QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
A
TENEO
C
ENTRAL
B
AR
O
PERATIONS
2007
Table 1. VALIDITY AND EFFECT OF LEGACY
VALIDITY AND EFFECT OF LEGACYThing owned in part by testator
(Art. 929)
General Rule: Conveys only interest or part owned bytestator
Exception
:
if testator otherwise provides – 1. He may convey more than what he owns - the stateshould try to acquire the part or interest owned by otherparties. If other parties are unwilling to alienate, theestate should give the legatee/devisee the monetaryequivalent (analogy with Article 931)2. He may convey less than what he owns (Article 794)
Thing owned by another
(Arts. 930-931)
General Rule:
1.
If testator ordered acquisition of the thing -
theorder should be complied with. If the owner is unwillingto part with the thing, the legatee/devisee should begiven the monetary equivalent2. If testator
erroneously believed that the thingbelonged to him
- legacy/device is void
Exception:
if testator acquire the thing onerously orgratuitously after making of the disposition, dispositionis validated
3. If testator knew that the thing did not belong to himbut did not order its acquisition -
code is silent butdisposition should be considered valid - there is animplied order to acquire and doubts must be resolvedin favor of intestacy
Thing already owned to thelegatee/devisee
(Arts 932-933)
1. If thing already
belonged to legatee/devisee
at timeof execution of will – legacy/devise is void2. If thing was
owned by another person
at time ofmaking the will and thereafter it is acquired bylegatee/devisee:a. If testator erroneously believed that he owned thething – legacy /devise is voidb. If testator was not in error – i. If thing was acquired onerously by L/D – L/D entitled to be reimbursedii. If thing was acquired gratuitously by L/D – nothing is due3. If thing was
owned by testator
at time will was madeand L/D acquired the thing from him thereafter – law issilent*Balane – L/D deemed revoked*Tolentino – no intention to revoke (BUT if the testatorhas not alienated the thing directly to the L/D, but to a3
rd
person and the former just acquired it from thelatter, there is an intention to revoke)
Leave a Comment
thank you so much for sharing your notes.
=)