089 003 420
e motion show tha dcipinary chrge have been e w he appropiate uorty, or f not, aequately expa wy o.
Second, e ien "mut so sow hat e or se w prejuce by te actons or inacton of couse.
See Mater of Asaad, 23
t case, the respondent as cope w te proceur requremets of
Mater f Lozda, supra
As to te isue of prejudce, e responen cais hat e hi sposor prove al of te ifotio needed to comete he Avt of Suppor pror to te Marc
e. n his response, pror coue umte eence sowi at e ponor fe o im, inter aa, a
o her prior year's
re empoyment leer.1 However, pror cousel cms at r varou reaso s foato was suce o complee e Aa of Suppo. Aon w his oto e responent has proved a aavt om he sposor. n er adavi, e sosor states e was tod by pror cousel tat he hd receved her ocumens d t he was ong to le he Adavt of Spor bere the net eing. u, the reective cs n re to i ponor y the respoden ror cone e n conriction. e respoet so asers ou is motio tat he provde pror coe wi i etre e om previous couse bere the Marc
tis red, pror cose tate is reponses to bo he repodet and the bar ocis a he i ot recive e le ti aer te Mch
proceedig. or his p, e repoent proved a f e sent to pror coue om detetion on Feby
stae hat, aong wi ht , e d over h ene e. Wie he f ubmtted wa oly a pae en, t rers o a pore previous fa, on he next pae s eter dte ebrry
aying hereby f o you he responents convicon recors. Agai, as o ts ssue, e respective cams by e reponent prior counse e n coaicio. e responent so sers tha pior conse avse m at cour appece by h eses were not necessy on Marc
on e sis of a request r a cotiuce.
Respondents Moton a
regar, te respodent a provied av om tese weses statig ter ndetain at rior coune ad iicae at tey nee no aten te Mc
eg. owever, pior couse spes is clam vorosly n hs reponses, aserig a he wou never advise cien ts way becuse he coul ver kow a Immigraon Juge wo in ct ant a connuace. Aa, e cts o e sse e n spute. Under these circstce, we cocue tat r puoe of te insta ppeal d otion, e responent has me his burde of estashn a
ineective stce of couse cam, reqn remd to the mmaon Juge to deee te ut n red to e vrous sue caims by bot e reponent d prior counse.
ts regar, o remd, te mion de o deveop the recor an n cs ernent to e neectve
Aou e epoyet eer appenty not on eerhead d there o expct ication of e tite of e person who ed the documen, tere is a business aes a te boo of te eer e nottion
ppe e o he aory' e, which my icate a tie or osito
Cite as: David Kirwa Kurgat, A089 003 420 (BIA Apr. 25, 2014)