Dp f ui
Executive Ofce r Imgrtion Review Decsio of the Board ofmmigratio Appeals FaH Crch, Vrgia
Fe: A05 379 500 -Sa tonio, TX In re MHON MROROVC KABLO REMOAL PROCEENGS APPAL Date ON BAF O RSPONDENT Smahae aanaa aghoum, squre ON BALF OF DS CC assar Assstant Chef Counsel APPLCATON Repenng
Te respnden, a naive d citzen f Uzbekistan, was rered eove m he nted Staes n absenta on Noveber 13, 202, aer nt appein at a hearng. He ed a moion o reopen on December 20 02, an appeas o the Imigaon Juge's Marc 5 203, denial of te motion The appea be sustaied The Boar ders to the ctua ndngs f an Immgraton udge, unless they are learly eneous, but t retans neendent judgmet and dsreton subet to appble goveng sandards, regdng pre questons f la d te apcaon f partuar stanard f la o hose ts. 8 C.R § 00(d)(3) Te respndent has esabshe tht his nnaearne a is heari as cased by "exepona rstaes
setion 240(e)() f the mmgatos ad atonalty t, 8 .C § 229a(e)();
22 &N e 3 (BA 998) (consderng the totalty of the cirumstanes in analyzing reopenng of an n absenta removal rder) In hs adavt, the respndent ndates that s rmer cousel never ansered her teehone alls d dd not nti him of hs heang.
n additon, the resondent submted a satement m ada a yeva inicatg that e responent's rmer atoey cease workng at her pror fe n September 202, tha te respnent aeared at ounsel's pror oce on Deember , 202, d tt several usucess atemps ere ten mae o reac te respnden's rmer aey. In gt of he egong, and e resnden's due dene in in is oton o reoen, we nd at e responent's nonappearance at is hearing was ase by an "exceptona rcuste ence, e reoen tese roeedgs d remad the rer r a eang. On ay 22, 202, the Immgrton C ed te otce of eang ony to the respndent's mer atey