High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
U.S. District Courtfor the District of Columbia Case No. 1:08-cv-02254 JR Court of Appeals Case No. 09-5080
Consolidating No. 09-5161
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
_____________
Ο
_____________
GREGORY S. HOLLISTER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,v.
BARRY SOETORO, et al,
Respondents – Appellees. _____________
Ο
_____________
CORRECTEDEMERGENCY MOTION OF LAWRENCE J. JOYCE, ESQUIRE andPHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE TO FILE A BRIEF
AMICUS CURIAE
INSUPPORT OF APPELLANTS HOLLISTER AND HEMENWAY,SUPPORTING REVERSAL
_____________________
Lawrence J. Joyce, Esquire1517 N. Wilmot Road,Suite 215Tucson, AZ 85712D.C. Circuit Bar No. 52501(520) 584-0236
As In Pro Se Amicus for himself and as Attorney for Amicus,
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
Case: 09-5080 Document: 1217859 Filed: 11/27/2009 Page: 1
i
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage(s)
TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………..………….iTABLE OF AUTHORITIES………………………………………………..…..ii-iiiI. Rule 29 Considerations……………………….……...……………..1-2II. Background…………………………………………………….….2-17A. Interest of Lawrence J. Joyce, Esquire…………….…….....2-14B. Interest of Philip J. Berg, Esquire…………………...…….14-17III. Contents of The Brief……………………………………………17-20A. Barnett v. Obama………………………………………….17-20B. Additional Materials in the Brief……………………………..20CONCLUSION………………………………………………………….………..21CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 32(a)…………………..…22Attachment Number OneErratum and Appellant Hollister’s Reply Brief.......…Attachments 1-1 through 1-42Attachment Number TwoApril 3, 2009 Letter from Robert Bauer to John D. Hemenway……Attachment 2-1ARGUMENT…………………………………………………….………...…... 1-20CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE……………………….………………………..23-24
Case: 09-5080 Document: 1217859 Filed: 11/27/2009 Page: 2
ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIESPage(s)CasesUnited States Supreme Court
Roe v. Wade
, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)………………………………………………..20
Sosna v. Iowa
, 419 U.S. 393 (1975)………………………………………………18
Court of Appeals: All Other Circuits
Wiley S. Drake, et al v. Barack H. Obama, et al
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Case No. 09=56827…………………1
United States District Court
Barnett v. Obama,
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10126 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2009)………….1, 16, 17, 18, 19
N.O.W. v. Scheidler,
510 U.S. 249 (1994)………………………………....………4
Martin v. Wilks
, 490 U.S. 760 (1989)…………………………………...…..…..…4
Marbury v. Madison
, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)..………………………..…...18
Bender v. Williamsport Area School Dist
., 475 U.S. 534 (1986)…………....……17
Andrus v. Charlestone Stone Products, Inc.
, 436 U.S. 604 (1978)……..……..….17
Berg v. Obama,
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24804 (3d Cir. Pa. Nov. 12, 2009)…..…15
Berg v. Obama
, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509 (E.D. Pa. 2008)…………………….……...15
Case: 09-5080 Document: 1217859 Filed: 11/27/2009 Page: 3
Add a Comment