Part 1Particle CoherenceIn the standard model, we have predictions that are based on why they have themass they have, but the predictions soon manifest themselves into a strangeparadoxical question: Why these certain masses, and not the other quantities? Inquantum physics this is called the Heirarchy Problem. Another problem, which seemswithin the midst of the Heirarchy Problem, is why the particles we observe havethe properties of coherence.Coherence of particle behaviour is quite simple. It is a measure itself of how thefundamental particle cohere together to present the quantum actions which takeplace everyday, such as entanglement, matter-antimatter collisions cohere to makequantum energy again, particles also cohere very efficiently when exchangingenergy, and even those which come together to create the nuclei of atoms; thereare many coherence examples in quantum physical transactions. But the essentialquestion right now is, what makes these particles so interactive? Why do most ofthe baryonic matter we see today work in the way they do?Some might hypothesize that the particle masses and their uncanny ability to workin harmony is a sign that something in the distant past corrected these values tocreate the universe we inexorably observe today. Indeed, we could have had one ofthose impobable universes where particle masses where extremely obscure, wherematter found it difficult to perturbate natural coherences among the manyparticles of the standard model. It also raises the question of course, how muchcoherence there really is. With the hypothetical discovery of dark matter, thereseems to be a fundamental breakdown on large distances concerning coherence. Itmay not necessrily have anything to do with the large distances involved, thoughwhilst that remains a putative arguement against a contending theory thatrelativity fails on large distances, but rather was to highlight the fact that ifcoherent particles exist in our part of the galaxy in their magnitude, thengreater parts of the universe have inevitably been created with particles in anot-so-coherent-state; afterall, dark matter covers nearly 30% of all unseenmatter, unseen because they fail to cohere correctly with the electromageticfluctuations.How efficient then was the universe to have particles cohere accordingly?It stands to reason that just because there are large area's which show adecadence in coherent abilities, may actually have been ''designed'' (1) - we livein a small portion of the universe. Atleast only 1% of all spacetime actuallyconstitutes real matter, and there are about 10^80 particles in the observableuniverse. The very chances that our universe appeared in the conditions they havetoday is about 10^10^123 to 1. Even for the correct enzymes for life to appear ison the accord of 10^40,000 to 1 that it be all by chance (ref 1).On the grand scale of the universe, where dark matter pervaids the unseen thereare still clumps of real matter we can observe, and they are scattered throughoutthe universe in their large galactic steller systems. We are not entirely sure howdark matter influenced the early universe and we are undecided how important darkmatter is today to the structure of the universe, simply because we know so littleabout it, other than showing gravitational forces where their should not be any,indicating that the fundamental particles of dark matter cease to cohere with thefundamental particle of the photon; on another note, if there had been no darkmatter, is it possible that the universe would not have progressed efficiently asit has today? You may have come to realize, that i am trying to show the possibleimportance of dark matters appearance within spacetime, even though it has a
Leave a Comment