Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Ricardo Fonseca-Haro, A097 369 036 (BIA May 27, 2014)

Ricardo Fonseca-Haro, A097 369 036 (BIA May 27, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,275 |Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record for further consideration of the respondent's assertion that he was admitted to the United States pursuant to Matter of Quilantan, 25 I&N Dec. 285 (BIA 2010), by being waived through at a port of entry. The Board rejected the DHS’s argument that the respondent’s testimony alone was insufficient to satisfy his burden of proof, but stated that the immigration judge could require the submission of reasonably obtainable corroborating evidence on remand. The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland and joined by Member Anne Greer and Member Roger Pauley.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record for further consideration of the respondent's assertion that he was admitted to the United States pursuant to Matter of Quilantan, 25 I&N Dec. 285 (BIA 2010), by being waived through at a port of entry. The Board rejected the DHS’s argument that the respondent’s testimony alone was insufficient to satisfy his burden of proof, but stated that the immigration judge could require the submission of reasonably obtainable corroborating evidence on remand. The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland and joined by Member Anne Greer and Member Roger Pauley.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Jul 09, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/12/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Canaes, Cynthia, Esq Canaes
&
Canals P C
114
Mesa Park D,
#
 Paso
TX 7991
Name: FNSECAHAR, RICARD
   
Executive Oce r Imigration Review
Board o mmigraton Appels Oce o he erk
5107 Lebg Pik St 2000 Fals Churc, Vgna 20530
OHS/ICE ice of Chef Couse -ELP
14
Haws Blvd. El Paso,
X 799
 A
97-696
Date of ths notce:
 /7/14
Eclosed is a copy of the Bord's decsion and order  he above-rerenced case. closure
P Mb: G, A  Wdd Ld  y Rg
Scerely,
D
c
t
Donna Ca Chief Clerk
 : k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Ricardo Fonseca-Haro, A097 369 036 (BIA May 27, 2014)
 
.·
US Depament of Justce
Executive Oe
r
Immigration Reiew Dson f  Board  mmn Appals Fals Chuh, Vga
0530
Fie: A97 369 036 -E Po, TX In re: RICARDO FONSECAO  REMOVL PROCEEGS APPEAL ON BEALF OF SPONDENT: Cyna Cales, Esquire ON BEHAL OF DH CHGE: Lorely Ramrez avez Assis Cief Counse ate
MA Y
2
7 2014
 Notie: e.  21 2(a)(6)(A)(i), I&N t [8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)()()(i)] Present witou being admited o oed (ud)· APLICAION: Adjusent of ss e esodent, a native ad itizen o Mexio, ppeas om e atio Jdges  Noveme 3, 211, eision, ing
h
removabe  harge  sutorily ineigbe to  prse ajusent o stas d seio 245() of e Imigrtion and Natona A (A), 8 U.SC. § 25()Hs aeal w be sed  e reord wil be remde r er  proeedings ossent wi s esio. We review ndings o t iudig reii nings, r e eor.
See
8 CR. § 03.()(3)();
see lso Mer of J-YC-,
 24 &N De 26 (BI 207);
Mae of H-
 23 &N e 462 IA 202) We review quesios of aw diseion, o jugmet, a a oter isses de novo.
See
8 C.F.R. § 03.()(3)(ii) Te resonde was ged t eing resent wiou

being dmited or oed, t e me bere e Iiaton uge d he reiterates o ape that e was admited to  e nied States we he was waved rog  po o en (J. at 2; Tr. t 23, 36-37  Res Brief a 2). I sustainig e arge, the ation Jdge onlue  a maer ofaw at  idividu wavd oug at  po o e has ot een admed He did ot allow e respodent o tes to ovide er detals egadng e irumstes o is etry
(I.J
at 2 Tr. a 37). on de ovo eview, w isagree wih the Iiatio dges ega olusion at  idivid waved oug at a o of eny as not been adted
(I.J
at 2) sead, as we ed i
Mtte f Quint
 2 &N e 2 (BIA 20) where aien is peied to enter e United Ses ae e as eseed himsef  insetio d mae no ase  to Unted Sates itzensip, the ie as bee admied bease te setion stises he
Cite as: Ricardo Fonseca-Haro, A097 369 036 (BIA May 27, 2014)
 
A097 369 036 emen of procedral reguly
See d.
at 29093
 ee ao Mae of Aegn
 &N Dec 308 B 980).  t cos of eded poceedg e eponent ll be aorded  oppoy  o esti  bit ny oter peinent edece egdig e ct d circmstce ondng hi eny owever h ains e bde o proo  demonrating at h wa waved ro a a po o y d  amied in overcomg e cge of inadmbiity ceny conained on te Noce o ppe
See
econ 20(c)(2)(B) o e Act 8 SC § 229a(c)2)B); 8 R § 200
s regard we e pesaded y  Depment o Hoed Secriy (DS) applate eron hat emd of te ecord i ecesy becaue he reodet dd not ave y cooboratg evdce o  e o entry a e  tie of te prio eg d cnoc y h bude of proof ith hs ot ye provided)  eioy on HS Bief at 3) Inea
Ma e f Qanan pa
 e respondent appety dd ot peen y docueny evdece coroboratg he claim of a aveou adsion b h cied hr buen o proof whee e c sodig hr ny were und  to be diped
See d
at 293 Fr even n e presence of a ctu dipte  miation uge ha the auhoi o detee ha cedil d perive esmoy that r to specic cts sces o cry a repoden' bden of proo ho e aio  Jdge veheles may eie e povion o eonaby obna coroboaon hee uch  ud appropae de e picl circmce
Cf
secio 20( c )( 4 )B) o e c eg to requieent  sstanng brde to eabi elgibiliy  ele o reoval) Becaue reovabiliy i till a isue we decine to reach te responde' gume egding is potei eligbiy r adment o sa or y or  of eief om eoval (.Ja 2 Notic of  ppea; Rep Brif a 23) ccordingly  lloing orde wil b eteed OER e repondent app  n RER ODR: he rcod  red  e proceedings conitent  s oe  r  ey of a new decion
2
Cite as: Ricardo Fonseca-Haro, A097 369 036 (BIA May 27, 2014)

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->