Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Mirkhond Mirorifovich Kabilov, A205 379 500 (BIA June 3, 2014)

Mirkhond Mirorifovich Kabilov, A205 379 500 (BIA June 3, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 257|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) rescinded an in absentia removal order upon finding the respondent’s failure to appear was due to “exceptional circumstances,” namely his former attorney's failure to answer telephone calls or notify the respondent of the time and date of the hearing. The decision was written by Member Sharon Hoffman and joined by Member John Guendelsberger and Member Elise Manuel.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) rescinded an in absentia removal order upon finding the respondent’s failure to appear was due to “exceptional circumstances,” namely his former attorney's failure to answer telephone calls or notify the respondent of the time and date of the hearing. The decision was written by Member Sharon Hoffman and joined by Member John Guendelsberger and Member Elise Manuel.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Jul 21, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/21/2014

pdf

text

original

 
SMAHANENAANAANAGHOUM SA Law Group, LLC 111 NE 1st Street 3rd Floor Miami FL 33132
U.. tt f t
Executiv Oce r Imigraton Rvew
Board of Immigration Appeals Oce of the Clerk
50 Leburg Pik, Sute 000 Fal Church na 050
HS/CE Oice of Chief Counse-SNA 8940 Fouinds Drive, 5th Floor San Antonio
78239 ame: MIRORFOVCH ABOV, MIRK ..  A 205379500 ate of this noce: 6/3/214
closed is a copy of the Boa's ecisio d orer in the aboe-rernce as. losure
 mbrs: Gendelee ohn oan, haon anel, e
Sincere,
D
c
Donn C Chef ek
T srm oke
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
 
U
Dp f ui
Executive Ofce r Imgrtion Review Decsio of the Board ofmmigratio Appeals FaH Crch, Vrgia

Fe: A05 379 500 -Sa tonio, TX In re MHON MROROVC KABLO  REMOAL PROCEENGS APPAL Date ON BAF O RSPONDENT Smahae aanaa aghoum, squre ON BALF OF DS CC assar Assstant Chef Counsel APPLCATON Repenng
JUN -3
2014
Te respnden, a naive d citzen f Uzbekistan, was rered eove m he nted Staes n absenta on Noveber 13, 202, aer nt appein at a hearng. He ed a moion o reopen on December 20 02, an appeas o the Imigaon Juge's Marc 5 203, denial of te motion The appea  be sustaied The Boar ders to the ctua ndngs f an Immgraton udge, unless they are learly eneous, but t retans neendent judgmet and dsreton subet to appble goveng sandards, regdng pre questons f la d te apcaon f  partuar stanard f la o hose ts. 8 C.R § 00(d)(3) Te respndent has esabshe tht his nnaearne a is heari as cased by "exepona rstaes

setion 240(e)() f the mmgatos ad atonalty t, 8 .C § 229a(e)();

f

22 &N e 3 (BA 998) (consderng the totalty of  the cirumstanes in analyzing reopenng of an n absenta removal rder) In hs adavt, the respndent ndates that s rmer cousel never ansered her teehone alls d dd not nti him of hs heang.
n additon, the resondent submted a satement m ada a yeva inicatg that e responent's rmer atoey cease workng at her pror fe n September 202, tha te respnent aeared at ounsel's pror oce on Deember , 202, d tt several usucess atemps ere ten mae o reac te respnden's rmer aey. In gt of he egong, and e resnden's due dene in in is oton o reoen, we nd at e responent's nonappearance at is hearing was ase by an "exceptona rcuste ence, e  reoen tese roeedgs d remad the rer r a eang. On ay 22, 202, the Immgrton C ed te otce of eang ony to the respndent's mer atey
 
A20 79 00 Aordngy, e oig order  be entered ORDER The aea is sustaned, the in absentia order is vaated and these roeedings are reoened d remded r roeedngs onsistent ith e regong onion.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->