Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Chan vs. Ellis: GA Court of Appeals Ruling

Chan vs. Ellis: GA Court of Appeals Ruling

Ratings: (0)|Views: 200|Likes:
Chan vs. Ellis: GA Court of Appeals Ruling. Transfer appeal to GA Supreme Court.
Chan vs. Ellis: GA Court of Appeals Ruling. Transfer appeal to GA Supreme Court.

More info:

Published by: ExtortionLetterInfo.com on Jul 03, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Court of Appealsof the State of Georgia
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A14A0014. CHAN v. ELLIS.
After this appeal was docketed, but before the parties filed their briefs,appellant Matthew Chan filed a motion to transfer the appeal to the Supreme Courtof Georgia, asserting that the appeal raised constitutional issues under that court’sexclusive jurisdiction. This court denied that motion on the ground that the appeal did“not challenge the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional provision.Accordingly, it does not appear
at this juncture
that subject-matter jurisdiction is proper in the Supreme Court.” (Emphasis supplied.)The entire record and the briefs of the parties and of amicus curiae, however,have raised significant and novel constitutional issues addressing the interplay of theFirst Amendment and the wide dissemination of information made possible by theinternet, particularly with respect to the issuance of a permanent protective order andthe trial court’s broad discretion to bring about the cessation of conduct constitutingstalking. As the briefs also make clear, the appeal raises issues of first impression inGeorgia, and there is very little if any directly applicable law in other jurisdictions.Therefore, while the appeal does not “draw in question” the constitutionality of anystatute within the meaning of Ga. Const. of 1983, Art VI, Sec. VI, Para. II (1), it is acase “involving the construction of . . . the Constitution of the State of Georgia or of the United States” within the meaning of that provision.Accordingly, this appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court.
July 02, 2014

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->