Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Obama's Lack of Constitutional Eligibility-The 3 Enablers-20091130 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly-Pg 9

    Uploaded by

    puzo1
    23K views1 page
    30 Nov 2009: This "The 3 Enablers" ad shows us who are the three enablers in our American system of government who are permitting Obama's usurpation of the Office of the Presidency in violation of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Obama was born a British Subject under British Nationality Laws since his father was a British Subject in 1961 and was only visiting the USA. Obama's father was never a U.S. Citizen, nor even an immigrant to the USA. Just like McCain is a U.S. Citizen because when he was born in Panama his father was a U.S. Citizen, Obama was a British Subject when born since his father was a British Subject. How can a person who is born a British Subject ever be considered a "natural born Citizen" of the USA? The answer is simple, he cannot. The founders of our Republic and the framers of our Constitution intended that a "natural born" Citizen is without any doubt a person born in the country to parents who are both Citizens of the country when their child is born. That was also confirmed in a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 1874 named Minor vs Happersett. Most American citizens are natural born Citizens. Obama's father was never a Citizen of the USA. Thus, Obama is NOT a "natural born Citizen" of the USA. The ancient Asian proverb depicted by the Chimps in the See, Hear, and Speak no Evil poses is classically known in the USA to depict situations where people are turning a blind eye to the obvious. The ad depicts the situation we are in where the Congress is turning a blind eye and will not "look" at or investigate the merits of the charges. The Courts will not "hear" in a trial the merits of the charges. And the Main Stream Media will not "talk" about the merits of the charges and discuss the Constitutional issues involved with the American people nor will they dig into Obama's sealed and hidden early life records. Their ignoring the questions and concerns of the People in this matter endangers our liberty by demonstrating that those in power, once in power feel they do not have to obey the Constitution and/or listen to the People. For more details about the lawsuit see: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/ http://www.protectourliberty.org/

    Original Title

    Obama's Lack of Constitutional Eligibility-The 3 Enablers-20091130 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly-pg 9

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    30 Nov 2009: This "The 3 Enablers" ad shows us who are the three enablers in our American system of government who are permitting Obama's usurpation of the Office of the Presidency in violation of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Obama was born a British Subject under British Nationality Laws since his father was a British Subject in 1961 and was only visiting the USA. Obama's father was never a U.S. Citizen, nor even an immigrant to the USA. Just like McCain is a U.S. Citizen because when he was born in Panama his father was a U.S. Citizen, Obama was a British Subject when born since his father was a British Subject. How can a person who is born a British Subject ever be considered a "natural born Citizen" of the USA? The answer is simple, he cannot. The founders of our Republic and the framers of our Constitution intended that a "natural born" Citizen is without any doubt a person born in the country to parents who are both Citizens of the country when their child is born. That was also confirmed in a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 1874 named Minor vs Happersett. Most American citizens are natural born Citizens. Obama's father was never a Citizen of the USA. Thus, Obama is NOT a "natural born Citizen" of the USA. The ancient Asian proverb depicted by the Chimps in the See, Hear, and Speak no Evil poses is classically known in the USA to depict situations where people are turning a blind eye to the obvious. The ad depicts the situation we are in where the Congress is turning a blind eye and will not "look" at or investigate the merits of the charges. The Courts will not "hear" in a trial the merits of the charges. And the Main Stream Media will not "talk" about the merits of the charges and discuss the Constitutional issues involved with the American people nor will they dig into Obama's sealed and hidden early life records. Their ignoring the questions and concerns of the People in this matter endangers our liberty by demonstrating that those in power, once in power feel they do not have to obey the Constitution and/or listen to the People. For more details about the lawsuit see: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/ http://www.protectourliberty.org/

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    23K views1 page

    Obama's Lack of Constitutional Eligibility-The 3 Enablers-20091130 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly-Pg 9

    Uploaded by

    puzo1
    30 Nov 2009: This "The 3 Enablers" ad shows us who are the three enablers in our American system of government who are permitting Obama's usurpation of the Office of the Presidency in violation of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Obama was born a British Subject under British Nationality Laws since his father was a British Subject in 1961 and was only visiting the USA. Obama's father was never a U.S. Citizen, nor even an immigrant to the USA. Just like McCain is a U.S. Citizen because when he was born in Panama his father was a U.S. Citizen, Obama was a British Subject when born since his father was a British Subject. How can a person who is born a British Subject ever be considered a "natural born Citizen" of the USA? The answer is simple, he cannot. The founders of our Republic and the framers of our Constitution intended that a "natural born" Citizen is without any doubt a person born in the country to parents who are both Citizens of the country when their child is born. That was also confirmed in a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 1874 named Minor vs Happersett. Most American citizens are natural born Citizens. Obama's father was never a Citizen of the USA. Thus, Obama is NOT a "natural born Citizen" of the USA. The ancient Asian proverb depicted by the Chimps in the See, Hear, and Speak no Evil poses is classically known in the USA to depict situations where people are turning a blind eye to the obvious. The ad depicts the situation we are in where the Congress is turning a blind eye and will not "look" at or investigate the merits of the charges. The Courts will not "hear" in a trial the merits of the charges. And the Main Stream Media will not "talk" about the merits of the charges and discuss the Constitutional issues involved with the American people nor will they dig into Obama's sealed and hidden early life records. Their ignoring the questions and concerns of the People in this matter endangers our liberty by demonstrating that those in power, once in power feel they do not have to obey the Constitution and/or listen to the People. For more details about the lawsuit see: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/ http://www.protectourliberty.org/

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    9/

    ADVERTISEMENT

    OBAMA’s Lack of Eligibility

    CONGRESS COURTS MEDIA

    Obama is NOT an Article II Natural Born Citizen


    and therefore is NOT Eligible to be President
    The President and CINC of the USA Must be a “Natural Born” Citizen — U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5

    No Person except a The Law of Nations, Per the British Nationality

    MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2009 // THE WASHINGTON TIMES


    Vattel, 1758. Act of 1948, Obama when
    natural born Citizen, or
    born in 1961 was a British
    a Citizen of the United Used by Ben Franklin, John Jay,
    Subject at birth.
    States, at the time of George Washington, and others.
    the Adoption of this Obama’s Father was NOT
    Vol.1, Ch.19, Section 212:
    a U.S. Citizen, nor was he
    Constitution, shall be
    “natural-born citizens, are an Immigrant to the USA,
    eligible to the Office those born in the country, nor was he even a Permanent
    of President of parents who are citizens” Resident of the USA.

    Obama, the Putative U.S. President, was Born a British Subject Governed by the British Nationality
    Act of 1948, and is Currently also a British Protected Person and/or a British Citizen to this Day.
    How can a person who is born a British Subject be considered a Natural Born Citizen of the USA?

    If you would like to help with this lawsuit, please contact Mario Apuzzo, Esq., 185 Gatzmer Avenue, Jamesburg NJ 08831
    Email: apuzzo@erols.com • TEL: 732-521-1900 • FAX: 732-521-3906 • BLOG: http://puzo1.blogspot.com • http://www.protectourliberty.org

    Paid for by: American people donating funds at ProtectOurLiberty.org in support of the Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al lawsuit.

    You might also like