p. 11)
Anthias and Yuval-Davis (1989) maintain that womens involvement and
participation in the processes of war and national struggles can take the
following forms: biological reproducers of members of ethnic groups, and in
participating both in the ideological reproduction of the ethnic collectivity and
transmission of its culture. Thus, women are also engaged actively in the
reconstruction, reproduction and transformation of ethnic and national identity
and become participants in national, economic, political and military struggles.
Ethnic nationalisms reinforce the power and privileges of patriarchal institutions
(such as the family, church, schools, political parties, etc.) by constraining women
to demonstrate their loyalty to these institutions and by turning theminto symbols
of their national collectivities.
Cynthia Cockburn (1998) informs us from her research in many conicts that
the role of women during conict is primarily humanitarian (securing food,
shelter and health) as well as trying to heal themselves and others of psychological
traumas and wounds. Women put their traditional roles aside and become the
main breadwinners and heads of families. Young girls mature and become women
more quickly, and if mothers are killed they assume the mother role. Women also
build networks for solidarity with other women and form groups to protest
resumption of violence both in and outside the home.
While before and during the conict women are used as symbols and
reproducers, after warfare and violent conicts women are called upon to
reconstruct society. Many women in Bosnia, for instance, advocated the
establishment of peace institutions and centres to promote non-violence,
a gender equality agenda and womens rights (Andric-Ruzicic, 1997; Golan,
1997; McCann, 1997; Senjak, 1997). In many instances, however, as Harding (1986)
informs us, victimisation of women does not cease after warfare. Widows and
women heads of families are viewed as a threat to changing social traditions,
which bolster male supremacy and promote womens subordination.
Feminists, especially radical feminists, have promoted the conviction that there
is a relationship among all forms of structural violenceinterpersonal, domestic,
social, institutional and international. The issues of inclusion and exclusion are
highlighted by both feminists and conict resolution approaches. Imbalances in
power sharing in a male-dominated world where womens participation and
perspectives on important issues of war and peace are still very profound. The
dichotomy of space into private and public spheres still continues and global
statistics are a testament to this asymmetry. Patriarchy builds its own self-
preservation mechanisms, as Sylvester reminds us:
Cypriot Womens Dialogue Across the Divide 335
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
As with most accepted ideologies and practices, once in place, patriarchy
is self sustaining: if a majority of politicians, priests, ministers, popes,
professors, chairs of corporate boards, physicians, job supervisors,
judges and peace makers are always men, then challenges to that groups
monopoly can actually seem unnatural, silly or even harmful to social
order . . . Patriarchy is a system in which there is constant, covert, low-
intensity, structural warfare against womenin war and in peace . . .
With the cessation of hostilities women have been abruptly dismissed
from the homefront jobs that pay, and sent back to their natural
nonpaying jobs in the private household. Both the shooting wars and
subsequent peace contain hidden wars of dominance over women.
(Sylvester, 1989, pp. 99100)
The under-representation of women in decision-making centres where issues of
war and peace are being decided was aptly brought up during the Fourth World
Conference on Women in Beijing, 1995 and is also mentioned in the Plan of Action
Document. The UN Security Council Resolution 1325 of 2000 reafrmed, among
other issues, the signicance of women in the process of prevention and resolution
of conicts and in peace-building. It also noted the need to consolidate data on the
impact of armed conict on women and girls and expressed its willingness to
incorporate a gender perspective into peacekeeping operations, urging the
Secretary General to ensure that, where appropriate, eld operations would
include a gender component.
In national governments and parliaments such as in the Scandinavian
countries, where there is a critical mass of women in the centres of decision-
making, it was observed that the priorities of those states were focused more on
issues of peace, abolition of all forms of violence and discrimination, promotion of
gender equality, quality education for all in contrast to the political and social
agendas of other countries in which women were absent or few in decision-
making bodies (Brock-Utne, 1985). Women, Brock-Utne (1985) has found in her
research, are socialised to support, on the whole, more equal distribution of
resources than men, reduction of military budgets, advocate dialogue and non-
violence as a means to solve differences and conicts. Another nding in Brock-
Utnes work relates to the structural and non-hierarchical changes promoted by
women and men who support positive peace (i.e. gender equality which means
access to equal opportunities and resources). In a state with high defence
expenditures and rigid patriarchal structures it is observed that women are at a
disadvantage to men in terms of employment opportunities, and are dismissed
from work more easily. This points further to the need for a feminist policy on
defence and security.
The work of Cypriot women I will discuss below connects to the above issues in
the sense that some womens groups in Cyprus have refused to conform to the
nationalist agenda of patriarchal institutions. They have decided to look at
womens condition through a gender lens and feminist ideology and values which
they perceive as being connected to the conict resolution principles of
cooperation, non-domination and creative synergy. These women tried to
transcend the Line in all its manifestations and create spaces for the articulation of
their experiences of the conict and of the Other. In addition, these women
opened a new space for a shared narrative to be created with possibilities for
reconciliation and renewed relationships.
336 M. Hadjipavlou
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
Conict resolution puts citizens back into the process of political participation
and empowerment, as does feminism, in that citizens become agents for political
and social change. In other words, processes within and between societies can
create a political environment, which can inuence de-escalation of the conict
and contribute to its resolution. The pro-active view of national interests and the
feminist understanding of security concerns support the view that protracted
conict relationships are susceptible to a range of inuences fromboth ofcial and
unofcial sources (Kelman, 1993; Cockburn, 2004). Let us now look at Cypriot
womens experiences and efforts to reach across to the Other and jointly create a
feminist understanding of the conict culture within and across the divide.
Cypriot Womens Intervention and Feminist Practices
I have spoken and written in detail elsewhere about the conict resolution and
unofcial citizens work in Cyprus (Hadjipavlou-Trigeorgis, 1998; Hadjipavlou,
2002). Here I will mainly discuss Cypriot womens voices and efforts in securing a
gender understanding of the conict and peace-building. I refer to two specic
groups, the Bi-communal Womens Group (BWG) (199596) and Hands Across
the Divide (HAD) (2003present). The memory and collective experience of
conict events for the Cypriots across the divide differ in time and intensity. It is
important for each group to understand these different experiences relating to
ethnic nationalisms and to a patriarchal social system. However, the collective
attitude in each community still persists that it is only we who suffered and are
the victims. What happened to the other community was unintended; it was an
accident of war, each claims.
The BWG (199596) was composed of 22 women, 11 from each side, of different
ages, social, ideological and educational backgrounds. They came together at the
initiative of a third party, a Fulbright scholar, and two local women coordinators.
3
I was the coordinator in the south and Sevgul Uludag, a feminist journalist, was
the coordinator from the north. This was the rst attempt to introduce a gender
lens and feminist perspectives onto the Cyprus conict and to engage in dialogue
relating to our perceptions of the Other, and to choose jointly if and how to move
forward. The BWGparticipants were not all feminists; some were aware of gender
analysis, but others felt that the conict was genderless because everybody
suffered, so did the women. Some of the women had been to other bi-communal
conict resolution mixed groups while some met the Other for the rst time. The
group worked either separately or together twice a week for 9 months. When the
Turkish Cypriot women were given permission by the military to cross the Line to
the buffer zone the meetings were held at the Ledra Palace Hotel, which is under
the control of the UN peacekeeping contingent. A room was provided for the
group with rudimentary facilities. Over the years, for many of us the Ledra Palace
became the symbol for rapprochement and conict resolution work but for the
nationalists from both communities it was a place of suspects who mixed with
the enemy.
In Cyprus no independent womens movement or feminist womens groups
have been established. All existing womens organisations are afliated to
political parties and often adopt the party agenda which is based on a male
understanding of politics and the conict, excluding the gender issue as being not
important enough to be tackled. HAD constitutes the rst attempt to form an
independent womens non-governmental organisation (NGO). Together with
Cypriot Womens Dialogue Across the Divide 337
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
other women, I was one of the co-founders. It was registered in 2001 in Britain due
to the political obstacle of (non)recognition. The feminist researcher Cynthia
Cockburn has helped the Cypriot women both in the formation of the group as
well as in securing funding from the British Council and Mama Cash.
4
Since the
embargo on crossings to and from the Line has been lifted, HAD members have
proposed the re-registration of their NGO in the Cyprus Republic so as to benet
from European Union funding privileges. This womens organisation aspires to
become the rst independent movement and aims to raise public consciousness
on the issues of gender equality and womens human rights, which it understands
to be as important as other national and political issues (Agathangelou, 2003).
The Work of the BWG
With the help of the three facilitators, the BMG worked rst on a leading question:
What contributes to pain and suffering in Cyprus through the eyes of women,
what needs to be done and how can it be done?. The group used the specic
method of interactive management (IM), which Dr Benjamin Broome, a Fulbright
scholar, introduced to different bi-communal citizens groups (Broome, 1998,
2000). It is a computer-supported decision-making method. The group progressed
through three stages of planning and design which included: (a) analysis of the
current situation, (b) goal setting/vision for the future and (c) development of a
collaborative action agenda. Some basic assumptions guided us in our rst
workshop as, for example, the following: (a) ethnic communities are
heterogeneous and contain many voices, including womens voices; (b) every
woman speaks as an individual rather than as a representative of her community,
party or business; (c) debate about political positions is best left to the politicians;
(d) the opportunity to engage in bi-communal dialogue is a privilege; and (e) we
are not here to solve the Cyprus problem but create conditions for the solution.
The BWG was not able to meet as a whole for the rst part of the workshop
because no permission was given for the TC women to cross to the Ledra Palace
Hotel in the buffer zone. The TC women often experienced this arbitrary decision
of the military authorities as both a violation of their right to meet the other, based
on the patriarchal assumption that the state, or male authority, can decide for its
citizens without giving any explanation, simply because it has claimed the power
to do so (Freire, 1970). The frustration and powerlessness felt by the whole group
was immense. The BWG chose, however, to continue the workshop mono-
communally at rst and when permissions were granted they worked jointly.
The BWGs voices on the lead question reected the complex and multilayered
fabric of the conict and we noted how our gendered identities intersect with
class, ethnicity, sexuality and rural/urban modalities. This realisation was in
opposition to the GC ofcial view, which assumed that because of past
co-existence, as soon as the Turkish army withdraws the people in both
communities will have no problem coming together as they did in the past. The
obstacle is not only the presence of the Turkish army but, as we realised from
many inter-ethnic citizens contacts and conict resolution training workshops, a
great deal of systematic work is needed to overcome past fears, hatred, suspicions,
mistrust and decades-old alienation before we can claim any level of future
cooperation and co-existence.
The IM method allowed each participant to generate as many ideas as she had
in answering the lead question. The 11 TC women produced 82 factors/causes
338 M. Hadjipavlou
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
that have contributed to pain and suffering and the 11 GCs produced 72. These
responses can be mapped into four broad categories which reect the many layers
of the conict: (a) (social) psychological; (b) structural; (c) historical and political;
and (d) philosophical. These factors were, sometimes, specic to GC women or to
TC women, and were sometimes shared.
Once an idea was presented the group engaged in discussion about that specic
factor as it was dened and meant by the author of the idea, the purpose being to
form a shared understanding and where possible reach a consensus. For instance,
in a general discussion the majority of the GC and TC women connected the idea
of women and peace with the biological functions of childbearing and
motherhood and thus concluded that women are by nature more peace-loving
than men. Thus the debate over nature or nurture arose. This assumption became
complicated when some other women in the group challenged this view, and
sought an explanation as to why some men love peace and some women
supported and participated in war activities. The feminists in the group brought
up the role of gender socialisation and social expectations and gender stereotypes
explaining that women in a patriarchal society at times of conict are turned into
objects and promoters of the national cause and values, as articulated by the
male-dominated system.
Previous research ndings among GC women only, and more recently among
women in all Cypriot communities which I coordinated (Hadjipavlou, 2004),
conrm this discussion in that many Cypriot women were unclear with regard to
the concepts of patriarchy, feminisms (still feminism carries negative connotations
in Cypriot society) and anti-militarism and connected peace with women only in
an essentalising way. Discussions and debates on these concepts and issues are
still absent from both the school curriculum and the civil society. Due to this lack
of gender consciousness and knowledge about feminisms as well as alternative
views about how femininity and masculinity are constructed and exploited by
ethnic nationalisms and conict cultures, a number of contradictions arose among
the members of the BWG: on one hand, all the women in the BWG described the
social organisation of their societies as patriarchal and hierarchical, but on the
other hand, many (apart from four women) said they were not feminists and that
the conict affected everybody irrespective of gender. At rst some did not
question their role as mothers offering their sons to ght for the liberation of their
homeland as a gender issue. It did not occur to them that they can challenge and
resist such practices and expectationsso deeply had they internalised their
national duty role (Anthias & Yuval-Davies, 1989). The discussion on the rest of
the issues became more gender-focused and for many this constituted a new
revelation of a different worldview about gender and peace. What we learned
fromthis initial discussion was that Cypriot women who were exposed to feminist
theories and gender analyses of social phenomena in their formal education were
able to inform and share with the rest of the BWG alternative viewpoints to the
internalised prevalent male view. The feminist women of the Group sensitised the
others to the fact that men were deciding both the national and international
agendas on Cyprus and that women adopted these agendas as if they were their
own. Many admitted that as women we are not trained in Cyprus to challenge
authority.
After this initial introduction to a gendered understanding of the Cyprus
conict the BWG was invited to imagine a new construction of the self and a
collectivity of the we, which would not be based on the traditional conceptions
Cypriot Womens Dialogue Across the Divide 339
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
of masculinity, femininity or gender constructions. Many women of the group
using this new perspective probed into their own experiences and located
knowledges outside the dominant hegemonic history as told by governing elites
in their communities. The gender lens perspective, a new tool for many, helped
them to articulate alternative interpretations of the conict and become the agents
of their own reality, recognising that their personal experience did matter. This
mental shift was not easy to maintain without being reminded constantly of the
process and the new concepts.
I now turn to the conditions which the BWG articulated as factors that
contributed to their suffering and pain on the island. I refer rst to the social,
psychological and philosophical factors, because these are usually the least to be
noted and addressed in a divided society where power politics is the normand the
us and them dichotomy creates sharp boundaries.
Fear of Domination and Free ExpressionWho is the Other?
The social psychological factors relating to the construction of otherness, to the
shaping of individual and collective national identities, to perceptions and belief
systems and to victimhood and stereotyping are factors that not only hinder the
resolution of the conict but also can help us understand the deep-rootedness of
the conict and the exclusion of some groups such as women from the peace
process. One of the issues that all the TC women expressed strongly was their fear
of being dominated by the GC majority and by Turkey, we feel like a sandwich
between the two some said. This metaphor was indeed very powerful. They
related personal stories of how they experienced the GCs, and what it felt like
living for a decade (196374) under constant fear and exclusion from the
privileges that the international recognition of the Cyprus Republic provided for
only GCs until today. This reects not only the arrogance of the dominant group,
the failure of the Republic and nationalist ideologies, but also majority/minority
dynamics whereby often the dominant group not only claims to knowwhat is best
for the dominated, but often speaks on their behalf. As a result, some of the GC
women were deeply touched and others felt some sense of guilt for what their
community did and still does. The TC women also criticised the Turkish military
presence in the North and the impact this has on their individual and collective
freedoms.
Some TCwomen also felt fear of expressing our true feelings contrary to ofcial
narratives because we would be ostracised. Thus a form of self-censorship was
imposed. Cypriot women (as do some men) tended to resort to silence, because
those who spoke their mind were labelled traitors or unpatriotic. The TC
women spoke about feeling disappointed at the lack of solidarity with, and the
indifference shown, by the GC community at their tragedy as experienced in the
196374 period when they felt like second-class citizens. The GC women
responded by saying that they also feared Turkeys domination, military presence
and expansionist intentions in Cyprus. Both groups realised through facilitation
that the master narratives drewlines between them in an effort to essentialise the
Other, which led to mutual victimhood.
For the TCs the Other in the pre-1974 period was the GCs, whereas for the GCs
in the post 1974 period it was Turkey (making the TCs invisible). Some women
expressed their difculty in reconsidering established beliefs about the Other
and they explained this as being due to their attachment to ideas and belief
340 M. Hadjipavlou
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
systems as being unchanged. Both groups admitted fear of opening up to the
Other which we do not know. The tendency to homogenise the Other in conict
situations emerged in these womens discussion. It was apparent that each ethnic
group had different grievances but shared the common desire for acknowl-
edgment of their pain.
The BWG discovered that the gendered view of history as developed by each
ofcial side left outside their consciousness the existence of the Others story,
which is why the need for otherness became an issue as well as the inclusion
exclusion dynamics. Each group tried to inform the other and understand why
each side silenced the reality of the Other. The TCs tried to make the GCs aware of
some of the severe problems and violence they had been subjected to in the 1960s,
and the GCs tried to make the TCs aware of their tragic condition in 1974. They
acknowledged that the ofcial male-dominated narratives silenced their own
communitys contribution in causing their own sides tragedy. As their dialogue
developed and they shared pain and historical grievances, concepts such as
apology, forgiveness and relational empathy were discussed as necessary
reconciliation tools. Both the process used and gradual trust-building released
energy and safe space to engage in exploring their multiple identities. This led the
GC women to be frank and to admit to the prevalence of a Greek superiority
complex and cultural arrogance, saying we, the Greeks have difculty to accept
other cultures. And since we are the majority we believe Cyprus belongs to us.
Statements such as these helped some TCs admit that we, as a minority play up
our victimhood role and we expect others to take notice of us. This clarity in the
group helped them move to the next, more creative phase of the workshop.
Both ethnic groups pointed out the privilege of being together and the new
possibilities these contacts created vis-a`-vis the unnaturalness in being forced to
live in one part of the island and keep fantasising about the other. This they
connected to the fact that Cyprus is an island and it is difcult to escape from it in
a psychological sense. Thus we are inter-dependent. But this ethnic division and
the Line was often experienced in a physical sense, as one TC woman vividly
expressed it:
When I am with you, Greeks, I nd my other half, which is missing.
At the end of a workshop when I leave the Ledra Palace and each of us
crosses the check point to go to our homes in opposing sides I feel at that
moment something really physical, a split within my body. The
geographical proximity becomes irrelevant compared to the forces of
militarism and foreign occupations as this denes my relationship to
you, the other.
The BWGstruggled in these discussions to locate its inner voice and strengths to
move beyond the practices of silencing, and public hegemonic histories and
instead create alternative feminist strategies such as empathy, apology and desire
for reconciliation.
Identity and Structural Conditions
The issue of identity in the Cyprus conict has, for each side, been signicant and
contested. Is the island Greek, or Turkish, or Cypriot, or European? Many men
died ghting for the Greekness or Turkishness of the island but none for the
Cypriotness. The imposed constitution in 1960 did not leave space for Cypriotness
Cypriot Womens Dialogue Across the Divide 341
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
and integrative institutions to develop; instead the majority/minority model
permeated every aspect of life creating mistrust and separation. In the post-1974
period many citizens groups started exploring the local cartography of struggles
and framed shared inter-ethnic desires and a vision of Cypriotness. The BWG
challenged the national dichotomy imposed on collective identities. My research
in 20023 on this issue has shown that despite the ofcial propaganda on the
reproduction and preservation of Greekness and or Turkishness, an over-
whelming majority in all communities denes their collective identity as Cypriot.
The majority of these were women who, connected with the land and the
community in a direct and concrete fashion, differed from the majority of men
who were exposed to the military and national discourses, as they have to carry
out their military service for more than 2 years (Hadjipavlou, 2004). The BWG
expressed their concern about the future in a divided and highly militaristic island
where biased education and biased history leave no say to women to determine
our future.
Since the late 1970s, due to the inux of Turks from Anatolia, the TC women
feared losing the Cypriot part of their identity because they considered the
settlers to be less educated, less cultured and more religious. Thus TCs created
another Other who, although from the same ethnic background, was viewed as
different and as not belonging to Cyprus. In a sense they behaved towards and
treated the Other Turks as they themselves were treated by the GCs in the past.
The GC women viewed the settlers as a problem, too, but from a different
perspective. The settlers were given GC refugees homes and properties, which
were illegally occupied by the Turkish military thus the settlers issue emerged
as a shared concern, but for different reasons. This issue then opened up a
discussion on racism, the power of the military and how this fed the assumed
power of the TC leadership, which encouraged the mainland Turks to come to
the north to be used as a voting instrument so that the establishment remained in
power and weakened the opposition.
The GCwomen in the workshop felt that the overemphasis on the Greek part of
their identity led to the exclusion of other aspects of their identities. Thus, for the
purpose of national unity the political male actors dened in an exclusive way
what constitutes the imagined community as well as the nationalist project.
Women were included in this as long as they served the national agenda of each
side, which included primary responsibility for reproduction and cultural
transmission of their respective communities. Some women in the BWG called
this patriotism and love of ones country, while others called this a gendered
nationalist project, which they connected to the need to have enemies as this
helps each ofcial side to refrain from taking its own share of responsibility in the
creation of the conict. They also critically linked love for our country to the view
that men are socialised to be the protectors and liberators of their nation, while
women are there to reproduce the nation and transmit to their children the
national ideology.
TC and GC women viewed the patriarchal structure of social organisation, the
absence of women from decision-making bodies and the peace processes as large
obstacles to the functioning of true, representative and participatory democracy in
Cyprus. They spoke about . . . insufcient levels of democracy in both
communities and the predominance of the national problem hindering womens
separate space to articulate womens issues. In other words, democracy in
divided societies is contingent upon the ethnic nationalist agenda, setting the
342 M. Hadjipavlou
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
criteria of what not to say or reveal to the enemy, thus imposing covert
censorship. Both GC and TC women also agreed that the lack of structures to get
to know each others culture, ways of living, and education reinforced the
communication embargo and the restrictive movement of ideas as additional
factors to serve adversarial politics.
Both education systems, according to the BWG, are structured to support the
patriarchal mentality and socialisation of youth in the conict; the national history
oneachside emphasises the atrocities committedbythe other against them. The GC
women in the group noted the prevalence of religious and social prejudices against
inter-marriages as these were, until recently, included in the Cyprus constitution.
5
Another mutual concern was voiced regarding the gendered division of space
into private and public. In both communities the BWG agreed women are absent
from key policy-making centres of power so they are not allowed to voice their
concerns and views unless they behave like men or do as men say. Thus the
politics of space builds a certain type of masculinity and femininity whereby
Cypriot men are viewed as pragmatic, tough, assertive and emotionally strong
and thus t for public life whereas women are viewed as emotional, home carers
and willing to give in, or in paying attention to the wrong things, thus t only for
the private sphere. Many women in the group also spoke about the increase in
structural and domestic violence and felt such issues had been social taboos a few
years back, in that they were not talked about publicly as were other issues
relating to reproductive rights, abortion and contraceptives. They supported the
view that if more women were present in decision-making centres and in public
life they would support the establishment of appropriate services to address the
thesis that the personal is political, and so their experience of domestic violence
would be addressed as a public, political issue. The lack of such sensitisation
and services they again related to the perpetuation of the conict which has
marginalised womens social issues.
Historical/Political Obstacles
The role of third parties and outside interferences were instrumental in shaping
the relationships within and between the two communities and politics in general.
Hence the BWG had no difculty identifying this factor. They went further,
however, than the national narrative, which attributes blame only to the outside
interference factor. They looked at the domestic factor as well pointing out the
role of the extremists and nationalists in each community, the role of leadership
and how the need for domination of the TCs by the GCs led to the creation of the
Green Line. This analysis challenged the dichotomy of us and them and
introduced a conict resolution discourse that allowed perspective taking as well
as getting away from the blame the other model. An acknowledgement of the
struggle [about] who is going to own and rule the island led to the discussion
about domination, nationalism and inequality in power and economic
development between the communities. The GC women pointed out that the
Greek words for fanaticism and nationalism are masculine whereas peace, love
and equality are feminine in an effort to elicit the male dominated culture of
exclusion and violence in their community. The BWG believed that due to the lack
of internal cohesion and inter-communal solidarity the Cypriots failed to prevent
harmful interference from outside powers thus we need to take our own
responsibility.
Cypriot Womens Dialogue Across the Divide 343
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
In conict resolution workshops the issue of trust both inside the room and
outside was signicant in helping participants move beyond confrontational,
gendered politics. The BWG identied the loss of trust for decades in each other
and the development of incompatible goals and expectations as causes of
alienation. The desire for building alliances across ethnic divides was expressed as
not yet an easy task to accomplish across civil society.
We also noted some intra-group differences as these emerged from time to time
in the way some women projected their level of thinking and identity vis-a`-vis the
other. For instance, some of the GCs who had university education were more
reective at times on issues of self-criticism, vulnerabilities and abstractions: We
have deep fears in accepting the others truth and we are unaware of ones own
identity as human beings. There is unawareness of who I am . . .. This level of
abstraction or transcendence was too much for some TC women, who were
struggling with basic, concrete needs such as employment, safety and visibility
andthey didchallenge these GCwomen. This was not surprising in viewof the fact
that these GCwomen belonged to the dominant and more privileged ethnic group
which, because of international recognition of the Republic of Cyprus, have to a
large extent resolved their basic needs for economic survival (low unemployment
rate andfour times higher per capita income than that of the TCs) andthey can thus
afford to move to higher level needs and reection. This discussion revealed not
only the ethnic difference but also class issues, and reminded the privileged group
to be more aware and sensitive to other identity differences.
A serious concern was voiced regarding the emphasis both communities put on
their differences, we always emphasise differences and not enough attention to
similarities and avoid mention of our shared positive past. Each group
understands the past differently. The TCs sought acknowledgement by the
dominant group of their past grievances and violences inicted on them, which
still remain unaddressed, whereas the GC women wanted to forget that past and
move on. The past, these women believed, became a tool for male politicians and
nationalists in each community to promote their politically incompatible positions
onto the solution of the conict and to justify the Line. The GCwomen were openly
critical of how the Republic of Cyprus uses military institutions to promote their
conception of security and defence and in a covert way intimidating citizens from
being critical about the high defence budget and militarisation. For these women
security meant building trust and cooperation at both ofcial and unofcial levels
and also economic wellbeing. They referred to human security needs.
In general the BWG were able, over time, to form a new community with a deep
awareness of the impact of patriarchy and of the conict on their personal and
collective lives. They promoted the practice of conict resolution workshops, of
dialogue, of direct personal contacts, use of their personal stories to construct new
knowledges and the ideology of rapprochement. They supported the need for a
gender understanding of the conict, history and power as tools and practices to
help bring about a culture for a solution in which womens presence and voices
will be accounted for.
I believe the BWG laid the foundation for the creation of HAD because some
members of this organisation were participants in the BWG until 1997 when, due
to political obstacles and the military practice of no permissions, the group was
prevented from meeting thereafter. This demonstrates how the work of women
in divided societies becomes contingent upon politicians arbitrariness who have
inscribed the Line on the Cypriot landscape in the rst instance.
344 M. Hadjipavlou
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
HAD
In discussing the role of HAD I use data from a meeting/symposium held in 2003,
at which I was a participant and note-taker. The meeting took place in a restaurant
across the dividing Line in the Turkish Quarter of the walled city of Nicosia
(in Cyprus we combine work with food and drink. It is a usual practice in our
conducting a symposium!). Eighteen members attended: nine TCs and nine GCs
of different ages and class backgrounds. At the time of our symposium, at the
ofcial political context the Annan Plan had been submitted to the leadership of
both communities. These women had read parts of the Plan and public discussion,
especially in the TC community, was quite extensive.
The underlying shared worldview of HAD is we all believe in the values of
democracy, which for many of us means an open market of ideas and freedom of
speech, gender equality and equal access to resources and opportunities and we
all aspire to live in a united country. Moreover,
We have come together to form a unitary organization, disregarding, as
far as possible, differences of ethnic or national identity, and even
geographical location . . . We know that to cooperate effectively we must
take account of the inequalities between us and inevitable differences in
the needs we prioritise, deriving from our different past experiences and
different realities today. (www.handsacrossthedivide.org)
The question that the group worked on at the symposium was: why do I as a
woman want a solution?. The facilitative process, which Cynthia Cockburn led,
was as follows: women worked in pairs brainstorming on the leading question.
Then each had to choose one main reason for wanting a solution. All the
answers were recorded on ipcharts and became working material for the
second phase of the workshop the following week. Here are some examples,
which indicate the multilayered aspect of the conict, as well as womens desires
for change:
A future, thats what I want. I want all the things that are suppressed
now, to be liberated, including gender. I want to feel free to plan ahead,
and move on . . . I want to live in a house that I know is my own . . . I want
the barbed wire and barrels, and sand bags out of my garden . . . I want a
solution so as to have normalisation of space and unblocking of energies.
(HAD meeting, 2003)
The women of HAD further voiced concerns and needs from a feminist
understanding of the solution and located their personal desires as being
political unlike the way as it is often projected in mainstream male politics
which deal with the solution in a legalistic and exclusionary way, not close to
the reality of most of the polity. The women did not simply want an agreement
on paper. They longed for a change in mentality, a new thinking and a
constructive way of looking at the future, including through a gender lens.
They proposed explicitly: We want particular attention to be given to the
practical implementation of legislative provisions on gender, so that equality
does not remain a mere principle, but it is achieved in practice . . . all new
policies should be screened and evaluated for their gender implications before
they are introduced . . . and their gender effects should be monitored during
implementation.
Cypriot Womens Dialogue Across the Divide 345
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
HAD members also felt strongly about the Cypriot part of their identity, as did
the BWG, but they also went beyond the ethnic part (GC or TC) to demand
opportunities to develop as women and as citizens.
As women [we] also want respect fromeach other in a society that will be
fully democratic. We want an electoral system that guarantees women
numerical parity with men in parliament and on all decision-making
bodies.
I want a solution urgently because I want my identity. . . my Cypriot
identity. I want to gain my identity rid of the oppression I feel now.
Women could change a lot in society if there were opportunities for
women to develop. I want to be sure of having equal rights as a woman
and as a person.
From the expressed desires of these women it is obvious that a solution to the
political problem is not only urgent but that it will also open up spaces for
womens development and participatory democracy. Women of HAD struggle
with their desire to broaden the implications of what a Cyprus solution entails
which to them means opportunities to be part of the solution.
Security for the women of HAD was dened beyond armies and weapons.
It meant human relationships, doing away with dividing lines in order for new
arrangements to be put in place without checkpoints and passports or identity
cards to cross to and from. More than the GC members, the TC members were
concerned with their childrens future and wanting the settlers to leave as well as
have the ability to present ourselves to the outside world as one country. For the
GC, women the freedom of movement on the whole of the island was more
important and the need for security and respect. I want a land without borders, a
single country with respect, gender equality and security. For the TCs the
prospect of Cyprus joining the European Union created a hope, because EU laws
may help us solve some of the problems of inequality we face in a patriarchal
society and offer us opportunities to work elsewhere as equals. Peace for the
women of HAD meant demilitarisation and not only the withdrawal of foreign
troops, but a change in the mindset about the Other: I want to start thinking
positive, new thoughts about the Other. Most of the desires of these women were
future-orientated and longed for a peaceful environment, a culture of peace. The
nationalist propaganda was bankrupt, they believed. Above all, we want a
solution in order to give us a future, to unlock our energies so that we can all
contribute to change as a society. I believe men are suffering too, they are victims
of the patriarchal system as well.
The women of HAD were much more aware of their role as social agents than
were the members of BWG, which shows a further development in gender
awareness work. They had very concrete ideas as to what the content of the
solution of the Cyprus conict should be like and wanted new structures and
institutions to address, among other issues, gender inequality and violence
against women: As women we wish to see the post of a gender ombudsperson
created, an ofce to which individuals suffering from discrimination on grounds
of gender, marital status, etc.[,] may appeal for redress. The idea for the
establishment of a Ministry of Equality was put forward.
These Cypriot womens desires, as expressed here, shed light on what is lacking
in the politics of the country as a whole and how the national issue, as dened
346 M. Hadjipavlou
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
by a patriarchal elite, has completely ignored these multiple inter-subjective
realities of womens perspectives and needs. It is a clear example of the gendered
nature of peace and conicta dimension that is not included in the political or
formal peace agendas. Women in Cyprus are still absent from the peace
negotiations. This is in contravention to the UN Security Council Resolution 1325,
which has been signed by Cyprus, calling upon states to include women at the
peace table so that their perspectives, experiences and concerns are legitimated
and included in a future solution. The Cypriot women in this organisation noted
some of the omissions of democracy, such as limitations on womens human
rights, continuation of gender inequalities and the invisibility of womens
agendas and needs. The above desires also reveal the multiple levels of reality
women experience and the efforts needed to employ feminist understandings and
gender perspectives that take into account the realities of both men and women.
Thus the inclusion of women of different cultures and ethnic backgrounds living
in the same space of Cyprus could further help to build alliances and cross-section
coalitions to affect a peace agreement.
Conclusion
From the Cypriot womens experiences as I have presented them in the BWG and
HAD, we note that to employ a feminist and gender perspective in the analysis of
the conict is supported by the use of conict resolution processes, methods and
tools. The use of both levels of analysis in the context of Cypriot women and their
experience of the Line across the Divide has encouraged both organisations to
produce in a safe and open environment their concerns, needs, grievances,
contradictions and desires for the future. Furthermore, the feminist strategies and
conict resolution processes have revealed these womens differences, both intra-
and inter-communally, with regard to freedom of expression, identity issues,
structural conditions, social psychological and political obstacles as these emerge
in a divided, patriarchal and militaristic environment. The fact that certain women
in the groups were themselves feminists and had been exposed in their formal
education to Womens Studies helpedthe others appreciate alternative worldviews
about nationalist constructions of identity, as well as gender constructions, and to
challenge the role of patriarchy and nationalisms in dening the levels of
development for menandwomeninconict societies. Thus Cyprus is still suffering
not only from a patriarchal order of things but also from nationalism and
militarism. Militarised masculinity is not the only form of masculinity and these
women hoped that with a solution and a new peace structure, other forms of
manhood for men and boys would be constructed. Values shared among feminists
and conict resolvers, such as tolerance, understanding, apology, cooperation,
empathy, acknowledgingthe others painandrealitybecame part of these womens
peace-building efforts. High on their agenda, they placed the need for gender for
equality and fullment of basic human rights. The culture these women promoted
was focusedmore on needs than on political positions or static, legalistic principles
that characterise the realist power-politics view of solving political conicts.
Aview that all women shared was the recognition that the Cyprus conict has,
for over 30 years, dominated the public discourse and the lives of all its citizens.
In effect this undermined the signicance of social issues, including womens
issues. In conict cultures there is a tendency to homogenise communities, failing
to acknowledge their complexity, andthus prolonging misperceptions, stereotypes
Cypriot Womens Dialogue Across the Divide 347
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
and misunderstandings between and among conicting parties (Hadjipavlou,
2003). In this article I have tried to show the heterogeneity and multiple voices of
women within and across communities. In Cyprus, we still lack extensive research
to understand womens realities and what women really want and need. This
micro-level research will be useful to both women and policy makers as well as to
third parties involved in peace negotiations. These womens experiences and
voices could produce new and signicant knowledges and information which
should be taken into account in a future Cyprus. This will build further bridges
and strengthen democratic principles, such as gender equality and the need for
otherness which in the context of Cyprus means inclusion of all other Others and
no need for permissions to cross to and from to met the Other.
My personal journey as a Greek Cypriot to peace-building and the choices I have
made has convinced me that there is no other way to question simplistic,
monolithic, patriarchal understandings of national interest and national
security other than experiencing the Other, the perceived enemy and realising
that the enemy has been socialised in the same way as myself. We were both
projects of ethnic nationalisms. I also learnt that a different education in feminism,
gender studies and conict resolution can help us question and overcome socially
constructed enemy images and gender stereotypes. We can even use this reective
learning to enhance our own insights into the victimperpetrator mentality and
acknowledge that the perpetrator is as much a victimas is the victima perpetrator.
The Cypriot womens daily psychological and political suffocation within the
parameters of multiple Lines until today is a testament to the continuing power of
militarism and ethnic nationalisms, despite the fact that the Republic of Cyprus
has become a member of the European Union. These conditions need to change
urgently, as the Cypriot women in the BWG and HAD have shown us. There is a
willingness and ability to make it happen. As Sharoni (1995) has reminded us,
every time a woman explains how her government is trying to control her fears,
her hopes and her labour such a theory is made (p. 89); that is, a feminist theory
on international conict and international relations. More micro-level studies on
gender and conict are needed in order to understand better the relationship and
multiple experiences of the men and women in the construction of a peace culture
where the dichotomy of self and Other, subject and object, can be eliminated.
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my gratitude to the four anonymous reviewers for their
very constructive suggestions and support as well as to Linda Peake, managing
editor of GPC for her encouragement and suggestions and to Leeann Townsend,
the editorial assistant for helping with corrections to the text. Also many thanks to
my colleagues at the University of Cyprus, Maria Margaroni and Fabienne Baider,
for their initial support in reading the rst draft of this paper which I presented at
the international conference on The Languages of Gender held at the university
of Cyprus, 2003. I bear full responsibility for the nal text.
Notes
1. By masculinist policies I mean an androcentric understanding of the conict which is divisive into
us and them and one of whose many tasks is that of the construction of the enemy that leads to the
perpetuation of the conict.
348 M. Hadjipavlou
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
2. I remember, after an inter-ethnic encounter in the buffer zone, that the moment of separation was
experienced by many of us as a form of violence on our bodies and we felt stiff and de-energised at
the realisation of how real this Line was and still is, affecting us not only psychologically but in a
physical sense too.
3. The language used in many bi-communal workshops and encounters was and still is English. Since
2003 many started learning each others language
4. Many more details about HAD can be found in Cockburns newly published book The Line, 2004.
5. Due to the accession of Cyprus to the European Union, such anachronistic and undemocratic
provisions became obsolete after 1 May 2004.
References
Agathangelou, Anna M. (2003) Envisioning a Feminist Global Society, Cypriot Women, Civil Society
and Social Change, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 57 July, pp. 290299.
Andric-Ruzicic, Duska (1997) Womens Self-Organizing in Bosnia: How we felt when supplying
psychoanalytical help to traumatized women, in: Biljana Kasic (Ed.) Women and the Politics of Peace,
pp. 1929 (Zagreb, Center for Womens Studies).
Anthias, Floya & Yuval-Davis, Nina (Eds) (1989) Woman-Nation-State (London, Macmillan).
Attalides, Michael (1979) Cyprus: nationalism and international politics (Edinburgh, Q Press Limited).
Brock-Utne, Birgit (1985) Educating for Peace: a feminist perspective (New York, Pergamon).
Broome, Benjamin (1998) Overviewof Conict Resolution activities in Cyprus. Their contribution to the
peace process. The Cyprus Review, 10(1), pp. 4767.
Broome, Benja (2000) Designing a Collective Approach to Peace: Interactive design and problem-
solving workshops with Greek-Cypriot and Turkish-Cypriot communities in Cyprus, International
Negotiation, 2, pp. 381407.
Bryant, Rebecca (1998) Education in Honor: Patriotism and the schools of Cyprus, in: Vaggelis
Calotychos (Ed.) Cyprus and its People: Nation, Identity, and Experience in an Unimaginable Community,
19551997, pp. 5368 (Boulder, CO, Westview Press).
Burton, W. John (Ed.) (1990) Conict: Human needs theory (New York, St Martins Press).
Cockburn, Cynthia (1998) The Space between Us: Negotiating gender and national identities (London &New
York, Zed Books).
Cockburn, Cynthia (2004) The Line Women, Partition and the Gender Order in Cyprus (London & New
York, Zed Books).
Coomeraswamy, Radhika (2001) Womens Leadership, Gender and Peace, in: S. Naraghi-Anderlini
(Ed.) Gender and Peace, pp. 1017 (USA, Ford Foundation).
Enloe, Cynthia (1989) Beaches and Bases: Making feminist sense of international politics (Berkeley,
University of California Press).
Enloe, Cynthia (2000) Maneuvers: The international politics of militarizing womens lives (Berkeley,
University of California Press).
Freire, Paulo (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed (New York, Continuum).
Golan, Daphna (1997) Palestinian and Israeli Women of the Jerusalem Link: On the road to peace!, in: Biljana
Kasic (Ed.) Women and the Politics of Peace, pp. 5359 (Zagreb, Centre for Womens Studies).
Hadjipavlou-Trigeorgis, Maria (1987) Identity Conict in Divided Societies: The case of Cyprus,
unpublished PhD thesis, Boston University.
Hadjipavlou-Trigeorgis, Maria (1998) Different Relationships to the Land: Personal narratives, political
implications and future possibilities, in: Vaggelis Calotychos (Ed.) Cyprus and its People, Nation,
Identity, and Experience in an Unimaginable Community 19551997, pp. 251277 (Boulder CO,
Westview Press).
Hadjipavlou, Maria (2002) Cyprus: A partnership between conict resolution and peace education,
in: G. Salamon & B. Nevo (Eds) Peace Education, The concept, principles and practices around the world,
pp. 193208 (Mahwah, New Jersey, London, Lawrence Erlaum Associates).
Hadjipavlou, Maria (2003) Inter-ethnic Stereotypes, Neighbourliness, Separation: Paradoxes and
challenges in Cyprus, Journal of Mediterranean Studies, 13(2), pp. 281318.
Hadjipavlou, Maria (2004) Women in the Cypriot Communities (Nicosia, PrintWays).
Harding, Sandra (1986) The Science Question of Feminism (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press).
Hill, Sir George (1952) History of Cyprus, vol. IV (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Kelman, Herbert (1993) Coalitions Cross Conict Lines: The interplay of conicts within and between
the Israeli and Palestinian communities, in: J. Simpson & S. Worchel (Eds) Conict between Peoples and
People, pp. 236258. (Chicago, Nelson Hall).
Cypriot Womens Dialogue Across the Divide 349
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
Kizilyurek, Nyazi (2002) Modernity, Nationalism and the Perspectives of a Cypriot Union, Cahiers
dEtudes sur la Mediterranean, 34, JulyDecember, pp. 211229.
Koumoulides, John (1974) Cyprus and the Greek War of Independence, 18211829 (Guildford and London,
Billing and Sons Limited).
Kyriakides, Stanley (1968) Cyprus: Constitutionalism and crisis government (Philadelphia, University of
Pennsylvania Press).
Lentin, Ronit (1997) Women, War and Peace in a Culture of Violence: The Middle East and Northern
Ireland, in: Biljana Kasic (Ed.) Women and the Politics of Peace, pp. 6475 (Zagreb, Centre for Womens
Studies).
McCann, Ann (1997) The Emergence of a Womens Political Movement in Northern Ireland, in: Biljana
Kasic (Ed.) Women and the Politics of Peace, pp. 3947 (Zagreb, Centre for Womens Studies).
Nedjatigil, Zaim, M. (1977) Cyprus Constitutional Proposals and Developments (TRNC Nicosia, Cyprus,
State Printing).
Patrick, Ronald (1976) Political Geography and the Cyprus Conict (19631971) (Canada, Department of
Geography, University of Waterloo).
Pollis, Adamantia (1973) Intergroup Conict and British Colonial Policy: The case of Cyprus.
Comparative Politics 5(4), pp. 575599.
Pollis, Adamantia (1996) The Social Construction of Ethnicity and Nationality: The case of Cyprus,
Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 2(1), pp. 6790.
Salih, Imbrhim (1968) Cyprus: An analysis of Cypriot political discord (New York, Theo Gaus Sons).
Senjak, Marijana (1997) Womens Self-Organizing in Bosnia: How we felt when supplying
psychological help to traumatized women, in: Biljana Kasic (Ed.) Women and the Politics of Peace,
pp. 2931 (Zagreb, Centre for Womens Studies).
Sharoni, Simona (1995) Gender and the Israeli Palestinian Conict (Syracuse, Syracuse University Press).
Sherif, Muzafer, Harvey, O.J., Hood, William, Sherif, C.W. & White, John, (1961) Intergroup Conict and
Cooperation: The robbers cave experiment (Norman, University of Oklahoma Press).
Sylvester, Christine (1989) Patriarchy, Peace and Women Warriors, in: LindaRennie Forcey (Ed.) Peace,
Meanings, Politics, Strategies, pp. 90122 (New York, Westport, Connecticut, London, Praeger).
Tickner, J. Ann (2001) Womens Leadership, Gender and Peace, in: S. Naraghi Anderlini (Ed.) Gender
and Peace, pp. 3041 (Ford Foundation).
Volkan, Vamik (1979) Cyprus: War and adaptation. A psychoanalytic history of two ethnic groups in conict
(Charlottesville, VA, The University Press of Virginia).
Yashin, Mehmet (2000) Dont Go Back to Kyrenia. Translated by Taner Baybar (Middlesex, Middlesex
University Press, World Literature Series).
ABSTRACT TRANSLATION
No Permiso para cruzar: Dialogo de mujeres Chipriotas a
traves de la linea
Resumen Mucha de la atencio n erudito han jado en el estudio del aspecto de
genero de los conictos etno-nacional para entender las experiencias de mujeres y
hombres en una situacio n de conicto y hasta que punto determinan estas
experiencias los diferentes clases de intervenciones para hacer y construir la paz.
Son las experiencias de mujeres diferentes que las de hombres? Tienen mujeres
una voz diferente que los discursos dominantes que producido por el sistema
patriarcal? En sociedades en conicto, responden mujeres diferente que hombres
al militarismo y la violacion de derechos humanos? Son las necesidades de
mujeres para identidad y paz diferente dependiendo en sus grupos etno-
religiosas? Son diferentes sus necesidades que las de hombres? E
ste art culo trata las representaciones abyecto del cuerpo feminizado
y el hogar. Abyeccio n tiene un papel critica en la creacio n de ambigu edad y
inquietud, abarcando las paradojas de trasgresio n, lo cual es importante para
examinar cr ticamente las relaciones y construcciones sociales. Realizo una
investigacio n de las interpretaciones de espacios abyectos en dos sitios, el cuerpo
y el hogar, a traves de tres pel culas: I Walked with a Zombie (1943), Evil Dead II
(1987) y The Others (2001). En mi analisis, muestro como estas pel culas interpretan
repetidamente los cuerpos feminizados y hogares que, cuando trasgresivos, se
ven como abyecto hasta que se reestablece el orden al n de la pel cula. En estos
textos horrores, las fronteras disuelven y crean momentos potencialmente
progresivos que pueda perturbar el genero y las normas y dicotom as, pero
u ltimamente se reican y se renormalizan las fronteras, reescribiendo el genero y
los patriarcal co digos de espacio.
Breached Bodies and Home Invasions 363
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
Landscapes on the Margins: Gender and homelessness
in Canada
FRAN KLODAWSKY
Department of Geography, Carleton University, Canada
Abstract This introductory article examines the issue of gendered homelessness and
asks why so little academic feminist writing addresses this theme. The article begins with
reference to a feminist novelThe Longings of Women by Marge Piercythat does
tackle this matter. The invisibility of the novels homeless character is used as a way of
introducing some distinctions between womens and mens homelessness. More generally,
the article has two objectives. The rst is to examine what feminist and other critical
geographers have said, conceptually and empirically, about gendered homelessness,
especially in Canada but also in other Western contexts. The second involves highlighting
the problematic nature of too great a focus on visibility in relation to gendered
homelessness, and offers an alternative reading drawn from examining the relations of
bodies and urban space in conjunction with a discussion about the politics of scale and
difference. All told, this collection of essays is an effort to highlight the often hidden and
variable nature of gendered homelessness in Ontario, Canada and to argue that the theme
is worthy of greater attention by feminist geographers.
Introduction
Until she could squat for the night, whether in a basement or a garage or
someones momentarily vacated house, [Mary] had hours to kill. She
rode public transportation out to the end of the line and back. She walked
around. Malls were for sitting. She always looked respectable enough not
to be bothered, so long as she didnt become familiar. Once again, her
invisibility helped. Malls were for old people killing time, retirees,
people on xed incomes in tiny rooms. Were all superuous. . .
It was a priority for Leila to have a house she could afford by herself, one
she could heat, hold on to. In spite of her accountants paean to
mortgages and deductible interest, she would pay off this mortgage as
rapidly as she could. There was nothing in the world like dealing with
the homeless to make a woman engage in nancial planning. It might not
work, for there was no avoiding catastrophes, but meeting former
Correspondence: Fran Klodawsky, Department of Geography, Carleton University, 1125
Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada. E-mail: fran_klodawsky@carleton.ca
Gender, Place and Culture
Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 365381, August 2006
ISSN 0966-369X print/ISSN 1360-0524 online/06/040365-17 q 2006 Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/09663690600808478
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
housewives, teachers, factory workers, waitresses, secretaries made Leila
understand how fragile were the underpinnings of security for women.
A man left or died, a job ended, a factory closed, a re burned out her
building, and she was out of money and on the streets. (From: Marge
Piercy, 1994, pp. 81, 428)
In The Longings of Women, novelist Marge Piercy explores the signicance of
home in the lives of three American women. One of them is homeless Mary
Burke, formerly a suburban middle-class housewife. Piercy examines the
particularly gendered route by which Mary lost her housingthat of a naive
wife who had subsumed her own needs to those of her family and found herself
suddenly without material support after her husband left her for a younger
woman. Piercys sensitive portrayal of Mary captures something of what is known
about the specics of North American womens homelessnessthat it is less
likely to constitute absolute homelessness such as sleeping on the street or in an
emergency shelter than the relative homelessness of, for example, squatting in an
employers empty house or exchanging sex for shelter.
Piercys novel is organised to illustrate the similarities and differences between
Mary and two other womenthe working class, uneducated and ultimately
ruthless Becky, and the outwardly successful author and professor, Leila. The
Longings of Women reects a feminist analysis that recognises society as having
coded certain spaces andtypes of activities as female andothers as male. Implicitly,
Piercy conveys how this coding contributes both to womens homelessness and to
its invisibility. Mary is able to pass as housed only as long as she looks the part of
a suburban housewife, in contrast to the obviously homeless characters who
panhandle and use emergency shelters in the downtown area.
Piercys portrayal also contests popular understandings of who is homeless and
where that homelessness is located. But ironically, the strategy of women such as
Mary who seek invisibility to avoid unwanted attention has resulted in
homelessness being seen, in the West, as a problem faced overwhelmingly by
men. For example, two early surveys using similar methodologyin Los Angeles
and in Calgaryestimated a gender ratio of about one woman to nine men
(Wolch & Dear 1993, p. 276; Perassini & McDonald 2000, p. 537). More recent
Canadian assessments have suggestedthat about 30%of the homeless are women
but these estimates, too, are based upon fairly narrow denitions of what
constitutes being homeless (Begin, 1999). One result has been a relative lack of
acknowledgment of the fact and diversity of womens homelessness and perhaps
as a consequence, a relative lack of feminist attention to this experience. Through
The Longings of Women and specically, through the character of Leila, Piercy alerts
readers that womens homelessness is not an extraordinary phenomenon but one
closelyintertwinedwithwomens vulnerabilities inthe labour market andat home.
This novel contributes to a terrain of womens experience where few feminist
theorists have chosen to venture. In academic writing, homeless women have
either been a forgotten category or they have been a point of reference to illustrate
such phenomena as the feminisation of poverty or the negative results of neo-
liberal social policies. Very rarely has the focus been on homeless womens
diversity or resistance to their situations. One motivation for this collection of
essays is to assert that feminist geography has much to contribute, both
theoretically and empirically, to gendered research and analysis of homelessness.
366 F. Klodawsky
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
In this introductory paper, I have two objectives. The rst is to examine what
feminist and other critical geographers have said about gendered homelessness,
especially in Canada as well as in other Western contexts. More particularly,
it introduces the following articles that draw on empirical research within the
province of Ontario, where a shift in welfare regime to one closely aligned with
neoliberal globalism is well under way (Peck, 2001). My second objective involves
highlighting the problematic nature of too great a focus on homelessness as a
problem with a particular image or set of visible characteristicsthat of bag
ladies, panhandlers or other apparently unhoused women. Instead, I offer an
alternative reading, by examining the relations between bodies and urban space in
conjunction with a discussion about the politics of scale and difference.
All told, this collection of essays is an effort to interrogate the variable nature of
gendered homelessness and to provide some clues for its recognition within the
multiplicity of often hidden places where homeless women are found. Too often,
when womens homelessness is acknowledged, it is presented as a negative status
so far from the experiences of housed women that no further distinction is
warranted. Among researchers and practitioners in the eld, however, it is clear
that there are multiple, quite distinct, pathways by which various women come to
be, and experience homelessness.
Gendered Geographies and Homelessness
Two early and very signicant feminist contributions to the analysis of
homelessness are found in the work of Watson and Austenberry (1986) and
Watson (1988). The authors argue that womens homelessness had to be
understood as a continuum of more and more tenuous housing arrangements,
intricatelytiedtothe sexual divisionof labour andtowomens social vulnerabilities
as daughters, wives and mothers:
Home ownership does not simply act to reproduce patriarchal family
relations at an ideological level. The structure of provision of this form of
tenure acts to systematically marginalize women and to further reinforce
the nuclear family household and womens economic dependence on a
male partner. (Watson, 1988, p. 28)
Watson (1988) makes the case that the opposite of homelessness is not housing
but home. For the single women she interviewed, home implies a set of social
relations. . . strongly linked with a notion of family (op. cit., p. 134). Along with
Watson and Austenberry (1986), the results of their research clearly establish that
being homeless depends on who is doing the dening. Many of those regarded as
homeless by the authors did not regard themselves in a similar manner. Their
analysis fundamentally challenges assumptions that homelessness is only about
the absence of a roof, as has sometimes been inferred in policy discussions
(Somerville, 1992).
Watson and Austenberrys arguments dovetailed neatly with broader feminist
debates about the meaning of home and homelessness in the early 1990s
(Dowling & Pratt, 1993). In arguing for a broader and more inclusive
understanding of womens homelessness, they challenged a policy and analytic
orientation that tended to focus on absolute homelessness, dened as sleeping
rough in public places or living in a shelter (Callaghan et al., 2002, p. 55). Their
work supports a more expansive denition (of relative homelessness), similar to
Gender and Homelessness in Canada 367
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
that suggested by United Nations researchers with regard to people who are
homeless:
Those who have no home and who live either outdoors or in emergency
shelters or hostels, and people whose homes do not meet UN basic
standards of adequate protection from the elements, access to safe water
and sanitation, affordable prices, secure tenure and personal safety, and
accessibility to employment, education and health care. (op. cit., p. 8)
This more expansive denition of what being without housing means is useful for
four reasons. The rst is practicalthe broader denition casts a wider net in an
arena where very little research has taken placebut equally there is a second,
conceptual rationale. An experience of homelessness does not dene the whole of
a persons life, although as the opening quote indicates, it can be all-encompassing
at some points in time. Rather, the dynamic nature of being homeless is best
appreciated when homelessness is regarded as part of a complex process that
includes unstable housing as well as its absence. Thirdly, this more expansive
denition speaks to the considerable evidence that womens homelessness is more
likely to be hidden (Watson &Austenberry, 1986; Novac et al., 1996; Kappel Ramji
Consulting Group, 2002). By hidden, I mean the fact that homeless and unstably
housed women have been less visible on the street and also in emergency shelters
than have men. Women have more frequently used informal strategies, such as
staying with friends and family or attaching themselves to housed men, in order
to avoid either the streets or emergency shelters. Even when shelters are used,
those devoted to women tend to be much smaller and less visible than those for
men (Klodawsky et al., 2002). Finally, more and more research in the West (as well
as internationally) is acknowledging the utility of the more expansive denition
(Somerville, 1992; Springer, 1996).
Watson and Austenberrys (1986) feminist perspective on housing and
homelessness offered a signicant advance over other contemporary writing
and their musings on the relationships between feminist and urban theory
anticipated more recent strands of feminist thought. They recognised the
problems of regarding homeless and unstably housed women as one
homogeneous group, acknowledging that their diverse situations could not be
understood without an appreciation of time/space, class, race and cultural
variations. Although very much a product of socialist-feminism, Watsons (1988)
observations about post-structuralism are noteworthy in naming an absence that
would soon attract the attention of numerous feminists:
Post-structuralism . . . allows for the possibility of a recognition of
fragmentation. Within this approach individuals are buffeted by
conicting and often unconscious needs and desires and are situated
in the midst of discourses not of their own making . . . Foucaults
contention that no relations of power exist without resistance provides
an impetus to perhaps refocus our attention as feminists on womens
opposition to the forms of control they experience within the urban
system. (Watson, 1988, p. 145)
The recognitionof urbanwomens resistance was addressedwithenthusiasminthe
1990s by a variety of feminist scholars (Bondi &Rose, 2003), but not especially with
regard to homelessness. Yet, as will be discussed below, the challenges raised by
368 F. Klodawsky
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
these scholars about the complex nature of gendered and racialised urban spaces
have provided important markers for work in this area as well. Before turning
to this newer feminist literature, however, it is appropriate to acknowledge other
geographers who have contributed to knowledge about the eld.
Seeing Gendered Homelessness
Some geographers, working in the tradition of welfare and social-cultural
geographies, have contributed signicant insights to homelessness research in the
Western world. Dear & Taylors (1982) landmark contributions on the relationship
between NIMBY (Not-In-My-Backyard) and the presence of community facilities
for deinstitutionalised psychiatric patients anticipated a more ambitious research
programme in Los Angeles. There, Jennifer Wolch, Michael Dear and various
students were among the rst to raise awareness about the relations between
welfare state restructuring and the dynamics of homelessness in United States, as
well as contributing new insights about homeless women (Wolch & Dear, 1993).
Rowe and Wolch (1990) revealed how the homeless women in LAs Skid Row had
concerns about physical assault, both on the street and in shelters, and their use of
sex as a survival strategy. Takahashi et al. (2002) conducted detailed research with
eight homeless women with children, exploring how their social identities were
shaped by structures and institutions but also how they contested those identities.
DeVerteuil (2003) described carefully how new poverty management strategies
of LA institutions organised and controlled the lives of 25 homeless women.
Takahashis (1998) study of the responses of communities to human service
facility siting for homeless individuals, and those with HIV/AIDS, noted that
homeless women tended to be regarded less fearfully than men. She also found
that racialisation accounted for the degree of stigma attached to various homeless
bodies. Together, the analytical contribution of these studies has been on the
multiple and spiralling adverse impacts on the everyday lives of marginalised
peoples, including their movements in space, that welfare state restructuring has
generated in the United States.
Another ambitious and multifaceted contribution by geographers has involved
a focus on the rural homelessness in Britain through both a cultural and a policy
lens. Cloke, Milbourne and Widdoweld (2002) were motivated in their work by
a strong political sense of the injustice of homelessness and from a desire to
provoke practical policy responses to the needs of homeless people hidden away
in rural areas (p. 4). They paid particular attention to the contrasting images that
rural and homeless evoked and what this implied for the ability of both rural
communities and government policies to address the problems faced by homeless
people living in rural areas. They did so with great sensitivity to both the uneven
geography of rural Britain and to the culturally charged meanings of home and
homelessness. Their conclusions regarding gendered homelessness, however,
were somewhat disappointing in that they focus on womens lesser propensity to
sleep rough. They attributed this difference as stemming from two factors: rst,
womens greater ability over men to achieve a higher priority for council housing,
especially when they were accompanied by children; and secondly, the reported
observation among professionals and volunteers that there was a greater
propensity for women (in contrast to men) to deal with their problems (p. 182).
However, their conclusions left unanalysed the relative signicance of hidden
homelessness for women as opposed to men.
Gender and Homelessness in Canada 369
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
A somewhat different set of concerns has been the focus of cultural geographers
engaged in examining the links between changes in ofcial attitudes about access
to such public spaces as the street or the park, and what this signied about the
rights of homeless people. Mitchell (1995), for example, in examining a series of
conicts over the Peoples Park in Berkeley, observed that activists and homeless
people who used the park promoted a vision of a space marked by free interaction
and the absence of coercion by powerful institutions (Mitchell, 1995, p. 115), but
this vision was effectively undermined by propertied others. In a somewhat
similar vein, Ruddick (2002) has explored the increasingly restrictive legal context
for the use of public space by homeless youth in central Toronto and how this
shift, in turn, taught the larger, potentially sympathetic public how to re-read
those gestures [by homeless youth] as aggressive and alien (2002, p. 63; see also
Ruddick 1996). Similarly, Brinegar (2000) has evaluated the extent to which
Tempe, Arizona residents attitudes towards homeless people reected the ofcial
and exclusive policies of the municipality.
Interestingly, there is little acknowledgement of gender differences in these
discussions. Rather, categories of the homeless or homeless youth are the
referents of choice. One probable rationale has already been noted: the much more
visible presence of homeless men on the street. Another explanation is given by
Peressini (2003):
homelessness is characterized by a leveling process, in which personal
and demographic characteristics have no observable impact on a
persons ability to adapt and to survive on the streets. To be homeless is
to be truly disadvantaged . . . (Peressini, 2003, pp. 386387)
Some researchers have argued explicitly against an emphasis on womens
homelessness because of their apparently smaller numbers and their better access
to facilities and services (Passaro, 1996; Perresini, 2003). The conclusions of urban
anthropologist Joanne Passaro (1996) are especially noteworthy here, in that they
are based on a feminist analysis of why single black men in New York City are
much more likely than women, especially women with children, to be and remain
visibly homeless. Her conclusions are based on a 4-year-long participant
observation research initiative with and about homeless men and women in New
York. She asserted that:
. . . homeless womenare ultimatelycomplicit inmaintainingandrecreating
the dominant discourse on gender and womens place because that
discourse and its protectionist entailments gives them a leg up for
survival . . . Inorder tosurvive, homeless womenhave little choice but to be
activeagents of their ownsuburbanization, complicit actors ina systemthat
denes their place as home andnds homes for theminthe outer boroughs
beyond the borders of Manhattan. The struggle over the Manhattan
landscape is left largely to men, primarily to black menwho are childless or
do not live with their children; these men are left without homes in part
because they are seen as hypermasculinized and untamed, not belonging
within the domesticated connes of home. (Passaro, 1996, p. 85)
She concludes with a strong plea for the critical importance of equally valuing all
individuals human rights (see also Cloke et al., 2002). She challenges the all-too-
facile assumption that housing support for women and children is more
important than support for single black men. Passaros text makes important
370 F. Klodawsky
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
reading, but she perhaps jumps to conclusions too readily about a hierarchy of
suffering and minimises the negative impacts of invisible homelessness. Although
her analysis is sensitive to the spatial distribution of, and different characteristics
between, homeless women and men, there is a lack of appreciation of the social
construction of scale in shaping understandings of similarity and difference and
the dynamics of this construction (Smith, 1993; Marston, 2002). In conjunction
with explorations about gender, bodies, home and the urban by geographers such
as Bondi (1998), Duncan (1996) and Bondi and Rose (2003), the next section
elaborates on the potential signicance of scale to contribute new insights to
gendered analyses of homelessness.
Scaling Gendered Homelessness
Through a series of vignettes, Neil Smith (1993) has illustrated how a purportedly
local homeless problem was actually embroiled in a politics of scale,
encompassing body, home, community, urban, region, nation, global (1993, p.
101). The example he used involved a series of conicts over who should be able to
claim the right to access a particular park. Previously, this space had been viewed
as available to homeless peoples but more recently had become a target of middle-
class consumption. In asking why this differentiation emerged, Smith implicated
municipal, national and global actors who were set on reorganising property
values in the city. He showed that their involvement consisted of various efforts to
establish boundaries that emphasised some types of differences, but rendered
others invisible. Specically, the Lower East Sides Tompkins Square Park was
alternatively scripted as a retreat from the wild city or as a symbol of the widest
degeneration the city could offer (1993, p. 93). In this view, restricting homeless
peoples use of the park while promoting its potential as a support for
gentrication was a strategy that helped shift understanding of how the space of
the park should be seen. Smith lamented that activists were so caught up in
contesting the Tompkins Square Parks changed meaning that they neglected
potential links with other similar struggles going on elsewhere in the city.
Consequently, the park became the site of a conict between particular (local)
homeless and housed bodies. But, seen at another scale, the gentriers and those
without homes were products of similar economic and political processes over the
redevelopment of land. Through their promoters differential ability to
manipulate and produce scale, some ideas about the park (such as its potential
as a site of middle class pleasure) were accentuated while others (such as the
negative impacts of commodication) were obscured.
Smith (1993) also noted that a gendered politics of scale was especially prominent
at the scales of body and of home. Drawing upon feminist analyses, he reminded
readers that the politics of abortion, rape, prostitution, reproduction and
bodycare focus on access to womens bodies, work women do with their
bodies and the boundary between individual and state control over the body
(1993, p. 102). These observations resonate with feminist geographies concerns
with, for example, womens learned fears about stranger rape, the dangers of
being in public alone, and patriarchal constructions of womens place in the home,
with bodies in need of male protection (Pain, 1991; Duncan, 1996). At the urban
scale, Liz Bondi (1998) has explored the variety of means by which women have
been associated, both ideologically and materially, with the suburban, the private
Gender and Homelessness in Canada 371
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
and the domestic, while men have been more commonly associated with the
urban, the public and the political, in ways reminiscent of The Longings of Women.
All these associations might, through the lens of a politics of scale, be regarded
as the unstable outcomes of gendered and other conicts. As such, homeless
womens spaces might also be recognised as diverse and ambiguous. One
powerful example that has emerged from on-going research in Ottawa, Ontario is
the problematic linking of immigrant women who are confronting multiple
barriers to settling in a new country, and Canadian-born women with severe
psychological challenges. Both have been labelled as homeless and have been
assumed (by some) to be equally served by the same womens emergency shelter,
the same services for homeless women and the same federal government initiative
against homelessness. Yet, an alternative reading of their situations might have
resulted in housing, policy and service initiatives that were distinct in terms of
both scale and rationale. With regard to scale, the federal level of government in
Canada is responsible for immigration policy and the provision of transitional
support, whereas health care is a provincial matter. With regard to rationale, the
transitional support that state policy assumes is enough for newcomer settlement
is clearly distinct from the long-term care that is often needed by vulnerable
people. These alternative understandings are certainly recognised by some
homeless women and by some service providers. However, large gaps remain
between services based on dominant images of womens homelessness, and the
measures that would be required to respond to their needs in a more nuanced
manner (Aubry et al., 2003; Klodawsky et al., 2005).
In a somewhat similar vein, Bondi (1998), Duncan (1996) and Bondi and Rose
(2003) have asserted recently that uncritically accepting public/male private/
female dichotomies have problematic shortcomings. Bondi and Rose (2003) draw
on Nancy Frasers analysis of how current struggles for justice have become much
more focused on recognition, or acknowledgement of differences among groups
mobilized under the banners of nationality, ethnicity, race, gender and
sexuality than on redistribution, or struggles against class exploitation (Fraser,
1997, p. 11). Thinking about feminist urban geography, they observe that
[a]lthough the distributive impacts of affective identities are noted, these are not
problematised to the same extent as issues of recognition (p. 9). In other words,
they conrm an impression that has often been voiced informally among feminist
geographers: that the sophistication and nuance of theoretical work, often
constructed around questions of identity, have not sufciently addressed policy
implications. Conversely, where issues of inequities and their policy implications
predominate, there often seems to be a lack of appreciation for the nuances
apparent in more theoretically informed analysis. Seen from the perspective of a
politics of scale, these dichotomies might also be criticised for their uncritical
reinforcement of certain associations between bodies and places. In the realm of
homelessness research, these divides have been very much in evidence. Drawing
upon both class and identity to problematise womens homelessness in a nuanced
yet policy-relevant manner is a challenge that remains to be addressed.
Marion Iris Young (1990) is a political philosopher whose musings have often
been utilised productively by feminist geographers. Her recent assessment of Toril
Mois claim, that the concept of lived bodies has greater analytical depth than
does gender, echoes some of the issues raised above (Young, 2002). Mois
argument is that, in destabilizing categories both of biological sex and gender
identity, recent deconstructive approaches to feminist and queer theorizing have
372 F. Klodawsky
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
opened greater possibilities for thinking a plurality of intersecting identities and
practices (Young, 2002, p. 411). Young praises the move from gender to lived
bodies in its greater sensitivity to the embodied particularities of individual lives,
but she also challenges the implicit assumption that feminism is now exclusively
about subjectivity. Instead, she asserts the conceptual value of gender as integral
to projects that describe and explain . . . structures and processes that produce
differential opportunities and privileges in contemporary society (op. cit., p. 421).
In other words, for Young, the concept of gender. . .[is] a tool for theorizing
structures more than subjects (op. cit., p. 422), and she proposes three axes of
analysis: a sexual division of labour, normative heterosexuality and gendered
hierarchies of power. Directly in the case of the sexual division of labour and
indirectly in the other two axes, Young hints at the structural reality of a
(somewhat uid) public/private dichotomy. She recognises the continuing
signicance of womens greater involvement in the work of caring . . . [that] takes
place primarily in unpaid labour in private homes (ibid.) and acknowledges the
gendered advantages and disadvantages that this produces. She notes that:
Gendered hierarchies of power intersect with a sexual division of labour
and normative heterosexuality in many ways to reproduce a sense of
entitlement of men to womens service and an association of
heterosexual masculinity with force and command. (ibid.)
Youngs (2002) discussion of gender and structures is reminiscent of Frasers
(1997) characterisation of a politics of redistribution, whereas her reections on
lived bodies is more compatible with a politics of recognition. Her arguments
also echo Bondi and Roses (2003) observations about a theory/policy divide. For
Young, an emphasis on lived bodies is likely to result in a focus on the pluralities
of womens experiences of, and responses to homelessness, while gendered
analysis will engage more centrally with social structures and the ways they
produce inequalities. In other words, for Young, an analysis that emphasises social
structure, gender and policy is distinct from one that emphasises lived bodies,
subjectivity and theory. Although questions of redistribution and recognition are
relevant to both, recent feminist engagements with subjectivity have tended to
emphasise issues of recognition, while policy orientated analysis that emphasises
a structural analysis has engaged more readily with issues of redistribution.
Youngs (2002) examination does not, however, acknowledge the complications
that a politics of scale might yield. Smiths (1993) argument is that the contexts within
which lived bodies nd themselves are profoundly affected by boundaries that are
politically constructed (and contested) (see also Marston, 2002). More explicit
attention to scale may hold important clues for how the apparent similarities and
dissimilarities between livedbodies are constructed(andthus might be rearranged).
For example, Passaro (1996) contrasts the situations (lived bodies) of men who are
on the streets of New York City and women with children in suburban emergency
shelters. Yet, from the perspective of a structural analysis, their experiences stem
largely fromsimilar forces, having to do with economic restructuring, gentrication,
and ultimately, marginalisation. As understood by Young, [m]arginals are people
the systemof [paid] labor cannot or will not use . . . (Young, 1990, p. 53). The different
situations of male and female marginals reect primarily their differing associations
with children. North American society is still somewhat less tolerant of children
sleeping on the streets (as opposed to unstable and substandard housing, hidden
from view), than it is of single (especially black) men doing so. As a result, public
Gender and Homelessness in Canada 373
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
policy distinctions of where different sorts of homelessness should be located are
affected; Moshers (2002) analysis of the parallels between the shrinkage of private
spaces for mothers on welfare andof public spaces for street youthin Ontario clearly
illustrates the difference between such a structural analysis and one that relies too
heavily on visible differences.
Conceptualising scale as a productive quality in the construction of difference
and similarity of womens and mens homelessness offers interesting conceptual
possibilities that encompass the insights of both lived bodies and gendered
perspectives. I am not claiming that both must be equally incorporated into any
one examination, but rather that there are dangers in fully neglecting one or the
other. Homeless women who may, at rst glance, powerfully illustrate the power
of public/private dichotomies to establish the terrain of womens subservient
status, also need to be recognised as diverse actors, with distinct trajectories that
led to their homelessness. The voices of homeless women who express their relief
at having escaped the violence and abuse of their family homes and who nd
increased autonomy and privacy in shelters and hostels do need to be
acknowledged (Tomas & Dittmar, 1995; Wardhaugh, 1999). And, while gendered
axes of power operate in and through space-time, so too do acts of individual and
collective resistance. Theoretical tools that capture the dynamic nature of these
movements and counter-movements are required and this means an appreciation
of the politics of scale in conjunction with investigations of lived bodies and
structures.
Placing Canadian Contributions
It is quite insightful to consider the ideas explored aboveabout gender and lived
bodies, policy and theory, recognition and redistribution, and the politics of
scalein the light of an examination of the small body of extant feminist Canadian
writing on place, gender and homelessness. This material might be sorted into
three somewhat distinct groups: (1) policy orientated documents and papers;
(2) academic papers that explore the lived bodies of particular groups of homeless
women; and (3) papers that implicitly or explicitly recognise scale as having
explanatory potential.
In examining this material, it is imperative to begin with an appreciation of its
pioneering efforts. Writing about gender and homelessness is quite recent in
Canada. One of the rst examples of a place-based analysis was Farges 1989 paper,
reporting on participant observation research with women in four Toronto hostels
for single homeless women. Her conclusions addressed a policy community that
regardedwomens homelessness as voluntary, using a theoretical framework that
emphasised womens roles in the sexual division of labour. Sylvia Novac used a
somewhat similar conceptual framework to present a series of compelling
arguments about the serious problemof womens homelessness (Novac et al., 1996,
1999, 2002). Novacs contributions have been particularly signicant in alerting the
Canadian policy community to the signicant nature of the problem and its
racialised, class- and age-specic dimensions. Sever (2002) also compiled and
organised a variety of primary and secondary research materials to highlight the
structural links between domestic violence and womens homelessness, and to
argue for the signicance of secure housing for women. Redistribution and policy
insights have also been of interest to Glasser et al. (1999) who, after comparing the
results of two recent censuses of homeless people in Quebec City and Hartford,
374 F. Klodawsky
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
Connecticut, made inferences about differences in urban and social policies in
Canada and the United States.
A second group of research articles qualitatively explored the interactions
between women residents and the specialised housing situations they inhabited.
For Beaman-Hall and Nason-Clark (1997), the focus was on the relationships
between transition house service providers, the clergy and womens groups in
Atlantic Canada, with regard to the issue of family violence. Transition housing
for battered women, this time in a large Canadian city, was also the site of Krane
and Davies (2002) analysis of attitudes towards mothering in shelter practice
with battered women. Bridgmans (2002) examination focused on the impacts of
an innovative shelter for chronically homeless women in Toronto. She emphasised
the signicance of ethnographic research in evaluating design from the
perspective of marginalised users.
In only a few Canadian cases, however, have gender, place and space been
interrogated as elements that are deeply implicated in the construction of both
gender and homelessness. A pioneer in promoting this approach has been Gerda
Wekerle (1997, 1994), whose examinations of womens housing disadvantage and
womens motivations for establishing alternative housing developments have
been set within a political economy frame of reference that linked gender, welfare
state restructuring and housing needs and resources. Jeff Sommers (1998)
discourse analysis of the changing construction of masculinities associated with
Vancouvers Downtown Eastside examined the ways in which particular spaces
and bodies constructed one another and how this changed over time in
conjunction with changing socio-economic and political contexts. Benoit et al.s
(2003) geographic location was also the Downtown Eastside, but they focused
specically upon the needs of Aboriginal women living there. As well as
providing important contextual information about the signicant presence of
aboriginal women in this extremely disadvantaged Vancouver neighbourhood,
they assessed the extent to which existing health clinics, including those run by
the Vancouver Native Health Society, adequately addressed these womens needs.
This articles most noteworthy element was its efforts to give voice to a particular
group of Aboriginal women, while remaining attuned to the structural factors that
had placed them and maintained their marginalisation in the Downtown Eastside.
Although the key analytical focus of Knowles (2000a, b) writing is not gender, it
remains exemplary in the seamless way that it captures the impacts on the bodies
of the madex-psychiatric patients in the City of Montrealof numerous stages
of downloading, privatisation and marketisation of long-term care, and how those
bodies cope with the resulting patchwork of services. She explained that:
Those who live in shelters, in rooming houses, and on the street and
who graze from food banks, soup kitchens and day centres generate
(a version of) the city, not as overlapping zones of occupation but as a
series of nodal points connected by the movement of people between
them . . . Lives are not lived in place but in the threading together of places as
sequential scenes in their trajectories. It is in the activities of lives and bodies
connecting places that the grammar of space is written, congured
through the agency of lives. Lives are best framed and understood as
multiple journeys from place to place and not as the processes occurring
in one particular place. Time and space intersect each other and give each
other form and substance. (Knowles, 2000b, pp. 216217)
Gender and Homelessness in Canada 375
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
Knowles researchistheresult of herobservationsandinterviewswith60ex-psychiatric
patients, two-thirds of whom were men. In Bedlam on the Streets, she explains her
difculty in nding women and getting into what were specically womens shelters
(Knowles, 2000a, p. 15), but her autobiographical sketches of two women capture the
ways in which motherhood and sexual abuse gured in their lives. Invisibility again
becomes a barrier to Knowles ability to access their lives equally to those of men.
Knowles lack of success in accessing women in womens shelters raises two
additional issues that will not be adequately explored in this paper, but that
certainly need to be acknowledged. The rst is the relationship between the
researchers and the researched in an area where power and other differentials are
all too evident and where the rewards of encounters are likely to be much more
signicant for the researcher than the researched. It is possible that womens
shelter gatekeepers had such an evaluation in mind when they decided not to
enable Knowles access to women shelter residents. Efforts that acknowledge and
incorporate these power differentials into their research are also examples of
efforts to combine understandings of lived bodies and gender in analysis.
A second and closely related issue is the role of feminist service providers in
helping to differentiate or homogenise the category homeless women. Exploring
howthey, too, have a role to play in acknowledging homeless womens diversity is
an important question for future research.
Cumulatively, the Canadian contributions itemised above mean that the base of
relevant knowledge at the beginning of the twenty-rst century is far greater than
it was in 1990. On the policy front, Novac especially has highlighted links between
violence, poverty, economic restructuring, racism, sexism and womens home-
lessness. Certainly, she has drawn extensively from feminist analysis and has
presented a compelling case for greater attention to gendered homelessness.
Without her efforts, it is likely that federal funding would not have been
forthcoming to support a session on Women and Homelessness at the
International Geographical Unions Gender and Geography Commission Work-
shopPlacing Gender/Making Policythe genesis of this collection of essays.
Yet, the limitations of policy-relevant writing in response to contractual funding
has restricted the extent to which theoretical advances are possible. Academic
writing in the eld also needs to be regarded as quite preliminary. New insights
have been conveyedbetween faith communities, womens violence and
homelessness, or between shelter design and quality of life and/or welfare state
restructuringbut equally, these insights highlight the enormity of what remains
to be considered, both theoretically and practically.
Geographers have begun the task of exploring what an appreciation of scale
might add to examinations of gendered homelessness. Wekerle (1997) Sommers
(1998), Benoit et al. (2003) and Knowles (2000a, b) are approaches that acknowledge
the multiscalar nature of cultural, social, political and economic factors that
produce andshape genderedhomelessness. The articles that followalso contribute
to these efforts. Interestingly, despite my efforts to capture experiences across
Canada, all the authors included here draw upon empirical research in Ontario.
Evidence from a recent Statistics Canada Census of Collective Dwellings (2002),
coupledwithknowledge of ashift inpolitical regime inOntario, provide some basis
for appreciating why this might be so. In 1995, provincial Ontario electors brought
to power a political party intent on reinventing government, especially with
regard to social security matters. Among its rst actions was a 21.6% reduction in
welfare rates for all recipients. Another was the immediate cessation of any new
376 F. Klodawsky
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
social (non-prot) housing (Ralph et al., 1997). Coupled with previous cutbacks in
the area of social housing at the federal level, visible homelessness grew
enormously in the 1990s, especially in Ontario. In 2001, the number of residents in
emergency shelters for persons lacking a xed address, other shelters and lodging
and rooming with assistance services was far greater in Ontario than in any other
province6100 compared to 3365 in Quebec and 1085 in British Columbia.
Similarly, residents in service collective dwellings includ[ing] hotels, motels and
tourist homes, lodging and rooming houses, school residences and YM/YWCAs
exhibited a similar pattern: 20,440 in Ontario compared to 11,760 in Quebec and
7740 in British Columbia (Statistics Canada, 2002, p. 5).
Despite their concentration within one province, the essays that follow do draw
on very diverse voices and circumstances. Indeed, the extent of these differences
within one (socially constructed) jurisdiction is testament to the need to
thoroughly and continuously challenge popular understandings and images of
homeless women, who are not only bag ladies with shopping carts or single
mothers living in emergency hotels or panhandling teenagers. Rather, as Leilas
reections on the opening page suggest, their diversity is almost as extensive as
that of housed women with whom they share overlapping characteristics. The
tendency to accentuate a divide between being housed and being homeless and to
naturalise that division is most fundamentally what is at stake for critical feminist
geographies. It is the hope that the articles that followby Whitzman, Klodawsky,
Aubry and Farrell, and Chouinardare seen as contributing to that contestation.
Respectively, women outside metropolitan locations, diverse male and female
youth in Ottawa, and women with disabilities affected adversely by changes in
provincial public policies, are the subjects of the three articles. In each case, bodies,
urban space, the politics of scale and difference are incorporated, albeit to a lesser or
greater extent. Whitzman contributes a nuanced and empathetic portrayal of the
impacts of homelessness on the bodies, voices and health of women living outside a
metropolitan area. She exposes the challenges faced by homeless women who have
seldomif ever beenheardfrom, throughher interviews withwomeninthree Ontario
communities: Oshawa, Kingston and Haliburton. She interrogates insightfully how
location acts to compound other disadvantages, such as disability, lack of education
and poverty. At the same time, Whitzman examines the policy barriers to integrated
healthservice solutions that result froma locationoutside of the metropolitan. Based
on research in Ottawa, Klodawsky, Aubry and Farrells article explores a gap
betweensenior government employabilitypolicies gearedtomarginalisedyouth, the
interests andgoals of suchyouthandthe role of local helpingagencies, oftencaught
between these two sets of pressures. Incorporating a feminist ethics of care lens, the
article raises questions about the effectiveness of workfare driven policies for
disadvantaged youth and queries the lack of senior government recognition of the
signicance of appropriately located, mult-faceted social services. Vera Chouinards
reections are pitched more broadly and consider the myriad connections between
housed and homeless women and the ways in which advantage and disadvantage
are dialectically intertwined. Her empirical focus is women with disabilities who are
in need of provincial income assistance in Ontario. As in the previous articles, the
impacts of neoliberalisation are documented, but rather than examining their
manifestation in a particular locale, Chouinard unpacks the governmental processes
that exacerbate the gaps between the afuent and the marginalised. None of these
cases is about women who are visibly homeless. Rather, the gendered lenses utilised
Gender and Homelessness in Canada 377
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
by the authors contribute new insights into the socio-spatial manifestations of
marginalisation in relation to home and homelessness.
Conclusions
Wherever there is illusion, the optical and the visual world plays an
integral and integrative, active and passive, part of it. It fetishises
abstraction and imposes it as the norm. It detaches the pure form from its
impure contentfrom lived time, everyday time and from bodies with
their opacity and solidity, their warmth, their life and their death. After
its fashion, the image kills. In this it is like all signs. Occasionally . . . the
artists tenderness or cruelty transgresses the limits of the image.
Something else altogether may then emerge, a truth and reality
answering to criteria quite different from those of exactitude, clarity,
readability and plasticity (Lefebrve, 1991, p. 97).
In his discussion of Social Space, Lefebrve (1991) particularly emphasises the
dangers of relyingonthe visual. Inthis essay, too, the falsityof the visual inthinking
about genderedhomelessness has been at the core. The seeming predominance of a
certain type of imagethat of a passive male panhandlerhas reinforced many
womens perceived interest in hiding or rejecting mainstream notions of their own
situations of homelessness. Feminist geographers with an interest in this eld need
to reject this image but much more is required. One question for research is to ask
why so muchhas occurred(or not occurred) onthe basis of this image while so little
has taken place on the basis of research that rejects its veracity. Another is to
incorporate both an appreciation for the multidimensional, multiscalar nature of
the meaning of home, to recognise that houselessness is not the same as
homelessness, and that the latter signals a more existentially complicated set of
needs andissues. There also is the needto problematise the ways that being housed
has been naturalised while being homeless has either been rendered invisible or
categorised as other. Finally, I would urge feminist geographers not only explore
the theoretical nuances of the relationships under investigation but also to develop
their policy and practice implications. An infusion of sophisticated gendered
analysis about diversity into a policy arena such as homelessness is desperately
needed, and it is hoped that this collection of essays will help to generate materials
that contribute to such a project.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Valerie Preston for the collaboration that was the inspiration for this
project. Thanks also to Susan Farrell, Sheela Subramanian, Carolyn Whitzman,
Janet Siltanen, members of the Carleton University Centre for Labour and
Community Studies and the three anonymous referees for their very useful
comments on an earlier draft of this article.
References
Aubry, Tim, Klodawsky, Fran, Hay, Elizabeth & Birnie, Sarah (2003) Panel Study on Persons Who Are
Homeless in Ottawa: Phase 1 results (Ottawa, Centre for Research on Community Services).
378 F. Klodawsky
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
Beaman-Hall, Lori & Nason-Clark, Nancy (1997) Partners or Protagonists? The Transition House
Movement and conservative churches, Aflia, 12(2), pp. 176196.
Begin, Patricia (1999) Homelessness (Ottawa, Parliamentary Research Branch of Library of Parliament).
Benoit, Cecilia, Carroll, Dena & Chaudhry, Munaza (2003) In Search of a Healing Place: Aboriginal
women in Vancouvers Downtown Eastside, Social Science and Medicine, 56, pp. 821833.
Bondi, Liz (1998) Gender, Class, and Urban Space: Public and private space in contemporary urban
landscapes, Urban Geography, 19(2), pp. 160185.
Bondi, Liz & Rose, Damaris (2003) Constructing Gender, Constructing the Urban: Constructing the
spaces of Anglo-American feminist urban geography, Gender, Place and Culture, 10, pp. 229246.
Bridgman, Rae (2002) Housing Chronically Homeless Women: Inside a safe haven, Housing Policy
Debate, 13, pp. 5181.
Brinegar, Sarah J. (2000) Response to Homelessness in Tempe, Arizona: Public opinion and government
policy, Urban Geography, 21(6), pp. 497514.
Callaghan, M., Farha, L. & Porter, B. (2002) Women and Housing in Canada: Barriers to equality (Toronto,
Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation).
Cloke, Paul, Milbourne, Paul & Widdoweld, Rebekah (2002) Rural Homelessness: Issues, experiences and
policy responses (Bristol, Policy Press).
Dear, M. & Taylor, S. (1982) Not on Our Street: Community attitudes to mental health care (London, Pion).
DeVerteuil, Geoffrey (2003) Homeless Mobility, Institutional Settings, and the New Poverty
Management, Environment and Planning A, 35(2), pp. 361379.
Dowling, Robyn & Pratt, Geraldine (1993) Home Truths: Recent feminist constructions, Urban
Geography, 14(5), pp. 464475.
Duncan, Nancy (1996) Renegotiating Gender and Sexuality in Public and Private Spaces, in: Nancy
Duncan (Ed.) Bodyspace: Destabilizing geographies of gender and sexuality, pp. 127145 (London,
Routledge).
Farge, Brenda Doyle (1989) Homeless Women and Freedom of Choice, Canadian Journal of Community
Mental Health, 8(1), pp. 135145.
Fraser, Nancy (1997) Justice Interruptus: Critical reections on the postsocialist condition (New York,
Routledge).
Glasser, Irene, Fournier, Louise & Costopoulous, Andre (1999) Homelessness in Quebec City, Quebec
and Hartford, Connecticut: A cross-national and cross-cultural analysis, Urban Anthropology, 28(2),
pp. 141163.
Kappel Ramji Consulting Group (2002) Common Occurrence: The impact of homelessness on womens health,
Phase II. Community Based Action Research (nal report) (Toronto, Brown Book Company).
Klodawsky, Fran, Aubry, Tim, Behnia, Behnam, Nicholson, Carl & Young, Marta (2005) The Panel Study
on Homelessness: Secondary data analysis of respondents whose country of origin is not Canada (Ottawa,
National Homelessness Secretariat).
Klodawsky, Fran, Farrell, Susan & Aubry, Tim (2002) Images of Homelessness: Implications for local
politics, Canadian Geographer, 46(2), pp. 124141.
Knowles, Caroline (2000a) Bedlam on the Streets (London, Routledge).
Knowles, Caroline (2000b) Burger King, Dunkin Donuts and Community Mental Health Care, Health &
Place, 6(3), pp. 213224.
Krane, Julia & Davies, Linda (2002) Sisterhood Is Not Enough: The invisibility of mothering in shelter
practice with battered women, Aflia, 17(2), pp. 167190.
Lefebvre, Henri (1991) The Production of Space (Oxford, Routledge). English translation by Donald
Nicholson-Smith from Production de lespace (1974), Editions Anthropos.
Marston, Sally (2002) The Social Construction of Scale, Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), pp. 219242.
Mitchell, Don (1995) The End of Public Space? Peoples park, denitions of the public, and democracy,
Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85(1), pp. 108134.
Mosher, Janet (2002) The shrinking of the public and private spaces of the poor, in: Joe Hermer & Janet
Mosher (Eds) Disorderly People: Law and the politics of exclusion in Ontario, pp. 4154 (Halifax,
Fernwood).
Novac, Sylvia, Brown, Joyce & Bourbonnais, Carman (1996) No Room of Her Own: A literature review on
women and homelessness (Ottawa, Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation).
Novac, Sylvia, Brown, Joyce & Gallant, Gloria (1999) Women on the Rough Edge: A decade of change for
long-term homeless women (Ottawa, Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation).
Canadian Housing and Renewal Association. Novac, Sylvia (2002) On Her Own: Young women and
homelessness in Canada (Ottawa, Status of Women Canada).
Pain, Rachel (1991) Space, Sexual Violence and Social Control: Integrating geographical and feminist
analyses of womens fear of crime, Progress in Human Geography, 15(4), pp. 415431.
Gender and Homelessness in Canada 379
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
8
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
Passaro, Joanne (1996) The Unequal Homeless: Men on the streets, women in their place (New York,
Routledge).
Peck, Jamie (2001) Neoliberalizing States: Thin policies/hard outcomes, Progress in Human Geography,
25(3), pp. 445455.
Peressini, T. (2004) Canadas homeless: patterns and policies, in: J. Curtis, E. Grabb & N. Guppy (Eds)
Social Inequality in Canada: Patterns, Problems (Toronto, Prentice Hall).
Peressini, T. & McDonald, L. (1991) Urban homelessness in Canada, in: T. Bunting & P. Filion (Eds)
Canadian Cities in Transition: The twenty-rst century, pp. 525543 (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Piercy, Marg (1994) The Longings of Women (New York, Fawcett Crest).
Ralph, Diana, Regimbald, Andre & St-Armand, Neree (1997) Open for Business, Closed to People: Mike
Harriss Ontario (Halifax, NS, Fernwood).
Rowe, S. & Wolch, J. (1990) Social Networks in Time and Space: Homeless women in Skid Row, Los
Angeles, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80, pp. 184204.
Ruddick, S. M. (1996) Young and Homeless in Hollywood: Mapping social identities (New York, Routledge).
Ruddick, S. M. (2002) Metamorphosis Revisited: Restricting discourses of citizenship, in: J. Hermer &
Janet Mosher (Eds) Disorderly People: Law and the politics of exclusion in Ontario, pp. 5564 (Halifax,
Fernwood).
Sever, Aysan (2002) A Feminist Analysis of Flight of Abused Women, Plight of Canadian Shelters:
Another road to homelessness, Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 11(4), pp. 307324.
Smith, Neil (1993) Homeless/global: scaling places, in: J. Bird (Ed.) Mapping the Futures, pp. 87119
(London, Routledge).
Somerville, Peter (1992) Homelessness and the Meaning of Home: Rooessness or rootlessness?,
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16(4), pp. 529530.
Sommers, Jeff (1998) Men at the Margin: Masculinity and space in downtown Vancouver, 19501986,
Urban Geography, 19(4), pp. 287310.
Statistics Canada. (2002) Collective Dwellings, Catalogue no. 96F0030XIE2001004 (Ottawa, 2001 Census:
analysis series).
Takahashi, Lois M. (1998) Homelessness, AIDS, and Stigmatization: The NIMBY syndrome in the United
States at the end of the Twentieth Century (New York, Clarendon Press).
Takahashi, Lois M., McElroy, Jamie & Rowe, Stacey (2002) The Sociospatial Stigmatization of Homeless
Women With Children, Urban Geography, 23(4), pp. 301322.
Tomas, Annabel & Helga, Dittmar (1995) The Experience of Homeless Women: An exploration of
housing histories and the meaning of home, Housing Studies, 10(4), pp. 493516.
Watson, Sophie & Austerberry, Helen (1986) Housing and Homelessness (London, Routledge).
Watson, Sophie (1988) Accommodating Inequality: Gender and housing (Sydney, Allen and Unwin).
Wardhaugh, Julie (1999) The Unaccommodated Woman: Home, homelessness and identity, Sociological
Review, 47(1), pp. 91109.
Wekerle, Gerda (1997) The shift to the market: gender and housing disadvantage, in: Patricia M. Evans
& Gerda Wekerle (Eds) Women and the Canadian Welfare State, pp. 170196 (Toronto, University of
Toronto Press).
Wekerle, Gerda (1994) Responding to Diversity: Housing developed by and for women, Canadian
Journal of Urban Research, 2, pp. 95113.
Wolch, Jennifer & Dear, Michael (1993) Malign Neglect: Homelessness in an American city (San Francisco,
Jossey-Bass).
Young, Iris Marion (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
Young, Iris Marion (2002) Lived Body vs. Gender: Reections on social structure and subjectivity,
RatioNew Series, 15(4), pp. 410428.
ABSTRACT TRANSLATION
Paisajes en los margines: genero y la falta de vivienda
Resumen E
sta
discusio n se sigue por un analisis detallado de los procesos que determinan como
las mujeres que reciben asistencia econo mica se hacen diferente negativamente
y se situ an in relacio n a vivienda y hogar. Aqu utilizo entrevistas con mujeres que
reciban asistencia provincial econo mica por el ODSP (Ontario Disability Support
Program, Programa de Asistencia para Discapacitados de Ontario).
The Dialectics of Differencing 417
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
P
o
n
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
a
d
J
a
v
e
r
i
a
]
a
t
2
0
:
1
9
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
Care and the Lives of Homeless Youth in Neoliberal Times
in Canada
FRAN KLODAWSKY*, TIM AUBRY** & SUSAN FARRELL