the he ca#t sa' the' are $oth tahor, $ut i the' come oe ater the e*t the he ca te them $oth that the' are#t tameh rom a saek.
sa's that i a perso ate a three pieces these +emaras prove that this perso is va!a' eati+ the issur a! thereore the %orah ca#t $e permitti+ this sceario. 8e thereore ar+ues &ith the Rash$a- a! ees this is m#!eoritta.
6hui 100a (!#h eriah)- sa's that !ieret peope shou! eat the " pieces a! seems that this is o' m#!era$aa.
- seems to sa' that it is a chumrah a! the chiuv or t&o peope to eat the pieces is o' m#!era$aa.
aramah" takin out one iece &or the kohen-ishna Arlah
- (p19-21) sa's 'ou ee! to take oe o them a&a' as the 4assur piece5 to +ive to the kohe.
(p22)- the reaso to remove oe o the ruits o the mutar ta#aroves is ot $ecause $itu reAuires the 4
attribution to something else
.5 ' terumah, the oo! $eo+s to the kohe a! the' !eserve their moe' a! 'ou ca#t !o $itu o the moe' o someoe ese, so 'ou must repa' the kohe. ut,
b' a taaroves o& issur there 4oul$
nee$ ha’aramah+5) Rashi
- 5E 7Fa- sa's that &e ca $e ma#arim $' thi+s other tha terumah a! he reAuires this $' $itu.
&ou! thro& oe o the pieces a&a', $ut that &as $ecause he &as a t#:a!!ik. Rea' he !i!#t have to !o that, $ut he ha! e*tra perishut.
(p2F>)- sa's he !oes#t ko& &here haramah &ou! app' $e'o! a case o +e:e hashevet (rom the kohe).
-(p2C) 'ou !o#t ee! to $e machmir a! thro& oe piece a&a',
like Tosefot/ S’mag, but not the Rashi.
109 (p27-29)- Auotes Rash$a, %oseotS#ma+.
sa's !o %oseot a! Auotes the aharam (echumrah).
+s this machlokes 6Rosh7Rashba8 on a $eoritta or $erabanan level91) ri -ea$im
(p1")- Rash$a a+rees &ith the Rosh m#!eoritta a! this is o' a machokes m#!era$aa.
This is the ashut shat in the machlokes
perhaps)=- et that the Rash$a ma!e his statemet o a !eoritta eve."