Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Juan Ignacio Ruela, A077 485 879 (BIA May 5, 2014)

Juan Ignacio Ruela, A077 485 879 (BIA May 5, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 461|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) terminated proceedings upon finding the respondent had not been sentenced to at least one year in prison for his forgery conviction under Ga. Code. 16-9-1(b). The Board took administrative notice of an order from the state trial judge clarifying that the respondent’s entire sentence was to be served on probation. The decision was written by Member Anne Greer and joined by Member John Guendelsberger and by Member Roger Pauley.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) terminated proceedings upon finding the respondent had not been sentenced to at least one year in prison for his forgery conviction under Ga. Code. 16-9-1(b). The Board took administrative notice of an order from the state trial judge clarifying that the respondent’s entire sentence was to be served on probation. The decision was written by Member Anne Greer and joined by Member John Guendelsberger and by Member Roger Pauley.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Jul 02, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/21/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Rawclie, Fred (Rocky) 801
Rswell Rd. Ste. 300 Atlanta, GA 3050-704 Name: Ruea Juan gnacio
    Exv  
Ian
Rvw
   pp O    k
5107 Lbr P Suite 2000 Fl Chc,
V
2030
OHS/ICE ice f Chief Counsel SOC 146 CCAd. Lumpin, GA 31815 A 077-485-879 Date f this otice 5/5/2014
Eclosed s  cpy f the Bord's decis d der i the bove-reereced cse. Eclsure Pe Members: Greer Ae

Gueelsberger J Puey Roger A Scerely, Do Crr Cie Clerk
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Juan Ignacio Ruela, A077 485 879 (BIA May 5, 2014)
 
US am f Jsi
Executive Oce r Immigration Review Fas Chuch, Virnia
0530
Fe: A77 48 879 Lumpkin A
Decsion of the Bod ofmiation Appeals
Dat
MY   
n r JUN IGNACIO RELA ka Dnel
L.
Ruea a.a. Juan Fas N RMOVAL PROCEEDNGS APEL ON BEHLF  RESPOENT: Fed (Ro) Rwe Esqr CHRGE:  Noice Se. 237(a)(2)()(iii) I&N A [8 US.C§ 227(a)(2)()(i)] -Cvicted of gavaed on dned n section (a(43)() o he At APPLICATION Teminaton he espondnt apps th mmigraio Judg's aur 7 214 disio ding i rmovae s chrged and oderin his emoval o Mxico e proeedns w e tnated. The respondent chaenes the Imigraion udes rinatin that hs convition  rgey n voaon o the
 OAL CO O GORGA §
69-(b) was n ggvated on. h espondent ontends that he ona jugme, which eed e iposion of a sentence of 4 es onnement to be srvd ntiel on poation wh no a i ws amiguous. He sses that he subsunt ria o order laried hat e was t snd to an pod of onnen and pusuat to

of
CVg
23 I& N D. 9 (I 2) th or's cariato order is due l it nd credt As such te respondn gs ta h des not stand ovted under the t and s not removle r havin sustaind n agravated on ovicton. The Board reviews n Imirtion Judge's ndings o  inudin ndings s o e credbil of testimon unr th cel erroneous" sdard. 8 C..R. § 3.(d(3)(i) We eview e novo uestos o aw distion jugnt and al otr issus in appas o eisions ofmmgraton uges. 8 C..R § 3.(d(3)(i.
 gvate o s n n revt

 s a os rang to .. rgr   hih he te o mpsonnt s t ast on year" ecton 1(a)(43(R) o h Act s e maton ug oed t respondent inay s sentne o 4 ars' onnement ut ws peited o serve th senten on proation suet to ompian wi the genea d speal ondions o hs probato (.. at 3 Exh. 2 Jugent an Sentnc). The ia udge's Ooe 24 23 Ordr o Clr enene staed hat te respon's ngtiatd pa ad  a sentne o u (4) s ntie on poton wi no pod o connmn whatsov" with espt to all ur ey ots in the indicment to whh  respondn ped gui (Ex. 2 Iditment; Exh. 3 Od to Cai Snence). h ourt satd: Th deend ws an is
Cite as: Juan Ignacio Ruela, A077 485 879 (BIA May 5, 2014)
 
07 485 879 ereby enenced to r year 4 yer ic], nirly o proaion, with no perio of connement whatoever, wh all oher  d condiio of e ennce o rain te ame on Coun, One, Two, Three, ad Four" The order wa daed nunc pro

o e orignal tencing date of October 6, 010 Ex  Order to Clari Setece. The Immigraion Judge etermied ha e cling order dd not operae o limiae e reponden' probationary ennce and made no mion of reucing or eiinaig e originally eumrae 4ye peo of connemt I.J at 3 e concluded ha he claricaion irored he eec of he aguage n he oigin ude whch w to upend he ennce in vor of probao o long a e reponen copie wih e e; ohwie probaion coud e revokd ad he rpode could be cod r ay poion of h origi 4ye te
(d.)
Addiioaly, obeving tha
§
69, the eorgia aory provion govng punen r he reponden' oee, mandae a prio erm of a lea 1 year, h Immigration Judge und a he repondn had no been eneced o a peio of aih probaion without coneen
(d
at 4 Te Immigration Judge concudd ha he reoden ad een entence to 4 yer' coneme wih l 4 ye to be evd on proaion
(id.
a 5. We need no reove whehe or not the mmigraon Judge' deination wa proer, becaue wih i appeal he repoden a ubed the trial judge Ordr to Coec Scrivener' Eor " The orer, daed Februay 6, 014, recie he erm of probaion impoed r eac of he repondn cimial convicion  ate in relvan par a e Cou did no nor doe i now ipoe any icceraion or conneme whaoever upon h an." We take aminiaive notice of e ia udge ordr, which ke clr at e reponn wa no enenced to any priod of cnement 8 C.FR.
§
1003d3iv. hen a cou doe not order a period of incarceraon an te upend i, bu iad impo proaon drecy, he convicton i not an aggravated lony'
Ud S
v.
GmB
6 F.3 19, 10 h Cir. 000 Since e repondent wa not convicted of a rgey oe r which the  of iprioen wa a lea 1 year, e wa ot convicd of an agravae ony prua o ecion 0a43R of e Ac. In te abence of uch a covicion, h repodnt i no removale a charged. Conequntly, thee proceedig wil be einaed. Accordingly, te llowing orr wil e enered ORER e Immigraion Judge January 17, 04, order i vacaed FRHR OER: The proceding are terminaed
Cite as: Juan Ignacio Ruela, A077 485 879 (BIA May 5, 2014)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->