You are on page 1of 15

om

om
.c

.c
er

er
Introduction. Why Primark ?

rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
A company which has achieved superior performance in recent years is a Associated

FC

FC
British Foods Plc subsidiary called Primark . Primark opened its first store in June 1969 in
Ireland, where it operates at Penneys .Today it has a total of 193 stores operating in

D
tP

tP
Ireland, Spain, United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Portugal and Germany and is still
ar

ar
aggressively expanding. In the UK, where Primark has its maximum number of stores,
m

m
138, Primark is second to Asda¶s George in terms of the largest number of clothes sold by
.S

.S
volume, overtaking established reputed companies such as Marks&Spencer[1]. The
w

w
w

w
company has had excellent financial performance . It is reported that their profits have
w

w
increased by 10%[2] and sales increased by 20%[3] in the year 2009 ³even though each of
://

://
its three main markets were subject to recessionary pressure and a decline in consumer
tp

tp
ht

ht
confidence´[4]. Primark has won several awards each year since 2005 and its most recent
awards are ³Best Budget Store on the High Street at the GMTV High Street Fashion
Awards 2009 (awarded 7th May 2009), Retailer of the Year for the second year in
succession at the BCSC Gold Awards and Value Retailer of the Year at the Drapers

om
Record Awards.[5]´. Apart from this, Primark has also been successful in establishing its
brand name. Celebrities such as Katie Holmes have been spotted wearing its clothes[6]

.c
er
and they have also been featured in one of the worlds most premium fashion magazine

rt
Vogue[7].
ve
on
What is Primark doing right ?
FC
D

Currently Primark only operates in Europe where the retail apparel industry grew by 2.1%
tP

in 2008, valued at $420.9 billion and is further expected to be valued at $467.6 billion in
ar

2010, an increase of 11.1% since 2008[8].


m
.S
w
w
w
://
tp
ht

om

om
.c

.c
er

er
rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
FC

FC
D

Source -Apparel Retail in Europe. [Online].


tP

tP

(http://web.ebscohost.com/bsi/pdf?vid=4&hid=3&sid=71068cf1-fcbe-4437-a97d-
ar

ar

f3206b008999%40sessionmgr4). Reference Code: 0201-2005. 2009, September.


m

(Accessed 15 November 2009)


.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
Primark has numerous competitors such as New Look, H&M and TK Maxx although its

FC

FC
biggest competitor in the UK is Asda¶s clothing brand George. Primark has managed to
increase sales and make profits during a turbulent economic climate even when well

D
tP

tP
established brands like Next have not been able do so[9]. Primark adopts the µno-frills¶
ar

ar
strategy which many successful business in other industries like Ryan air have adopted.
m

m
They describe themselves as having ³a lean business which responds quickly in the
.S

.S
marketplace, has short lines of management, good buying and excellent distribution´[10].
w

w
w

w
Furthermore, unlike its competitors, Primark specifically targets people under the age of
w

w
35. These are the people who are the most fashion conscious. Primark has excellent µtime
://

://
to market¶ and it is said that it takes them a maximum of 6 weeks to get the latest trends
tp

tp
ht

ht
from the catwalks to the shop floors[11]. Primark has very clearly positioned themselves
as being at the absolute bottom end of the market in terms of prices unlike some of its
competitors such as Marks and Spencer which have mid range prices. Primark has a clear
marketing strategy where it provides the young generation with the trendiest clothes at the

om
lowest prices possible. This is further emphasized by its company slogan ³look good pay
less´

.c
er
rt
According to Porter[12] there are two ways a company can excel and make profits.
ve
Firstly, by the cost leadership strategy where a firm concentrates on having the lowest
on
prices in the industry or by differentiating themselves so that they can charge a premium.
FC

Primark very evidently adopts the strategy where it tries to keep its costs as low as
D

possible. Primark tries and effectively cuts costs at all stages of its supply chain. It out
tP

sources most of its supplies from oversees countries thus taking advantage of the low
ar

labor and land costs. Primark, due to its size, orders in bulk and thus benefits from
m
.S

economies of scale. It can respond quickly and effectively to the market due to its flat
w

management structure. Unlike other competitors Primark spends no money on advertising.


w

Primark then passes these costs savings to their customers. So far, this strategy has proved
w
://

effective.
tp
ht

om

om
.c

.c
er

er
rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
FC

FC
D

D
tP

tP
ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
Porters five forces

rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
³the state of competition in the industry depends on five basic forces´[13]. These forces

FC

FC
are represented in the diagram below.

D
tP

tP
ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht

om
.c
er
rt
ve
on
FC
D
tP
ar
m
.S
w
w
w

Source- Porter, M. How competitive forces shape strategy. [Online].


://

(http://web.ebscohost.com/bsi/pdf?vid=4&hid=103&sid=0269c0c7-a2fc-4828-92be-
tp
ht

9cf6b828cedc%40sessionmgr114) Harvard Business Review, Vol.86,(1), 2008. (Accessed


15 November 2009)
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
rt

rt

Michael porter has identified these five forces, which he says affect the competitiveness in
ve

ve

the industry. The way these forces interact with each other and their collective strength
on

on

determines the potential profit a firm can earn in an industry. It is essential that a firm
FC

FC

evaluates these forces and builds its corporate strategy keeping these forces in mind so
D

that it can defend itself from them or take advantage of them[14]. These forces have been
tP

tP

critically examined in the context of the retail apparel industry in Europe.


ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
Supplier power

rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
Primark mostly buys its supplies from oversees. Suppliers are clothing manufacturers. In

FC

FC
total they have more than 400 suppliers which are not individually very big in size[15]. As
we can see Primark has a vast database of suppliers and is hence not dependant on any one

D
tP

tP
them. In addition to this the cost of switching from one supplier to another is low as there
ar

ar
are a larger number of suppliers making fairly undifferentiated products. Hence their
m

m
suppliers are not powerful.
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht

om
.c
er
rt
ve
on
FC
D
tP
ar
m
.S
w
w
w
://
tp
ht

Source -Apparel Retail in Europe. [Online].


(http://web.ebscohost.com/bsi/pdf?vid=4&hid=3&sid=71068cf1-fcbe-4437-a97d-
f3206b008999%40sessionmgr4). Reference Code: 0201-2005. 2009, September.
om

om
(Accessed 15 November 2009)
.c

.c
er

er
rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
FC

FC
D

D
tP

tP
ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
Buyer power

rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
Buyers here are individual customers. In the value apparel industry products are

FC

FC
undifferentiated and substitutes can be found very easily. There is fierce competition.
Primark is competing with brands such as H&M, Asda¶s George, Tesco and many others

D
tP

tP
which are selling clothes at cut throat prices in order to attract customers. Hence Primark
ar

ar
cannot charge high prices as firstly their competitive advantage is that they can sell good
m

m
quality fashionable clothes at very low prices and secondly there are no switching costs for
.S

.S
customers. In this sector there is also very little or no brand loyalty. Hence we can say
w

w
w

w
there is high buyer power
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht

om
.c
er
rt
ve
on
FC
D
tP
ar
m
.S
w
w
w
://
tp
ht

om

om
.c

.c
er

er
rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on

Source -Apparel Retail in Europe. [Online].


FC

FC

(http://web.ebscohost.com/bsi/pdf?vid=4&hid=3&sid=71068cf1-fcbe-4437-a97d-
f3206b008999%40sessionmgr4). Reference Code: 0201-2005. 2009, September.
D

D
tP

tP

(Accessed 15 November 2009)


ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
New Entrants

rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
In the value apparel industry, there are several barriers to entry which is an advantage for

FC

FC
Primark. High entry and exit costs make it difficult for firms to enter. New firms can not
benefit from economies of scale, which is a key factor as a firm has to have low prices in

D
tP

tP
order to compete. In addition to this new firms wanting to enter the apparel industry
ar

ar
would not have the sufficient capital required for investing in research and setting up the
m

m
distribution channels. Research is crucial in order to keep up with trends, for example, due
.S

.S
to its size and financial resources Primark is able to have people travel globally to keep up
w

w
w

w
with the latest fashion worldwide . In addition to this set up costs are extremely high as
w

w
new firms would not have sufficient funds to have stores in prime locations in city centers
://

://
such as Primark . Recently ABF spent seventy million pounds on its new stores in
tp

tp
ht

ht
Netherlands, UK and Spain[16].

om
.c
er
rt
ve
on
FC
D
tP
ar
m
.S
w
w
w
://
tp
ht

om

om
.c

.c
er

er
rt

rt
ve

ve

Source -Apparel Retail in Europe. [Online].


on

on

(http://web.ebscohost.com/bsi/pdf?vid=4&hid=3&sid=71068cf1-fcbe-4437-a97d-
FC

FC

f3206b008999%40sessionmgr4). Reference Code: 0201-2005. 2009, September.


D

(Accessed 15 November 2009)


tP

tP
ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
Threat of substitution

rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
Typically in the 5 forces model Porters refers to a substitute as a product in another

FC

FC
industry .This would mean customer could buy directly from manufacturers. However the
substitutes here can also be seen as the vast number of competitors. There in no cost to

D
tP

tP
customers for switching to other brands. Customers will choose the brand which offers
ar

ar
them the best value for money. There is little brand loyalty in this industry. Brand loyalty is
m

m
typically seen in higher range designer wear.
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht

om
.c
er
rt
ve
on
FC
D
tP
ar
m
.S
w
w
w
://
tp
ht

om

om
Source -Apparel Retail in Europe. [Online].
(http://web.ebscohost.com/bsi/pdf?vid=4&hid=3&sid=71068cf1-fcbe-4437-a97d-
.c

.c
er

er

f3206b008999%40sessionmgr4). Reference Code: 0201-2005. 2009, September.


rt

rt

(Accessed 15 November 2009)


ve

ve
on

on
FC

FC
D

D
tP

tP
ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
Rivalry

rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
In this industry the players are all fairly large. Primark has many competitors like Tesco,

FC

FC
Asda¶s George and many more which offer similar products at equally low prices. Hence it
faces fierce competition because it is in a market with many players offering similar

D
tP

tP
products. The clothes can be seen as µperishable¶ as trends are constantly changing and
ar

ar
thus firms are desperate to get rid of stocks. Furthermore in this industry exit barriers are
m

m
high thus it is hard for a firm to leave. These factors make the competition very intense.
.S

.S
Recent figures show that ³Asda now leads the clothing market with a 10.1 percent share,
w

w
w

w
Primark follows closely with 9.9 percent and Marks & Spencer now sits in third place with
w

w
9.8 percent´[17]. These figures show how closely Primark is competing with other firms
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht

om
.c
er
rt
ve
on
FC
D
tP
ar
m
.S
w
w
w
://
tp
ht

om

om
Source -Apparel Retail in Europe. [Online].
.c

.c

(http://web.ebscohost.com/bsi/pdf?vid=4&hid=3&sid=71068cf1-fcbe-4437-a97d-
er

er
rt

rt

f3206b008999%40sessionmgr4). Reference Code: 0201-2005. 2009, September.


ve

ve

(Accessed 15 November 2009)


on

on
FC

FC
D

D
tP

tP
ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
rt

rt
ve

ve
After the firm analyses the five forces that effects the level of competitiveness in the

on

on
industry and their causes, the firm can identify its strengths and weaknesses and thus

FC

FC
position itself appropriately[18]. We see that the biggest negatives for Primark here are
that firstly, there are many competitors fighting for the same customers and secondly they

D
tP

tP
have no control over the prices they charge as they have to make sure their prices are very
ar

ar
competitive. Primark¶s strength is that so far they have been able to keep costs down due
m

m
to their excellent supply chain .
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
Marketing mix
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
³the marketing mix is the set of controllable tactical marketing tools that the firm blends to
produce the response it wants in the target market´[19]. It consists of the ³four p¶s´
which are product, place, price and promotion. We see that Primark has a very simple
marketing mix which relates to its simple marketing strategy.

om
Product

.c
er
rt
Primark mainly has fashionable apparel for people under 35. However they also sell
ve
accessories, footwear and home wear . Primark primarily focuses on women swear which
on
works to their advantage as statistics show that ³Womenswear sales dominated the
FC

European apparel retail industry in 2008,generating 54.4% of the industry¶s overall


D

revenues´[20]
tP
ar
m
.S
w
w
w
://
tp
ht

om

om
.c

.c
er

er
rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
FC

FC
D

D
tP

tP
ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
FC

FC
D

D
tP

tP
ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht

om
.c
er
rt
ve
on
FC

Source -Apparel Retail in Europe. [Online].


D
tP

(http://web.ebscohost.com/bsi/pdf?vid=4&hid=3&sid=71068cf1-fcbe-4437-a97d-
ar

f3206b008999%40sessionmgr4). Reference Code: 0201-2005. 2009, September.


m

(Accessed 15 November 2009)


.S
w
w

They describe their products as having ³Style, quality and affordable prices all rolled into
w

one´[21]. Primark gets their products specifically made for them and they have a family of
://

brands like Butler & Webb which has formal menswear, Active which has sports clothes
tp
ht

for boys, Atmosphere which has women swear, footwear and accessories and Early Days
which has baby wear to name a few.
om

om
Place
Primark sells to its customers through its own shops. They have 193 stores in total. It
.c

.c

mainly has its shops in prime locations like London¶s Oxford Street. This is a huge
er

er
rt

rt

advantage for them as it makes it very accessible for their target market, which is people
ve

ve

below 35.
on

on
FC

FC

Price
D

Primark uses cost leadership strategy, where they differentiate themselves from their
tP

tP

customers on the basis of their very low costs. Primark has super competitive prices.
ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
rt

rt
ve

ve
Promotion- Primark does not spend on advertising and promotion. Instead it depends on

on

on
its customers to spread the word and on the local press. They pass on the cost savings to

FC

FC
their customers.

D
tP

tP
SWOT
ar

ar
m

m
The SWOT analysis is used to critically evaluate what Primark¶s strengths and weaknesses
.S

.S
currently are, the opportunities they have and their potential threats.
w

w
w

w
w

w
Strengths
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
³Our buying power allows us to buy in bulk and we pass the cost savings back to the
customer. And we keep our overheads low wherever we can. With state-of-the-art
logistics systems our stores have up-to-the minute fashion, as soon as it reaches us.´[22].
Primark has successfully managed to deliver good quality, low price products to its

om
customers. As we can see above they have a cost saving strategy which allows them to do
so. Primark focuses on people under the age of 35, which helps them to differentiate

.c
er
themselves from their competitors like TK Maxx which offers ³designer labels for less´.

rt
Primark¶s biggest competitor in the UK is Asda¶s George .They currently hold the number
ve
1 position in terms of the volume of clothes sold[23]. However, Primark has an advantage
on
over them as they have their stores in prime locations whereas Asda usually has stores in
FC

the outskirts of cities.


D

Primark has over 400 1st tier suppliers which gives them a lot off flexibility and lowers
tP

their suppliers bargaining power. At the same time, the management states that ³Six out of
ar

our top 10 suppliers have been with Primark for a decade or more, as have nearly half of
m
.S

our top 50 suppliers and a quarter of our top 250 suppliers´[24]. The close relationship
w

they keep with their suppliers allows their suppliers to understand the requirements of
w

Primark and thus cater to them effectively. Less than 2% of these suppliers are in the UK
w
://

or Ireland while the rest are overseas. Thus Primark takes advantage of the low labor
tp

costs across the globe and at the same time has suppliers close by to cater to urgent
ht

fashion trends.
Furthermore, Primark has a research team going across the globe in order to find the latest
trends so that the can provide their target market with the most fashionable clothes. It
takes them only 6 weeks to get designs out of the catwalk on to their stores.
om

om
Primark so far has had positive cash flows and has profits increasing every year which
.c

.c

proves they are effectively catering to the market segment they have identified and that
er

er

they have the right systems in place. Moreover, they have continuously been winning
rt

rt

several awards each year since 2005 . They have won the value for money award by Prima
ve

ve

High Street Fashion Awards for 3 years in succession and the Retailer of the Year award
on

on

by BCSC Gold Awards 2 years in succession[25].


FC

FC
D

D
tP

tP
ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
Weaknesses

rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
Primark¶s biggest weakness is that it has been criticized for having unethical working

FC

FC
conditions. In 2005 it was called the least ethical clothes shop and ranked 2.5 out of 20 on
an ethical index[26]. In 2008, BBC exposed Primark, when it carried out an investigation

D
tP

tP
about its suppliers and found out that their oversees suppliers in countries such as India
ar

ar
were using child labor and had poor working conditions for the workers. Primark denied
m

m
having any knowledge of this and has since taken several steps to combat this issue.
.S

.S
It now has workshops and training sessions for its suppliers overseas. It has launched an
w

w
w

w
extranet service on ethical trading for oversees suppliers and has audits conducted of the
w

w
suppliers by their own managers and external organizations. In addition to this they have
://

://
joined several NGO¶s and is part of the Ethical Trading Initiative.
tp

tp
ht

ht
Primark does not engage in any advertising. This has not been a major disadvantage to
them so far as they have been able to pass on the money they save to their customers ,
however as competition is increasing and new firms are entering the market which are
aggressively advertising and promoting their brands, Primark might have to reconsider

om
their advertising strategy as this might be a disadvantage for them.
Primark focuses mainly on women¶s apparel and does not have as vast a range for

.c
er
menswear as a result they could lose customers to competitors.

rt
Primark does not have an online catalogue and does not have online shopping which is
ve
rare today and a big drawback for them as most of their competitors are already have it.
on
Another weakness is that Primark has a perception of being of poor quality and its
FC

competitors have repeatedly tried to differentiate themselves from Primark on this point.
D

For example Sir Stuart of Marks&Spencer said ³You cannot sell a T-shirt in the UK for
tP

£2 and pay the designer and pay for the raw materials and pay the manufacturer and pay
ar

the rents and pay the rates ... and pay a fair living wage to the person who made it. I won¶t
m
.S

sell a T-shirt for £2.´[27] and Mr Thompson from Asda stated that they were
w

concentrating mainly on improving their quality thus trying to distance themselves from
w

Primark[28].
w
://
tp

Opportunities
ht

Primark has been successful in establishing themselves as a good brand which is evident by
their financial success. They should take advantage of this and expand to other countries
and other continents. This is the right time as the world is trying to get out of recession
om

om
and thus people would look for cheap , good quality and fashionable clothing. This is the
.c

.c

period when people would be willing to try something new which is reasonably priced. In
er

er

better times perhaps people would be more reluctant to try something such as Primark as
rt

rt

it could be perceived as being cheap because it was of poor quality. Primark can take
ve

ve

advantage of the situation and get people used to the habit of buying low priced clothes
on

on

more often in order to keep up with trends. However, in doing this they must ensure that
FC

FC

they have systems and organization in place in the new markets, which can replicate their
D

success.
tP

tP
ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
Another big opportunity for Primark is to diversify. As they have already established

rt

rt
ve

ve
themselves they should try and cater to more peoples needs. Perhaps try and target the

on

on
older generation which they are not currently doing. They should also come out with other

FC

FC
ranges of clothes such as children¶s schools uniforms and bridal wear . It is said that Asda
was able to gain 1st position in the ranking of volume of clothes sold due the their ³back to

D
tP

tP
school range´[29]. They have also introduced women¶s bridal gown which is only 60
ar

ar
pounds[30].
m

m
.S

.S
Threats
w

w
w

w
w

w
Primark¶s main threat is that it has a lot of competition from well established names such
://

://
as Next, Marks&Spencer and H&M. In addition to this due to the sudden popularity of
tp

tp
ht

ht
low prices apparel there might be new entrants trying to get a share of the market or
already big clothes lines might make cheaper lines. Armani already has a cheaper line
called Armani exchange . This is not as low priced as Primark, however, customers might
be willing to pay a higher price due to the reputation Armani has. There could be a threat

om
to their business if a competitor who is perceived to be superior in quality can match their
prices. Primark has to constantly be innovating and differentiating themselves from others.

.c
er
Also, Due to their lack of advertising they might loose customers to their competitors

rt
ve
on
Conclusion and Primark¶s future
FC
D
tP

Primark¶s strategy has been clear so far and has worked very well for them. However,
ar

they need to consider how can they continue to be successful and further differentiate
m

themselves from their competitors. To achieve this the following steps are recommended.
.S

They must continue to improve their supply chain and vendor base to maintain cost
w

leadership and speed to market, be the first to bring the latest fashion and trends to the
w
w

market, fill the gaps in their portfolio e.g. clothes for men and older people, think about
://

advertising specially their new lines and in new markets, start an online business and
tp

implement and communicate to customers their efforts towards having the most ethical
ht

working conditions, concern for environment and human values. Furthermore, they must
expand to markets where they can replicate their model. They may not be able to expand
to developing and emerging markets as in these markets they may not have any
competitive advantage.
om

om
All in all, Primark has been extremely successful. As their chairman Martin Adamson said
.c

.c

³Primark, along with its competitors, operated in an extremely tough consumer


er

er
rt

rt

environment. It was nevertheless able to deliver excellent sales and profit growth
ve

ve

confirming that its merchandise and pricing are attractive in all market conditions"[30].
on

on
FC

FC
D

D
tP

tP
ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
Reference List

rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
FC

FC
1. Shoppers Turn From M&S To Primark And Asda. [Online].

D
tP

tP
(http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Business/Asdas-George-Takes-No1-Spot-In-Terms-Of-Volume-
ar

ar
Of-Clothes-Sold-Followed-By-Primark-And-MS/Article/200910215402674). 2009, October 09.
m

m
(Accessed 14 November 2009)
.S

.S
2. Teather, D. Primark profits increase despite recession. [Online].
w

w
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/apr/21/primark -announces-profit-rise). 2009, April 21.
w

w
(Accessed 14 November 2009)
w

w
3. Creevy, J. Value fashion retailer Primark has reported sales up 20% in the year to September 12,
://

://
with like-for-likes up 7%. [Online]. (http://www.retail-week.com/city/trading-update/primark-like-for-
tp

tp
likes-up-7/5007679.article). 2009, November 3. (Accessed 14 November 2009)
ht

ht
4. Creevy, J. Value fashion retailer Primark has reported sales up 20% in the year to September 12,
with like-for-likes up 7%. [Online]. (http://www.retail-week.com/city/trading-update/primark-like-for-
likes-up-7/5007679.article). 2009, November 3. (Accessed 14 November 2009)
5. 2009 Retailer of the Year Award. [Online].
(http://www.primark.co.uk/page.aspx?pointerid=f2dd40a4bb9c4769b76864659d6fedc0). 2009, May

om
08. (Accessed 18 November 2009)

.c
6. Katie Holmes Loves Primark. [Online]. (http://www.imnotobsessed.com/2008/08/08/katie-holmes-

er
loves-primark). 2008, August 08. (Accessed 14 November 2009)

rt
7. Gelb, M. Primark - king of no-frills fashion. [Online].
ve
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4466986.stm). 2005, December 02. (Accessed 15 November
on
2009)
FC

8. Apparel Retail in Europe. [Online]. (http://web.ebscohost.com/bsi/pdf?vid=4&hid=3&sid=71068cf1-


fcbe-4437-a97d-f3206b008999%40sessionmgr4). Reference Code: 0201-2005. 2009, September.
D
tP

(Accessed 15 November 2009)


ar

9. Thompson, J. Primark defies the downturn but grocery decline hits ABF. [Online].
m

(http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/primark-defies-the-downturn-but-grocery-
.S

decline-hits-abf-1630415.html}. 2009, February 24. (Accessed 15 November 2009)


w

10. In Practtice. [Online]. (http://www.primark.co.uk/Ethical/In_Practice). (Accessed 17 November


w

2009)
w

11. Frequently asked questions. [Online]. (http://www.primark.co.uk/aboutus/FAQ). (Accessed 18


://

November 2009)
tp

12. Porter, M. How competitive forces shape strategy. [Online]. (http://my.execpc.com/~jpurtell/HBR-


ht

HowCompetitiveForcesShapeStrategy.PDF) Harvard Business Review, 1997. (Accessed 15 November


2009)
13. Porter, M. How competitive forces shape strategy. [Online]. (http://my.execpc.com/~jpurtell/HBR-
HowCompetitiveForcesShapeStrategy.PDF) Harvard Business Review, 1997. (Accessed 15 November
2009)
om

om
14. Porter, M. How competitive forces shape strategy. [Online]. (http://my.execpc.com/~jpurtell/HBR-
.c

.c

HowCompetitiveForcesShapeStrategy.PDF) Harvard Business Review, 1997. (Accessed 15 November


er

er

2009)
rt

rt

15. Supplier Selection. [Online]. (http://www.primark.co.uk/Ethical/In_Practice/Supplier_Selection).


ve

ve

(Accessed 18 November 2009)


on

on

16. Mason, R. Associated British Food sales boosted by Primark. [Online}.


FC

FC

(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/5192345/Associated-British-
Food-sales-boosted-by-Primark.ht ml). 2009, April 21. (Accessed 15 November 2009)
D

D
tP

tP

17. Marks & Spencer loses to Primark and Asda. [Online]. (http://www.globally.co.uk/marks-spencer-
ar

ar

loses-to-primark-and-asda-1899/). 2009, October 09. (Accessed 16 November 2009)


m

18. Porter, M. How competitive forces shape strategy. [Online]. (http://my.execpc.com/~jpurtell/HBR-


.S

.S

HowCompetitiveForcesShapeStrategy.PDF) Harvard Business Review, 1997. (Accessed 15 November


w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht
om

om
.c

.c
er

er
2009)

rt

rt
19. Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Wong, V., Saunders, J. PRINCIPLES OF MARKETING. 5th European ed.

ve

ve
Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 2008, p49

on

on
20. Apparel Retail in Europe. [Online]. (http://web.ebscohost.com/bsi/pdf?vid=4&hid=3&sid=71068cf1-

FC

FC
fcbe-4437-a97d-f3206b008999%40sessionmgr4). Reference Code: 0201-2005. 2009, September.

D
(Accessed 15 November 2009)
tP

tP
21. Fashion at Primark. [Online}. (http://www.primark.co.uk/Our_Products). (Accessed 19 November
ar

ar
2009)
m

m
22. Frequently asked questions. [Online]. (http://www.primark.co.uk/aboutus/FAQ). (Accessed 18
.S

.S
November 2009)
w

w
23. Shoppers Turn From M&S To Primark And Asda.. [Online].
w

w
(http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Business/Asdas-George-Takes-No1-Spot-In-Terms-Of-Volume-
w

w
Of-Clothes-Sold-Followed-By-Primark-And-MS/Article/200910215402674). 2009, October 09.
://

://
(Accessed 14 November 2009)
tp

tp
24. Supplier Selection. [Online]. (http://www.primark.co.uk/Ethical/In_Practice/Supplier_Selection).
ht

ht
(Accessed 18 November 2009)
25. News Stories. [Online].
(http://www.primark.co.uk/page.aspx?pointerid=c6af0127d7ba4048986d9cb732876ac8). (Accessed
19 November 2009)

om
26. Hickman, M. Primark is named as least ethical clothes shop. [Online].
(http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/primark -is-named-as-least-ethical-clothes-shop-

.c
518600.html). 2005, December 08. (Accessed 17 November 2009)

er
27. Leroux, M. M&S surrenders supremacy to Asds and Primark. [Online].

rt
ve
(http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/retailing/article6867118.ece). 2009,
October 09. (Accessed 17 November 2009)
on
28. Leroux, M. M&S surrenders supremacy to Asds and Primark. [Online].
FC

(http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/retailing/article6867118.ece). 2009,
D

October 09. (Accessed 17 November 2009)


tP

29. Shoppers Turn From M&S To Primark And Asda. [Online].


ar

(http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Business/Asdas-George-Takes-No1-Spot-In-Terms-Of-Volume-
m

Of-Clothes-Sold-Followed-By-Primark-And-MS/Article/200910215402674). 2009, October 09.


.S

(Accessed 14 November 2009)


w

30. Asda launches budget Wedding Dress Range. [Online]. (http://www.weddingchaos.co.uk/wedding-


w

news/asda-wedding-dress.asp). (Accessed 19 November 2009)


w

31. Mason, R. Associated British Food sales boosted by Primark. [Online}.


://

(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/5192345/Associated-British-
tp

Food-sales-boosted-by-Primark.ht ml). 2009, April 21. (Accessed 15 November 2009)


ht

om

om
.c

.c
er

er
rt

rt
ve

ve
on

on
FC

FC
D

D
tP

tP
ar

ar
m

m
.S

.S
w

w
w

w
w

w
://

://
tp

tp
ht

ht

You might also like