Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Judy v. Obama et. al.,

Judy v. Obama et. al.,

Ratings: (0)|Views: 206|Likes:
Published by Freedom&Liberty
Civil Rights Law Suit filed by Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy against Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro his campaign organization OFA (Organization for America), the DNC Officials, and high ranking D's in Congress including Rep. Nancy Pelosi and U.S. Sen. Harry Reid.
Civil Rights Law Suit filed by Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy against Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro his campaign organization OFA (Organization for America), the DNC Officials, and high ranking D's in Congress including Rep. Nancy Pelosi and U.S. Sen. Harry Reid.

More info:

Published by: Freedom&Liberty on Jul 17, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/19/2014

pdf

text

original

 
1 Cody Robert Judy Attorney Pro Se 3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2 Ogden, Utah 84401 801-497-6655  ___________________________________________________________________________________
DISTRICT OF UTAH
 –
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 ________________________________________________________________________ CODY ROBERT JUDY , CIVIL RIGHTS ANTI-TRUST LAW SUIT
 
42 U.S.C. -§ 1983 (Jury Trial Demand) & Violation of the Sherman Act
 
v. Case No. 1:14cv00093 BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA JUDGE: Honorable Bruce S. Jenkins aka BARRY SOETORO , DNC , ORGANIZATION FOR ACTION et al.,  __________________________________________________________________________________ COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Cody Robert Judy pro se, and submits this NOTICE of ACTION on the listed Defendants for violation of his Civil Rights and violations of Anti-Trust law generally governed by statutes included but not limited to: 42 U.S.C. § 1983,§ 42 U.S.C. Chapter 21 (access to businesses)-The Sherman Act 1890; Clayton Act 1914 as is applicable in the Federal Court 351 So. West Temple, SLC, UT.
PARTIES TO THE ACTION Defendant(s)
Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro
 -
Organization For Action : (hereafter OFA) is a tax-exempt organization operating as a 401(c) (4) aka BarackObama.com a primary fund raising organization for Barack Obama with 13 Million Members was formally a community organizing project of the DNC but reorganized as OFA after second inaugurati
on organized for the purpose of Barack Obama’
s agenda and increased support for the DNC. Mitch Stewart
 –
Director, Jeremy Bird-Deputy Director
 
Democratic National Committee
 –
 hereafter DNC Nat. Chair Debbie Wasserman Shultz -UT Chair
 –
Jim Dabaki- Matt Lyon
 –
UT Ex.Dir. U.S. House Min. Ldr. Nancy Pelosi
 –
 acting in official position under color of state/fed law. U.S. Sen. Maj. Ldr. Harry Reid- acting in official position under color of state/fed law Barack Obama
 –
 As Candidate Barack Obama also occupying the Office of the President illegally.
  Address in the State of Utah - 825 North 300 West, Suite C400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 (801) 328-1212
Plaintiff:
Cody Robert Judy
 –
 3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2 Ogden, UT. 84401 (801)-497-6655
 
 
2
JURISDICTION STATEMENT
Jurisdiction is proper for this Court under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P, under on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348, because the Court recognizes Barack Hussein Obama as President of the United States and several prominent figures also in Office such as Rep. Nancy Pelosi and U.S. Sen. Harry Reid ; under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where  jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment to the Constitution, an act of Congress ie the Sherman Act; and 28 U.S.C. 1332 as some of the parties are from different states of the United States.
NATURE OF THE SUIT
The nature of the suit is brought to the Court as a matter of personal injury and liability of the Defendants to compensate for injuries caused in their illegal activities,( ie., fraud in representation of identification, operating under corporate status in the formation of illegal cartels prohibiting fair competition, under the standard rules of the U.S.C for the Office of the President) that have prejudiced and discriminated against the Plaintiff and his Civil Rights under the United States Constitution in running for President in 2008,2012, that have a continuous public and press libelous and defamation injury associated with the term
“Birther”
 as a negative pejorative rather than a positive formulation of law born with the Courts confirming considerations of truth, for the 2016 Presidential Race. Recently the Defendant Barack Hussein Obama
said, “Ok, Sue me!”, so Plaintiff is obliging.
 
UNITED STATES STATUTES IN VIOLATION
Plaintiff asserts that statutes of law in violation of his rights by the Defendant(s) include U.S.C. 42 § 1983, and The Sherman Act and defamatory and libelous laws of negative public and press related connotation.
Count I.
 U.S.C. 42§ 1983- The Plaintiff is assured under the Constitution all the rights and privileges of running for the Office of the President if he meets the qualifications of said requirements in the U.S.C. Having met those, he then is prejudiced and discriminated against by the Defendant(s) who have in their political activity violated his rights by violating, mooting, or disregarding the qualifications for the Office of the President. This is not an action to remove the Defendant Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro from Office as Plaintiff believes that rest with Congress, but an action of liability based on the
Candidate Barack Hussein Obama’s violation that he knew or should have known in his “Candidates Oath” put forth to
 the various Secretaries of States in the Union, that stated should he be elected he could meet the qualifications for the Office for which he was putting himself up for election and
Plaintiff’s
 assertions that he has failed to do so,
which has violated Plaintiff’s rights and effectively
 
3 caused him injury and continues to do so justifying Compensatory and Punitive Damages of personal injury : $40,000,000.00
Count II.
 The Sherman Act - Plaintiff asserts what amounts to Defendant(s) formation and combinations of corporations in a tying affect termed exclusive dealing arrangements, that form in the clear definition an illegal cartel forming a monopoly violating anti-trust laws, based on the violations of identification fraud for the Office of the President and putting forth a candidate that they knew or should have known was not qualified for the Office. In meeting qualifications demanded for the Office of the President, a combination of separate corporations are involved in actions that constitute illegal activity, that defendants knew or should have known are in violation if lawful corporate activity injuring Plaintiff and the election process as a whole. Plaintiff asserts and will show Defendants did know, or should have known, that Barack Hussein Obama was not a qualified candidate under the U.S.C. demands for said
office and though he did win the “Election” of said office, has done so in violation of Plaintiff’s Rights
which now affords and demands accountability and liability under tacit collusion, restraint of fair trade or competition formulating a substantial exclusionary effect, demanding compensation and injury afforded under statutes of The Sherman Act. As Candidates have sought protections in forming Corporations for their election races, the corporations are then subject to the Sherman Act encapsulating various corporate laws that condemn monopolies and that said Defendant(s) violate in anti-trust laws in competition by predatory action. Statute violation $100,000,000.00
BRIEF STATEMENT OF THE CASE WITH QUESTIONS OF LAW
Plaintiff asserts Defendant(s) have conspired together in an illegal collusion as a cartel that has acted as a monopoly in the political arena contrary to the public good, in the illegal action of restraining competition
under fair election practices considered a “service” in a form of ‘bid
-
rigging’ to which one
party of a group of bidders will be designated to win the bid or nomination irrespective of fair practices which action that is negligible and while not requiring anyone to be removed from an elected office , does require a compensatory damage award as well as a Statutory and Punitive Damages Award simply to deter the same kind of behavior that has caused the damages actually helping the greater public at large from the same kind of malicious or mal- treatment and serve as warnings to big and small companies alike not to engage in like behavior with an award due to the Plaintiff as subject of violations. Q1- The U.S. Supreme Court Case in
Minor v. Happersett 
 is the precedent case outlining both conditions
 
of the ‘natural born citizen’ s
hip/criteria also demanded
for the Office of the President as “Bo
rn in the
U.S. to Citizen Parents” to which it is
referred
there was no doubt of those being ‘natural born citizens’.
 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->