IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICOFRONT RANGE EQUINE RESCUE,,
Plaintiffs,vs. No. 1:13-CV-00639-MCA-RHS
TOM VILSACK, Secretary U.S.Department of Agriculture,
is before the Court on Plaintiffs’
Notice of Motion and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction; Memorandum of Pointsand Authorities in Support Thereof
[Doc. 5]. Having considered the submissions, therelevant case law, the oral argument of the parties, and otherwise being fully advised inthe premises, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion in part, in that it grants Plaintiffs’ motionfor a temporary restraining order.The decision to grant a temporary restraining order is within the Court’s discretion. See Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. Stovall, 341 F.3d 1202, 1205 (10th Cir. 2003). Toobtain a temporary restraining order “the moving party must demonstrate: (1) a likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a likelihood that the movant will suffer irreparable harm inthe absence of preliminary relief; (3) that the balance of equities tips in the movant’sfavor; and (4) that the injunction is in the public interest.” Attorney Gen. of Oklahoma v.
Page 1 of 7