Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Intern filing in Fox Searchlight intern case

Intern filing in Fox Searchlight intern case

Ratings: (0)|Views: 8 |Likes:
Published by Fortune
The plaintiffs-appellees brief in Eric Glatt, et al v. Fox Searchlight and Fox Entertainment in the Second Circuit, the case over unpaid internships
The plaintiffs-appellees brief in Eric Glatt, et al v. Fox Searchlight and Fox Entertainment in the Second Circuit, the case over unpaid internships

More info:

Published by: Fortune on Jul 16, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/16/2014

pdf

text

original

 
13-4478-cv
(
L
)
IN THE
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
E
RIC
G
LATT
, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,A
LEXANDER 
F
OOTMAN
, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, E
DEN
M.A
 NTALIK 
, D
AVID
B. S
TEVENSON
,
ANENE
G
RATTS
, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, B
RIAN
 N
ICHOLS
,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
 —against— F
OX
S
EARCHLIGHT
P
ICTURES
I
 NC
., F
OX
E
 NTERTAINMENT
G
ROUP
, I
 NC
.,
 Defendants-Appellants.
ON APPEALFROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICTCOURTFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICTOF NEWYORK 
BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES
d
ACHEL
B
IEN
A
DAM
T.
LEIN
J
UNO
T
URNER 
O
UTTEN
& G
OLDEN
LLP3 Park Avenue, 29th Floor  New York, New York 10016(212)245-1000
 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees
13-4481-cv(
CON
)
Case: 13-4478 Document: 122 Page: 1 06/27/2014 1259408 74
 
INTRO COUN STATE 
I.I
SUMM 
I.I
STATE 
I.I
DUCTIOER-STAMENT O Sum Clas
.
 ARY OF The Judg 
A.
 
B.
 The
.
Coll MENT O The
A.
 
B.
 Anta
.
 
A.
 
B.
 ..............EMENT THE Cary Judg and CollHE ARGourt Shoent to PlThe Dist The Dist ourt Shoctive Cert FACTS .
lack Swa
Eric Gla Alexand  lik and theTwo Inteand Impl Fox UseEmploye 
TABLE
................OF THE ISE ...........ent ........ctive CertUMENT .ld Affirmintiffs .....ict Court ict Court ld Affirmification .................. Plaintiff t ..............r Footma Certified rn Recruitemented Unpaid Ie Worklo
 
F CON
.................SSUES ......................................ification .................... the Distri.................Adopted tApplied t the Distri.................................. ................................ ...............Class and ers Oversniform Innterns to ds, and C
ENTS
................................................................................................
 
ct Court’s ................e Correcte Law Coct Court’s ................................................................................Collectivw Fox’s Iternship Peplace Pat Costs .........................................................................................................Grant of ................. Legal Starrectly ......Grant of ..................................................................................... ................nternship olicies ......id Worke.................................................................................................................ummary ................ndard .......................lass and ................................................................................................rogram ................s, Reduce ..................... 1 ..... 2 ..... 3 ..... 4 ..... 6 ..... 6 ..... 6 ..... 6 ..... 7 ..... 7 ..... 9 ..... 9 ..... 9 ... 10 ... 11 ... 11 ... 12 
Case: 13-4478 Document: 122 Page: 2 06/27/2014 1259408 74
 
ARGU 
I.I
 
C.
 
D.
ENT ..... The BroaRem 
A.
 
B.
 
C.
 This
.
Inter  
A.
Antalik Perform Fox ChaProgram
 
.................est Fox Pd Definitidial Goal
Portlan
Does No 1. UIt Tr  2.
P
B 3. T
 L
 This CoTest ....... The Pri Court Shoships ......The DOto the Su 1. wiTend Class d Productged Its UBecause ................roposes n of “Ems ..............
 Terminal
t Apply toder
Portl
eceived ainees’ W
rtland Te
neficiary e Court S
urelbrook 
rt Has No................ary Beneuld Adopt ................ Test Inc preme Coquiring Eth the FLst.............ii nd Collecive Work npaid Intef the Risk .................ould Imployee” an.................
 
’s Excepti Plaintiffs .
nd Termi
 No Immeork ...........
minal
 Did est ..........ould Not Decision .t Adopted .................iciary Testhe DOL’.................rporates trt’s Decich CriteriA’s Broa.................tive Memfor Fox’s rnship Pro that It W................rmissibly d Would ................n for “Tr ................
al
, an Ediate Adv................ Not End ................Follow th................Fox’s Pri................t Is Unmas Six Crit................e Criteriion in
Po
on to Be Coverag................ers Regul perationgram to a s Not Co................. Narrow thwart the .................inees” Is ................. ployer Mntage” fr .................rse a Pri................. Sixth Ci.................ary Bene.................ageable ...ria for Un................. that Wer 
tland Ter 
et Is Mo than a B.................arly ................
 
Paid  pliant .....................e FLSA’s Act’s ................arrow a................st Show tm the ................ary ................cuit’s ................ficiary ................................ paid ................ Essential
inal
 ........e Consistlancing ................... 13 ... 13 ... 15 ... 15 d ... 16 at ... 18 ... 21 ... 22 ... 23 ... 24 ... 26 ... 26 nt ... 28
Case: 13-4478 Document: 122 Page: 3 06/27/2014 1259408 74

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->