• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • 1
    CommentGo Back
Download
 
THE POWER ELITE PLAYBOOK 
PART 1
PROMOTING WAR
 
Deanna SpingolaSeptember 9, 2007Ever since Lincoln's "Civil War," America has been "transformed from alimited, constitutional government to a highly centralized welfare-warfare state."[1]War is allegedly initiated for "national security"reasons - "newspeak" for resource seizure and/or control bymultinational corporations/banks through their financial grip ongovernments. What! You think the United States would not participatein or condone plunder? The government plunders your pocket forinterest payments (AKA income tax) on their loans from the FederalReserve to finance all war-like activities, whether subversive or public!False pretenses for war include: civilize the uncivilized, spreaddemocracy, save foreign citizens from their selectively despicableleaders (those resistant to U.S. interests), eradicate slavery, attackthem before they attack us (media-induced fear), or fight Nazism,Communism, Fascism, terrorism, ___________ (fill in the blank). If those justifications fail, "false flag" operations are used - frequently againstU.S. citizens (The Maine, The Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, Northwoods Tonkin, 9/11). Corroborating "news," stipulated via the daily memo, iscombined with patriotic pro-war exuberance, contrived fear and subtlebut unmistakable ethnic denunciation is disseminated by numerous so-called "conservative" talking heads - nothing but Murdoch mouthpieces- indistinguishable except for personal characteristics.Unless deliberately distracted individuals ignore the pro-war monopolymedia's regurgitation of disinformation and misinformation andinvestigate the circumstances regarding U.S. invasions into othercountries, they are enslaved by apathetic ignorance and at the mercyof the corporate-owned, government-sanctioned Ministry of Truth andtheir fabricated federal fairy tales designed to manipulate us intoendless unconstitutional foreign "entanglements."In this subjective environment, anti-war sentiments are equivalent totreason. Alternative media voices are silenced by dismissals or showcancellations. A thorough review of historical specifics would eitherexpose government officials who, ignorant of the Constitution,specialize in serial stupidity or verify their treacherous adherence tothe banker's globalist agenda. Power-driven members in the threebranches of government either willingly acquiesce or act to prevent amedia-blitzing exposure of some abominable character flaw orbehavior by their well-informed, all knowing managers. Alternatives forelimination of the noble-acting, uncooperative include: assassinations,plane crashes, Watergating, or suicide by multiple gun shot wounds.
 
 The arrogant interventionist attitude necessitates the demonization of entire ethnic and philosophical groups - why else would otherwise goodpeople maim, rape or slaughter complete strangers - other humans?After World War II, many non Nazis were unaware of their government'satrocities in neighboring countries. Americans, calculatingly shockedby graphic newsreel images, readily hated all Germans for the Nazi'sethnic brutality. To incite our contemporary indignation, our monopolymedia promptly revealed unearthed bodies accredited to Hussein'sregime. In contrast, that same monopoly media conceals the graphicimages of returning body bags, slaughtered children, whitephosphorous-toasted cadavers, and the murdered family of thefourteen year old girl who was gang raped, murdered and then burnedand who knows what else.[2]Exposing these horrific images woulddetract from the globalist agenda of sustained warfare in the oil-richMiddle East.Governments are artificial entities, financed by international bankloans; they target "enemies," and whip up the populace, assisted byStallone-style Hollywood flicks that glorify "good wars." Well-placedpatriotic posters and ads focusing on the "war on terror" target specificaudiences. Some of those ads are financed byFreedom's Watch, withcommunications expert, Ari Fleischer, a dual U.S.-Israel citizen andformer Bush press secretary, as their spokesman. Currently his group ismounting a multimillion-dollar advertising campaign to urge congressand constituents to support the war and not "cut and run,"psychologically well-chosen words for a people who wish to radiatestrength.[3]Who else sponsors ads - the banker-backed Carlyle Group,Blackwater, or Halliburton - groups that apparently value money overlife? What motivates affluent groups like this who wield sufficientinfluence that citizens abandon all sensitivity to human life in favor of some well-marketed yet indefinite agenda?Despite consenting signatures, the Geneva Conventions need to bereestablished after the lastest horrors have been publically exposed;they do little to curb future atrocities. The conference in 1949 prohibitsreprisal killings, terrorizing entire populations, permanently displacingresidents, plundering and pillaging, physical abuse or torture, murder,corporal punishments, mutilation and medical or scientificexperiments, injuries against people due to race, nationality, religion orpolitical opinion. Those prohibitions should have covered Korea,Vietnam and our other post-war interventions. They didn't! It tookanother post-Vietnam Geneva Convention!Who benefits? In order to engage in contemporary no-win wars, thegovernment borrows money from the Federal Reserve resulting inincreased profits for the bankers. Lengthy no-win wars sustain profitsfor the power elite. Winning terminates the money siphoning machine.Militaristic minions, reinforced by CIA-style bureaucratic agencies,prevent or inhibit competition for available resources, depopulatecountries, destabilize economies, seize prime lands and resources,perpetuate government contracts to certain big business buddies, alter
 
social structure and culture, perpetuate hostility, provoke civil war(divide and conquer - the people kill each other) with both sidesfinanced and logistically supported, build permanent military bases inorder to execute additional assaults in the area, relocate populationsfor covert political purposes, transfer power and emotionally decimateand destroy families, the most essential social unit. Violence iswidespread - triggering forced migration. Iraqi families, who have beenexpelled from their homes, use refuse to erect makeshift shelters forprotection against the intense heat of the Middle East. War-wearyinnocent children play amongst heaps of garbage and drink and eatwhatever they can scavenge.[4]War is indiscriminate - everyonesuffers.Another function of foreign wars is chaotic national division anddistraction. Citizens are currently contending on prospectivepresidential candidates by who will prolong or end the war(s). The bestcandidate is the one who will protect us from our own government!While thus distracted we fail to recognize that our government is, infact, seizing our most fundamental liberties (Patriot Act) and combiningour country with Mexico and Canada, a finalizing step to the one worldgovernment. Continuous wars, since the Civil War, catapult us towardsthe same goal.Neither Vietnam nor Iraq was a threat to our "national security." Theongoing assault against the citizens of Iraq started long before March2003 or even 1991. This last invasion was premeditated and plannedlong before 9/11. Likewise - "the invasion of Vietnam was deliberateand calculated, as were policies and strategies that bordered ongenocide and were designed to force millions of people to abandontheir homes. Experimental weapons were used against civilians.Chemicals banned in the United States -- Agent Orange -- were used tochange the genetic and environmental order in Vietnam."[5]  The French, led by Louis-Napoleon, motivated by greedy economic andmilitary interests, first invaded the vulnerable Vietnamese in July 1857. They professed to have a "moral obligation," as a "superior culture," tocivilize the "uncivilized," a common Western justification for manyhostile invasions. Without sufficient weapons and national unity toresist the French, Emperor Tu Duc signed the Treaty of Saigon, a "peacetreaty," in June 1862 giving into the French demands which includedpayment of a large indemnity to France for its losses in attackingVietnam."[6]"Peace treaties" are habitually disingenuous, but standardprocedure - the antagonistic, armed invaders conquer and subjugatethe indigenous unarmed populace and belatedly proffer "peace," whilestripping them of their dignity and natural resources.A few citizens, friendly and helpful to the invading French, wererewarded with the forcefully-vacated residences of fleeing families, acommon practice. Valuables, personal or national, do not disappear -they merely change hands. Lands were also allotted to incomingFrench settlers, creating a "French-Vietnamese landholding class."[7] 
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...