Volume 4 Composite

Proposed Costco Wholesale Store and Fueling Facility
Route 202/35
Town of Yorktown, Westchester County, New York
___________________________________________________________

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Volume 4
Appendices

Prepared by

TRC Engineers, Inc.
Hawthorne, New York

TRC Project No. 165213

Date Submitted: July 14, 2014
Date Accepted:
FEIS APPENDICES

C. Correspondence

D. Natural Resources

E. Stormwater Management (Part 1)

APPENDIX C
C. Correspondence

New York State Department of Transportation Letter
Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation Letter
Capellini, esq. Letters to Property Owners
Yorktown Consolidated Water District Letter
EcolScience Letter to NYS Department of Environmental Conservation
EcolScience Letter to Westchester County Department of Health
Westchester County Bus Stop Letter

APPENDIX D
D. Natural Resources

APPENDIX E
E. Stormwater Management (Part 1)

Preliminary Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
Water Quality Calculations
Press Release: Lake George Permeable Pavement.
Increased Rainfall Intensity Analysis
Subsurface Investigation Reports

APPENDIX E
E. Stormwater Management

Preliminary Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)

Appendix C Water Quality Calculations
2 Sand Filter Calculations
3 - Press Release: Lake George Permeable Pavement
Appendix D Stormwater Management Calculations
3 Increased Rainfall Intensity Analysis
Appendix F Subsurface Investigation Reports

PRELIMINARY STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN

COSTCO WHOLESALE STORE AND FUELING FACILITY
CROMPOND ROAD
YORKTOWN, NEW YORK

Owner/Operator of Facility:

Retail Store Construction Company
500 Old Country Road
Garden City, New York
Tel: (516) 741-7400

Prepared by:

TRC Engineers, Inc.
7 Skyline Drive
Hawthorne, New York 10532
Tel: (914) 592-4040

Project No.: 165213

Date: November 16, 2011
Revised: J uly 9, 2014

COSTCO Wholesale Store and Fueling Facility
Yorktown, New York Preliminary Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
TRC Engineers, Inc. Revised July 9, 2014
Project No. 165213
Table of Contents
Section 1 - Scope of Report
1.1 Scope
1.2 Record Keeping

Section 2 - Project Information
2.1 Project Description
2.2 Soils
2.3 Floodplain
2.4 Historical

Section 3 - Stormwater Management
3.1 Green Infrastructure Planning
3.2 Water Quality Volume (WQv)
3.3 Runoff Reduction Techniques
3.4 Water Quality Treatment Practices
3.5 Stormwater Peak Rate Control Practices
3.6 Offsite Roadway Improvements - Analysis
3.7 Storm Drainage System

Section 4 Maintenance of Stormwater Management Practices
4.1 Long Term Maintenance and Operations
4.2 Maintenance Agreement

Section 5 - Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
5.1 Overview
5.2 Plan Contents
5.3 Temporary Erosion Control Measures
5.4 Permanent Erosion Control Practices
5.5 Final Stabilization
5.6 Site Assessment Inspections

Section 6 Summary and Conclusions

Project No. 165213
Appendices
A. Contractor/Subcontractor SPDES Permit Certification

B. Figures
1. Site Location Map
2. Flood Insurance Rate Map
3. NRCS Soils Map
4. Pre-Development SWM Map
5. Post-Development SWM Map
6. Offsite Drainage Area Maps (DA-4 & DA-5)
7. Offsite Drainage Area Maps (DA-6)
10. Offsite Water Quality BMP Locations (Bioretention area, DA-4)
11. Offsite Water Quality BMP Locations (Dry Swale, DA-7)
12. Preliminary Construction Schedule

C. Water Quality Calculations
1. Stormwater Management GI Planning and Practice Selection Worksheet
2. Sand Filter Calculations
3. Lake George/Beach Road Porous Pavement Press Release
4. Fecal Coliform Analysis

D. Peak Rate Control Calculations
1. Pre Development Calculations
2. Post Development Calculations
3. Increased Rainfall Intensity Analysis
4. Offsite Drainage Calculations

E. Storm Drain Line Calculations
1. Storm Pipe Design
2. Hydraulic Grade Line (HGL) Analysis

F. Subsurface Investigation Report
1. Tectonic Subsurface Investigation Report Dated J une 3, 2013
2. Tectonic Subsurface Investigation Report Dated April 30, 2014

G. Maintenance Inspection Checklist
1. Stormwater Pond/Wetland Operation, Maintenance, and Management Inspection Checklist
2. Sand/Organic Filter Operation, Maintenance, and Management Inspection Checklist
3. Bioretention Operation, Maintenance, and Management Inspection Checklist
4. Open Channel Operation, Maintenance, and Management Inspection Checklist

H. Vortechs9000 Construction Details and Maintenance Guide
I. Sample Storm Water Control Facilities Maintenance Agreement
J . Correspondence
K. NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity GP-0-
10-001
L. MS4 SWPPP Acceptance Form
M. Notice of Intent
Project No. 165213
Pertinent Drawings
Drawing C-1 Cover Sheet
Drawing C-11 Existing Conditions Plan
Drawing C-101 Layout Plan
Drawing C-201 Grading Plan
Drawing C-301 Utilities Plan
Drawing C-401A Construction Sequence Phase 1
Drawing C-401B Construction Sequence Phase 2
Drawing C-401C Construction Sequence Phase 3
Drawing C-401D Construction Sequence Phase 4
Drawing C-401E Construction Sequence Phase 5
Drawing C-402A Site Erosion and Sediment Control Phase 1
Drawing C-402B Site Erosion and Sediment Control Phase 2
Drawing C-402C Site Erosion and Sediment Control Phase 3
Drawing C-402D Site Erosion and Sediment Control Phase 4
Drawing C-402E Site Erosion and Sediment Control Phase 5
Drawing C-700 SWM Plan View and Sections
Drawing C-701 Pond Details
Drawing C-703 Details
Drawing C-705 Details
Drawing C-707 SWM Storage Tanks
Drawing C-801 Highway Improvement Plan
Drawing WC-1 NYCDEP Watercourse Confirmation Map

Project No. 165213 Page 1
Section 1 - Scope of Report

1.1 Scope

The purpose of this report is to present the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) for the Costco Wholesale that is proposed at the northwest quadrant of the
intersection of the Taconic State Parkway and Crompond Road (NYS Route 35/U.S.
Route 202) in the Town of Yorktown, Westchester County, New York. The SWPPP has
been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) State Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(SPDES) General Permit for Discharges from Construction Activity GP-0-10-001
(General Permit). The General Permit authorizes stormwater discharges from
construction activities where disturbance of one (1) acre or more of land is involved.

The stormwater management design has been performed in accordance with the technical
standards provided in the latest version of the New York State Stormwater Management
Design Manual (DEC Design Manual) dated August 2010. The SWPPP has also been
prepared in accordance with Chapter 248, Stormwater Management and Erosion and
Sediment Control, of the Town of Yorktowns Municipal Code. Since the Town of
Yorktown is a regulated, traditional land use control MS4 entity as defined in the General
Permit, the Town will be responsible for review and approval of the SWPPP. Since the
project is also situated within the New York City watershed located east of the Hudson
River, the project has also been designed to meet the requirements of the New York City
Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP) Rules and Regulations for the
Protection from Contamination, Degradation and Pollution of the New York City Water
Supply and its Sources (Rules and Regulations).

This SWPPP has been prepared in accordance with Section 18-39 of the referenced
NYCDEP Rules and Regulations. The project site is situated within a Designated Main
Street Area and therefore relief from certain design requirements is granted. For
example, relief is provided from the development restrictions associated with the 100 foot
watercourse offset as stated in Section 18-39(a)(3). Relief is also provided from the
requirement of two types of stormwater management practices in series as stated in
Section 18-39(c)(6)(ii).

During construction, the potential for soil erosion and sedimentation will be controlled by
soil erosion and sediment control devices designed and installed in accordance with the
New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control dated
August 2005.

1.2 Record Keeping

In accordance with the requirements of the General Permit, the Owner/Operator shall
maintain a record of all inspection reports in a site logbook. The site logbook shall be
maintained on site and be made available to the permitting authority upon request. The
site logbook shall contain the following documents:

A. NYSDEC Notice of Intent.
B. NYSDEC Notice of Acknowledgement.
C. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).
D. MS4 SWPPP Acceptance Form.
E. Notice of Intent
F. Contractor/Subcontractor SPDES Permit Certification (Signed copy).
G. Pre-Construction Site Assessment Report.
H. Site Assessment Reports.
I. Final Certification.
J . SWPPP Modifications.
K. SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity
GP-0-10-001

The Operator shall retain copies of SWPPP and any reports submitted in conjunction with
this General Permit, and records of all data used to complete the NOI to be covered by
this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date that the site is finally
stabilized.

Section 2 - Project Information

2.1 Project Description

The proposed Costco Project is situated on an 18.75-acre tract of land located in the
northwest quadrant of the intersection of the Taconic State Parkway and NYS Route
35/U.S. Route 202 (Crompond Road), in the Town of Yorktown, Westchester County,
New York (see Appendix B, Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The site has frontage along
the Taconic Parkway, NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202 and Old Crompond Road. The
existing site is presently developed. The development consists of four separate uses,
which includes two residences, Zinos Wholesale Nursery, King Gate and Fence
Company and the former Yorktown Motel. The Project proposes demolition of the entire
existing development and infrastructure, and development of a 151,092 square feet
building supported by 610 parking spaces and a 12-dispenser fueling facility.

The current development encompasses approximately 10.15 acres of the existing site,
with current land cover as described in Table 2-1.

Table 2-1
Existing Land Cover
Land Cover Description Area
Wooded
(1)
8.60
Open Vegetated (non wooded) Space 7.25
Gravel Surfaces 0.42
Pavements and Buildings 2.48
Total Site Area 18.75
Note:
(1) Wooded area includes 1.04 acres of freshwater wetlands.

The proposed site development will disturb approximately 14.01 acres and will result in
the land cover as described in Table 2-2.

Table 2-2
Proposed Land Cover
Land Cover Description Area
Wooded
(1)
4.74
Open Vegetated (non wooded) Space 3.20
Pavements and Buildings 10.81
Total Site Area 18.75
Note:
(1) Wooded area includes 1.04 acres of freshwater wetlands.

The proposed project also includes the construction of sanitary sewer and gas main
extensions within Old Crompond Road, from approximately 200 feet east of Stoney
Street to NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202. Offsite roadway improvements will also consist
of widening NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202 along the site frontage and east of the Site
frontage, ending east of the NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202/Taconic State Parkway
interchange at Strang Boulevard.

The construction of the offsite utility extensions in Old Crompond Road will disturb
approximately 0.4 acre. The construction of the proposed offsite roadway improvements
will disturb approximately 2.1 acres, including the disturbance associated with
construction of 0.77 acre of new impervious surfaces.

Therefore, the total disturbed area for the proposed project is approximately 16.5 acres.

2.2 Soils

Review of the Soil Survey of Westchester County indicates that there are seven types of
soils present on the proposed site (Appendix B, Figure 3 - Soils Map). Table 2-3 below
summarizes the characteristics of each of the soil types present on the site.

Table 2-3
Soil Characteristics
Map Unit Soil Names Water Table (ft.) Depth to
Bedrock
Hydrologic
Group
Erosion
Hazard
ChC

Charlton Loam,
8 to 15 percent slopes
More than 6' deep
throughout the year
>60 B Moderate
CsD Chatfield-Charlton
Complex (Chatfield
soil properties
More than 6 feet
deep throughout
the year
20 to 40

B Severe
LcB Leicester Loam
3 to 8% slopes, stony
1.5 feet
November thru
May
>60 C Moderate
PnB

Paxton fine sandy
loam
2 to 8% slopes
1.5 to 2.5 feet
February to April
>60 C Moderate
PnC

Paxton fine sandy
loam
8 to 15% slopes
1.5 to 2.5 feet
February to April
>60 C Moderate
Sh Sun loam 1.0 above to 0.5
below the surface
from Nov. to April

>60

D

None or
slight
Ub

Udorthents, smoothed Variable Variable C Variable
Source: Soil Survey of Putnam and Westchester Counties, New York Soil Conservation
Service.
Natural Resource Conservation Center Web Soil Survey

2.3 Floodplain

The site is located within the Hunter Brook drainage basin. A review of the Flood
Insurance Rate Map (See Appendix B, Figure 2) for the Town of Yorktown effective
September 28, 2007 indicates that the Project site is not located within the 100-yr.
floodplain.

2.4 Historical

A Phase 1 Archeological Assessment has been performed for the Project. The research
indicates that the Project site is not listed nor will it directly affect any properties listed on
the State or National Register of Historic Places. (Refer to Phase 1A Archeological and
Historic Resources and Assessment for Costco Wholesale as prepared by Historical
Perspectives, Inc.)
Section 3 - Storm Water Management

3.1 Green Infrastructure Planning

In accordance with Section 3.6 of the DEC Design Manual, storm water management has
been developed for the proposed Costco by applying a five-step process, which includes:

1. Site Planning to preserve natural features and reduce impervious cover;
2. Calculation of water quality volume (WQv);
3. Incorporation of green infrastructure (GI) techniques and standard storm water
management practices (SMPs) with Runoff Reduction (RRv) Capacity;
4. Use of standard SMPs to treat WQv not reduced by GI techniques and SMPs with
Runoff Reduction (RRv) Capacity, and;
5. Volume and peak rate control practices.

Several green infrastructure planning practices found in Table 3.1 (Page 3-5) of the DEC
Design Manual have been applied to preserve and minimize impact to natural resources
as well as reduce impervious cover. Following is a description of the planning practices
applied to this Project.

Preservation of Natural Resources

Preservation of Undisturbed Areas
As shown in Table 2-1, approximately 8.60 wooded acres of the existing site is presently
undisturbed. The undisturbed area is generally located in the western portion of the site.
The proposed site development is generally located within the previously developed area,
and in the eastern portion of the property. After development, approximately 4.74 acres
of the woods on site will remain undisturbed.

Preservation of Wetlands and Waterways
The Project site includes two wetlands. Wetland A is 0.91 acres and is located on a
north-south axis in the western portion of the site. Wetland B is 0.13 acres and is situated
in the northeast corner of the site. Within Wetland A is a stream which flows from north
to south, exiting at the southwest corner of the site. The proposed development avoids
direct impact to both wetlands as well as the stream.

Preservation of Buffer
The Town of Yorktowns Wetland Ordinance, Chapter 178 of the Municipal Code,
establishes a 100-foot buffer around wetlands. Work within this buffer is a regulated
activity and requires granting of a wetland permit by the Town Planning Board. The
project proposes disturbance within the buffers of Wetlands A and B. Wetland B is a
lesser quality wetland in terms of function than Wetland A. Therefore, the development
encroaches further into the buffer of Wetland B in order to minimize encroachment into
the buffer of Wetland A. (See Section III.F and Appendix C of the Projects FEIS for
additional description of the wetland functions.)

Of the 100 foot wooded buffer associated with Wetland A, all of the western buffer and
roughly two-thirds of the eastern buffer nearest the wetland will remain undisturbed
under the modified Site Plan. Eastern buffer disturbance will be minimized by
constructing a retaining wall and shortened earth embankment along the westerly edge of
the parking area. The earth embankment will be planted primarily with a mix of shrubs,
trees, and low maintenance groundcover. Accounting for an additional 10-foot
construction corridor at the toe of the proposed wall, 0.52 acres of the Wetland A buffer
will be disturbed. Impervious surfaces will not be constructed within the buffer. (See
Section III.G of the Projects FEIS for additional description of the reduced impacts to
the Wetland A buffer).

Of the 100 foot buffer associated with Wetland B, the proposed impervious surfaces and
disturbance limit would generally be kept approximately 20 feet and 10 feet, respectively
from the wetland. Construction has been proposed near Wetland B in order to locate the
development as far as practical from Wetland A.

Reduction of Clearing and Grading
The Project proposes limiting the onsite soil disturbance to approximately 14.01 acres,
thereby maintaining approximately 4.74 acres as undisturbed.

Maintaining Sensitive Areas
The Project proposes locating the majority of the development at the eastern and central
portions of the site. Therefore, the most sensitive areas to the west including the stream,
Wetland A and most of its buffer, and much of the Project sites steepest slopes will be
preserved.

In addition to preserving natural resources as described above, the design reduces
proposed impervious cover by the following planning practices:

Reduction in Impervious Cover

Parking Reduction
The standard parking stall dimensions required by Costco is 10-feet by 20-feet, with the
standard drive aisle width of 24-feet. These standard dimensions have been reduced for
this Project, resulting in an overall reduction of proposed impervious pavement. The
reductions in pavement are accomplished by first reducing the 10-feet wide stall
dimension to 9-feet for 296 parking spaces, approximately 49% of the parking area.
These narrower parking spaces are located further from the entrance. In addition to
narrowing the width of selected parking spaces, the 20-feet space length was reduced to
18.5-feet in nearly all locations. In turn, this reduces the 64-foot dimension normally
required for a double parking bay (including the drive aisle) to 61 feet. Further
reductions to impervious area by reducing the width of drive aisles is not practical as the
minimum dimensions provided are necessary to secure traffic safety.

In addition to reducing impervious surfaces through reduction of parking stall
dimensions, the Applicant proposes minimizing the total number of parking spaces. This
Project proposes 610 parking spaces, which equates to a parking index of 4.04 spaces per
1,000 square feet. Costco historic data, as well as the Institute of Traffic Engineers
(ITE), Chapter 5.2.6 of the DEC Design Manual and the Applicants 2012 Parking
Utilization Study (FEIS Section III.L and FEIS Appendix H) support a parking index of
less than 4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet.

By implementing these two planning strategies the amount of proposed impervious area
will be reduced by approximately one acre when compared to a parking area using
Costco standard parking dimensions and a parking index required by Town zoning.

3.2 Water Quality Volume (WQv)

Chapter 4 of the DEC Design Manual provides the following equation to determine the
WQv (in acre-feet of storage):

WQv =(P) (Rv) (A)
12
Where:
WQv = water quality volume (in acre-feet)
P = 90% Rainfall Event Number (see Figure 4.1, DEC Design Manual)
Rv = 0.05 +0.009 (I), where I is the percent of impervious cover
A = site area in acres (onsite)

The value of the 90% Rainfall Event (P) for the northwestern part of Westchester County,
New York is 1.2 inches.

The Project is located within the New York City East of Hudson (EOH) Watershed.
SMPs shall be sized in accordance with Section 18-39(c) (3) of the latest New York City
Rules and Regulations dated April 2010 to capture and treat either WQv as computed
above, or the estimated runoff volume resulting from the one-year 24-hour storm using
NRCS methodology (TR-55 and TR-20) over the post-development drainage area,
whichever is greater. Based on consultation with the NYCDEP, the 1 year, 24-hour
rainfall value (P) of 3.0 inches based on the updated isohyetal map (Figure 4.2 in the
DEC Design Manual) from the Northeast Regional Climate Center (NRCC) was used.
Standard SMPs shall be designed in accordance with standards in Chapters 6 and 10 of
the DEC Design Manual.

While the proposed project includes some areas of redevelopment (i.e. disturbance and
reconstruction of existing impervious surfaces), it primarily entails new construction (i.e.
construction of new impervious surfaces and new land disturbance). The proposed
Costco project will result in the construction of 9.10 acres of new impervious surfaces,
8.33 acres onsite and 0.77 acre as part of the offsite roadway improvements.

In addition, Page 9-2 of the DEC Design Manual provides that [f]or redevelopment
projects located in critical environmental areas and other sensitive or regulated areas,
however, all attempts should be made to seek compliance with the technical standards set
elsewhere in this manual. (emphasis added). The New York City EOH Watershed is a
sensitive or regulated area warranting that compliance.

Therefore, the Projects post-construction SMPs will be designed in accordance with the
technical standards applicable to new construction as described in Chapters 3, 4, and 5 of
the DEC Design Manual. Those new construction standards include Stormwater
Management Planning (see Section 3.1 above), the unified storm water sizing criteria (per
this section plus Sections 3.4 and 3.5 below), and green infrastructure practices to provide
runoff reduction (see Section 3.3 below).

The required WQv to be captured and treated, prior to the incorporation of green
infrastructure techniques and standard SMPs with Runoff Reduction Volume (RRv)
capacity (see Section 3.3 below), is 2.79 acre-feet (121,532 cubic feet). Item No. 2 of the
Storm Water Management Green Infrastructure (GI) Planning and Practice Selection
Worksheet in Appendix C shows that the greater WQv computed is the estimated runoff
volume resulting from the one-year 24-hour storm (P rainfall value of 3.0 inches) using
NRCS methodology (TR-55 and TR-20) over the total post-development contributing
drainage area of 24.28 acres within the limits of study (see Section 3.5C, Table 3-2).

3.3 Runoff Reduction Techniques

Runoff reduction is the reduction of WQv achieved through application of green
infrastructure (GI) techniques and standard SMPs having runoff reduction volume (RRv)
capacity. In order to satisfy the RRv criteria, Section 3.6 of the DEC Design Manual
requires the total (100%) reduction of WQv through the iterative application of GI
techniques and standard SMPs.

However, the DEC Design Manual also states that projects that do not/cannot achieve
100% reduction of WQv must reduce a percentage of the runoff from new impervious
areas to be constructed for the project, at a minimum. The reduction is achieved when
the runoff is captured, routed through GI or an SMP, infiltrated into the ground, reused,
reduced by evapotranspiration, and eventually removed from the storm water discharge
from the site. The percent reduction is based on the Hydrologic Soil Groups (HSGs) of
the project and is defined by the parameter Specific Reduction Factor (S).

The targeted, or minimum, RRv required is calculated using the following formula as
described in Section 4.3 of the DEC Design Manual:

RRv =(P) (Rv)* (Ai)
12
Where:
Ai = (S) (Aic)
Ai= = Impervious cover targeted for runoff reduction
(Aic) = Total area of new impervious cover
Rv* = 0.05 +0.009 (I), where I is 100% impervious
S = Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) Specific Reduction Factor (S)

The proposed Costco project and its associated offsite roadway improvements will result
in the construction of 9.10 acres of new impervious surfaces. In the absence of 100%
reduction of WQv, the targeted RRv for this project is 0.78 acre-feet, or 33,977 cubic feet
(See Item No.3 of the GI Worksheet in Appendix C for detailed calculations). RRv is
computed using the value of P equal to 3.0 inches.

Application of Green Infrastructure (GI) Techniques
Recommended green infrastructure techniques for runoff reduction listed in Tables 3.2
and 5.7 of the DEC Design Manual were considered for use in this Project to the extent
practicable. As required by Section 5.3 of the DEC Design Manual, explanations are
given to either the applicability and/or feasibility of each technique as described below:

Conservation of Natural Areas
Approximately 8.92 acres, most notably the western portion of the drainage area, which
contains Wetland A, a stream and wooded buffer (both offsite and onsite), have been
preserved in their natural state.

Sheet Flow to Riparian Buffers and Filter Strips
The riparian buffers both east and west of the existing stream currently sheet flow toward
the stream. This remains unchanged for the buffer west of the stream and for the inner
two-thirds of the eastern buffer adjacent to the stream. However, this technique cannot
be applied since all of the undisturbed area within the buffers was already accounted for
under Conservation of Natural Areas.

Vegetated Open Swale
Although implementation of a vegetated open swale was considered during the design
process, it was determined that sufficient space within the site development upstream of
the stormwater management pond was not available.

Tree Planting
A landscape plan has been designed for the project in which various plantings including
trees, shrubs and groundcovers are planted throughout the site. Perimeter landscaping is
provided along the NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202 perimeter, within the Taconic Parkway
right-of-way, along the westerly embankment, and within the interior of the site in
landscaped islands throughout the parking area. However, this technique cannot be
applied because (1) the slopes of the perimeter planting areas exceed five (5) per cent,
and (2) the raised landscaped islands are not directly connected to the proposed
impervious areas within the parking lot.

Disconnection of Rooftop Runoff
This technique cannot be applied to this project because the proposed building rooftop
area exceeds the maximum thresholds (500-2,000 sf) established in Section 5.3.5 of the
DEC Design Manual. Furthermore, disconnection of rooftop runoff is impractical for a
large commercial development in cold weather climates. In order to ensure customer and
traffic safety, the rooftop runoff will be connected to an enclosed drainage system in
order to prevent the potential hazard of icy sidewalk, parking area and roadway
conditions.

Stream Daylighting
The existing stream will be maintained in its natural state. Discharge from the detention
pond will flow through a closed pipe that will outlet to a level spreader which will
disperse outflow from the pond over an extended area, resulting in reduced concentrated
flow and velocities.

Rain Garden
The use of rain gardens for the Costco project is not feasible for two reasons: the
maximum contributing drainage area must not exceed 1,000 sf, and rain gardens cannot
be used to treat runoff from urban parking areas or roadways. Rain gardens are better
suited for treatment of runoff from residential rooftops and driveways.

Green Roof
The Owner/Operator believes that utilization of a green roof is not practical for the
proposed plan, as the Costco prototype building has been developed to maximize
construction and operational efficiency. The building structure is a pre-engineered
system designed to minimize the amount of material used and maximize the use of
recycled resources. Adding only four inches of growing medium would increase the
structural load on the roof by nearly four million pounds, resulting in increased use of
natural resources required for framing (steel), shipping (fuel) and would greatly increase
the cost and carbon footprint of the building. The Costco roof is equipped with as many
as 200 Energy Star rated skylights designed to maximize natural lighting while enhancing
the indoor environment for customer and employees. Interior lights are activated by light
sensitive photocells and are illuminated only when needed, thereby maximizing energy
efficiency. Costcos Solar White roof panels are solar reflective and exceed the value
required for LEED certification. Providing a vegetated roof would eliminate positive
effects of the solar white roof, increase the cost, complexity and long term maintenance
of waterproofing the 200 skylights.

Stormwater Planters
The roof area of the proposed Costco building is too large (151,000sf) to use storm
water planters, which are limited to maximum impervious drainage are of 15,000 square
feet.

Rain Tank/Cistern
Use of rain tanks is not practical for the proposed plan as the size of the tanks would be
prohibitive to store roof runoff from a building this size. The use of rain tanks would be
more applicable to a small scale project. In addition, any cisterns designed for use
throughout the year would need to be protected from freezing by insulating them, or
locating them indoors or underground below the frost line because of the winter climate.
These requirements would make the use of cisterns for this project cost-prohibitive.

Porous Pavement
The Owner/Operator and TRC recognizes that the use of permeable/porous pavement for
parking areas in cold weather climates has been successfully done with such projects as
the St. Marys Visitor Center in Montanas Glacier National Park and at the University of
New Hampshire Stormwater Center (UNHSC). The field experience at the UNHSC
porous asphalt parking lot located in Durham, New Hampshire led to the development of
the UNHSC Design Specification for Porous Pavement and Infiltration Beds in 2007
and further revised in October 2009. As stated in Part 1.1A of the Specification:

This specification is intended for a cold climate application based upon
the field experience at the UNHSC porous asphalt parking lot located in
Durham, New Hampshire, however the specification can be adapted to
projects elsewhere provided that selection of materials and system design
reflects local conditions, constraints, and objectives.

Based on the above, the use of permeable/porous pavement for the proposed Costco site
has to be considered based on the feasibility or limitations set forth in the DEC Design
Manual. For instance, Section 5.3.11 of the DEC Design Manual (page 5-116) states that
permeable/porous pavement should not be used where sand or other materials are
applied for winter traction since they quickly clog the pavement.

There are also other significant site limitations that either negate or severely limit the use
of permeable/porous pavement for runoff reduction on the Project. Pavement systems
designed for runoff reduction must be designed to the capacity of the underlying soil and
required elements of infiltration systems (DEC Design Manual, Page 5-115), so
permeable/porous pavements must be constructed directly over native soils that can
support adequate infiltration and have not been compacted, disturbed or filled. Since
most of the site parking areas will be constructed in proposed compacted fill the use of
permeable/porous pavement for runoff reduction is not feasible.

In addition, per Page 5-116 of the DEC Design Manual, the use of permeable/porous
pavement is not recommended for high volume parking lots, particularly drive aisles.
Since the parking area has been reduced as described in Section 3.1 of this report, all
remaining parking is considered prime parking and no overflow parking is provided.

For the offsite roadway improvements, the use of permeable/porous pavements subject to
the design requirements of the NYSDOT. At present, the NYSDOT does not allow
permeable/porous pavement on their roadways. The DOT is close to completing or has
completed construction of a one-mile stretch of Beach Road located adjacent to Lake
George in Warren County, NY using porous pavement specifically designed for heavy
traffic and use (see press release in Appendix C). While it is probable that the
performance of the Beach Road porous pavement will positively affect the DOTs future
decision regarding its use in roadway design, such a decision will not likely come in time
for NYSDOT to allow its use on the Project.

Application of Standard SMPs with RRv Capacity
As shown in the Storm Water Management - GI Planning and Practice Selection
Worksheet in Appendix C of the SWPPP, runoff reduction from the proposed Costco
project will be achieved through the design and construction of a subsurface infiltration
system as a source control within proposed Drainage Areas P-2b-1 and P-2b-2 plus most
of the impervious surfaces of Route 202/35 within the limits of the proposed offsite
roadway improvements. Infiltration practices are listed in Table 3.5 of the DEC Design
Manual as one of the acceptable standard SMPs with RRv capacity, with 90% of WQv
removed at the source.

In order to fully comply with the requirements of Section 3.6 of the DEC Design Manual,
the infiltration system, which will be located beneath the parking area as shown on
Drawing C-301 and Figure 5, has been sized to contain and reduce/remove 100% WQv
resulting from the 1-year, 24-hour storm over the contributing post-development drainage
areas using NCRS methodology (see Summary discussion below), without taking credit
for the rate of exfiltration as required by Sections 6.3 and 10.4.3 of the DEC Design
Manual. The system has also been designed to fully dewater the entire WQv within 48
hours after a storm event.

WQv/RRv flows (i.e. 1-year storm flows) from Drainage Areas P-2b-1 and P-2b-2 plus
the offsite impervious surfaces of Route 202/35 (Drainage Sub Areas DA-6 and DA-8)
will be captured and conveyed to the subsurface infiltration system at three points of
entry. Prior to entering the infiltration system, runoff will pretreated using three flow-
based, New York State verified, proprietary (hydrodynamic) structures such as a
VortechsModel 9000 device or equivalent. The proposed bottom of the infiltration
vault will be at elevation 419.0 (two feet below the lowest existing elevation where the
proposed vault will be located), with a 36-inch x 22-inch elliptical overflow outlet pipe to
convey runoff from storms greater than the 1-year event.

Subsurface data from four test pits (BINF-5, 6, 11 and 12) dug at the proposed infiltration
vault location as part of a subsurface investigation show the presence of coarse to fine
sands and gravels ranging from 0.5 feet below existing grade to ten feet deep with no
bedrock or groundwater present. Site-specific soil testing to determine infiltration rates
was also performed, in J anuary 2013 and witnessed by the NYCDEP. NYCDEP has
confirmed an acceptable percolation at the location of the proposed onsite infiltration
vault. DEP also confirmed percolation rates from testing of three out of the four test pits
ranging from 14.5 to 19 inches per hour. Refer to Appendix F for the complete report
with table of infiltration test results dated J une 3, 2013 prepared by Tectonic Engineering
and Surveying Consultants, P.C. A rate of 14.5 inches per hour was conservatively
used for the design of the infiltration system. All testing was done in accordance with the
New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual, Appendix D: Infiltration
Testing Requirements.

Summary
Through the application of green infrastructure (GI) techniques and/or standard SMPs
with RRv capacity, 100% of the WQv to be treated for the proposed Costco project will
be reduced. It should be noted that the total RRv provided (Item No. 14 of the GI
Worksheet in Appendix C) is a net value. This is because the application of the area
reduction practices discussed above causes the weighted CN value to increase from 82 to
91, thereby resulting in a slightly greater WQv using NRCS methodology (Item Nos. 11
and 12 of the GI Worksheet).

3.4 Water Quality Treatment Practices

The required WQv is 2.79 acre-feet (121,532 cubic feet), as stated in section 3.2, Water
Quality Volume. The proposed onsite subsurface infiltration system provides treatment of
slightly more than the full (100%) WQv, 2.91 acre-feet or 126,803 cubic feet, in a
standard practice. Detailed calculations are provided in Appendix C. By using a
standard practice listed in Table 3.3 of the DEC Design Manual that is designed in
accordance with the technical standards in Chapter 6, the project will meet the following
water quality objectives:

Capture and treat the full water quality volume (WQv).
Minimum 80% TSS removal and 40% TP removal.
Acceptable longevity in the field.
Incorporate a pretreatment mechanism.

The design of the infiltration system in accordance with Section 10.4.3 of the DEC
Design Manual to capture, remove and treat 100% WQv resulting from the 1-year, 24-
hour storm over the contributing post-development drainage areas also meets the
standards for enhanced phosphorus removal. As such, net removals of 80% particulate
phosphorus and 60% dissolved phosphorus can be achieved (Section 10.3.4).

Fueling Facility
For the purposes of storm water management, the proposed fueling facility is classified a
stormwater hotspot, which is defined in Section 4.11 of the DEC Design Manual as a
land use or activity that generates higher concentrations of hydrocarbons, trace metals
and toxicants than are found in typical stormwater runoff. As such, runoff from hotspot
areas cannot infiltrate untreated into groundwater, and a greater level of treatment is
required to prevent pollutant wash off after construction. Section 4.11 requires that
SWPPPs for stormwater hotspots include a series of operational practices at the site that
reduce the generation of pollutants. Therefore, runoff from the fueling facility will
receive separate water quality treatment prior to discharging to the site storm drainage
and the underground infiltration systems.

The fueling facility areas are graded in such a manner as to isolate their stormwater
runoff from the remainder of the site. Runoff from the tank filling area and the fuel
dispensing area will be captured and conveyed to separate perimeter sand filter systems.
Each system has been sized to capture and treat the 1-year, 24-hour storm runoff volume
from their respective contributing drainage areas. In addition, the drain inlet grates for
each perimeter sand filter will be fitted with inserts containing filters with a special
sorb type media specially designed to trap hydrocarbons, metals and silts in the runoff.
The pretreated runoff will then be conveyed to the underground infiltration system that
will provide final treatment and polishing. Refer to Appendix C for detailed design and
sizing calculations for the perimeter sand filters, and details of the catch basin inserts and
filters.

Coliform Analysis
In accordance with the NYCDEP Rules and Regulations, a coliform analysis was
performed. The analysis indicates that the proposed Project, with implementation of the
subsurface infiltration system will result in a decrease of coliform bacteria (Detailed
calculations are provided in Appendix C of the SWPPP).

3.5 Stormwater Peak Rate Control Practices

A. Methodology

The Unified Storm Water Sizing Criteria in Chapter 4 of the DEC Design Manual
typically requires that storm water quantity controls be designed and implemented
on development projects that increase runoff rates by increasing impervious area
and/or changing the hydrology under existing (pre-development) conditions.
Where required, the goal in designing and implementing storm water quantity
controls is to assure that post-development runoff rates will be equal to or less
than pre-development runoff rates for the for the 1, 10 and 100-year design storms
at a minimum.

Storm water quantity controls for Costco has been designed to assure that post-
development peak quantity runoff rates will be equal to or less than pre-
development runoff rates for the full range of design storms. A Type III, 24-hour
rainfall distribution was used for the 1, 2, 10, 25, 50 and 100-year design storms.
The rainfall values associated with each of the design storms are 3.0, 3.5, 5.0, 6.0,
7.0 and 7.5 inches, respectively. The controls have been designed in accordance
with Part III.B.2 of GP-0-10-001 and the following publications:

"Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds" (Technical Release No. 55),
published by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (formerly Soil Conservation
Service, SCS), dated J une 1986.
New York State Storm Water Management Design Manual, August 2010.

The above rainfall values for the 2, 10 and 100-year storms are from the most
current version (August 2010) of the New York State Stormwater Management
Design Manual, which uses isohyetal maps from Technical Paper No. 40
Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States (TP-40) for 24-hour rainfall
values. An updated isohyetal map for the 1 year, 24-hour rainfall based on data
ending 2003 from the Northeast Regional Climate Center (NRCC), was used for
the 1-year storm, in accordance with NYSDEC, and NYCDEP. Rainfall values
for the 25- and 50-year storms were found in Figure 10-1 of the New York
Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control Manual.

TRC is aware of updated hydrologic data and rainfall distributions for the 1-, 2-,
10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year design storms published by the NRCC in J anuary
2011. Of note, the NRCC 50-year rainfall (7.7 inches in 24 hours) and the NRCC
100-year rainfall (9.22 inches in 24 hours) amounts exceed the 7.5-inch rainfall
for the 100-year storm based on TP-40 data.

In a March 2013 meeting with representatives of the NYCDEP, TRC requested
clarification regarding which rainfall values should be utilized in the hydrologic
calculations. Although DEP representatives were aware of and recognized the
J anuary 2011 hydrologic data and rainfall distributions published by NRCC for
the various design storms, they verified that the required use of the NRCC data
has not been officially adopted as policy by the DEC. Therefore, rainfall amounts
used for the hydrologic analysis are those currently specified by in the DEC
Design Manual. See Appendix J for correspondence supporting this position.

However, in order to address concerns about the potential impacts of greater
precipitation events based on the NRCC data, the hydrologic models were run
using a range of rainfall values greater than the 100-year TP-40 value of 7.5
inches in order to evaluate the effectiveness of storm water management system
(see Section 3.5F).

The pre and post-development runoff rates provided in this SWPPP were
calculated using the computer software program entitled "HydroCAD, Version
10.0, Build 10. This program incorporates the methodology used in SCS TR-20
and TR-55 to compute and route flood hydrographs.

B. Existing (Pre-Development) Conditions

Under existing (pre-development) conditions, nine (9) drainage areas were
identified. The existing drainage areas are shown on Appendix B, Figure 4 -
Existing Drainage Area Map and summarized in Table 3-1 below. The drainage
areas total 23.62 acres, which includes 4.87 acres of off-site area in addition to the
18.75-acre site.

Design Points were identified for each of the existing drainage areas. The Design
Points represent the location where the majority of runoff from an area exits the
site. The same design points are identified in post-development conditions so that
a comparison can be made between the pre and post development conditions. A
description of each of the design points follows:

1) Design Point 1 is located at an existing 2 foot by 2 foot box culvert that
crosses Old Crompond Road approximately 100-feet west of the site. This
point is where the composite flow from Design Points 2, 4 and 5 merge.
This culvert discharges to offsite downstream areas southwest of the site,
where it drains into a large wetland area located between Old Crompond
Road and NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202. From the culvert, stormwater
runoff flows westerly through the wetland area to a piped system that
conveys the Sherry Brook to its terminus at Stoney Street where it
discharges to the Hunter Brook. Local residents have asserted that runoff
frequently bypasses the culvert at Design Point 1 and flows westerly along
Old Crompond Road some 650 feet where the runoff ponds before passing
through a 24 inch culvert, which discharges, to the wetland area cited
previously.

2) Design Point 2 is located at the southwestern boundary of the site where
the stream discharges offsite approximately 100 feet upstream from
Design Point 1. This location represents the point at which the majority of
the sites runoff leaves the site.

3) Design Point 2c is located at the existing point of discharge for the
Wetland A pond, or vernal pool. The Wetland A pond is depressed
approximately eight inches in depth, and therefore has some limited
capacity to provide stormwater detention. There is an earthen saddle at
the downstream end of the pond that functions as a weir to release flows to
the Wetland A watercourse that travel some 525 feet to Design Point 2.

4) Design Point 3 is located at the northerly boundary of the Project Site.
Runoff from this point drains overland to the north toward Bear Mountain
Extension where runoff merges with the Hunter Brook.

5) Design Point 4 is located at an existing drainage system (inlet and open
end pipe) situated along the easterly edge of Old Crompond Road some
160 feet north of its intersection with NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202. Low
flows are collected in this system and conveyed under Old Crompond
Road. The stormwater runoff flows overland to the wetland area, which
drains to the piped section of the Sherry Brook, which discharges to the
Hunter Brook. Stormwater runoff from all but the minor rainfall events
bypasses the drainage system and flows to Design Point 1.

6) Design Point 5 is located at an existing drain inlet situated along the
southerly side of NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202 at the southern boundary
of the Project Site. Low flows from the north side are collected and
conveyed in a pipe system under NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202 that
discharges to the south. Runoff from this drainage system flows westerly
to where it joins with the piped section of Sherry Brook, which discharges
to the Hunter Brook. Stormwater runoff from all but the minor rainfall
events on the north side bypasses Design Point 5 and flows to Design
Point 1. Runoff from DA-6 also contributes to this Design Point 5. See
Section 3.6 for further discussion.

Table 3-1 summarizes the characteristics of each existing drainage area.

Table 3-1
Summary of Existing Drainage Areas
Drainage
Areas
Contributing
Drainage
Areas (acres)
CN
Tc
(min.)
DA-E1a 1.16 58 11.8
DA-E1b 1.43 65 12.1
DA-E2a 6.21 62 20.1
DA-E2c 4.77 61 12.4
DA-E3 4.46 69 19.7
DA-E4 4.08 74 16.1
DA-E5 0.62 95 6.0
DA-6 0.30 98 6.0
DA-8 0.59 98 6.0

Detailed calculations for the existing (pre-development) drainage conditions are
contained in Appendix D.

C. Post Development Conditions

Under post-development conditions, ten (10) drainage areas were identified on the
site. The post-development drainage areas are shown on Appendix B Figure 5 -
Post-Development Drainage Area Map. Table 3-2 summarizes the characteristics
of each proposed drainage area. Existing drainage area DA-E5 is included in
drainage area DA-P2b-1, because the proposed storm water conveyance system
will intercept the runoff from this area and carry it through the site.

Table 3-2
Summary of Proposed Drainage Areas
Drainage
Areas
Contributing
Drainage
Areas (acres)
CN
Tc
(min.)
DA-P1a 1.14 59 11.8
DA-P1b 0.82 69 6.0
DA-P2a 2.69 63 11.7
DA-P2b-1 8.52 94 11.1
DA-P2b-2 5.11 93 10.2
DA-P2c 3.72 62 12.4
DA-P3 0.55 55 23.1
DA-P4 0.45 81 8.2
DA-6 0.41 97 6.0
DA-8 0.87 96 6.0

Storm water abatement of peak discharge rates will be provided, in part, by
reducing runoff volume through infiltration. However, in order to assure that
post-development peak runoff rates will be equal to or less than existing peak
runoff rates for the full range of design storms, stormwater detention is provided.
A dry extended detention pond will detain and attenuate runoff for the larger
storm events (i.e. the 2- through 100-year storms). Drainage Areas DA-P2b-1 and
P2b-2 drain to the pond. Reduction in peak discharge rates is accomplished
through a combination of detention storage and flow attenuation through a multi-
stage outlet structure.

D. Stream Channel Protection Volume (CPv)

Stream Channel Protection Volume Requirements (CPv), as stated in Section 4.4
of the DEC Design Manual, are designed to protect stream channels from erosion.
In New York State, this goal is accomplished by providing 24-hour extended
detention of the one (1)-year, 24-hour storm event that remains after runoff
reduction. The DEC Design Manual states that Reduction of runoff for meeting
stream channel protection objectives, where site conditions allow, is encouraged
and the volume reduction achieved through green infrastructure can be deducted
from CPv.

By sizing the proposed subsurface infiltration system for enhanced phosphorus
removal, (see Section 3.4) CPv requirements are automatically satisfied.

E. Overbank Flood Control

Overbank flood control, as stated in Section 4.5 of the DEC Design Manual, is
intended to prevent an increase in the frequency and magnitude of out-of-bank
downstream flooding. This is obtained by attenuating the post development 10-
year, 24-hour peak discharge rate (Qp) to predevelopment rates. For this Project,
the Qp has been reduced to below the existing peak discharge rate. The detailed
Qp calculations are contained in Appendix D.

F. Extreme Flood Control

The intent of the extreme flood criteria, as stated in Section 4.6 of the DEC
Design Manual is to prevent the increased risk of flood damage from large storm
events. This requires attenuation of the post development 100-year, 24-hour peak
discharge rate (Qf) to preconstruction rates. For this Project, the Qf has been
reduced to below the existing peak discharge rate. Table 3-3, Extended Detention
Pond Summary Table, indicates the inflow, outflow, water surface elevation,
storage and freeboard of the extended detention facility for each of the design
storms. Detailed calculations for the post-development drainage conditions areas
are contained in Appendix D.


Table 3-3
Extended Detention Pond Summary Table
Design
Storm
Peak
Inflow
Peak
Outflow Volume
Water
Surface
Elevation Freeboard
(cfs) (cfs) (Cu. Ft.) (ft.) (ft.)
1 0.00 0.00 0 425.00 8.25
2 6.44 0.52 1,976 425.55 7.70
10 24.41 5.49 12,025 427.63 5.62
25 36.13 7.82 21,014 429.00 4.25
50 47.74 12.87 42,048 431.41 1.84
100 53.59 20.12 47,267 431.91 1.34
Notes: Emergency Spillway Elevation Crest =432.25
Top of Berm Elevation =433.25
Freeboard measured from Top of Berm to Water Surface Elevation.

It is important to note that runoff from the Costco project during a 100-year storm
will be detained below the proposed emergency spillway crest for the detention
pond, as shown in Table 3-3. The freeboard (height above the 100-year water
surface elevation to the top of berm) provided meets the minimum height required
of one (1) foot, satisfying current NYSDEC criteria (Sources: Section 4.6 of the
DEC Design Manual and Appendix A, Guidelines for the Design of Dams).
The emergency spillway will provide safe conveyance of runoff generated from
storms greater than the 100-year event to Wetland A and the stream, as well as
providing safe conveyance of runoff from the pond in the event that the principal
outlet structures become clogged or non-operational.

A summary of the existing and post-development runoff rates to each of the
design points is presented in Table 3-4, Peak Discharge Rate Comparison Table.
Because of the storm water quantity control measures, the peak runoff rates under
the post development condition will be less than the peak runoff rates for the
existing conditions.

Table 3-4 - Peak Discharge Rate Comparison Table
Design Storm
Frequency
Rainfall
(inches)
Design
Point
Existing Runoff
Rate (cfs)
Proposed Runoff Rate
(cfs)
% Reduction
1-Year Design
Storm
3.0 1 1.78 1.23 31
2 1.24 0.73 41
2c 0.02 0.00 100
3 2.00 0.03 99
4 2.94 0.63 79
5 2.50 0.00 (Note 7) 100
2-Year Design
Storm
3.5 1 3.22 2.28 29
2 2.27 1.40 38
2c 0.17 0.09 47
3 3.04 0.08 97
4 4.15 0.82 80
5 2.96 0.20 (Note 7) 93
10-Year Design
Storm
5.0 1 9.10 6.42 29
2 6.43 3.96 38
2c 1.58 0.89 44
3 6.73 4.31 36
4 8.20 1.44 82
5 4.31 0.80 (Note 7) 81
25-Year Design
Storm
6.0 1 14.16 9.69 32
2 11.41 6.77 41
2c 4.36 2.95 32
3 9.48 7.35 22
4 11.17 1.86 83
5 5.21 1.20 (Note 7) 77
50-Year Design
Storm
7.0 1 23.74 16.54 30
2 19.37 15.31 21
2c 7.55 5.67 25
3 12.37 11.04 11
4 14.20 2.29 84
5 6.11 1.60 (Note 7) 74
100-Year
Design
Storm
7.5 1 28.71 25.73 10
2 23.51 23.22 1
2c 9.52 6.97 27
3 13.85 12.96 6
4 15.73 2.51 84
5 6.55 1.80 (Note 7) 73
Notes:
1. Design Point 1: Offsite location where stream discharges to existing culvert under Old Crompond Road.
2. Design Point 2: Location where stream discharges from the site.
3. Design Point 2c: Point of discharge from Wetland A pond/vernal pool.
4. Design Point 3: Location where site runoff discharges from site at north property line.
5. Design Point 4: Location where site runoff discharges to existing culvert at Old Crompond Road.
6. Design Point 5: Location where existing site runoff discharges to existing storm drain in NYS Route 35/U.S.
Route 202. Incorporated into Design Point 2 (DA-E5 is incorporated into DA-P2b-1) under post-development
conditions.
7. Under proposed condition, DA-5 is incorporated into DA-2b1, which drains to DP-2.

It should be noted that the largest areas from which storm water is discharged
from the site via the detention basin outlet pipes are at Design Points 2 and 3. The
combined discharge rates to DP-3, which drains north from the site, has been
reduced for all storms, thereby improving offsite drainage conditions. Discharge
rates from DP-2 are also reduced for all storms because of the proposed runoff
reduction measures and attenuation of the remaining runoff through the onsite
detention pond. Runoff from Design Point 1, which is located approximately
100-feet from the southwest corner of the property, is the most important point of
the analysis. DP-1 is the point at which runoff from Design Points 2, and 4
converge. The combined peak discharge rates at this point are markedly reduced
below present flow rates, thereby improving offsite drainage conditions.

Increased Rainfall Intensity Analysis
In order to address concerns about the potential impacts of greater precipitation
events based on the NRCC data, the hydrologic models were run using a range of
rainfall values greater than the 100-year design storm (TP-40 value of 7.5 inches).
The results of the additional analysis show that the proposed storm water
management system will provide effective reduction of post-development peak
runoff rates to pre-development rates for 24-hour rainfall events up to 8.25 inches
of rainfall at each design point (DP 1 thru DP 5) as summarized in Table 3-5
below. If the NRCC rainfall values are adopted prior to final approval, the
Applicant has agreed to amend the design to comply with the amended standards.
See Appendix D for the hydrologic model printouts.

Table 3-5
Max Peak Discharge Runoff Rate
Comparison Table
(8.25 in, 24-hr Rainfall)
Design
Point
FEIS
Existing
Conditions
(cfs)
FEIS
Proposed
Conditions
(cfs)
% Dec. (-) %
1 38.36 33.55 -13%
2 31.55 30.34 -4%
2c 16.53 9.30 -44%
3 16.16 15.79 -2%
4 18.05 2.83 -84%
5 7.22 2.09 -71%

The hydraulic design model for the infiltration system was run based on 14.5
inches of infiltration per hour, although soil testing resulted in rates from 14.5 to
19 inches per hour (see also Response III.G 17). With effective maintenance of
the pretreatment facilities, the higher infiltration rates will be achieved resulting in
greater infiltration and reduced runoff. Therefore, the proposed storm water
management system will provide effective control of post-development runoff
rates to pre-development levels for storms of even greater intensity that the water
quality storm.

3.6 Offsite Roadway Improvements - Analysis

Construction of offsite roadway improvements within the NYS Route 35/U.S.
Route 202 corridor will be required in order to mitigate the projected traffic
impacts from the proposed Costco Wholesale project. The improvements,
consisting primarily of road widening to provide extra lanes for through and
turning movements, will extend along NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202 between
Old Crompond Road and Strang Boulevard. The improvements will also include
widening of Mohansic Avenue near its intersection with NYS Route 35/U.S.
Route 202.

TRC performed an analysis of two (2) composite (containing site and offsite
areas) and three (3) offsite drainage areas, all of which are within the Hunter
Brook watershed, in order to determine the potential impacts, if any, that the
proposed roadway improvements would have on storm water quantity and quality.

Storm Water Quantity
The offsite drainage areas are shown on Figure 6 through Figure 9 in Appendix B,
with summary discussions provided below. A summary of the quantitative
analysis for the six (6) offsite drainage areas is provided in Appendix D.

DA-4 As shown in Figure 6, proposed roadway widening along the site
frontage will result in a slight increase of 0.06 acre in impervious surface.
However, as shown previously in Tables 3-1 (Section 3.5B) and 3-2 (Section
3.5C), this increase will be more than offset by the significant decrease in
composite drainage area of 3.63 acres (from 4.08 existing to 0.45) post-
development. The decrease comes from the physical diversion of the 3.63
acres to site drainage area DA-P2b-1, resulting in reduced runoff from DA-4.
The diverted runoff will be conveyed by the site drainage system to the
subsurface infiltration system for runoff reduction and treatment, and the dry
extended detention pond (P-1) for attenuation. Runoff from the remaining
areas not diverted to the site drain to Sherry Brook, which drains to Hunter
Brook.

DA-5 Similar to DA-4 (Figure 6) and as stated in Section 3.5C, the entire
drainage area DA-5 (0.62 acre total, 0.56 acre impervious) will be diverted
under post-development conditions to drainage area DA-P2b-1. Although
proposed roadway widening along the site frontage will result in 0.20 acre of
new impervious surface, the proposed storm water conveyance system will
intercept the runoff from the area and carry it through the site to the
subsurface infiltration system for runoff reduction and treatment, and the dry
extended detention pond (P-1) for attenuation.

DA-6 - Runoff from this drainage area drains to a roadside ditch, which is
conveyed to the Sherry Brook on the south side of NYS Route 35/U.S. Route
202. As shown in Figure 7, proposed roadway widening on Mohansic Avenue
for a new right turn lane at its intersection with NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202
will result in 0.14 acre of new impervious surface within the offsite drainage
area. However, when analyzed in terms of potential impact on the hydrologic
characteristics for DA-6, specifically its weighted CN, the small increase in
impervious surface relative to the 38.93 acre overall drainage area results in
no increase to CN. With no changes to the size and time of concentration
(Tc), there will be no increase in and therefore no impact to peak runoff rates
from area DA-6.

DA-7 Runoff from this drainage area drains north of NYS Route 35/U.S.
Route 202 and east of Strang Boulevard, crosses under the Taconic State
Parkway and then discharges to Hunter Brook headwaters approximately 1700
feet north of the Costco site. As shown in Figure 8, proposed roadway
widening on the westbound side of NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202 from
Strang Boulevard to a high point approximately 200 feet east of the
northbound Taconic Parkway off and on ramps will result in 0.07 acre of new
impervious surface within the offsite drainage area. Similar to DA-6, the
small increase in impervious surface relative to the 55.79 acre overall drainage
area results in no increase to CN. With no changes to the size and time of
concentration (Tc), there will be no increase in and therefore no impact to
peak runoff rates from area DA-7.

DA-8 - As shown in Figure 9, proposed roadway widening on the westbound
side of NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202 from the high point approximately 200
feet east of the northbound Taconic Parkway off and on ramps to the
southbound Taconic Parkway off and on ramps will result in 0.30 acre of new
impervious surface within the offsite drainage area. Similar to areas DA-6
and DA-7, the small increase in impervious surface relative to the 37.17 acre
overall drainage area results in no increase to CN. With no changes to the size
and time of concentration (Tc), there will be no increases in and therefore no
impact to peak runoff rates from the area, which ultimately discharges to the
DOT drainage channel running adjacent to the eastern site property line.
Runoff is conveyed to the DOT detention basin located approximately 650
feet north of the Project site, where it is attenuated and treated prior to release
to the Hunter Brook.

The diversion of runoff from approximately 4.3 acres from drainage areas DA-4
and DA-5 to the onsite storm water management system for attenuation, plus no
increases in peak runoff from areas DA-6, DA-7 and DA-8 as discussed above,
will result in overall reductions to localized peak runoff rates within the NYS
Route 35/U.S. Route 202 corridor. When combined with the reductions in onsite
peak runoff rates as shown in Table 3-4, cumulative storm water quantity impacts
are mitigated under post-development conditions, thereby improving offsite
drainage conditions.

Table 3-6
Summary of Offsite Drainage Conditions
(Contributing to Route 202/35 & Old Crompond Road Right-of-Way)
Offsite Drainage
Area Designation
Existing
Drainage Area
(ac)
Proposed
Drainage Area
(ac)
New Impervious
Area (ac)
Existing
CN
Proposed
CN
DA-4 (1) 4.08 0.45 0.06 74 81
DA-5 (2) 0.62 0.00 0.20 95 n/a
DA-6 (3)(4) 38.93 38.93 0.14 78 78
DA-7 (3) 55.79 55.79 0.07 81 81
DA-8 (3)(4) 37.17 37.17 0.30 84 84
TOTAL 136.59 132.35 0.77
n/a n/a
Notes:
(1) Since the drainage area is significantly reduced there will be a decrease in stormwater discharge, and
stormwater abatement is not required. (3.63 acres becomes part of DA-P2b-1)
(2) DA-5 runoff is rerouted to and treated by the Onsite Stormwater Management System. (0.62 Acres becomes
part of DA-P2b-1)
(3) The addition of the proposed impervious area results in no increase to the CN. Therefore, there is no
appreciable increase in peak runoff rates, and stormwater abatement is not required.

(4) Analysis is conservative as runoff from the 1-year storm will be captured and conveyed to the onsite
infiltration system.

Storm Water Quality
As part of the supplemental subsurface soils investigation performed by Tectonic,
six additional test pits, TP-1 (R) through TP-6 (R), were dug in March 2013
within the Route 202/35 right-of-way (see Appendix F report for locations) to
determine the feasibility of providing localized SMPs with RRv capacity for the
Route 202/35 improvements within the right-of-way. Infiltration tests for TP-3
(R), TP-5 (R), and TP-6 (R) were not performed because of unsuitable soil
conditions encountered, which consisted of either fill materials and/or fine-
grained soils (silts and clays) with very low permeability. Test Pit TP-4 (R) was
abandoned when excavation equipment damaged an unmarked, live water service
line after excavating to 3 feet below existing ground surface.

The subsurface soils investigation determined that providing localized SMPs with
RRv capacity within the right-of-way was not feasible, and therefore an alternate
means of meeting RRv requirements for the Route 202/35 improvements was
necessary. Table 3-7 below shows the proposed RRv/WQv treatment of each
drainage area from the improved portions of Route 202/35.

Storm water runoff from the 1-year, 24-hour storm for the majority of Drainage
Area DA-4 (0.94 ac.), plus runoff from DA-5, Sub-DA-6 and Sub-DA-8 will be
captured in proposed roadway storm drain systems and diverted to the subsurface
infiltration practice on the Costco site for 100% runoff reduction and water
quality treatment. Flows and volumes from storm events greater than the 1-year
frequency will continue to be conveyed to their current points of discharge. New
impervious pavement in these drainage areas will be 0.64 acres and the total
impervious area contributing runoff to be treated in the onsite infiltration practice
will be 2.91 acres, as summarized in Table 3-7.

Table 3-7
Offsite (Rte. 202/35) Improvement Stormwater RRv/WQv Treatment
Drainage
Area
Impervious Area (acres)
RRv/WQv
Treatment
Pre-development
(without
treatment)
Post-development
New (1)
Draining to Site
RRv/WQv
Treatment
Practice
Draining to
Offsite
RRv/WQv
Treatment
Practice
Remaining Area
(without treatment)
(3)
(a) (b) (c) (d) (a)+(b)-(c)-(d)=(e)
4 1.02 (2) 0.06 0.94 0.06 0.08
Onsite Infiltration
Offsite
Bioretention
5 0.56 0.20 0.76 - 0.00 Onsite Infiltration
7 0.48 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.48 Offsite Dry Swale
Total 3.91 0.77 2.91 0.13 1.64 -
Notes:
(1) New offsite impervious pavement associated with Route 202/35 improvements
(2) Impervious area includes gravel (0.29 acres) and paved/building (0.73 acres) surfaces.
(3) Remaining Impervious Surfaces are existing pavements that will continue to contribute runoff to their
original design point without water quality treatment.

Runoff volumes equal to the minimum required RRv from the remaining fringe
portions of drainage areas DA-4 (0.06 acres of new pavement) and Sub-DA-7
(0.07 acres of new pavement) are unable to be diverted to the onsite infiltration
practice. Runoff from these areas will be conveyed to a dry swale (Sub-DA-7) and
a bioretention practice (DA-4) for reduction and treatment. See Figures 10 and 11
for the locations of these proposed practices.

As part of the an additional supplemental subsurface soils investigation, two test
pits, TP-BINF-X18 and TP-BINF-X21, were dug in April 2014 in the proposed
locations of the bioretention area and dry swale/infiltration trench within the
Route 202/35 right-of-way (see Appendix F report for locations). Subsurface data
from the test pits show the presence of coarse to fine sands with little gravel to
within five feet below existing grade with no bedrock. Groundwater was
encountered within 5 feet below existing grade. Refer to Appendix F for the
complete report dated April 30, 2014 prepared by Tectonic Engineering and
Surveying Consultants, P.C.

Providing reduction in runoff volume greater than the minimum RRv is not
possible in these fringe areas due to various physical constraints that exist,
including limited open area within the public right-of way outside the pavement,
steep slopes, limited available vertical storage depth, and limited operational
head.

In summary, as shown in Table 3-7, column (a) indicates that under existing
conditions, there is untreated runoff from 3.91 acres draining to the roadway
right-of-way. Column (e) indicates that under post-development conditions
untreated runoff from existing impervious area draining to the roadway right-of-
way will be reduced to 1.64 acres, thereby improving water quality draining to
downstream water bodies including Sherry and Hunter Brooks.

3.7 Storm Drainage System

A. Catch Basins and Drain Inlets

All catch basins and drain inlets will be equipped with a minimum 18-inch sump.
The catch basins will act as pretreatment devices by removing coarse grit, sand
and debris. The use of sumps will extend the life and performance of the selected
SMP.

B. Storm Pipes

Storm water runoff from the site will be directed to the detention pond by way of
onsite and offsite storm drainage systems. The storm drainage systems are
designed using the rational method and are sized for the 10-yr design storm. A
Hydraulic Grade Line (HGL) analysis was also performed for the 100-yr. design
storm to assure that the stormwater runoff will be conveyed to the detention basin.
The storm drain line calculations and HGL analysis have been included in
Appendix E.
Section 4 Maintenance of Stormwater Management Practices

4.1 Long Term Maintenance and Operations

Periodic long-term inspection and maintenance of the Stormwater Management Practices
(SMPs) is essential to ensure that the facilities will function as designed. The facility
owner/operator, its successors and assigns, shall be responsible for maintaining all onsite
SMP components. These components consist of the storm water management practices
and the storm drainage collection system (pipes, drain inlets and manholes).

Comprehensive descriptions of recommended inspection and required maintenance items
and intervals for the SMPs are provided in the following publications:

New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual, August 2010.

Maintenance Program Guidance, NYSDEC.

"Reducing the Impacts from Stormwater Runoff from New Development",
NYSDEC, Second Edition, April 1993, Chapter 7.

"Controlling Urban Runoff: A Practical Manual for Planning and Designing
Urban BMPs", by Thomas R. Schueler, Department of Environmental Programs,
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG), J uly 1987,
Chapters 3, 4, 5 and 9.

These descriptions are applicable to the selected facilities and provide the foundation for
an effective facilities maintenance plan. Descriptions of the facility maintenance for this
project are provided in the following paragraphs.

A. Dry Extended Detention Pond

Inspections. Ponds should be inspected periodically during the first six (6) months,
then on a semiannual basis to ensure that the structure operates in the manner
originally intended. When possible, inspections should be conducted during and
following major storm events (minimum 1.0 rainfall in 24 hours) to determine if the
pond is meeting the targeted detention times. In particular, the extended detention
outlet control device should be inspected once every six (6) months for evidence of
clogging, or conversely, for too rapid a release. The forebay and main basin should
also be checked for the accumulation of sediment and erosion problems. Other
problems which should be checked for include: subsidence, erosion, cracking or tree
growth on the embankment; the condition of the emergency spillway; the adequacy
of upstream/downstream channel erosion control measures; erosion of the pond's
bed and banks (side slopes); and modifications to the pond or its contributing
watershed that may influence pond performance. Inspections should be carried out
with as-built pond plans and the DEC Stormwater Pond/Wetland Operation,
Maintenance and Management Inspection Checklist in hand. A sample of the
Checklist is provided in Appendix G.

Vegetation Management. The grass and turf areas in the upper stage, side-slopes,
embankment, and perimeter access areas must be mowed at least twice a year to
discourage woody growth and control weeds. Grass should not be cut below 4
inches, for if the grass is routinely cut too short filter strip performance may be
impaired. Grass clippings should be gathered and removed or directed away from
the SMP so that clogging of soil or inlet pipes can be avoided.

Other maintenance actions include de-thatching, soil conditioning and re-seeding.
Extensive application of fertilizers and pesticides to promote growth should be
discouraged since these substances may be picked up in runoff and have an
adverse effect on water quality.

Unwanted vegetation on embankments requires complete removal to ensure that it
does not return. Roots should be removed from the embankment to prevent
destabilization due to their decomposition.

Poorly maintained SMPs are particularly susceptible to the establishment of
undesirable plant communities that include monocultures and non-native
invasives that out-compete desired vegetation. Ongoing vegetation management
can minimize this concern.

Debris and Litter Removal. Debris, leaves, grass clippings and litter will accumulate
on pond embankments and side slopes, perimeter and access areas, and near the
extended detention control device and should be removed during regular mowing
operations. Particular attention should be paid to floatable debris (debris jams) that
can eventually clog the control device, trash rack or riser.

Erosion Control. The pond side-slopes, emergency spillway and embankment all
may periodically suffer from slumping and erosion, although this should not occur
often if the soils are properly compacted during construction. Re-grading and re-
vegetation may be required to correct the problems.

Nuisance Control. Standing water or soggy conditions within the lower stage of an
extended detention pond can create nuisance conditions such as odors, insects,
weeds and debris. Most of these problems can be controlled through periodic
mowing, debris removal and by ensuring that outlet structures of extended detention
control devices are kept free of debris and trash. Nuisance problems can be
contained within the lower stage of a two-stage detention facility. Wetland plants
established in the lower stage detention facility will provide habitat for birds and
predacious insects, which in turn will provide a natural check of mosquitoes and
other nuisance insects.

Structural Repairs and Replacement. Repair or replace as necessary structural
components that show signs of deterioration, seepage or failure. Various
inlet/outlet devices and standpipe or riser structures will deteriorate with time and
may have to be replaced. Concrete pipes and risers should last from 50 to 75
years. These elements should also be inspected by a licensed/certified
professional to determine their structural integrity.

Embankments should also be inspected by a licensed/certified professional who
can identify signs of seepage, settlement, and scouring. These and other problems
can threaten the structural integrity of the embankment, possibly leading to dam
failure.

Inflow Pipes. Inflow pipe locations should be checked for clogging caused by
sediment build-up, which is a common problem when runoff leaves an impervious
surface and enters a vegetative or earthen surface. Rip rap aprons shall be cleaned
of sediment and repaired (dislodged stones reset or replaced, etc.) as necessary.

Sediment Removal. Significant quantities of sediment, if left unchecked, can
accumulate in an extended detention pond and become unsightly. This can be
prevented through removal of sediment from the pretreatment forebays or
chambers as determined through inspection in order to preserve the available
stormwater management capacity of the extended detention pond, and to prevent
the outlet orifices from becoming clogged. Sediment removal in the forebay shall
occur every 3 years or after 30% of the total forebay, capacity has been lost.
Sediment removal from the main basin shall occur every five (5) years or when
the minimum water depth in the permanent pool approaches three (3) feet.

Most accumulated sediment in an extended detention pond does not constitute a
hazardous or toxic waste. Therefore, the sediment can be safely disposed of using
conventional techniques such as for fill, land application, or landfill material.

B. Vortechs9000

Standard construction details of the proposed Vortechs9000 unit are provided
in Appendix H. The facility owner, its successors and assigns, shall implement
the following inspection and maintenance protocol for the Vortechs9000 unit
using the VortechsMaintenance Guide provided in Appendix H.

C. Subsurface Infiltration System

All system components expected to receive and/or trap debris and sediment
must be inspected for clogging, excessive debris and sediment accumulation
at least two times annually. At least one of the inspections shall be done
within 24 hours after a storm event exceeding 1 inch of rainfall in order
to verify that the system is effectively infiltrating the runoff.
All sediment/silt, litter, trash and debris shall be removed from the system
upon any noticeable accumulation observed as part of the normal inspection
intervals. Sediment removal shall take place when the system is thoroughly
dry. Disposal of debris, trash, sediment, and other waste material shall be
done at suitable disposal/recycling sites and in compliance with all applicable
local, state, and federal waste regulations.
A written report of every inspection and maintenance procedure conducted in
the system shall be kept on file. The facility owner, its successors and
assigns, shall retain these reports as evidence of ongoing inspections and
maintenance.

D. Catch Basins

Catch basins and drain inlets shall be inspected at least twice a year cleaned out as
necessary. Inlet structures usually are cleaned out with a vacuum truck. Most
accumulated sediment does not constitute a hazardous or toxic waste. Therefore,
the sediment can be safely disposed of using conventional techniques such as for
fill, land application, or landfill material.

4.2 Maintenance Agreement

The Town of Yorktown, as the regulated, traditional land use control MS4 entity as
defined in the General Permit, shall require that the facility owner, its successors and
assigns, enter into an agreement to provide for the long term maintenance and
continuation of storm water control measures as part of the owners compliance with
Chapter 248, Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control, of the Town
of Yorktowns Municipal Code. A sample maintenance agreement is provided in
Appendix I.
Section 5 - Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Measures

5.1 Overview

During construction, the potential for soil erosion and sedimentation will be controlled
through the use of temporary soil erosion and sediment control devices. These devices
will be designed and installed in accordance with the New York State Standards and
Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control dated August 2005.

The soil erosion and sediment control plan will minimize the downstream erosion hazard
by controlling runoff at its source, minimizing runoff from disturbed areas and de-
concentrating storm water runoff. The objectives of the erosion control plan will be
achieved through the management of storm water runoff during construction.

5.2 Plan Contents

The soil erosion and sediment control measures that will be applied to the site during
earthwork and grading operation are as follows:

Minimize the amount of land disturbance at any one time.
Retain existing vegetation where feasible.
Stabilize disturbed areas that will not require further earthwork operations within
the required time frames specified under the General Permit and the New York
State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control.
Trap sediment on-site prior to discharge from the site.

Construction of the Project, which includes the Costco site, the Old Crompond Road
utility extensions, and the Route 35/202 improvements, shall be done in strict
conformance with the detailed scheduling and sequencing plans referenced in Section 5.5
of this document below and as part of the erosion and sediment control (ESC) plans. As
shown in the Preliminary Construction Schedule (Figure 12, Appendix B) and in
accordance with Part II.C.3 of GP-0-10-001, the construction will disturb or leave
exposed no greater than five (5) acres of soil at any one time. The total project proposes
a maximum disturbed area of approximately 16.5 acres (Site 14 ac.; Route 35/202 2.1
ac; Old Crompond Road 0.4 ac.). Each phase/stage area must be temporarily and/or
permanently stabilized prior to disturbing subsequent phase/stage areas. As each
phase/stage area is cleared and graded, SESC measures shall be established and the soil
stabilized. It is important to note that the disturbance area values for the Project shown in
the Preliminary Construction Schedule represent the proposed maximum amount of soil
disturbance/exposure that will occur for each month during the construction period. It is
envisioned that the implementation of temporary and/or permanent soil stabilization
measures within each phase/stage area as described below should result in actual
Project disturbance areas less than the maximums shown.

ESC measures shall be adjusted on a continual basis as earth-moving operations proceed
from one phase/stage area to another. Sensitive resources, i.e. wetlands, will receive
additional protection by using double rows of silt fence along the proposed limits of
disturbance within the buffer. Dewatering operations and surface runoff from disturbed
areas will be directed to sediment control measures.

A detailed phasing/staging plan showing compliance with the 5-acre maximum
disturbance requirement can be found on Drawings C-402A thru C-402E, and will be
submitted to the Town Planning Department for acceptance in conjunction with Final Site
Plan Approval. The accepted plan will be used by the Applicants, Towns, and/or
NYCDEP inspectors for field review and monitoring of the Contractors activities.

In accordance with Part III.C of GP-0-10-001, the Owner/Operator shall comply with the
following requirements:

The Owner/Operator shall have a qualified inspector conduct at least one (1) site
inspection every seven (7) calendar days.
In areas where soil disturbance activity has been temporarily or permanently ceased,
temporary and/or permanent soil stabilization measures shall be installed and/or
implemented within seven (7) days from the date the soil disturbance activity ceased.
The soil stabilization measures selected shall be in conformance with the most current
version of the technical standard, New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion
and Sediment Control.
The Owner/Operator shall install any additional site-specific practices needed to
protect water quality.
At a minimum, the qualified inspector shall inspect all erosion and sediment control
practices to ensure integrity and effectiveness, of all post SESC practices.
The qualified inspector shall prepare an inspection report and notify the owner or
operator and contractor of any corrective action that needs to be made.

Once disturbed areas have been stabilized, demolition or construction activities may
advance to new areas. Stabilization of disturbed areas must be provided by employing
temporary and/or permanent control measures.

Hydrology During Construction
The temporary sediment basin will be constructed early in Phase 2 of the project
construction (see Drawing C-401B). Runoff from the site during construction will be
directed to the sediment basin for attenuation and sediment removal.

The temporary sediment basin during construction has been designed to be larger than the
post-development detention basin. The sediment basin is designed to control the runoff
from the 10-year storm. This design, which is in accordance with the New York
Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, accounts for the
following:
Increased runoff volume due to conditions during construction (including winter
conditions in which heavy rainfall can occur on frozen ground);
Additional storage volume necessary to provide proper sediment storage and
settlement, and;
To account for the fact that the infiltration facility cannot be brought on-line until
final stabilization of all contributing areas has occurred.

Considering these conditions, the sediment basin during construction will be larger than
the post-development detention basin, thereby providing extra protection for adjacent
Wetland A and downstream water bodies, including Sherry and Hunter Brooks. The
sediment storage volume provided conservatively accounts for 3,600 cubic feet of
sediment storage volume for each acre of contributing area (approximately 13.6 acres)
even though a maximum of only five acres may be disturbed at any one time, which will
further enhance settlement. Trapped sediment will be removed regularly from the
sediment basin to maintain adequate storage volume and ensure proper functioning of the
basin. The sediment basin design includes a riser pipe, an anti-vortex device, trash rack
and dewatering orifice that will provide the minimum 10-hour dewatering duration to
allow for adequate settlement. As another precaution to prevent sediment from reaching
Wetland A, the temporary sediment basin will discharge only to the north where it will
discharge to a level spreader. The outflow will then spread out over the existing wooded
terrain along its existing flow path allowing for further natural filtration. An added
precaution to protect Wetland A and downstream water bodies includes a double row of
sediment barrier, which will be installed along the entire westerly limit of work adjacent
to Wetland A to trap sediment and provide a physical barrier separating the wetland from
construction activities.

While under construction, runoff conditions of disturbed areas (bare/frozen soil) will be
similar to impervious conditions with short times of concentration and high runoff values,
as accounted for under post-development conditions. Since the sediment storage volume
within the sediment basin has been designed conservatively, as described above,
additional storage volume in the basin will be available to account for runoff in these
more extreme conditions. Site runoff will be directed (i.e. temporary drainage ditches
and water bars) to sediment control measures (i.e. sediment basin and sediment traps) for
settlement prior to discharge. Sediment barriers and traps will capture sediment from
perimeter areas.

5.3 Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures

In addition to the temporary sediment basin, other temporary soil erosion and sediment
control measures will include, but not limited to, silt fences, diversion ditches,
stabilization of the construction entrance, sediment traps, storm drain inlet protection,
hydro-seeding and dust control. Detailed descriptions of each of the measures that will
be employed on the project have been included in the following paragraphs.

A. Silt Fences

Silt fences consist of standard strength filter fabric with wire mesh reinforcement
(or extra strength synthetic filter fabric) secured to supporting posts and
entrenched at the base. The fence will be three feet high; with the wire fence
reinforcement constructed of a minimum 14.5-gauge galvanized steel wire and a
minimum mesh spacing of six inches. Fences will be secured in place by
galvanized steel or wood posts set at six feet on-center. The filter fabric will be
stapled to the upgradient face of each fence. The purpose of silt fences is to
intercept and detain sediment contained in sheet overland runoff from disturbed
areas of limited extent. In addition, the silt fencing will physically delineate the
limit of work on the down slope side of work areas.

Installation and Maintenance

Silt fences will be installed where the disturbed land is located at a
minimum distance of ten feet from critical areas (streams and wetlands).
Silt fences will be installed on the down slope side of work areas, as close
to the disturbed areas as possible.
Filter fabric requirements and installation design criteria will be in
accordance with the requirements in the New York State Standards and
Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control.
Sediment will be removed from behind silt fences when sediment has
accumulated to one-third of the original height of the fence.

B. Hydromulch

Hydromulch shall be one of the primary means of stabilizing areas of disturbed
earth. Hydromulch is composed of a combination of cellulose (partially digested
wood fibers) and crimped polyester fibers in a gum-based tackifier. The
ingredients are non-toxic, biodegradable, photodegradable and environmentally
safe. Hydromulch is typically mixed with water and applied from a tank truck
using power equipment.

Hydromulches shall be applied in accordance with the manufacturers
requirements and/or the requirements of the New York State Standards and
Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, with the top two inches of
compacted or crusted soil loosened prior to application. Hydromulch will be used
with mulching described below for all areas with slopes up to 20%. The
mulching on site will be continuously inspected and maintained for ultimate
effectiveness.

C. Mulching

Mulch shall be the other primary means of stabilizing areas of disturbed earth.
Temporary stabilization of disturbed areas will be accomplished by using a mulch
of wood chips created from the low-value trees cleared on site. These chips will
be stockpiled and protected in a manner similar to a soil stockpile until needed.
Straw mulch will be used for stabilized areas associated with permanent seeding.

Mulches shall be applied in accordance with the requirements of the New York
State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, with the
top two inches of compacted or crusted soil loosened prior to application.

Mulching is a very commonly used, well-established and highly effective
stabilization method. The mulching on site will be continuously inspected and
maintained for ultimate effectiveness.

D. Hydroseeding

Hydroseeding will be the means of providing temporary stabilization. The seed
mix of fertilizer, water, and mulch will be applied as a mixture utilizing power
equipment. The mix will be applied in two equal applications. Non-toxic,
vegetable dyes will be used to determine the extent of coverage upon application.
After grass has appeared, those areas that fail to show a uniform stand of grass
will be re-seeded. This process will be repeated until all areas are covered with
satisfactory growth. Seed mixtures appropriate to the soils, slopes, and uses will
be selected in accordance with the New York State Standards and Specifications
for Erosion and Sediment Control.

E. Erosion Control Blankets

Erosion control blankets typically consist of a rolled mat of interwoven straw
and/or coconut fibers with a top and/or bottom layer of natural or synthetic
netting.

Erosion control blankets will be used to stabilize all areas with slopes greater than
20%. Erosion control blankets will also be used with hydroseeding as a
temporary stabilization measure until final seeding. In addition, blankets can be
used as a permanent stabilization measure to help retain topsoil and seed after
final seeding, or as permanent turf reinforcement. This is possible because
erosion control blankets are classified under the following categories: temporary,
photodegradable; temporary, long-term; temporary, biodegradable; long-term
biodegradable; and permanent.

F. Dust Control

Dust Control shall be accomplished through the use of vegetative cover, mulch,
spray adhesive, sprinkling or barriers.

Water will be applied by sprinkler or water truck as necessary during grading
operations to minimize sediment transport and maintain acceptable air quality
conditions. Repetitive treatments will be done as needed until grades are paved or
stabilized with vegetation.

G. Stabilized Construction Entrance

A ramp of crushed stone extending a minimum distance of 50 feet will be
installed at each point of ingress and egress from the site. The purpose of the
device is to minimize the potential of tracking mud from the site onto public
rights-of-way.


Minimum length will be 50 feet.
Stone size - use 1-4" stone, or reclaimed or recycled concrete equivalent.
Length - not less than 50 feet (except on a single residence lot where a 30-
foot minimum length would apply).
Thickness - not less than six (6) inches.
Width - twelve (12) foot minimum, but not less than the full width at
points where ingress or egress occurs. Twenty-four (24) foot if single
entrance to site.
Filter cloth - will be placed over the entire area prior to placing of stone.
Surface water - all surface water flowing or diverted toward construction
entrances shall be piped across the entrance. If piping is impractical, a
mountable berm with 5:1 slopes will be permitted.
Maintenance - the entrance shall be maintained in a condition, which will
prevent tracking, or flowing of sediment onto public rights-of-way, all
sediment spilled, dropped, washed or tracked onto public rights-of-way
must be removed immediately.
When washing is required, it shall be done on an area stabilized with
stone and which drains into an approved sediment trapping device.
Periodic inspection and needed maintenance shall be provided after each
rain.

H. Water Barriers (Roadway Interceptor Swales)

This temporary device consists of an earthen berm and a crushed stone-filled
swale constructed across sloping unpaved proposed roadways. The purpose of this
device is to direct runoff away from the road surface and minimize sediment from
entering the drainage system. This shortens the length of disturbed slope by
intercepting runoff and diverting it away from the roadway catch basins and into a
channel.

Installation

Swales will be placed a cross roads, which are to be constructed in fill
every 150 feet on slopes of five to ten percent, and every 300 feet on
slopes less than five percent.
Swales will have a contributory drainage area less than five acres.
Swales will drain to sediment basins.

I. Soil Stockpiling

Topsoil and earth material shall be stockpiled for reuse at the location shown on
the Erosion Control Plans. The stockpile has been located away from sensitive
vegetation or specimen trees and on a dry level area.

Installation

All stockpiles shall be protected using a perimeter dike of silt fence or
straw bale sediment barriers to prevent sediment runoff. This applies to
all stockpiles remaining in place for more than two weeks.
Stockpile side slopes shall not exceed 2 horizontal to 1 vertical (2:1).
Temporary seeding or covering of stockpiles shall be completed within
two weeks of formation.

J . Inlet Protection (Stone and Block)

Temporary catch basin protection will be employed to prevent the deposition of
sediment into the storm sewer system prior to the stabilization of exposed areas
with vegetation or pavement.


Stone and block filters will be placed around each catch basin inlet prior to
paving or stabilization with vegetation.
Sediment shall be removed from the filters when sediment has
accumulated to 50 percent of the filter's original height.

K. Catch Basin Sediment Trap III

Catch basin sediment traps will be utilized to provide sediment storage capacity
and to prevent the deposition of sediment into the storm sewer system prior to the
stabilization of exposed areas with vegetation or pavement.


Sediment shall be removed and the trap restored to its original dimensions
when the sediment has accumulated to 1/2 the design depth of the trap.
Removed sediment shall be deposited in a suitable area and in such a
manner that it will not erode.
The volume of sediment storage shall be 3600 cubic feet per acre of
contributory drainage.
The structure shall be inspected after each rain and repairs made as
needed.
Construction operations shall be carried out in such a manner that erosion
and water pollution shall be minimized.
The sediment trap shall be removed and the area stabilized when the
constructed drainage area has been properly stabilized.
Cut slopes shall be 1:1 or flatter.

L. Excavation Dewatering

Sump pits shall be constructed to where water will collect in building foundation
excavation, utility trench or other location where water may collect during the
excavation phase of construction. The sump pit shall be constructed of a perforated
vertical standpipe placed in the center of the pit to collect filtered water. The
vertical standpipe shall be wrapped in a filter cloth (Mirafi 100X, Poly Filter GB, or
a filter cloth with an equivalent sieve size between 40 - 80). It is recommended that
to inch hardware cloth be wrapped around and secured to the standpipe prior to
attaching the filter cloth.

The vertical standpipe assembly shall be placed on a 12-inch layer of 2 inch
aggregate. After installing the standpipe, the pit shall be backfilled with 2 inch
aggregate. The standpipe shall project 12 to 18 inches above grade. The number of
sump pits and locations shall be determined by the contractor.

Water is then pumped from the center of the standpipe to a suitable designed
sediment trap, sediment basin, or stabilized area, such as a filter strip. If a sediment
trap or portable sediment tank is used, the tank or trap shall have a minimum
volume of the 16 times the pump discharge rate.

If oil contaminated water is encountered it shall be pumped into an oil/water/grit
separator unit. The separator unit shall be designed for gravity separation of free
oils (hydrocarbons and petroleum byproducts) along with some settleable solids.
The oil and grease concentration in the effluent from the oil/water unit shall not
exceed 10mg/l (10 ppm). The unit shall remove all free oil droplets equal to or
greater than 20 microns. The Separator Unit shall also comply with all Federal,
State and Local regulations. A portable sediment tank will be required as
pretreatment if the selected oil water separator does not have a grit chamber.

The Contractor shall submit the performance data for the selected oil/water
separator unit for review and approval prior to delivery to the site.

M. Concrete Waste

Discharge of excess or waste concrete and/or wash water from Concrete Ready-
Mix Trucks will be allowed on the construction site, but only in specifically
designated diked areas that have been prepared to prevent contact between the
concrete and/or wash water and storm water that will be discharged from the site or
in locations where waste concrete can be placed into forms to make riprap or other
useful concrete products. The cured residue from the concrete washout diked areas
shall be disposed in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations. The
jobsite superintendent is responsible for assuring that these procedures are
followed.

N. Temporary Fuel Tanks

Temporary on-site fuel tanks for construction vehicles shall meet all state and
federal regulations. Tanks shall have approved spill containment with the capacity
required by the applicable regulations. The tank shall be in sound condition free of
rust or other damage, which might compromise containment. Hoses, valves,
fittings, caps, filler nozzles, and associated hardware shall be maintained in proper
working condition at all times.

O. Sanitary Waste

A licensed sanitary waste management contractor, as required by local
regulations, will collect all sanitary waste from on-site portable units.

5.4 Permanent Erosion Control Measures

a. Rip Rap Outlet Protection

Rip Rap Outlet Protection has been designed in accordance with the Standards
and Specifications for Rock Outlet Protection and were employed at storm drain
outlets.

Rip Rap Outlet Protection (Scour Hole) has been employed at Storm Drain outlets
ES A-1, and EP B-1. A depression was provided at the outlet to reduce outlet
velocities and provide improved dispersal of the culvert discharge to further
minimize potential erosion.

5.5 Construction Schedule and Sequence

The Preliminary Construction Schedule (Figure 12) shows that construction of the Project
is anticipated to take approximately 15 months beginning in September 2014 with
completion by December 2015. The Project construction phases and sequencing are
shown in Drawings C-401A through C-401E (see also FEIS Exhibits III.O-4a through
4e).

5.6 Site Assessment Inspections

As of the effective date of the General Permit, site assessment and inspections are
required for all construction activities as described in Part IV. of GP-0-10-001. The site
assessment and inspections required for this project will be as follows:

A. The owner/operator shall have a qualified inspector" conduct an assessment of
the site prior to the commencement of construction and certify in an inspection
report that the appropriate erosion and sediment controls described in the SWPPP
and required by the General Permit have been adequately installed or
implemented to ensure overall preparedness of the site for the commencement of
construction. Qualified Inspector, such as a licensed Professional Engineer,
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC), licensed
Landscape Architect, or other Department endorsed individual(s). It also means
someone working under the direct supervision of the licensed Professional
Engineer or licensed Landscape Architect, provided that person has training in the
principles and practices of erosion and sediment control. Training in the
principles and practices of erosion and sediment control means that an individual
performing a site inspection has received four (4) hours of training, endorsed by
the Department, from a Soil and Water Conservation District, CPESC, Inc. or
other Department endorsed entity in proper erosion and sediment control
principles no later than two (2) years from date this general permit is issued.

B. Following the commencement of construction, the qualified inspector shall
conduct at least one (1) site inspection every seven (7) calendar days.

C. Where soil disturbance activities have been temporarily suspended (e.g. winter
shutdown) and temporary stabilization measures have been applied to all
disturbed areas, the qualified inspector shall conduct a site inspection at least once
every thirty (30) calendar days. The owner/operator shall notify the DEC
Regional Office stormwater contact person (see contact information in Appendix
F of GP-0-10-001) in writing prior to reducing the frequency of inspections.

D. Where soil disturbance activities have been shut down with partial project
completion, the qualified inspector can stop conducting inspections if all areas
disturbed as of the project shutdown date have achieved final stabilization, (i.e. all
soil disturbance activities have ceased and a uniform, perennial vegetative cover
with a density of eighty (80) percent over the entire pervious surface has been
established; or other equivalent stabilization measures, such as permanent
landscape mulches, rock rip-rap or washed/crushed stone have been applied on all
disturbed areas that are not covered by permanent structures, concrete or
pavement) and all post-construction stormwater management practices required
for the completed portion of the project have been constructed in conformance
with the SWPPP and are operational. The owner/operator shall notify the DEC
Regional Office stormwater contact person (see contact information in Appendix
F of GP-0-10-001) or MS4 in writing prior to the shutdown. If soil disturbance
activities are not resumed within 2 years from the date of shutdown, the
owner/operator shall have the qualified inspector(s) perform a final inspection and
certify that all disturbed areas have achieved final stabilization, all temporary,
structural erosion and sediment control measures have been removed; and that all
post-construction stormwater management practices have been constructed in
conformance with the SWPPP by signing the Final Stabilization and Post-
Construction Stormwater Management Practice certification statements on the
Notice of Termination (NOT). The owner/operator shall then submit the
completed NOT form.

E. The qualified inspector shall prepare an inspection report subsequent to each and
every inspection. At a minimum, the inspection report shall include and/or
address the following:

1. Date and time of inspection;
2. Name and title of person(s) performing inspection;
3. A description of the weather and soil conditions (e.g. dry, wet, saturated)
at the time of the inspection;
4. A description of the condition of the runoff at all points of discharge from
the construction site. This shall include identification of any discharges of
sediment from the construction site. Include discharges from conveyance
systems (i.e. pipes, culverts, ditches, etc.) and overland flow;
5. A description of the condition of all natural surface water bodies located
within, or immediately adjacent to, the property boundaries of the
construction site which receive runoff from disturbed areas. This shall
include identification of any discharges of sediment to the surface water
body;
6. Identification of all erosion and sediment control practices that need repair
or maintenance;
7. Identification of all erosion and sediment control practices that were not
installed properly or are not functioning as designed and need to be
reinstalled or replaced;
8. Description and sketch of areas that are disturbed at the time of the
inspection and areas that have been stabilized (temporary and/or final)
since the last inspection;
9. Current phase of construction of all post-construction stormwater
management practices and identification of all construction that is not in
conformance with the SWPPP and technical standards; and
10. Corrective action(s) that must be taken to install, repair, replace or
maintain erosion and sediment control practices and to correct deficiencies
identified with the construction of the post-construction stormwater
management practice(s).
11. Digital photographs, with dates stamp, that clearly show the condition of
all practices that have been identified as needing corrective actions. The
qualified inspector shall attach paper color copies of the digital
photographs to the inspection report being maintained onsite within seven
(7) calendar days of the date of the inspection. The qualified inspector
shall also take digital photographs, with date stamp, that clearly show the
condition of the practice after corrective action has been completed and
include them in the inspection report that documents the completion of the
corrective action work within seven (7) calendar days of that inspection.

Within one business day of the completion of an inspection, the qualified
inspector shall notify the owner/operator and appropriate contractor (or
subcontractor) of any corrective actions that need to be taken. The contractor (or
subcontractor) shall begin implementing the corrective actions within one
business day of this notification and shall complete the corrective actions in a
reasonable time frame.

All inspection reports shall be signed by the qualified inspector. Pursuant to Part
II.C.2 of GP-0-10-001, the inspection reports shall be maintained on site with the
SWPPP.

F. The Contractor(s) shall be responsible to provide proper storage of construction
materials and chemicals on site, as well as proper containment (dumpsters, etc.)
and disposal of litter, construction debris and waste materials. The contractor
shall also define what pollution controls, including spill prevention and response,
will be in place to prevent exposure to storm water of those materials that could
become a pollutant source.

G. The owner/operator shall maintain a record of all inspection reports in a site
logbook. The site logbook shall be maintained on site and be made available to
the permitting authority upon request. Prior to the commencement of
construction, the owner/operator shall certify in the site logbook that the SWPPP
meets all Federal, State and local erosion and sediment control requirements.

H. Prior to the commencement of construction, the owner/operator shall have all
Contractors and Subcontractors sign a copy of the certification statement. All
certifications must be included in the SWPPP. All Contractors and Subcontractors
identified in a. SWPPP shall sign a copy of the following certification statement
before undertaking any construction on activity at the site identified in the
SWPPP:

I hereby certify that I understand and agree to comply with the terms and
conditions of the SWPPP and agree to implement any corrective actions identified
by the qualified inspector during a site inspection. I also understand that the
owner or operator must comply with the terms and conditions of the most current
version of the New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("SPDES")
general permit for stormwater discharges from construction activities and that it
is unlawful for any person to cause or contribute to a violation of water quality
standards. Furthermore, I understand that certifying false, incorrect or
inaccurate information is a violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the
State of New York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative
proceedings.

I. The above certification must also identify the specific elements of the SWPPP
that each contractor and subcontractor will be responsible for and include the
name and title of the person providing the signature; the name and title of the
trained individual(s) (as defined in Appendix A of GP-0-10-001) responsible for
SWPPP implementation; the name, address and telephone number of the
contracting firm; the address (or other identifying description) of the site; and the
date the certification is made.

J . The owner/operator shall post at the site, in a publicly accessible location,
summary of the site inspection activities on a monthly basis.

K. The owner/operator shall also prepare a written summary of its status with respect
to compliance with this general permit at a minimum frequency of every three
months during which coverage under this permit exists. The summary should
address the status of achieving each component of the SWPPP.

L. Prior to filing of the Notice of Termination (NOT) or the end of permit term, the
owner/operator shall have the qualified inspector perform a final site inspection.
The qualified inspector shall certify that all disturbed areas have achieved final
stabilization (as defined in Item D above) and all temporary, structural erosion
and sediment control measures have been removed; and that all post-construction
stormwater management practices have been constructed in conformance with the
SWPPP by signing the Final Stabilization and Post-Construction Stormwater
Management Practice certification statements on the NOT.
Section 6 - Summary and Conclusions

Based on the information presented in this report, the implementation of the proposed Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Plan for the Project will meet the design objectives stated in this
Report.

Respectfully submitted,

TRC Engineers, Inc.

Nickitas F. Panayotou P.E.
Principal, Land Development

Thomas D. Holmes
Project Manager

Christopher S. Hanzlik, CPESC, CPSWQ
Project Manager

Under New York State Education Law Article 145 - Engineering, Section 7209 (2), it is a violation of this law for
any person to alter an item in any way in this Report, unless acting under the direction of a licensed professional
engineer. If an item bearing the seal of an engineer is altered, the altering engineer shall affix to the item his seal
and the notation "altered by" followed by his signature and the date of such alteration, and a specific description of
the alteration.

Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\Reports\SWPPP\FEIS SWPPP\FEIS SWPPP-GP10 Final_Purged J uly 2014.docx

Project No. 165213
APPENDIX A

CONTRACTOR/SUB-CONTRACTOR SPDES PERMIT CERTIFICATION

Project Name: COSTCO Wholesale
Address: NYS Route 35/U.S. Route 202
Yorktown, New York

In accordance with the requirements of the NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for Construction
Activities, GP-0-10-001, the Contractor and Subcontractor are required to certify that they
understand the permit conditions and their responsibilities. Any Contractor or Sub-Contractor
performing an activity that involves soil disturbance shall provide a signed copy of this
certification to the Engineer prior to performing any Contract work.

I hereby certify that I understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the SWPPP and
agree to implement any corrective actions identified by the qualified inspector during a site inspection. I
also understand that the owner or operator must comply with the terms and conditions of the most recent
version of the New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("SPDES") general permit for
stormwater discharges from construction activities and that it is unlawful for any person to cause or
contribute to a violation of water quality standards. Furthermore, I understand that certifying false,
incorrect or inaccurate information is a violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the State of New
York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceedings.

Company Name:
Address:

Tel.:
Fax:
Description of Specific SWPPP Elements Company is Responsible For:

Signature Date

Printed Name Title
Name and Title of Trained Individual(s) Responsible for SWPPP Implementation:

Project No. 165213
APPENDIX B
FIGURES
FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
FIGURE 3 NRCS SOILS MAP
FIGURE 4 PRE-DEVELOPMENT SWM MAP
FIGURE 5 POST-DEVELOPMENT SWM MAP
FIGURE 6 OFFSITE DRAINAGE AREA MAPS (DA-4 & DA-5)
FIGURE 7 OFFSITE DRAINAGE AREA MAPS (DA-6)
FIGURE 10 - OFFSITE WATER QUALITY BMP LOCATION (DA-4)
FIGURE 11 - OFFSITE WATER QUALITY BMP LOCATION (DA-7)
FIGURE 12 - PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
S
h
e
r
r
y

B
r
o
o
k

S
I
T
E

Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Crompond Rd
O
ld

C
r
o
m
p
o
n
d
R
d
T
a
c
o
n
i
c

S
t
a
t
e

P
k
w
y
M
o
h
a
n
s
i
c

A
v
e
T
a
c
o
n
i
c

S
t
a
t
e

P
k
w
y
202
ChC
Ub
PnB
Sh
LcB
CsD
Ub
ChC
SuB
P
n
C
598260
598260
598320
598320
598380
598380
598440
598440
598500
598500
598560
598560
598620
598620 4
5
7
1
7
0
0
4
5
7
1
7
0
0
4
5
7
1
7
6
0
4
5
7
1
7
6
0
4
5
7
1
8
2
0
4
5
7
1
8
2
0
4
5
7
1
8
8
0
4
5
7
1
8
8
0
4
5
7
1
9
4
0
4
5
7
1
9
4
0
4
5
7
2
0
0
0
4
5
7
2
0
0
0
4
5
7
2
0
6
0
4
5
7
2
0
6
0
4
5
7
2
1
2
0
4
5
7
2
1
2
0
4
5
7
2
1
8
0
4
5
7
2
1
8
0
0 100 200 300 50
Feet
0 40 80 120 20
Meters
41 17' 43''
7
3

4
9
'

1
9
'
'
41 17' 26''
7
3

4
9
'

1
9
'
'
41 17' 26''
41 17' 43''
7
3

4
9
'

3
5
'
'
7
3

4
9
'

3
5
'
'
Map Scale: 1:2,430 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Soil MapWestchester County, New York
(COSTCO - 165213)
Natural Resources Natural Resources Natural Resources Natural Resources
Conservation Service Conservation Service Conservation Service Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
4/28/2010
Page 1 of 3
Figure 3
M
A
P

L
E
G
E
N
D
M
A
P

I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
A
r
e
a

o
f

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t

(
A
O
I
)
A
r
e
a

o
f

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t

(
A
O
I
)
S
o
i
l
s
S
o
i
l

M
a
p

U
n
i
t
s
S
p
e
c
i
a
l

P
o
i
n
t

F
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
B
l
o
w
o
u
t
B
o
r
r
o
w

P
i
t
C
l
a
y

S
p
o
t
C
l
o
s
e
d

D
e
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
G
r
a
v
e
l

P
i
t
G
r
a
v
e
l
l
y

S
p
o
t
L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l
L
a
v
a

F
l
o
w
M
a
r
s
h

o
r

s
w
a
m
p
M
i
n
e

o
r

Q
u
a
r
r
y
M
i
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s

W
a
t
e
r
P
e
r
e
n
n
i
a
l

W
a
t
e
r
R
o
c
k

O
u
t
c
r
o
p
S
a
l
i
n
e

S
p
o
t
S
a
n
d
y

S
p
o
t
S
e
v
e
r
e
l
y

E
r
o
d
e
d

S
p
o
t
S
i
n
k
h
o
l
e
S
l
i
d
e

o
r

S
l
i
p
S
o
d
i
c

S
p
o
t
S
p
o
i
l

A
r
e
a
S
t
o
n
y

S
p
o
t
V
e
r
y

S
t
o
n
y

S
p
o
t
W
e
t

S
p
o
t
O
t
h
e
r
S
p
e
c
i
a
l

L
i
n
e

F
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
G
u
l
l
y
S
h
o
r
t

S
t
e
e
p

S
l
o
p
e
O
t
h
e
r
P
o
l
i
t
i
c
a
l

F
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
C
i
t
i
e
s
W
a
t
e
r

F
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
O
c
e
a
n
s
S
t
r
e
a
m
s

a
n
d

C
a
n
a
l
s
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
a
i
l
s
I
n
t
e
r
s
t
a
t
e

H
i
g
h
w
a
y
s
U
S

R
o
u
t
e
s
M
a
j
o
r

R
o
a
d
s
L
o
c
a
l

R
o
a
d
s
M
a
p

S
c
a
l
e
:

1
:
2
,
4
3
0

i
f

p
r
i
n
t
e
d

o
n

A

s
i
z
e

(
8
.
5
"

1
1
"
)

s
h
e
e
t
.
T
h
e

s
o
i
l

s
u
r
v
e
y
s

t
h
a
t

c
o
m
p
r
i
s
e

y
o
u
r

A
O
I

w
e
r
e

m
a
p
p
e
d

a
t

1
:
1
2
,
0
0
0
.
P
l
e
a
s
e

r
e
l
y

o
n

t
h
e

b
a
r

s
c
a
l
e

o
n

e
a
c
h

m
a
p

s
h
e
e
t

f
o
r

a
c
c
u
r
a
t
e

m
a
p
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
S
o
u
r
c
e

o
f

M
a
p
:

N
a
t
u
r
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s

C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
W
e
b

S
o
i
l

S
u
r
v
e
y

U
R
L
:

h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
e
b
s
o
i
l
s
u
r
v
e
y
.
n
r
c
s
.
u
s
d
a
.
g
o
v
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e

S
y
s
t
e
m
:

U
T
M

Z
o
n
e

1
8
N

N
A
D
8
3
T
h
i
s

p
r
o
d
u
c
t

i
s

g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

U
S
D
A
-
N
R
C
S

c
e
r
t
i
f
i
e
d

d
a
t
a

a
s

o
f
t
h
e

v
e
r
s
i
o
n

d
a
t
e
(
s
)

l
i
s
t
e
d

b
e
l
o
w
.
S
o
i
l

S
u
r
v
e
y

A
r
e
a
:

W
e
s
t
c
h
e
s
t
e
r

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

N
e
w

Y
o
r
k
S
u
r
v
e
y

A
r
e
a

D
a
t
a
:

V
e
r
s
i
o
n

5
,

F
e
b

5
,

2
0
1
0
D
a
t
e
(
s
)

a
e
r
i
a
l

i
m
a
g
e
s

w
e
r
e

p
h
o
t
o
g
r
a
p
h
e
d
:

7
/
3
1
/
2
0
0
6
T
h
e

o
r
t
h
o
p
h
o
t
o

o
r

o
t
h
e
r

b
a
s
e

m
a
p

o
n

w
h
i
c
h

t
h
e

s
o
i
l

l
i
n
e
s

w
e
r
e
c
o
m
p
i
l
e
d

a
n
d

d
i
g
i
t
i
z
e
d

p
r
o
b
a
b
l
y

d
i
f
f
e
r
s

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

b
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
i
m
a
g
e
r
y

d
i
s
p
l
a
y
e
d

o
n

t
h
e
s
e

m
a
p
s
.

A
s

a

r
e
s
u
l
t
,

s
o
m
e

m
i
n
o
r

s
h
i
f
t
i
n
g
o
f

m
a
p

u
n
i
t

b
o
u
n
d
a
r
i
e
s

m
a
y

b
e

e
v
i
d
e
n
t
.
S
o
i
l

M
a
p
W
e
s
t
c
h
e
s
t
e
r

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

N
e
w

Y
o
r
k
(
C
O
S
T
C
O

-

1
6
5
2
1
3
)
N
a
t
u
r
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
W
e
b

S
o
i
l

S
u
r
v
e
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

C
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
v
e

S
o
i
l

S
u
r
v
e
y
4
/
2
8
/
2
0
1
0
P
a
g
e

2

o
f

3
Figure 3
Map Unit Legend
Westchester County, New York (NY119)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
ChC Charlton loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 11.0 48.9%
CsD Chatfield-Charlton complex, hilly, very rocky 1.5 6.6%
LcB Leicester loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, stony 1.4 6.2%
PnB Paxton fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 2.2 9.8%
PnC Paxton fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 0.1 0.6%
Sh Sun loam 1.2 5.3%
SuB Sutton loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes 0.5 2.3%
Ub Udorthents, smoothed 4.6 20.4%
Totals for Area of Interest 22.5 100.0%
Soil MapWestchester County, New York COSTCO - 165213
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
4/28/2010
Page 3 of 3
Figure 3
Figure 12
Project No. 165213
APPENDIX C
WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS
1. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT - GI PLANNING AND
PRACTICE SELECTION WORKSHEET
2. SAND FILTER CALCULATIONS
3. LAKE GEORGE/BEACH ROAD POROUS PAVEMENT PRESS
RELEASE
4. FECAL COLIFORM ANALYSIS
Project No. 165213
1 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT - GI PLANNING AND PRACTICE SELECTION WORKSHEET
Project: ProjectNo.: 165213
Date: 05/28/14
Subject: Comp.By: JLM
Chckd.By: CSH/TDH
DAtoDP1 24.31 acres HSG(s): P= 3 inches
1.PlantoPreserve,avoidandminimize(underlineallconceptsutilized):
WQv= (P)(DA)(Rv)
12
Where:
P = 24hourRainfallfor1yearstormwheninNYCDEPregulatedarea
DA =
Ai
=
Aiex = Existingimperviousarea(forredevelopmentprojects)
Aic Totalareaofnewimperviouscover(forneworredevelopmentprojects)
I =
Rv =
WQv =
Ifsoilrestorationisnotpracticed,includeconstructioncompactedareasasimpervious.
DA= 24.31 acres Ai= 10.09 acres I= 41 Rv= 0.42 WQv= 2.57 acft
Aiex= 3.94 acres
Aic= 9.10 acres
DA= 24.31 acres 82
(P0.2S)
2
2.20 Q= 1.38 WQv= (Q)(DA) WQv= 2.79 acft
(P+0.8S) 12
WQv= 2.79 acft
RRv=
12
Where:
P = 24hourRainfallfor1yearstormwheninNYCDEPregulatedarea
Ai
= (S)(Aic)Imperviouscovertargetedforrunoffreduction
Aic = Totalareaofnewimperviouscover
Rv* =
S =
withS= 0.55 Asoils 0.4 Bsoils 0.3 Csoils 0.2 Dsoils,or
Ifsoilrestorationisnotpracticed,includeconstructioncompactedareasasimpervious.
(Aic)= 9.1 acres S= 0.36 Ai= 3.28 Rv= 0.95 RRv= 0.78 acft
0.05+0.009*I,whereI=100%impervious
HydrologicSoilGroup(HSG)SpecificReductionFactor(S)
weightedHSGAverageinDA(seecalc)
RunoffQ(in.)= ;S=(1000/CN)10=
WQvtobeusedshallbegreaterof2aor2b;therefore
3.CalculateTargetRunoffReductionVolume(RRv)(when100%WQvreductioncannotbeachieved): (P)(Ai)(Rv*)
Percentofimperviouscover,proposed
0.05+0.009*I
Requiredwaterqualityvolume(acrefeet)
2b.Calculatewaterqualityvolume(WQv)usingNRCSmethodology:
WeightedCN= (seeseparatecalculation)
2.InaccordancewithSection1839(c)(3)oftheApril2010versionofthe"NewYorkCityRulesandRegulations",WQvshallbethegreater
ofvolumecalculatedusingthe90%Ruleequationvs.theestimatedrunoffvolumeresultingfromtheoneyear,24hourstormusingNRCS
methodology(TR55andTR20)overthepostdevelopmentdrainagearea.
2a.Calculatewaterqualityvolume(WQv)using90%Ruleequation:
Drainageareainacres
Totalsiteimperviousareainacres(forredevelopmentprojects,weighttheareabasedon25%ofexistingimpervious+100%ofnew
impervious,i.e.,Ai=0.25[Aiex]+1.0[Aic])
Preserveundisturbed,naturalBuffer,andcriticalenvironmentalareas
Employopenspace,conservation,andclusteringsitedesigntechniques
Avoiddevelopinginenvironmentallysensitiveareas :floodplain,steepslopes,habitat,ecosystems,bedrock, wetlands,shorelines,shallowgroundwater,
impervioussoils,unstablesoils
Minimizeimpervioussurfaces:buildingfootprints, parking,roads,sidewalks,anddriveways
Minimizeclearingandgrading
WATERQUALITYVOLUME(WQv)NYSSizingCriteria,Section4.1andSection10.3.2,NYSSMDM
RedevelopmentProjectinNYCDEPEOHWatershed
WatershedDrainageArea: Soils: 1YearRainfallEvent:
B,C,D
PLANNING
TRCEngineers,Inc.
ProposedCostcoWholesale
Yorktown,NY
PreliminarySWM
StormWaterManagementGreenInfrastructure
PlanningandPracticeSelectionWorksheetforNewor
Q:\PROJECTS160\165213\SWM\GISWMWorksheetDEC_DEPRedev114.xlsx5/28/20143:46PM Page1of4
Date: 05/28/14
Chckd.By: CSH/TDH RedevelopmentProjectinNYCDEPEOHWatershed
TRCEngineers,Inc.
Yorktown,NY
PreliminarySWM
4.Incorporateareareductionpractices(completeforallapplicablepractices):
(areaincludespracticeandcontributingarea)
Conservationofnaturalareas: (contributingAi= 0.15 ac.) Area= 8.92 ac.
Riarianbuffers/filterstrips: (contributingAi= 0 ac.) Area= 0 ac.
Treeplanting/treepreservation: (contributingAi= 0 ac.) Area= 0 ac.
Totalareareduction: TotalAreaReduced= 8.92 ac.
TotalImperviousareawithinareareduction: AiinReducedArea= 0.15 ac.
5.SubtracttotalareareductionfromDA:
Remainingdrainagearea:(#2DA#4area) RemainingDrainageArea= 15.39 ac.
RemainingImperviousarea:(#2Ai#4Ai) RemainingAi= 9.94 ac.
6.RecalculateWQvForsiteareaafterremainingafterareareductions:
RemainingDA= 15.39 remainingAi= 9.94 Rv= 0.63 AreaReducedWQv= 2.43 ac.ft.
7.Runoffreduction(RRv)from#2a:(#2aWQv#6WQv)= RRv= 0.00 acft
8.IncorporateRooftopareadisconnection:
Totaldisconnectedrooftoparea(nowconsideredperviousforRvcalculation(s)) Area= 0 ac.
9.RecalculateWQvwithRvmodifiedforrooftopdisconnection:
DA(from#5)= 15.39 ac. (remainingAi= 9.94 ac.);Rv= 0.63 Rvreduced WQv= 2.43 ac.ft.
10.Runoffreductionvolume:#6(areareducedWQv)#9(RvreducedWQv)= RRv= 0.00 acft
DA= 15.39 acres 93
(P0.2S)
2
0.75 Q= 2.25 WQv= (Q)(DA) WQv= 2.89 acft
(P+0.8S) 12
WQv= 2.89 acft
12.Runoffreductionvolumefrom#2bWQv:(#2bWQv#11WQv)= RRv= 0.10 acft*
*negativenumber(i.e.0.02)
denotesincreaseinWQv.
11.Recalculatewaterqualityvolume(WQv)usingNRCSmethodology:
WeightedCN= (seeseparatecalculation)
RunoffQ(in.)= ;S=(1000/CN)10=
WQvtobeusedshallbegreaterof#9or#11;therefore
AREAREDUCTIONPRACTICES
ROOFTOPAREADISCONNECTION
RECALCULATENRCSWATERQUALITYVOLUME(WQv)AFTERAREAREDUCTIONSANDROOFTOPDISCONNECTION
Date: 05/28/14
TRCEngineers,Inc.
Yorktown,NY
PreliminarySWM
13.SourceControlWQvTreatmentPracticesWorksheet
AllowableRunoffReductionVolume(RRv)
Infiltration(soilswithk>0.5"/houronly)
DA= 0.00 acre(s)Ai= 0.00 acre(s)Rv= 0.00 WQv= 0.00 acft 90%ofWQv= 0.00 acft
Bioretention 80%ofWQv= acft A/BsoilsOR
DA= 0.00 acre(s)Ai= 0.00 acre(s)Rv= 0.00 WQv= 0.00 acft 40%ofWQv= 0.00 acft C/Dsoils
DrySwale 40%ofWQv= 0.00 acft A/BsoilsOR
DA= 0.00 acre(s)Ai= 0.00 acre(s)Rv= 0.00 WQv= 0.00 acft 20%ofWQv= acft C/Dsoils
VegetatedOpenSwale 20%ofWQv= 0.00 acft A/BsoilsOR
GreenRoof
RainGarden 100%ofWQv= 0.00 acft A/BsoilsOR
StormwaterPlanters
Cisterns/RainBarrels
PorousPavement(A/B/Csoilsonly)
DA= 0.00 acre(s)Ai= 0.00 acre(s)Rv= 0.00 WQv= 0.00 acft 100%onWQv= 0.00 acft A/B/Csoils
Infiltration(soilswithk>0.5"/houronly)
DA= 14.94 acre(s)CN= 95 Q(in.)= 2.45 WQv= 3.05 acft 90%ofWQv= 2.74 acft
S= 0.53
Bioretention 80%ofWQv= acft A/BsoilsOR
DA= 0.00 acre(s)CN= 0 Q(in.)= 0.00 WQv= 0.00 acft 40%ofWQv= 0.00 acft C/Dsoils
S= 0.00
DrySwale 40%ofWQv= 0.00 acft A/BsoilsOR
DA= 0.00 acre(s)CN= 0 Q(in.)= 0.00 WQv= 0.00 acft 20%ofWQv= acft C/Dsoils
S= 0.00
VegetatedOpenSwale 20%ofWQv= 0.00 acft A/BsoilsOR
S= 0.00
GreenRoof
S= 0.00
RainGarden 100%ofWQv= 0.00 acft A/BsoilsOR
S= 0.00
StormwaterPlanters
S= 0.00
Cisterns/RainBarrels
S= 0.00
PorousPavement(A/B/Csoilsonly)
DA= 0.00 acre(s)CN= 0 Q(in.)= 0.00 WQv= 0.00 acft 100%onWQv= 0.00 acft A/B/Csoils
S= 0.00
14.94 acres
13b.SubtotalSourceControlWQvTreatmentVolume= 3.05 acft
13c.SubtotalRunoffReductionVolume(RRv): 2.74 acft
13a.SubtotalDATributarytoSourceControlWQvTreatmentPractices=
Subtotal(Rv)RRv=
SOURCECONTROLWQvTREATMENTPRACTICES
StandardPracticesasSourceControluseifWQvcomputedby90%Rule(#2aor#9WQv)
GreenInfrastructurePracticesuseifWQviscomputedby90%Rule(#2aor#9WQv)
StandardPracticesasSourceControluseifWQvcomputedbyNRCS(#2bor#11WQv)
GreenInfrastructurePracticesuseifWQviscomputedbyNRCS(#2bor#11WQv)
Date: 05/28/14
TRCEngineers,Inc.
Yorktown,NY
PreliminarySWM
14.TotalRRvprovided=(#7+#10+#13c)for#2aWQv,(#12+#13c)for#2bWQv=TotalRRv= 2.65 acft
Yes
No
16.IsRRv(#14)minimumRRv(#3)? Yes ifNo,provideadditionalRRvandRecalculate.
17.Totaldrainageareatreatedwithrunoffreduction/sourcecontrolpractices= 23.86 acres.
(areareduction(from#4)+totalDAtributarytosourcecontrol(13a.))
18.IsallthewatershedDAtreatedbyeitherareareductionorsourcecontrolpractices? No
RemaininguntreatedDA=WatershedDA(#2a) 0 0.00 acres= 0 acres
Remainingimperviousarea=totalAi(#2a) 0.00 acre(s)treatedAi(#13+#8+#4) 0.00 acres= 0.00 acres
RemainingDA= 0 acres RemainingAi= 0.00 acres Rv*= 0.00 WQv= 0.00 acft
2.79 2.65 acft WQv= 0.15 acft*
Ponds WQvProvided= acft
Wetlands WQvProvided= acft
Infiltration WQvProvided= 2.91 acft
Filters WQvProvided= acft
MinimumRvforStandardPracticesis0.2
a.Using90%Rule:
acre(s)treatedDA(#17)
b.UsingNRCSMethodology:
RemaininguntreatedWQv=#2bWQv acftTotalProvidedRRv(#14)
*negativenumber(i.e.0.02)
denotesincreaseinWQv.
15b.IsRRv(#14)original#2bWQv? IfNo,goto#19b(ifapplicable).IfYes,skip#19andaddressPeakFlowRateAttenuation.
IfNo,gotoStep#19.IfYes,skip#19andaddress
PeakFlowRateAttenuation.
STANDARDWQvTREATMENT
19.ProvidetreatmentforanyremaininguntreatedwatershedDAoruntreatedWQvwithstandardpractices:
TOTALRUNOFFREDUCTIONVOLUME(RRv)
TotalProvidedRRv=
15a.IsRRv(#14)original#2aWQv? IfNo,goto#19a(ifapplicable).IfYes,skip#19andaddressPeakFlowRateAttenuation.
Project: Project No.: 165213
Date: 5/28/14
Subject: Comp. By: CSH
Chckd. By: TDH
Post Development
Subarea
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
B, C 98 10.81 1059.38
B 61 2.25 137.25
C 74 0.95 70.30
B 55 2.63 144.65
C 70 1.12 78.40
D 77 0.99 76.23
B 55 2.12 116.60
C 70 0.15 10.50
D 77 0.36 27.72
98 0.77 75.46
B 61 0.32 19.52
0.00
C 98 1.46 143.08
C 74 0.38 28.12
0.00
Total = 24.31 1987.21
total product 1987.21
total area 24.31
Storm #1 Storm #2 Storm #3
Frequency yr. 1
Rainfall, P in. 3
S =(1000/CN) - 10 2.20
Runoff, Q in. 1.38
Runoff Volume ac.ft. 2.79
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
Woods
Composite Post-Dev. DA for WQv
Prior to Greeen Infrastructure
1. Runoff curve number (CN)
Soil Name Hydro Group Cover Description (cover type, treatment &
conditions)
CN
Impervious (Onsite)
Open Space (Good Condition)
Woods
Woods
Woods (Offsite)
Woods (Offsite)
Impervious (Offsite Proposed)
Open Space (Good Condition, Offsite)
Impervious (Offsite Existing)
CN (weighted) = =
Use CN= 82
2. Runoff
Woods (Offsite)
CN (weighted) = 81.7
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-05-28-14.xlsx-Comp PDA-WQv_12-30-5/28/2014-3:36 PM
Date: 5/28/14
Subject: Comp. By: CSH
Chckd. By: TDH
Post Development
Subarea
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
B,C 98 10.81 1059.38
B 61 1.12 68.32
C 74 0.95 70.30
C 98 0.77 75.46
B 61 0.05 3.05
C 98 1.31 128.38
C 61 0.38 23.18
Total = 15.39 1428.07
total product 1428.07
total area 15.39
Frequency yr. 1
Rainfall, P in. 3
S =(1000/CN) - 10 0.75
Runoff, Q in. 2.25
Runoff Volume ac.ft. 2.89
Composite Post-Dev. DA for WQv
After Area Reduction Practices
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
CN
Impervious
Impervious (Offsite, Proposed)
conditions)
93
2. Runoff
CN (weighted) = =
CN (weighted) = 92.8 Use CN=
Impervious (Offsite, Existing)
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-05-28-14.xlsx-Comp PDA_AR-WQv_12-30-5/28/2014-3:37 PM
Appendix C-Water Quality Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\HydroCAD\SWPPP Calcs\
Type III 24-hr 1-year Rainfall=3.00" 14-06-30-Post Development Calculations-noexfil
Printed 7/9/2014 3:41:49 PM Prepared by TRC Engineers, Inc.
Page 1 HydroCAD10.00-12 s/n 06251 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Pond 1P: Infiltration Basin/Detention Chambers
Inflow Area = 14.940 ac, 85.34% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.34" for 1-year event
Inflow = 33.15 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 2.910 af
Outflow = 0.17 cfs @ 24.16 hrs, Volume= 0.038 af, Atten=99%, Lag=720.9 min
Primary = 0.17 cfs @ 24.16 hrs, Volume= 0.038 af
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=0.00-120.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs / 3
Peak Elev=433.05' @ 24.16 hrs Surf.Area=9,000 sf Storage=126,407 cf
Plug-Flow detention time=1,343.6 min calculated for 0.038 af (1% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time=929.0 min ( 1,722.7 - 793.6 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 419.00' 135,900 cf 15.00'W x 150.00'L x 15.10'H Prismatoid x 4
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 432.90' 36.0" W x 22.0" H Ellipse Culvert
L=30.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke=0.500
Inlet / Outlet Invert=432.90' / 432.01' S=0.0297 '/' Cc=0.900
n=0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area=4.32 sf
Primary OutFlow Max=0.17 cfs @ 24.16 hrs HW=433.05' TW=425.09' (Dynamic Tailwater)
1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.17 cfs @ 1.09 fps)
Pond 1P: Infiltration Basin/Detention Chambers
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Inflow Area=14.940 ac
Inflow=33.15 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
Primary=0.17 cfs @ 24.16 hrs
Peak Elev=433.05'
Storage=126,407 cf
36.0" x 22.0"
Ellipse Culvert
n=0.013
L=30.0'
S=0.0297 '/'
33.15 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
0.17 cfs @ 24.16 hrs
Appendix C-Water Quality Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\HydroCAD\SWPPP Calcs\
Type III 24-hr 1-year Rainfall=3.00" 14-06-30-Post Development Calculations-noexfil
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
434
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
424
423
422
421
420
419
Initial Tailwater
Culvert
Project No. 165213
2 SAND FILTER CALCULATIONS

Project: Costco Project No.: 165213
Date: 1/22/14
Subject: Perimeter Sand Filter Calculations
TD F-7-2 Comp. By: JLM
Chckd. By: TDH
WQv = (P) (Rv) (A)
12
Where:
P =
A =
Ai =
I =
Rv =
WQv =
(Acre-ft) (Cu. Ft.)
3.0 0.018 0.018 100.0 0.95 0.0043 186
FILTER BED
Required Filter Bed Area
Af =(WQv)(df)/[(k)(hf+df)(tf)]
Af =Surface area of filter bed (ft
2
)
WQv =Water Quality Volume (cf)
df =Filter Bed Depth (ft)
k =Coefficient of permeability of filter media (ft/day) (3.5 ft/day for sand)
hf =Average height of water above filter bed (ft)
tf =Design filter bed drain time (days) use 1.67 days
WQv = 186 cf
df = 1.0 ft
k = 3.5 ft/day
hf = 0.50 ft
tf = 1.67 days
Af = 21 ft
2
3.50ft
0.05 +0.009 * I
Parameter
TRC Engineers, Inc
Total Chamber Depth =df+2hf+0.5' (freeboard) +1.0' (gravel/underdrain) (D
t
)=
I (%) Water Quality Volume
Water Quality Volume, WQv
1-YR Storm Event
Site area in acres (onsite)
Site impervious area in acres (onsite)
Percent of impervious cover, proposed
Rv
Required water quality volume (acre-feet)
P (in.) Ai (acres) A (acres)
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\1-22-14 Perimeter Sand Filter Calcs.xls - Sand Filter F-7-2 - 2/26/2014 - 10:05 AM
Date: 1/22/14
Chckd. By: TDH
TRC Engineers, Inc
PRETREATMENT & WQv RETENTION
Pretreatment = 40% of WQv (per Section 6.4.7 of SWDM) = 74 cf
75% WQv Temp. Storage Requirement (per Section 6.4.4 of SWDM)= 140 cf
Calculate 40% Pretreatment Volume:
2.0ft
1.5ft
44ft Length Width Height
44 1.5 3.50
132 cf >74 cf
Calculate Temporary holding of 75% WQv:
1.0ft
2.0ft
3.0ft Length Width Height
44 2.0 3.50
Filter Bed Area =L x Ws = 88ft
2
> 21ft
2
88cf
198cf
286 cf > 140 cf
3.5 ft
3.50 ft
Treatment Chamber Interior
Dimensions (ft)
Pretreatment volume below weir =
Pretreatment Chamber Volume (PC) =L x Wp x D =
Pretreatment Chamber Interior
Dimensions (ft)
Total Width =
Retention Volume = (TC) + (PC) =
Depth of Water (2hf)=
Width of Sand (Ws)=
Chamber Depth - freeboard (D)=
Total Depth =
Depth below weir =
Width of pretreatment (Wp) =
Length =
Treatment Chamber Volume (TC) =L x Ws x (2hf) =
RES Sandfilter Structures
COSTCO
Westchester County NY
.
Date: 1/22/14
Chckd. By: TDH
WQv = (P) (Rv) (A)
12
Where:
P =
A =
Ai =
I =
Rv =
WQv =
(Acre-ft) (Cu. Ft.)
3.0 0.166 0.166 100.0 0.95 0.0393 1,712
FILTER BED
Required Filter Bed Area
Af =(WQv)(df)/[(k)(hf+df)(tf)]
Af =Surface area of filter bed (ft
2
)
WQv =Water Quality Volume (cf)
df =Filter Bed Depth (ft)
k =Coefficient of permeability of filter media (ft/day) (3.5 ft/day for sand)
hf =Average height of water above filter bed (ft)
tf =Design filter bed drain time (days) use 1.67 days
WQv = 1,712 cf
df = 1.5 ft
k = 3.5 ft/day
hf = 0.75 ft
tf = 1.67 days
Af = 195 ft
2
4.50ft
Ai (acres)
TRC Engineers, Inc
I (%)
Water Quality Volume, WQv
1-YR Storm Event
Site area in acres (onsite)
Site impervious area in acres (onsite)
Required water quality volume (acre-feet)
Parameter
P (in.) A (acres) Water Quality Volume
Percent of impervious cover, proposed
0.05 +0.009 * I
Rv
Total Chamber Depth =df+2hf+0.5' (freeboard) +1.0' (gravel/underdrain) (D
t
)=
Date: 1/22/14
Chckd. By: TDH
TRC Engineers, Inc
PRETREATMENT & WQv RETENTION
Pretreatment = 40% of WQv (per Section 6.4.7 of SWDM) = 685 cf
75% WQv Temp. Storage Requirement (per Section 6.4.4 of SWDM)= 1,284 cf
Calculate 40% Pretreatment Volume:
2.5ft
4.0ft
70ft Length Width Height
70 4.0 4.50
700 cf > 685 cf
Calculate Temporary holding of 75% WQv:
1.5ft
2.8ft
4.0ft Length Width Height
70 2.8 4.50
Filter Bed Area =L x Ws = 196ft
2
> 195ft
2
294cf
1,120cf
1,414 cf > 1,284 cf
6.8 ft
4.50 ft
Chamber Depth - freeboard (D)=
Pretreatment volume below weir =
Total Depth =
Retention Volume = (TC) + (PC) =
Treatment Chamber Volume (TC) =L x Ws x (2hf) =
Pretreatment Chamber Volume (PC) =L x Wp x D =
Depth of Water (2hf)=
Width of Sand (Ws)=
Length =
Treatment Chamber Interior Dimensions
(ft)
Total Width =
Pretreatment Chamber Interior
Dimensions (ft)
Depth below weir =
Width of pretreatment (Wp) =
RES Sandfilter Structures
COSTCO
Westchester County NY
.
Project No. 165213
3 - LAKE GEORGE/BEACH ROAD POROUS PAVEMENT PRESS RELEASE
New York State
E N V I R O N M E N T A L F A C I L I T I E S C O R P O R A T I O N

MATTHEW J. DRISCOLL, President and CEO

For Immediate Release: July 11, 2012
EFC Contact: Jon Sorensen | 518.402.6924 | 518.956.2297

New York State, Warren County Begin Work
on Porous Asphalt Roadway in Lake George

------------------------------------------------------------

Porous Pavement Will Reduce Pollution into Lake George

Construction has begun on a unique porous-pavement road system that will reduce
pollution into Lake George from vehicle traffic and road salt on a one-mile stretch of
Beach Road.

Beach Road will be the first major roadway in New York State to be covered with a
porous-pavement surface. When completed next year, the $7,692,000 project will create
the largest and longest stretch of porous pavement ever constructed in the Northeast
designed for heavy traffic and use.

To see how it works, click here.

Subsurface work will be completed this summer, along with a 100-foot test section of
porous pavement that will be used to help the engineers refine the Quality Control
procedures, perform lab tests, and enhance construction techniques to be used when
installing the porous asphalt roadway.

In addition to $7.7 million in federal, state and county highway aid, financing for the
engineering and design of this unique road surface is being supported by a Green
Innovation Grant from the New York State Environmental Facilities Corp. (EFC). The
Green Innovation Grant Program is a statewide competition, spurring the development
of new and sustainable ways to reduce water pollution by managing stormwater with
low-cost, eco-friendly designs such as porous pavement.

With funding from the Green Innovation Grant Program, engineers from the New
York State Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, the
Warren County Department of Public Works and the firm of Barton & Loguidice, P.C.,
have designed a road system and a surface-testing protocol that will greatly advance the
use of porous asphalt surfaces across the country.

The result will be amazing as water will seem to literally disappear from the surface
of Beach Road, said EFC President and CEO Matthew Driscoll. EFC is providing
another green grant to Lake George to construct another porous road surface as part of
the renovation of the former Gaslight Village amusement park.

- more -

625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12207-2997
518.402.6924 800.882.9721
www.efc.ny.gov
When we build our roads and bridges we must do so as stewards of the environment,
said State Transportation Commissioner Joan M. McDonald, not only for the sake of
maintaining a safe and healthy environment but also to protect and enhance local
economies that depend on tourism dollars, as does Lake George, a favored destination
for tens of thousands of New Yorkers and non-New Yorkers alike who appreciate all of
the beauty and recreation Lake George has to offer.

Warren County values the protection of Lake George as both an environmental and
economic asset to the region, said Warren County Board of Supervisors Chairman Dan
Stec. Stormwater from Beach Road has long been a concern of ours and we are pleased
that weve been able to come up with an innovative project with the partnership of New
York State to address this source of pollution.

An additional $2 million will be spent by the Department of Environmental
Conservation next year to apply a porous surface to part of Beach Road that includes the
DECs Lake George Beach Day Use Area.

Using porous-pavement will help improve water quality in Lake George and protect
it from day-to-day, harmful run off, said DEC Commissioner Joe Martens. As an
important tourist and recreational area in the southeastern Adirondack State Park, the
health Lake George is vital to the regional economy.

The porous surface will eliminate the need for drainage structures in the roadway,
reduce the amount of salt (and other chlorides) required in winter time by up to 50%,
reduce road spray, improve traction. The pores in the asphalt matrix provide an
environment where petroleum and other automobile based contaminants will
biologically break down before entering the stone reservoir system below the pavement
or the original ground underneath, said Tom Baird P.E., Project Manager and Chief
Engineer, on the project for Barton & Loguidice.

Baird has spent much of the past two years studying the science of porous pavement,
developing specifications and creating a unique design for Beach Road that had to
account for its close proximity to Lake George, the existing high water table, and
varying lake elevations during significant storm events and cold temperatures.

Project Engineer with B&L, Dan Rourke. P.E., added, The new pavement system will
be able to store up to 5 of rain in a 24-hour period and also includes provisions to
protect the pavement and storage systems from even more extreme weather conditions
that can occur around Lake George.

This is one of the most important lake saving projects ever for Lake George, said
Walt Lender, executive director of the Lake George Association, The LGA recognizes
Warren County, New York State and the Federal Highway Administration for taking the
bold steps to move forward on this revolutionary project -- one we believe will get
national recognition and will set a precedent for many like it to follow in other lakeside
communities.

Beach Road is a four lane roadway that stretches for approximately 1 mile along the
southern shore of Lake George from Route 9 (Canada Street) to Route 9L in the Town
and Village of Lake George, Warren County NY. Work this summer will be confined to
portions of Beach Road farthest away from Route 9 in order to minimize any impact on
the tourism season.
###
Project No. 165213
4 FECAL COLIFORM ANALYSIS
Date: 02/05/14
Subject: Comp. By: JLM
Chckd. By: TDH
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Sub Area Land Use Land Use (2) Area, ac
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
Impervious Transportation 0.04 1.6E+08 6.4E+06
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.16 8.3E+09 1.3E+09
Woods Mixed Forest 0.96 1.2E+10 1.2E+10
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.47 8.3E+09 3.9E+09
Gravel Industrial 0.01 1.8E+04 1.8E+02
2.59 2.6E+10
10.98 1.2E+11
13.57 1.5E+11
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.88 8.3E+09 7.3E+09
6.21 6.6E+10
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.96 8.3E+09 8.0E+09
4.77 5.4E+10
10.98 1.2E+11
Costco Wholesale
Rt 202/35
Yorktown Heights, NY
NYCDEP Pollutant Loading Analysis
F. Coli - Coefficient Method
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Total at Design Point #2
Design Point #2c
(2)
Pre-development Conditions
DA-E1a
(2)
DA-E1b
DA-E2a
DA-E2c
Design point #1
Design Point #2a
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Pollutant loading analysis\DEIS coliform\NYCDEP-Coliform Calcs-02.05.14.xls-2/6/2014-2:36 PM 1 of 5
Date: 02/05/14
Chckd. By: TDH
Costco Wholesale
Rt 202/35
TRC Engineers, Inc.
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
1.88 8.3E+09 1.6E+10
4.46 3.2E+10
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
2.79 8.3E+09 2.3E+10
Bare Soil Barrenland 0.11 0.0E+00 0.0E+00
4.08 2.5E+10
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.06 8.3E+09 5.0E+08
0.62 5.9E+08
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
DA-6 Impervious Transportation 0.30 1.6E+08 4.8E+07
0.30 4.8E+07
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
DA-8 Impervious Transportation 0.59 1.6E+08 9.4E+07
0.59 9.4E+07
(2)
(2)
DA-E3
(2)
(2)
(2)
DA-E4
DA-E5
Date: 02/05/14
Chckd. By: TDH
Costco Wholesale
Rt 202/35
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Post-development conditions without WQ Treatment
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.17 8.3E+09 1.4E+09
Open Space
Residential
LowDensity
0.39 8.3E+09 3.2E+09
1.96 2.0E+10
21.32 9.4E+10
23.28 1.1E+11
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.51 8.3E+09 4.2E+09
2.69 3.0E+10
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
1.34 8.3E+09 1.1E+10
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.75 8.3E+09 6.2E+09
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.01 8.3E+09 8.3E+07
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.06 8.3E+09 5.0E+08
14.91 2.0E+10
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.30 8.3E+09 2.5E+09
3.72 4.4E+10
21.32 9.4E+10
DA-6
DA-8
Design Point #2b
Design Point #2a
(2)
DA-P2a
DA-P2b-1
DA-P1a
DA-P1b
DA-P2b-2
DA-P2c
Design Point #2c
(2)
Totals at Design Point #1
Totals at Design Point #2
Design Point #1
Date: 02/05/14
Chckd. By: TDH
Costco Wholesale
Rt 202/35
TRC Engineers, Inc.
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.03 8.3E+09 2.5E+08
0.55 6.5E+09
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.31 8.3E+09 2.6E+09
0.45 2.6E+09
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.00 8.3E+09 0.0E+00
0.00 0.0E+00
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.00 8.3E+09 0.0E+00
0.00 0.0E+00
(1) (3) (4) (3) x (4) =(5)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./acre/year)
Total Fecal
Coliform Load
(no./year)
Open Space
Residential
Low Density
0.00 8.3E+09 0.0E+00
0.00 0.0E+00
(2)
DA-6 (1)
(2)
DA-8 (1)
(2)
(2)
(2)
DA-P5 (1)
DA-P4
DA-P3
Date: 02/05/14
Chckd. By: TDH
Costco Wholesale
Rt 202/35
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Design Point
Pre-
development
Post-
development
Percent
Reduction
#1 1.5E+11 1.1E+11 22%
#2 1.2E+11 9.4E+10 22%
#3 3.2E+10 6.5E+09 80%
#4 2.5E+10 2.6E+09 90%
#5 5.9E+08 0.0E+00 100%
#6 4.8E+07 0.0E+00 100%
#8 9.4E+07 0.0E+00 100%
Notes:
(2) Land Use Sub Type from Attachment A.
(1) DA-P5, DA-6, and DA-8 are rerouted to, and treated by the Onsite Stormwater Management System.
(becomes part of DA-P2b-1)
Total Fecal Coliform Load (no./year)
Project No. 165213
APPENDIX D
PEAK RATE CONTROL CALCULATIONS
1. PRE DEVELOPMENT CALCULATIONS
2. POST DEVELOPMENT CALCULATIONS
3. INCREASED RAINFALL INTENSITY ANALYSIS
4. OFFSITE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
TRCEngineers,Inc.
Design
Storm
Design
Point
FEISExisting
Conditions(cfs)
FEISProposed
Conditions(cfs)
%Dec.()
%Inc.(+)
1 1.78 1.23 31%
2 1.24 0.73 41%
2c 0.02 0.00 100%
3 2.00 0.05 98%
4 2.94 0.63 79%
5 2.50 0.00 100%
8 1.68 0.00 100%
1 3.22 2.28 29%
2 2.27 1.40 38%
2c 0.17 0.09 47%
3 3.04 0.10 97%
4 4.15 0.82 80%
5 2.96 0.20 93%
8 1.96 0.41 79%
1 9.10 6.42 29%
2 6.43 3.96 38%
2c 1.58 0.89 44%
3 6.73 4.38 35%
4 8.20 1.44 82%
5 4.31 0.80 81%
8 2.82 1.71 39%
1 14.16 9.69 32%
2 11.41 6.73 41%
2c 4.36 2.95 32%
3 9.48 6.95 27%
4 11.17 1.86 83%
5 5.21 1.20 77%
8 3.39 2.56 24%
1 23.74 14.33 40%
2 19.37 12.88 34%
2c 7.55 5.67 25%
3 12.37 10.33 16%
4 14.20 2.29 84%
5 6.11 1.60 74%
8 3.96 3.40 14%
1 28.71 22.93 20%
2 23.51 20.68 12%
2c 9.52 6.97 27%
3 13.85 12.27 11%
4 15.73 2.51 84%
5 6.55 1.80 73%
8 4.24 3.82 10%
Design
Storm
FEISExisting
Conditions(cfs)
FEISProposed
Conditions(cfs)
%Dec.()
%Inc.(+)
1 10.90 1.91 82%
2 15.33 3.81 75%
10 31.16 14.75 53%
25 43.41 22.26 49%
50 60.38 31.95 47%
100 69.08 43.33 37%
100
CombinedPeakDischargeRunoffRateComparisonTable
10
25
50
PeakDischargeRunoffRate ComparisonTable
1
2
Q:\PROJECTS160\165213\SWM\HydroCAD\PeakComparisonTables06.30.14.xlsx7/10/20149:57AM 1of2
TRCEngineers,Inc.
Design
Storm
Design
Point
FEISExisting
Conditions(acft)
FEISProposed
Conditions(acft)
%Dec.()%
Inc.(+)
1 0.294 0.172 41%
2 0.207 0.097 53%
2c 0.001 0.000 100%
3 0.249 0.011 96%
4 0.309 0.049 84%
5 0.196 0.000 100%
8 0.136 0.000 100%
1 0.536 0.356 34%
2 0.402 0.245 39%
2c 0.084 0.047 44%
3 0.355 0.019 95%
4 0.422 0.064 85%
5 0.231 0.001 100%
8 0.161 0.003 98%
1 1.455 1.652 14%
2 1.145 1.401 22%
2c 0.400 0.302 25%
3 0.727 0.782 8%
4 0.804 0.112 86%
5 0.347 0.008 98%
8 0.234 0.017 93%
1 2.185 2.358 8%
2 1.735 1.998 15%
2c 0.653 0.504 23%
3 1.008 1.708 69%
4 1.083 0.146 87%
5 0.424 0.014 97%
8 0.283 0.031 89%
1 2.982 3.303 11%
2 2.380 2.825 19%
2c 0.930 0.725 22%
3 1.306 2.453 88%
4 1.374 0.180 87%
5 0.500 0.022 96%
8 0.332 0.047 86%
1 3.401 3.910 15%
2 2.718 3.370 24%
2c 1.076 0.840 22%
3 1.460 2.709 86%
4 1.524 0.198 87%
5 0.538 0.026 95%
8 0.357 0.057 84%
Design
Storm
FEISExisting
Conditions(acft)
FEISProposed
Conditions(acft)
%Dec.()%
Inc.(+)
1 1.184 0.232 80%
2 1.705 0.443 74%
10 3.567 2.571 28%
25 4.983 4.257 15%
50 6.494 6.005 8%
100 7.280 6.900 5%
100
CombinedPeakDischargeVolumeComparisonTable
10
25
50
PeakDischargeVolumeComparisonTable
1
2
Q:\PROJECTS160\165213\SWM\HydroCAD\PeakComparisonTables06.30.14.xlsx7/10/20149:57AM 2of2
Project No. 165213
1 PRE DEVELOPMENT CALCULATIONS
Date: 04/02/13
Subject: Comp. By: J LM
Chckd. By: TDH
Pre-Development
Subarea DA-E1a
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
98 0.01 1
B 55 0.45 25
C 70 0.05 4
98 0.03 3
B 55 0.43 24
B 61 0.16 10
C 70 0.03 2
Total = 1.16 68
total product 68
total area 1.16
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 58
CN (weighted) = =
Impervious (offsite)
Woods Good
Woods Good
Woods (offsite)
Woods Good (offsite)
Open Space Good (offsite)
conditions)
CN
Impervious
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-E1a
CN Worksheet - TR55
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-02-24-14.xlsx-DA-E1a-2/24/2014-10:20 AM
Date: 04/02/13
Chckd. By: TDH
Pre-Development
Subarea DA-E1b
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
98 0.08 8
B 55 0.56 31
B 61 0.38 23
B 85 0.01 1
C 70 0.09 6
98 0.12 12
B 61 0.07 4
C 74 0.02 1
C 70 0.10 7
Total = 1.43 93
total product 93
total area 1.43
CN (weighted) = =
Woods Good
Use CN= 65
Woods (offsite)
Cover Description (cover type, treatment &
conditions)
CN
Impervious
Woods Good
Open Space Good
Gravel
Soil Name
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
DA-E1b
Hydro Group
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-02-24-14.xlsx-DA-E1b-2/24/2014-10:20 AM
Date: 04/02/13
Chckd. By: CSH
Pre-Development
Subarea DA-E2a
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
98 0.40 39
B 61 0.72 44
B 69 0.16 11
B 85 0.04 3
B 55 3.71 204
C 74 0.87 64
D 77 0.29 22
B 55 0.02 1
Total = 6.21 389
total product 389
total area 6.21
Gravel
Woods
Woods
Woods
Hydro Group Cover Description (cover type, treatment &
conditions)
Impervious
Open Space Good
Open Space Fair
DA-E2a
CN Worksheet - TR55
Woods (offsite)
Soil Name
CN (weighted) = =
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 63
CN
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-02-24-14.xlsx-DA-E2a-2/24/2014-10:20 AM
Date: 04/02/13
Chckd. By: CSH
Pre-Development
Subarea DA-E2c
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
98 0.01 1
B 61 0.96 59
B 55 1.06 58
D 77 0.68 52
B 55 1.69 93
D 77 0.37 28
Total = 4.77 292
total product 292
total area 4.77
CN (weighted) = =
Woods (offsite)
Use CN=
Open Space Good
Woods
61
conditions)
Impervious
Woods
Soil Name
Woods (offsite)
CN
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
DA-E2c
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-02-24-14.xlsx-DA-E2c-2/24/2014-10:20 AM
Date: 04/02/13
Chckd. By: TDH
Pre Development
Subarea DA-E3
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
98 1.23 121
B 55 1.35 74
B 61 1.88 115
Total = 4.46 309
total product 309
total area 4.46
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 69
CN (weighted) = =
CN (weighted) =
conditions)
CN
Impervious
69.4
Woods Good
Open Space Good
CN Worksheet - TR55
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-E3
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-02-24-14.xlsx-DA-E3-2/24/2014-10:20 AM
Date: 04/02/13
Chckd. By: CSH
Pre-Development
Subarea DA-E4
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
98 0.53 52
B 55 0.05 3
B 61 1.68 102
B 85 0.29 25
B 86 0.11 9
C 74 1.10 81
98 0.20 20
C 70 0.11 8
C 74 0.01 1
Total = 4.08 301
total product 301
total area 4.08
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 74
CN
Open Space Good
conditions)
Open Space Good
CN (weighted) = =
Gravel
Impervious
Woods Good
Woods Good (offsite)
Bare Soil
CN Worksheet - TR55
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-E4
Date: 04/02/13
Chckd. By: CSH
Pre Development
Subarea DA-E5
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
98 0.16 16
98 0.40 39
B 61 0.03 2
C 74 0.03 2
Total = 0.62 59
total product 59
total area 0.62
CN Worksheet - TR55
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-E5
CN
Impervious
conditions)
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 95
CN (weighted) = =
Date: 10/31/13
Chckd. By: CSH
Pre Development
Subarea DA-6
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
C 98 0.30 29
Total = 0.30 29
total product 29
total area 0.30
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
DA-6
conditions)
CN
Impervious
CN (weighted) = =
CN (weighted) = 98.0 Use CN= 98
Date: 10/31/13
Chckd. By: CSH
Pre Development
Subarea DA-8
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
C 98 0.59 58
C 74 0.29 21
Total = 0.88 79
total product 79
total area 0.88
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
DA-8
conditions)
CN
Impervious
CN (weighted) = =
Date: 4/2/13
DA-E1a
Chckd. By: TDH
A-B
Woods
0.40
ft 100
in 3.5
ft/ft 0.130
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
B-C
U
ft 430
ft/ft 0.044
ft/s 3.4 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V

ft
2

ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V

ft
ft/s
L
3600 V
hours 0.20
minutes 11.8
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
21. Average velocity, V (assumed)
c. Channel Flow
12. Cross sectional flow area, a
5. Land Slope, s
7. Surface description (Paved or Unpaved)
e. Total
d. Pipe Flow
22. T
t
=
a. Sheet Flow
1. Surface Description (table 3-1)
6. T
t
=
b. Shallow Concentrated Flow
3. Flow length, L (total L <300 ft)
4. Two-year 24-hour rainfall, P
2
0.00
0.0 0.0 0.0
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
=
17. V =
0.00 hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.16
hr 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.04
hr
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
Time of Concentration
9. Watercourse slope, s
0.00
8. Flow length, L
0.16 0.00
15. Channel slope, s
16. Manning's roughness coefficient, n
14. Hydraulic radius, r =a/p
w
ft/s
2. Manning's roughness coeff., 'n' (table 3-1)
10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1)
13. Wetted perimeter, p
w
11. T
t
=
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-DA-E1a-2/24/2014-12:29 PM
Date: 4/2/13
DA-E1b
Chckd. By: TDH
A-B B-C
Grass Grass
0.24 0.24
ft 85 65
in 3.5 3.5
ft/ft 0.071 0.231
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
C-D
U
ft 420
ft/ft 0.126
ft/s 5.7 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V

ft
2

ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V

ft
ft/s
L
3600 V
hours 0.20
minutes 12.1
e. Total
0.00
d. Pipe Flow
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
22. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0
0.00
0.00
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00
17. V = ft/s
0.0
c. Channel Flow
Segment ID
w
w
11. T
t
= hr 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02
Segment ID
8. Flow length, L
6. T
t
= hr 0.12 0.06 0.00 0.18
Segment ID
2
5. Land Slope, s
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
a. Sheet Flow
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-DA-E1b-2/24/2014-12:29 PM
Date: 5/29/13
DA-E2a
Chckd. By: TDH
A-B B-C
Grass Grass
0.24 0.24
ft 125 25
in 3.5 3.5
ft/ft 0.020 0.140
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
C-D D-E E-F
U U U
ft 111 170 95
ft/ft 0.171 0.094 0.232
ft/s 6.7 4.9 7.8
L
3600 V
F-G
ft
2
142.400
ft 82.0
ft 1.74 0.00 0.00
ft/ft 0.016
0.03
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft 385
L
3600 V

ft
ft/s
L
3600 V
hours 0.34
minutes 20.1
e. Total
w
ft/s
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
=
d. Pipe Flow
c. Channel Flow
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
0.03
8. Flow length, L
11. T
t
= 0.02
hr 0.27 0.00
0.00 hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.31
hr 0.00 0.01 0.00
hr 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
0.0 9.0 0.0
a. Sheet Flow
6. T
t
=
2
5. Land Slope, s
22. T
t
=
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
17. V =
w
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-DA-E2a-2/24/2014-12:29 PM
Date: 4/5/13
DA-E2c
Chckd. By: TDH
A-B B-C
Woods Woods
0.40 0.40
ft 33 27
in 3.5 3.5
ft/ft 0.015 0.296
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
C-D D-E
U U
ft 63 91
ft/ft 0.095 0.176
ft/s 5.0 6.8 0.0
L
3600 V
ft
2
ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V

ft
ft/s
L
3600 V
hours 0.21
minutes 12.4
e. Total
0.00
d. Pipe Flow
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
22. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0
0.00
0.00
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00
17. V = ft/s
0.0
c. Channel Flow
Segment ID
w
w
11. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Segment ID
8. Flow length, L
6. T
t
= hr 0.16 0.04 0.00 0.20
Segment ID
2
5. Land Slope, s
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
a. Sheet Flow
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-DA-E2c-2/24/2014-12:29 PM
Date: 8/3/12
Subject: Comp. By: AB
DA-E3
Chckd. By:
A-B
Grass
0.24
ft 150
in 3.5
ft/ft 0.033
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
B-C C-D D-E
U P U
ft 17 373 337
ft/ft 0.023 0.011 0.080
ft/s 2.4 2.1 4.6
L
3600 V

ft
2

ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V

ft
ft/s
L
3600 V
hours 0.33
minutes 19.7
e. Total
w
ft/s
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
=
d. Pipe Flow
c. Channel Flow
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
0.00
8. Flow length, L
11. T
t
= 0.07
hr 0.26 0.00
0.00 hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.26
hr 0.00 0.05 0.02
hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0 0.0
a. Sheet Flow
6. T
t
=
2
5. Land Slope, s
22. T
t
=
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
17. V =
w
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-DA-E3-2/24/2014-12:29 PM
Date: 5/29/13
DA-E4
Chckd. By: TDH
A-B B-C C-D
Grass Grass Grass
0.24 0.24 0.24
ft 47 21 36
in 3.5 3.5 3.5
ft/ft 0.020 0.090 0.080
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
D-E E-F
U U
ft 447 132
ft/ft 0.030 0.170
ft/s 2.8 6.7 0.0
L
3600 V

ft
2

ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V

ft
ft/s
L
3600 V
hours 0.27
minutes 16.1
e. Total
w
ft/s
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
=
d. Pipe Flow
c. Channel Flow
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
0.04
8. Flow length, L
11. T
t
= 0.05
hr 0.12 0.06
0.00 hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.22
hr 0.04 0.01 0.00
hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0 0.0
a. Sheet Flow
6. T
t
=
2
5. Land Slope, s
22. T
t
=
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
17. V =
w
Date: 8/3/12
DA-E5
Chckd. By:
A-B
Imp
0.01
ft 100
in 3.5
ft/ft 0.060
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
B-C
P
ft 437
ft/ft 0.070
ft/s 5.4 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V

ft
2

ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V

ft
ft/s
L
3600 V
*Total =2.1 min Min. Tc =6 min
hours 0.04
minutes 2.1
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
c. Channel Flow
5. Land Slope, s
e. Total
d. Pipe Flow
22. T
t
=
a. Sheet Flow
6. T
t
=
2
0.00
0.0 0.0 0.0
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
=
17. V =
0.00 hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.01
hr 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02
hr
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
0.00
8. Flow length, L
0.01 0.00
w
ft/s
w
11. T
t
=
Date: 11/4/13
DA-6
Chckd. By: CSH
A-B
Pavement
0.01
ft 150
in 3.5
ft/ft 0.072
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
B-C
P
ft 38
ft/ft 0.072
ft/s 5.5 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V
ft
2

ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V
C-D
ft 268
ft/s 2.0
L
3600 V
hours 0.06
minutes 6.0
0.04
e. Total
0.00
d. Pipe Flow
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
22. T
t
= hr 0.04 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
17. V = ft/s
0.0
c. Channel Flow
Segment ID
w
w
11. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Segment ID
8. Flow length, L
6. T
t
= hr 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02
Segment ID
2
5. Land Slope, s
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
a. Sheet Flow
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-EDA-6-2/24/2014-12:29 PM
Date: 11/4/13
DA-8
Chckd. By: CSH
A-B
Pavement
0.01
ft 66
in 3.5
ft/ft 0.015
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
ft
ft/ft
ft/s 0.0 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V
ft
2

ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V
B-C
ft 55
ft/s 2.0
L
3600 V
hours 0.02
minutes 6.0
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
a. Sheet Flow
Segment ID
2
5. Land Slope, s
6. T
t
= hr 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
Segment ID
8. Flow length, L
11. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
c. Channel Flow
Segment ID
w
w
17. V = ft/s
0.0
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00
0.01 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0
0.00
0.01
e. Total
0.00
d. Pipe Flow
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
22. T
t
= hr
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-EDA-8-2/24/2014-12:29 PM
1aS
DA-E1a
1bS
DA-E1b
2aS
DA-E2a
2cS
DA-E2c
3S
DA-E3
4S
DA-E4
5S
DA-E5
6S
Sub DA-6 Pavt
8S
Sub Area DA-8
2aR
Reach #2
2cR
Reach #1
2cP
Wetland Ponding
Area
1L
Design Point 1
2cL
Design Point 2c
2L
Design Point 2
3L
Design Point 3
4L
Design Point 4
5L
Design Point 5
8L
Design Point 8
Routing Diagram for 13-12-06-Pre Development Calculations
Prepared by TRC Engineers, Inc., Printed 2/24/2014
HydroCAD10.00 s/n 06251 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Subcat Reach Pond
Link
APPENDIX D1 Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\HydroCAD\SWPPP Calcs\
13-12-06-Pre Development Calculations
Printed 2/24/2014 10:39:24 AM Prepared by TRC Engineers, Inc.
Page 2 HydroCAD10.00 s/n 06251 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Area Listing (all nodes)
Area
(acres)
CN Description
(subcatchment-numbers)
0.160 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B (2aS)
5.880 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1aS, 1bS, 2aS, 2cS, 3S, 4S, 5S)
1.160 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (1bS, 4S, 5S)
0.110 86 Fallow, bare soil, HSG B (4S)
0.340 85 Gravel roads, HSG B (1bS, 2aS, 4S)
2.610 98 Paved parking, HSG B (1aS, 1bS, 2aS, 2cS, 3S, 4S)
0.560 98 Paved parking, HSG C (5S)
0.890 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers, HSG C (6S, 8S)
9.320 55 Woods, Good, HSG B (1aS, 1bS, 2aS, 2cS, 3S, 4S)
1.250 70 Woods, Good, HSG C (1aS, 1bS, 2aS, 4S)
1.340 77 Woods, Good, HSG D (2aS, 2cS)
23.620 68 TOTAL AREA
Type III 24-hr 1-year Rainfall=3.00" 13-12-06-Pre Development Calculations
Time span=0.00-120.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 2401 points x 3
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Runoff Area=1.160 ac 3.45% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.27" Subcatchment 1aS: DA-E1a
Tc=11.8 min CN=58 Runoff=0.14 cfs 0.026 af
Runoff Area=1.430 ac 13.99% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.51" Subcatchment 1bS: DA-E1b
Runoff Area=4.770 ac 0.21% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.37" Subcatchment 2cS: DA-E2c
Runoff Area=4.460 ac 27.58% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.67" Subcatchment 3S: DA-E3
Runoff Area=0.300 ac 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.77" Subcatchment 6S: Sub DA-6 Pavt
Runoff Area=0.590 ac 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.77" Subcatchment 8S: Sub Area DA-8
Avg. Flow Depth=0.00' Max Vel=0.53 fps Inflow=0.02 cfs 0.001 af Reach 2aR: Reach #2
n=0.030 L=385.0' S=0.0156 '/' Capacity=1,270.26 cfs Outflow=0.02 cfs 0.001 af
Avg. Flow Depth=0.00' Max Vel=1.21 fps Inflow=0.02 cfs 0.001 af Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Peak Elev=393.75' Storage=6,301 cf Inflow=0.92 cfs 0.145 af Pond 2cP: Wetland Ponding Area
Outflow=0.02 cfs 0.001 af
Inflow=1.78 cfs 0.294 af Link 1L: Design Point 1
Primary=1.78 cfs 0.294 af
Inflow=0.02 cfs 0.001 af Link 2cL: Design Point 2c
below 25.00 cfs Inflow=2.94 cfs 0.309 af Link 4L: Design Point 4
Primary=2.94 cfs 0.309 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af
Total Runoff Area = 23.620 ac Runoff Volume = 1.328 af Average Runoff Depth = 0.67"
82.81% Pervious = 19.560 ac 17.19% Impervious = 4.060 ac
Summary for Subcatchment 1aS: DA-E1a
Runoff = 0.14 cfs @ 12.39 hrs, Volume= 0.026 af, Depth= 0.27"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span=0.00-120.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 1-year Rainfall=3.00"
Area (ac) CN Description
0.040 98 Paved parking, HSG B
0.880 55 Woods, Good, HSG B
0.080 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
0.160 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B
1.160 58 Weighted Average
1.120 57 96.55% Pervious Area
0.040 98 3.45% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
11.8 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 1aS: DA-E1a
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.1
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
Runoff=0.14 cfs @ 12.39 hrs
Type III 24-hr
1-year Rainfall=3.00"
Runoff Area=1.160 ac
Runoff Volume=0.026 af
Runoff Depth=0.27"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=58
0.14 cfs @ 12.39 hrs
Summary for Subcatchment 1bS: DA-E1b
0.010 85 Gravel roads, HSG B
0.020 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
12.1 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 1bS: DA-E1b
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.51"
Tc=12.1 min
CN=65
0.50 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
0.290 77 Woods, Good, HSG D
0.160 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B
20.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.40"
Tc=20.1 min
CN=62
1.24 cfs @ 12.42 hrs
Summary for Subcatchment 2cS: DA-E2c
12.4 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 2cS: DA-E2c
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.37"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=61
0.92 cfs @ 12.29 hrs
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: DA-E3
19.7 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 3S: DA-E3
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.67"
Tc=19.7 min
CN=69
2.00 cfs @ 12.32 hrs
0.110 86 Fallow, bare soil, HSG B
16.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.91"
Tc=16.1 min
CN=74
2.94 cfs @ 12.25 hrs
0.560 98 Paved parking, HSG C
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.45"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=95
1.65 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Summary for Subcatchment 6S: Sub DA-6 Pavt
0.300 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers, HSG C
6.0 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 6S: Sub DA-6 Pavt
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.95
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.77"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
0.85 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Summary for Subcatchment 8S: Sub Area DA-8
6.0 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 8S: Sub Area DA-8
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.77"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
1.68 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Summary for Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Max. Velocity=0.53 fps, Min. Travel Time=12.2 min
Avg. Velocity =0.53 fps, Avg. Travel Time=12.2 min
Peak Storage=12 cf @ 24.43 hrs
Average Depth at Peak Storage=0.00'
Bank-Full Depth=2.50' Flow Area=142.5 sf, Capacity=1,270.26 cfs
32.00' x 2.50' deep channel, n=0.030 Earth, grassed & winding
Side Slope Z-value=15.0 5.0 '/' Top Width=82.00'
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Inlet Invert=390.00', Outlet Invert=384.00'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.022
0.021
0.02
0.019
0.018
0.017
0.016
0.015
0.014
0.013
0.012
0.011
0.01
0.009
0.008
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0
Outflow=0.02 cfs @ 24.43 hrs
Avg. Flow Depth=0.00'
Max Vel=0.53 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
Capacity=1,270.26 cfs
0.02 cfs @ 24.23 hrs
0.02 cfs @ 24.43 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Summary for Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.022
0.021
0.02
0.019
0.018
0.017
0.016
0.015
0.014
0.013
0.012
0.011
0.01
0.009
0.008
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0
Max Vel=1.21 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
0.02 cfs @ 24.20 hrs
0.02 cfs @ 24.23 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Summary for Pond 2cP: Wetland Ponding Area
Plug-Flow detention time=748.5 min calculated for 0.001 af (1% of inflow)
#1 393.10' 13,483 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below
Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area
(feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft)
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 388.9 2,358 13,483 61,089
#1 Primary 393.75' Special & User-Defined
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.835 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
1=Special & User-Defined (Custom Controls 0.02 cfs)
Pond 2cP: Wetland Ponding Area
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Peak Elev=393.75'
Storage=6,301 cf
0.92 cfs @ 12.29 hrs
0.02 cfs @ 24.20 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Special & User-Defined
Summary for Link 1L: Design Point 1
Primary = 1.78 cfs @ 12.38 hrs, Volume= 0.294 af, Atten=0%, Lag=0.0 min
Primary outflow =Inflow, Time Span=0.00-120.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs
Link 1L: Design Point 1
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
1.78 cfs @ 12.38 hrs 1.78 cfs @ 12.38 hrs
Summary for Link 2cL: Design Point 2c
Link 2cL: Design Point 2c
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.022
0.021
0.02
0.019
0.018
0.017
0.016
0.015
0.014
0.013
0.012
0.011
0.01
0.009
0.008
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0
0.02 cfs @ 24.20 hrs 0.02 cfs @ 24.20 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
1.24 cfs @ 12.42 hrs 1.24 cfs @ 12.42 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
2.00 cfs @ 12.32 hrs 2.00 cfs @ 12.32 hrs
Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af
Primary outflow =Inflow below 25.00 cfs, Time Span=0.00-120.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Secondary=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
below 25.00 cfs
2.94 cfs @ 12.25 hrs 2.94 cfs @ 12.25 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
below 16.00 cfs
2.50 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 2.50 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow Area = 0.590 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.77" for 1-year event
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
1.68 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 1.68 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2- year Rainfall=3.50" 13-12-06-Pre Development Calculations
Type III 24-hr 2- year Rainfall=3.50"
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.32
0.3
0.28
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.2
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
Type III 24-hr
2- year Rainfall=3.50"
Runoff Depth=0.45"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=58
0.30 cfs @ 12.26 hrs
12.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.75"
Tc=12.1 min
CN=65
0.84 cfs @ 12.20 hrs
20.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.62"
Tc=20.1 min
CN=62
2.27 cfs @ 12.36 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.57"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=61
1.84 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
19.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.95"
Tc=19.7 min
CN=69
3.04 cfs @ 12.31 hrs
16.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.24"
Tc=16.1 min
CN=74
4.15 cfs @ 12.24 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.94"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=95
1.96 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.27"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
1.00 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.27"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
1.96 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow Area = 4.770 ac, 0.21% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.21" for 2- year event
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.18
0.17
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.1
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
Max Vel=0.53 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
0.17 cfs @ 16.40 hrs
0.17 cfs @ 16.70 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.18
0.17
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.1
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
Max Vel=1.21 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
0.17 cfs @ 16.37 hrs 0.17 cfs @ 16.40 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 388.9 2,358 13,483 61,089
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.835 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Peak Elev=393.77'
Storage=6,580 cf
1.84 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
0.17 cfs @ 16.37 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
3.22 cfs @ 12.33 hrs 3.22 cfs @ 12.33 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.18
0.17
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.1
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0.17 cfs @ 16.37 hrs 0.17 cfs @ 16.37 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
2.27 cfs @ 12.36 hrs 2.27 cfs @ 12.36 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
3.04 cfs @ 12.31 hrs 3.04 cfs @ 12.31 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
below 25.00 cfs
4.15 cfs @ 12.24 hrs 4.15 cfs @ 12.24 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
below 16.00 cfs
2.96 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 2.96 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow Area = 0.590 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.27" for 2- year event
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
1.96 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 1.96 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.17"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=58
1.11 cfs @ 12.19 hrs
12.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.65"
Tc=12.1 min
CN=65
2.12 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
20.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.44"
Tc=20.1 min
CN=62
6.43 cfs @ 12.31 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.37"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=61
5.55 cfs @ 12.19 hrs
19.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.96"
Tc=19.7 min
CN=69
6.73 cfs @ 12.29 hrs
16.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.36"
Tc=16.1 min
CN=74
8.20 cfs @ 12.23 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.42"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=95
2.88 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.76"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
1.43 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.76"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
2.82 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Max Vel=0.87 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
1.58 cfs @ 12.71 hrs
1.49 cfs @ 12.84 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Max Vel=1.56 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
1.58 cfs @ 12.70 hrs 1.58 cfs @ 12.71 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Center-of-Mass det. time=84.6 min ( 962.9 - 878.3 )
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 388.9 2,358 13,483 61,089
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.835 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Peak Elev=393.87'
Storage=8,631 cf
5.55 cfs @ 12.19 hrs
1.58 cfs @ 12.70 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
9.10 cfs @ 12.27 hrs 9.10 cfs @ 12.27 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
1.58 cfs @ 12.70 hrs 1.58 cfs @ 12.70 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6.43 cfs @ 12.31 hrs 6.43 cfs @ 12.31 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6.73 cfs @ 12.29 hrs 6.73 cfs @ 12.29 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 25.00 cfs
8.20 cfs @ 12.23 hrs 8.20 cfs @ 12.23 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
below 16.00 cfs
4.31 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 4.31 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
2.82 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 2.82 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.76"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=58
1.79 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
12.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.35"
Tc=12.1 min
CN=65
3.10 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
20.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.09"
Tc=20.1 min
CN=62
9.74 cfs @ 12.30 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.01"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=61
8.53 cfs @ 12.19 hrs
19.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.71"
Tc=19.7 min
CN=69
9.48 cfs @ 12.28 hrs
16.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.18"
Tc=16.1 min
CN=74
11.17 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=5.41"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=95
3.49 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=5.76"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
1.72 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=5.76"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
3.39 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Peak Storage=1,247 cf @ 12.57 hrs
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=1.29 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
4.37 cfs @ 12.50 hrs
4.19 cfs @ 12.57 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=2.21 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
4.36 cfs @ 12.49 hrs 4.37 cfs @ 12.50 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 388.9 2,358 13,483 61,089
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.835 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Peak Elev=393.97'
Storage=10,521 cf
8.53 cfs @ 12.19 hrs
4.36 cfs @ 12.49 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
14.16 cfs @ 12.40 hrs 14.16 cfs @ 12.40 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
4.36 cfs @ 12.49 hrs 4.36 cfs @ 12.49 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
11.41 cfs @ 12.46 hrs 11.41 cfs @ 12.46 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
9.48 cfs @ 12.28 hrs 9.48 cfs @ 12.28 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 25.00 cfs
11.17 cfs @ 12.22 hrs 11.17 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 16.00 cfs
5.21 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 5.21 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
3.39 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 3.39 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.41"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=58
2.54 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
12.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.10"
Tc=12.1 min
CN=65
4.18 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
20.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.80"
Tc=20.1 min
CN=62
13.33 cfs @ 12.29 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.70"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=61
11.77 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
19.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.51"
Tc=19.7 min
CN=69
12.37 cfs @ 12.28 hrs
16.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.04"
Tc=16.1 min
CN=74
14.20 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.41"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=95
4.09 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.76"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
2.01 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.76"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
3.96 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=1.61 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
7.56 cfs @ 12.40 hrs
7.41 cfs @ 12.45 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=2.67 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
7.55 cfs @ 12.38 hrs 7.56 cfs @ 12.40 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 388.9 2,358 13,483 61,089
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.835 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Peak Elev=394.04'
Storage=12,184 cf
11.77 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
7.55 cfs @ 12.38 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
23.74 cfs @ 12.35 hrs 23.74 cfs @ 12.35 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
7.55 cfs @ 12.38 hrs 7.55 cfs @ 12.38 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
19.37 cfs @ 12.37 hrs 19.37 cfs @ 12.37 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
12.37 cfs @ 12.28 hrs 12.37 cfs @ 12.28 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 25.00 cfs
14.20 cfs @ 12.22 hrs 14.20 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 16.00 cfs
6.11 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 6.11 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
3.96 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 3.96 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.76"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=58
2.97 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
12.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.49"
Tc=12.1 min
CN=65
4.73 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
20.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.17"
Tc=20.1 min
CN=62
15.21 cfs @ 12.29 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.07"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=61
13.47 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
19.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.93"
Tc=19.7 min
CN=69
13.85 cfs @ 12.28 hrs
16.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.48"
Tc=16.1 min
CN=74
15.73 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.90"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=95
4.40 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=7.26"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
2.16 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=7.26"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
4.24 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=1.76 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
9.57 cfs @ 12.35 hrs
9.32 cfs @ 12.41 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=2.88 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
9.52 cfs @ 12.34 hrs 9.57 cfs @ 12.35 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 388.9 2,358 13,483 61,089
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.835 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Peak Elev=394.08'
Storage=12,986 cf
13.47 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
9.52 cfs @ 12.34 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
28.71 cfs @ 12.33 hrs 28.71 cfs @ 12.33 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
9.52 cfs @ 12.34 hrs 9.52 cfs @ 12.34 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
23.51 cfs @ 12.35 hrs 23.51 cfs @ 12.35 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
13.85 cfs @ 12.28 hrs 13.85 cfs @ 12.28 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 25.00 cfs
15.73 cfs @ 12.22 hrs 15.73 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 16.00 cfs
6.55 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 6.55 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
4.24 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 4.24 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Project No. 165213
2 POST DEVELOPMENT CALCULATIONS
Date: 12/30/13
Chckd. By: TDH
Post Development
Subarea DA-P1a
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
B 61 0.01 1
B 55 0.44 24
C 70 0.05 4
98 0.05 5
B 61 0.16 10
B 55 0.40 22
C 70 0.03 2
Total = 1.14 67
total product 67
total area 1.14
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-P1a
Impervious (Offsite)
conditions)
CN Worksheet - TR55
Woods (Offsite)
CN
Woods
Woods
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 59
CN (weighted) = =
Woods (Offsite)
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-02-24-14.xlsx-DA-P1a-2/24/2014-10:22 AM
Date: 12/30/13
Chckd. By: TDH
Post Development
Subarea DA-P1b
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
B 61 0.28 17
C 70 0.21 15
C 98 0.10 10
B 61 0.11 7
C 70 0.12 8
Total = 0.82 57
total product 57
total area 0.82
Use CN= 69
CN (weighted) = =
Woods (Offsite)
Woods
conditions)
CN
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
DA-P1b
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-02-24-14.xlsx-DA-P1b-2/24/2014-10:22 AM
Date: 12/30/13
Chckd. By: TDH
Post Development
Subarea DA-P2a
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
B 61 0.51 31
B 55 1.01 56
C 70 0.86 60
D 77 0.29 22
B 55 0.02 1
Total = 2.69 170
total product 170
total area 2.69
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 63
CN (weighted) = =
CN (weighted) =
conditions)
Proposed Costco
CN
Woods
63.3
Woods (Offsite)
Woods
Yorktown, New York
DA P2a
Woods
CN Worksheet - TR55
Soil Name
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-02-24-14.xlsx-DA-P2a-2/24/2014-10:22 AM
Date: 05/28/14
Chckd. By: CSH
Post Development
Subarea DA-P2b-1
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
B 98 5.16 506
C 98 1.23 121
B 61 0.39 24
C 74 0.64 47
C 98 0.27 26
C 98 0.52 51
B 61 0.03 2
C 74 0.31 23
Total = 8.55 800
total product 800
total area 8.55
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 94
CN (weighted) = =
conditions)
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-P2b-1
CN
Impervious (Parking, Roof)
CN Worksheet - TR55
Impervious (Parking, Roof)
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-06-23-14.xlsx-DA-P2b-1-7/9/2014-3:58 PM
Date: 12/30/13
Chckd. By: CSH
Post Development
Subarea DA-P2b-2
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
B 98 4.36 427
B 61 0.73 45
B 61 0.02 1
Total = 5.11 473
total product 473
total area 5.11
Use CN= 93
CN (weighted) = =
Impervious
conditions)
CN
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
DA-P2b-2
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-02-24-14.xlsx-DA-P2b-2-2/24/2014-10:22 AM
Date: 12/30/13
Chckd. By: TDH
Post Development
Subarea DA-P2c
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
B 61 0.30 18
B 55 0.66 36
D 77 0.70 54
B 55 1.70 94
D 77 0.36 28
Total = 3.72 230
total product 230
total area 3.72
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
DA-P2c
conditions)
CN
Woods
Woods
Woods (Offsite)
Use CN= 62
Woods (Offsite)
CN (weighted) = =
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-02-24-14.xlsx-DA-P2c-2/24/2014-10:22 AM
Date: 12/30/13
Chckd. By: TDH
Post Development
Subarea DA-P3
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
B 61 0.03 2
B 55 0.52 29
Total = 0.55 30
total product 30
total area 0.55
CN (weighted) = =
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 55
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
DA-P3
CN
Woods
conditions)
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\CN Sheets\CN calcs-02-24-14.xlsx-DA-P3-2/24/2014-10:22 AM
Date: 12/30/13
Chckd. By: TDH
Post Development
Subarea DA-P4
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
B 98 0.06 6
C 98 0.08 8
C 74 0.31 23
Total = 0.45 37
total product 37
total area 0.45
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 81
CN (weighted) = =
Open Space (Good Condition, Onsite)
conditions)
CN
CN Worksheet - TR55
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-P4
Date: 12/30/13
Chckd. By: CSH
Post Development
Subarea DA-6
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
C 98 0.14 14
C 98 0.26 25
C 74 0.01 1
Total = 0.41 40
total product 40
total area 0.41
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
DA-6
conditions)
CN
Impervious (proposed)
Impervious (existing)
CN (weighted) = =
Date: 12/30/13
Chckd. By: CSH
Post Development
Subarea DA-8
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
C 98 0.30 29
C 98 0.51 50
C 74 0.06 4
Total = 0.87 84
total product 84
total area 0.87
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
DA-8
conditions)
CN
Impervious (proposed)
Impervious (existing)
CN (weighted) = =
Date: 4/5/13
DA-P1a
Chckd. By: TDH
A-B
Woods
0.40
ft 100
in 3.5
ft/ft 0.130
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
B-C
U
ft 430
ft/ft 0.044
ft/s 3.4 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V
ft
2
ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V
ft
ft/s
L
3600 V
hours 0.20
minutes 11.8
e. Total
w
ft/s
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
=
d. Pipe Flow
c. Channel Flow
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
0.00
8. Flow length, L
11. T
t
= 0.04
hr 0.16 0.00
0.00 hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.16
hr 0.04 0.00 0.00
hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0 0.0
a. Sheet Flow
6. T
t
=
2
5. Land Slope, s
22. T
t
=
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
17. V =
w
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-DA-P1a-2/24/2014-12:52 PM
Date: 4/5/13
DA-P1b
Chckd. By: TDH
A-B
Grass
0.24
ft 70
in 3.5
ft/ft 0.600
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
B-C
U
ft 235
ft/ft 0.081
ft/s 4.6 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V
ft
2
ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V
ft
ft/s
L
3600 V
hours 0.06
minutes 6.0
e. Total
0.00
d. Pipe Flow
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
22. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0
0.00
0.00
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00
17. V = ft/s
0.0
c. Channel Flow
Segment ID
w
w
11. T
t
= hr 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
Segment ID
8. Flow length, L
6. T
t
= hr 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.04
Segment ID
2
5. Land Slope, s
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
a. Sheet Flow
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-DA-P1b-2/24/2014-12:52 PM
Date: 8/3/12
DA-P2a
Chckd. By: TDH/CSH
A-B
Woods
0.40
ft 90
in 3.5
ft/ft 0.078
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
ft
ft/ft
ft/s 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V
B-C
ft
2
142.400
ft 82.0
ft 1.74 0.00 0.00
ft/ft 0.016
0.03
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft 385
L
3600 V
ft
ft/s
L
3600 V
hours 0.19
minutes 11.7
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
c. Channel Flow
5. Land Slope, s
e. Total
d. Pipe Flow
22. T
t
=
a. Sheet Flow
6. T
t
=
2
0.01
0.0 9.0 0.0
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
=
17. V =
0.00 hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
hr 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.18
hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
hr
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
0.00
8. Flow length, L
0.18 0.00
w
ft/s
w
11. T
t
=
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-DA-P2a-2/24/2014-12:52 PM
Date: 6/5/13
DA-P2b-1
Chckd. By: TDH
A-B B-C
Grass Grass
0.24 0.24
ft 48 35
in 3.5 3.5
ft/ft 0.146 0.679
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
C-P
P
ft 292
ft/ft 0.021
ft/s 3.0 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V
ft
2
ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V
C-D
ft 557
ft/s 2.0
L
3600 V
hours 0.19
minutes 11.1
e. Total
d. Pipe Flow
22. T
t
=
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
=
a. Sheet Flow
6. T
t
=
2
hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0 0.0
ft/s
0.08 hr 0.08 0.00 0.00
c. Channel Flow
w
0.08
hr 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.03
hr
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
0.02
8. Flow length, L
0.06 0.00
17. V =
w
11. T
t
=
5. Land Slope, s
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-DA-P2b-1-2/24/2014-12:52 PM
Date: 6/5/13
DA-P2b-2
Chckd. By: TDH
A-B
Grass
0.24
ft 23
in 3.5
ft/ft 0.500
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
B-C
P
ft 192
ft/ft 0.005
ft/s 1.5 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V
ft
2
ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V
C-D
ft 818
ft/s 2.0
L
3600 V
hours 0.17
minutes 10.2
e. Total
0.00
d. Pipe Flow
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
22. T
t
= hr 0.11 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0
0.00
0.11
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00
17. V = ft/s
0.0
c. Channel Flow
Segment ID
w
w
11. T
t
= hr 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.04
Segment ID
8. Flow length, L
6. T
t
= hr 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02
Segment ID
2
5. Land Slope, s
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
a. Sheet Flow
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-DA-P2b-2-2/24/2014-12:52 PM
Date: 4/5/13
DA-P2c
Chckd. By: TDH/CSH
A-B B-C
Woods Woods
0.40 0.40
ft 33 27
in 3.5 3.5
ft/ft 0.015 0.296
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
C-D D-E
U U
ft 63 91
ft/ft 0.095 0.176
ft/s 5.0 6.8 0.0
L
3600 V
ft
2
ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V
ft
ft/s
L
3600 V
hours 0.21
minutes 12.4
e. Total
0.00
0.00
d. Pipe Flow
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
22. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0
0.00
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00
17. V = ft/s
0.0
c. Channel Flow
Segment ID
w
w
11. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Segment ID
8. Flow length, L
6. T
t
= hr 0.16 0.04 0.00 0.20
Segment ID
2
5. Land Slope, s
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
a. Sheet Flow
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-DA-P2c-2/24/2014-12:52 PM
Date: 8/3/12
DA-P3
Chckd. By:
A-B
Grass
0.24
ft 150
in 3.5
ft/ft 0.013
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
B-C
U
ft 155
ft/ft 0.052
ft/s 3.7 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V
ft
2
ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V
ft
ft/s
L
3600 V
hours 0.39
minutes 23.1
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
c. Channel Flow
5. Land Slope, s
e. Total
d. Pipe Flow
22. T
t
=
a. Sheet Flow
6. T
t
=
2
0.00
0.0 0.0 0.0
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
=
17. V =
0.00 hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.37
hr 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
hr
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
0.00
8. Flow length, L
0.37 0.00
w
ft/s
w
11. T
t
=
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-DA-P3-2/24/2014-12:52 PM
Date: 8/3/12
DA-P4
Chckd. By:
A-B B-C
Grass Grass
0.24 0.24
ft 75 59
in 3.5 3.5
ft/ft 0.240 0.130
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
ft
ft/ft
ft/s 0.0 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V
ft
2

ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V
ft
ft/s
L
3600 V
hours 0.14
minutes 8.2
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
c. Channel Flow
5. Land Slope, s
e. Total
d. Pipe Flow
22. T
t
=
a. Sheet Flow
6. T
t
=
2
0.00
0.0 0.0 0.0
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
=
17. V =
0.00 hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.14
hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
hr
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
0.07
8. Flow length, L
0.07 0.00
w
ft/s
w
11. T
t
=
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-DA-P4-2/24/2014-12:52 PM
Date: 11/4/13
DA-6
Chckd. By: CSH
A-B
Pavement
0.01
ft 150
in 3.5
ft/ft 0.072
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
B-C
P
ft 38
ft/ft 0.072
ft/s 5.5 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V
ft
2

ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V
C-D
ft 268
ft/s 2.0
L
3600 V
hours 0.06
minutes* 6.0
0.04
e. Total
0.00
d. Pipe Flow
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
22. T
t
= hr 0.04 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00 0.00
17. V = ft/s
0.0
c. Channel Flow
Segment ID
w
w
11. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Segment ID
8. Flow length, L
6. T
t
= hr 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02
Segment ID
2
5. Land Slope, s
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
a. Sheet Flow
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-PDA-6-2/24/2014-12:52 PM
Date: 11/4/13
DA-8
Chckd. By: CSH
A-B
Pavement
0.01
ft 150
in 3.5
ft/ft 0.022
0.007 (nL)
0.8
P
2
0.5
s
0.4
B-C
P
ft 20
ft/ft 0.022
ft/s 3.0 0.0 0.0
L
3600 V
ft
2

ft
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft/ft
1.49 r
2/3
s
1/2
n
ft
L
3600 V
C-D
ft 448
ft/s 3.7
L
3600 V
hours 0.06
minutes 6.0
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Site Plan
Yorktown, NY
Preliminary SWM
a. Sheet Flow
Segment ID
2
5. Land Slope, s
6. T
t
= hr 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.03
Segment ID
8. Flow length, L
11. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
c. Channel Flow
Segment ID
w
w
17. V = ft/s
0.0
18. Flow Length, L
19. T
t
= hr 0.00 0.00
0.03 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0
0.00
0.03
e. Total
0.00
d. Pipe Flow
Segment ID
20. Pipe length, L
22. T
t
= hr
Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\Tc Sheets\Costco - Tc Worksheet-02-24-14.xls-Tc-PDA-8-2/24/2014-12:52 PM
1aS
DA-P1a
1bS
DA-P1b
2aS
DA-P2a
2b-1S
DA-P2b-1
2b-2S
DA-P2b-2
2cS
DA-P2c
3S
DA-P3
4S
DA-P4
6S
Sub DA-6
8S
Sub DA-8
2aR
Reach #2
2cR
Reach #1
1P
Infiltration
Basin/Detention
Chambers
2b-2P
Detention Pond
2cP
Wetland Ponding
Area
1L
Design Point 1
2cL
Design Point 2c
2L
Design Point 2
3L
Design Point 3
4L
Design Point 4
5L
Design Point 5
8L
Design Point 8
SG-1L
StormGate-2b1
SG-2L
StormGate-2b2
SG-3L
StormGate-6
SG-4L
StormGate-8
Routing Diagram for 14-06-26-Post Development Calculations
HydroCAD10.00-12 s/n 06251 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Subcat Reach Pond
Link
Appendix D-Post Development Calculations Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\HydroCAD\SWPPP Calcs\
14-06-26-Post Development Calculations
Area
(acres)
CN Description
2.740 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1aS, 1bS, 2aS, 2b-1S, 2b-2S, 2cS, 3S)
1.330 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (2b-1S, 4S, 6S, 8S)
9.570 98 Paved parking, HSG B (1aS, 2b-1S, 2b-2S)
1.330 98 Paved parking, HSG C (1bS, 2b-1S)
1.290 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers, HSG C, Offsite, Existing (2b-1S, 6S, 8S)
0.710 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers, HSG C, Offsite, Proposed (2b-1S, 6S, 8S)
0.060 98 Paved roads w/curbs & storm sewers, HSG C, Offsite Proposed (4S)
0.080 98 Paved roads, HSG C, Offsite existing (4S)
4.580 55 Woods, Good, HSG B (1aS, 2aS, 2cS, 3S)
1.270 70 Woods, Good, HSG C (1aS, 1bS, 2aS)
14-06-26-Post Development Calculations
Pipe Listing (all nodes)
Line# Node
Number
In-Invert
(feet)
Out-Invert
(feet)
Length
(feet)
Slope
(ft/ft)
n Diam/Width
(inches)
Height
(inches)
Inside-Fill
(inches)
1 1P 431.67 430.78 30.0 0.0297 0.013 36.0 22.0 0.0
2 2b-2P 423.83 415.38 88.0 0.0960 0.013 18.0 0.0 0.0
3 2b-2P 423.65 421.00 29.0 0.0914 0.013 18.0 0.0 0.0
Type III 24-hr 1-year Rainfall=3.00" 14-06-26-Post Development Calculations
Runoff Area=1.140 ac 4.39% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.30" Subcatchment 1aS: DA-P1a
Runoff Area=0.820 ac 12.20% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.67" Subcatchment 1bS: DA-P1b
Runoff Area=8.550 ac 83.98% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.35" Subcatchment 2b-1S: DA-P2b-1
Runoff Area=3.720 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.40" Subcatchment 2cS: DA-P2c
Runoff Area=0.550 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.25" Subcatchment 3S: DA-P3
Runoff Area=0.410 ac 97.56% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.66" Subcatchment 6S: Sub DA-6
Peak Elev=428.51' Storage=85,561 cf Inflow=33.15 cfs 2.910 af Pond 1P: Infiltration Basin/Detention
Discarded=0.76 cfs 2.911 af Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=0.76 cfs 2.911 af
Peak Elev=425.00' Storage=0 cf Inflow=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Pond 2b-2P: Detention Pond
Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Tertiary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=0.00 cfs 0.000 af
below 21.86 cfs Inflow=21.86 cfs 1.950 af Link SG-1L: StormGate-2b1
below 1.14 cfs Inflow=1.14 cfs 0.091 af Link SG-3L: StormGate-6
Summary for Subcatchment 1aS: DA-P1a
11.8 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 1aS: DA-P1a
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.17
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.1
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.30"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=59
0.16 cfs @ 12.36 hrs
Summary for Subcatchment 1bS: DA-P1b
3.5 Direct Entry,
3.5 0 Total, Increased to minimum Tc =6.0 min
Subcatchment 1bS: DA-P1b
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.67"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=69
0.54 cfs @ 12.11 hrs
11.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.43"
Tc=11.7 min
CN=63
0.73 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
Summary for Subcatchment 2b-1S: DA-P2b-1
* 0.270 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers, HSG C, Offsite, Proposed
* 0.520 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers, HSG C, Offsite, Existing
11.1 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 2b-1S: DA-P2b-1
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.35"
Tc=11.1 min
CN=94
19.05 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
10.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.25"
Tc=10.2 min
CN=93
11.29 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
Summary for Subcatchment 2cS: DA-P2c
12.4 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 2cS: DA-P2c
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.40"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=62
0.84 cfs @ 12.26 hrs
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: DA-P3
23.1 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 3S: DA-P3
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.052
0.05
0.048
0.046
0.044
0.042
0.04
0.038
0.036
0.034
0.032
0.03
0.028
0.026
0.024
0.022
0.02
0.018
0.016
0.014
0.012
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.25"
Tc=23.1 min
CN=57
0.05 cfs @ 12.58 hrs
* 0.060 98 Paved roads w/curbs & storm sewers, HSG C, Offsite Proposed
* 0.080 98 Paved roads, HSG C, Offsite existing
8.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.31"
Tc=8.2 min
CN=81
0.63 cfs @ 12.12 hrs
Summary for Subcatchment 6S: Sub DA-6
6.0 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 6S: Sub DA-6
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.66"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=97
1.14 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.55"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=96
2.38 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Max Vel=0.00 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Max Vel=0.00 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Discarded = 0.76 cfs @ 10.10 hrs, Volume= 2.911 af
Plug-Flow detention time=(not calculated: outflow precedes inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time=1,028.3 min ( 1,821.9 - 793.6 )
#1 Discarded 419.00' 0.76 cfs Exfiltration when above 419.00'
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.76 cfs @ 10.10 hrs HW=419.16' (Free Discharge)
1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.76 cfs)
2=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Inflow
Discarded
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Discarded=0.76 cfs @ 10.10 hrs
Peak Elev=428.51'
Storage=85,561 cf
33.15 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
0.76 cfs @ 10.10 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Total
Discarded
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
434
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
424
423
422
421
420
419
Exfiltration
Initial Tailwater
Culvert
Summary for Pond 2b-2P: Detention Pond
Tertiary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af
Peak Elev=425.00' @ 0.00 hrs Surf.Area=3,379 sf Storage=0 cf
Plug-Flow detention time=(not calculated: initial storage exceeds outflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time=(not calculated: no inflow)
#1 425.00' 59,878 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc)
425.00 3,379 255.7 0 0 3,379
426.00 4,256 281.7 3,809 3,809 4,523
428.00 6,226 328.9 10,420 14,229 6,896
430.00 8,466 371.0 14,635 28,864 9,343
432.00 10,966 412.2 19,378 48,242 12,028
433.00 12,320 432.2 11,636 59,878 13,437
#1 Primary 423.83' 18.0" Round Culvert
n=0.013, Flow Area=1.77 sf
#2 Device 1 425.00' 6.0" Vert. Orifice C=0.600
#3 Device 1 431.00' 2.5' long x 0.5' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
#4 Device 1 432.25' 72.0" x 72.0" Horiz. Riser C=0.600
Limited to weir flow at low heads
#5 Secondary 423.65' 18.0" Round Culvert
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
#9 Tertiary 432.25' 143.0 deg x 15.0' long Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir
Cv=2.47 (C=3.09)
1=Culvert (Passes 0.00 cfs of 5.45 cfs potential flow)
2=Orifice ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
4=Riser ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=425.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
Tertiary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=425.00' TW=393.10' (Dynamic Tailwater)
9=Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Pond 2b-2P: Detention Pond
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Tertiary=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Peak Elev=425.00'
Storage=0 cf
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Total
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
Orifice
Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Riser
Orifice
Riser Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir
Plug-Flow detention time=(not calculated: initial storage exceeds outflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time=(not calculated: no outflow)
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 677.9 2,358 13,483 36,557
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.895 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
1=Special & User-Defined ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Peak Elev=393.69'
Storage=5,378 cf
0.84 cfs @ 12.26 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
1.23 cfs @ 12.21 hrs 1.23 cfs @ 12.21 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0.73 cfs @ 12.22 hrs 0.73 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.052
0.05
0.048
0.046
0.044
0.042
0.04
0.038
0.036
0.034
0.032
0.03
0.028
0.026
0.024
0.022
0.02
0.018
0.016
0.014
0.012
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
0
0.05 cfs @ 12.58 hrs 0.05 cfs @ 12.58 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
below 25.00 cfs
0.63 cfs @ 12.12 hrs 0.63 cfs @ 12.12 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
below 10.00 cfs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Summary for Link SG-1L: StormGate-2b1
Link SG-1L: StormGate-2b1
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 21.86 cfs
21.86 cfs @ 12.14 hrs 21.86 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 11.29 cfs
11.29 cfs @ 12.14 hrs 11.29 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Summary for Link SG-3L: StormGate-6
Link SG-3L: StormGate-6
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
below 1.14 cfs
1.14 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 1.14 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
below 2.38 cfs
2.38 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 2.38 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Peak Elev=425.55' Storage=1,978 cf Inflow=6.45 cfs 0.050 af Pond 2b-2P: Detention Pond
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.36
0.34
0.32
0.3
0.28
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.2
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.49"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=59
0.34 cfs @ 12.23 hrs
3.5 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.95"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=69
0.82 cfs @ 12.10 hrs
11.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.66"
Tc=11.7 min
CN=63
1.32 cfs @ 12.20 hrs
11.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.84"
Tc=11.1 min
CN=94
22.76 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
10.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.73"
Tc=10.2 min
CN=93
13.57 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.62"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=62
1.61 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
23.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.115
0.11
0.105
0.1
0.095
0.09
0.085
0.08
0.075
0.07
0.065
0.06
0.055
0.05
0.045
0.04
0.035
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=0.42"
Tc=23.1 min
CN=57
0.10 cfs @ 12.49 hrs
8.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.71"
Tc=8.2 min
CN=81
0.82 cfs @ 12.12 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.15"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=97
1.35 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.05"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=96
2.81 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Max Vel=0.53 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
0.50 cfs @ 12.30 hrs
0.38 cfs @ 12.59 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Max Vel=1.21 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
0.52 cfs @ 12.25 hrs
0.50 cfs @ 12.30 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Plug-Flow detention time=1,256.5 min calculated for 3.459 af (100% of inflow)
2=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Inflow
Discarded
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Peak Elev=430.76'
Storage=105,827 cf
33.15 cfs @ 12.10 hrs
0.76 cfs @ 9.55 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Total
Discarded
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
434
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
424
423
422
421
420
419
Exfiltration
Initial Tailwater
Culvert
425.00 3,379 255.7 0 0 3,379
426.00 4,256 281.7 3,809 3,809 4,523
428.00 6,226 328.9 10,420 14,229 6,896
430.00 8,466 371.0 14,635 28,864 9,343
432.00 10,966 412.2 19,378 48,242 12,028
433.00 12,320 432.2 11,636 59,878 13,437
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Cv=2.47 (C=3.09)
2=Orifice (Orifice Controls 0.52 cfs @ 2.63 fps)
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Peak Elev=425.55'
Storage=1,978 cf
6.45 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
0.52 cfs @ 12.25 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Total
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
Orifice
Riser
Orifice
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 677.9 2,358 13,483 36,557
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.895 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Peak Elev=393.76'
Storage=6,440 cf
1.61 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
0.09 cfs @ 18.10 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
2.28 cfs @ 12.20 hrs 2.28 cfs @ 12.20 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.105
0.1
0.095
0.09
0.085
0.08
0.075
0.07
0.065
0.06
0.055
0.05
0.045
0.04
0.035
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
0.09 cfs @ 18.10 hrs 0.09 cfs @ 18.10 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
1.40 cfs @ 12.23 hrs 1.40 cfs @ 12.23 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.115
0.11
0.105
0.1
0.095
0.09
0.085
0.08
0.075
0.07
0.065
0.06
0.055
0.05
0.045
0.04
0.035
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
0.10 cfs @ 12.49 hrs 0.10 cfs @ 12.49 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
below 25.00 cfs
0.82 cfs @ 12.12 hrs 0.82 cfs @ 12.12 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.22
0.21
0.2
0.19
0.18
0.17
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.1
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
below 10.00 cfs
0.20 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 0.20 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.46
0.44
0.42
0.4
0.38
0.36
0.34
0.32
0.3
0.28
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.2
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0.41 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 0.41 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
below 21.86 cfs
26.03 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
21.86 cfs @ 12.10 hrs
4.17 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 11.29 cfs
13.57 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
11.29 cfs @ 12.10 hrs
2.28 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
below 1.14 cfs
1.35 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
1.17 cfs @ 12.08 hrs
0.20 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
below 2.38 cfs
2.81 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
2.45 cfs @ 12.08 hrs
0.41 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.23"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=59
1.17 cfs @ 12.19 hrs
3.5 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.96"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=69
1.81 cfs @ 12.10 hrs
11.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.51"
Tc=11.7 min
CN=63
3.60 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
11.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.31"
Tc=11.1 min
CN=94
33.79 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
10.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.20"
Tc=10.2 min
CN=93
20.35 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.44"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=62
4.61 cfs @ 12.19 hrs
23.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.42
0.4
0.38
0.36
0.34
0.32
0.3
0.28
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.2
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.10"
Tc=23.1 min
CN=57
0.38 cfs @ 12.38 hrs
8.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.99"
Tc=8.2 min
CN=81
1.44 cfs @ 12.12 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.65"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=97
1.94 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.53"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=96
4.09 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Max Vel=0.99 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
2.08 cfs @ 13.22 hrs 2.07 cfs @ 13.30 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Max Vel=1.71 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
2.08 cfs @ 13.20 hrs 2.08 cfs @ 13.22 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Inflow
Discarded
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Peak Elev=432.49'
Storage=121,373 cf
33.15 cfs @ 12.05 hrs
0.76 cfs @ 8.30 hrs
4.91 cfs @ 13.13 hrs
Total
Discarded
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
434
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
424
423
422
421
420
419
Exfiltration
Initial Tailwater
Culvert
425.00 3,379 255.7 0 0 3,379
426.00 4,256 281.7 3,809 3,809 4,523
428.00 6,226 328.9 10,420 14,229 6,896
430.00 8,466 371.0 14,635 28,864 9,343
432.00 10,966 412.2 19,378 48,242 12,028
433.00 12,320 432.2 11,636 59,878 13,437
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Cv=2.47 (C=3.09)
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Peak Elev=427.64'
Storage=12,048 cf
24.46 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
1.46 cfs @ 12.28 hrs
4.04 cfs @ 12.28 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Total
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
Orifice
Riser
Orifice
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 677.9 2,358 13,483 36,557
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.895 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Peak Elev=393.84'
Storage=7,940 cf
4.61 cfs @ 12.19 hrs
0.89 cfs @ 12.94 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6.42 cfs @ 12.17 hrs 6.42 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.95
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0.89 cfs @ 12.94 hrs 0.89 cfs @ 12.94 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
3.96 cfs @ 12.23 hrs 3.96 cfs @ 12.23 hrs
Inflow Area = 0.550 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth =17.07" for 10-year event
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
4.38 cfs @ 12.29 hrs 4.38 cfs @ 12.29 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
below 25.00 cfs
1.44 cfs @ 12.12 hrs 1.44 cfs @ 12.12 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
below 10.00 cfs
0.80 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 0.80 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
1.71 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 1.71 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
below 21.86 cfs
37.31 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
21.86 cfs @ 12.05 hrs
15.45 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 11.29 cfs
20.35 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
11.29 cfs @ 12.05 hrs
9.06 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
below 1.14 cfs
1.94 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
1.14 cfs @ 12.00 hrs
0.80 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
below 2.38 cfs
4.09 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
2.38 cfs @ 12.00 hrs
1.71 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.84"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=59
1.86 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
3.5 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.71"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=69
2.54 cfs @ 12.10 hrs
11.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.18"
Tc=11.7 min
CN=63
5.44 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
11.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=5.30"
Tc=11.1 min
CN=94
41.07 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
10.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=5.18"
Tc=10.2 min
CN=93
24.82 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.09"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=62
6.99 cfs @ 12.19 hrs
23.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=1.68"
Tc=23.1 min
CN=57
0.62 cfs @ 12.36 hrs
8.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.88"
Tc=8.2 min
CN=81
1.86 cfs @ 12.12 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=5.64"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=97
2.34 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=5.53"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=96
4.94 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=1.35 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
4.77 cfs @ 12.58 hrs
4.71 cfs @ 12.63 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=2.28 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
4.77 cfs @ 12.56 hrs 4.77 cfs @ 12.58 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Inflow
Discarded
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Peak Elev=433.18'
Storage=127,616 cf
33.15 cfs @ 12.00 hrs
0.76 cfs @ 7.50 hrs
14.40 cfs @ 12.62 hrs
Total
Discarded
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
434
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
424
423
422
421
420
419
Exfiltration
Initial Tailwater
Culvert
425.00 3,379 255.7 0 0 3,379
426.00 4,256 281.7 3,809 3,809 4,523
428.00 6,226 328.9 10,420 14,229 6,896
430.00 8,466 371.0 14,635 28,864 9,343
432.00 10,966 412.2 19,378 48,242 12,028
433.00 12,320 432.2 11,636 59,878 13,437
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Cv=2.47 (C=3.09)
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Peak Elev=429.69'
Storage=26,336 cf
36.20 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
1.99 cfs @ 13.03 hrs
6.76 cfs @ 13.03 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Total
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
Orifice
Riser
Orifice
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 677.9 2,358 13,483 36,557
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.895 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Peak Elev=393.93'
Storage=9,683 cf
6.99 cfs @ 12.19 hrs
2.95 cfs @ 12.55 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
9.69 cfs @ 12.17 hrs 9.69 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
2.95 cfs @ 12.55 hrs 2.95 cfs @ 12.55 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6.73 cfs @ 12.50 hrs 6.73 cfs @ 12.50 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6.95 cfs @ 12.97 hrs 6.95 cfs @ 12.97 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
below 25.00 cfs
1.86 cfs @ 12.12 hrs 1.86 cfs @ 12.12 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
below 10.00 cfs
1.20 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 1.20 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
2.56 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 2.56 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
below 21.86 cfs
44.59 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
21.86 cfs @ 12.00 hrs
22.73 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
below 11.29 cfs
24.82 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
11.29 cfs @ 12.00 hrs
13.53 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
below 1.14 cfs
2.34 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
1.14 cfs @ 12.00 hrs
1.20 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 2.38 cfs
4.94 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
2.38 cfs @ 12.00 hrs
2.56 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.51"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=59
2.64 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
3.5 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.51"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=69
3.31 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.90"
Tc=11.7 min
CN=63
7.39 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
11.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.29"
Tc=11.1 min
CN=94
48.31 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
10.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.17"
Tc=10.2 min
CN=93
29.27 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.80"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=62
9.57 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
23.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.31"
Tc=23.1 min
CN=57
0.89 cfs @ 12.35 hrs
8.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.81"
Tc=8.2 min
CN=81
2.29 cfs @ 12.12 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.64"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=97
2.74 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.52"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=96
5.78 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=1.89 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
11.47 cfs @ 12.72 hrs
11.38 cfs @ 12.75 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=3.08 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
11.46 cfs @ 12.71 hrs 11.47 cfs @ 12.72 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Inflow
Discarded
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Peak Elev=433.86'
Storage=133,703 cf
33.15 cfs @ 11.90 hrs
0.76 cfs @ 6.80 hrs
23.01 cfs @ 12.54 hrs
Total
Discarded
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
434
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
424
423
422
421
420
419
Exfiltration
Initial Tailwater
Culvert
425.00 3,379 255.7 0 0 3,379
426.00 4,256 281.7 3,809 3,809 4,523
428.00 6,226 328.9 10,420 14,229 6,896
430.00 8,466 371.0 14,635 28,864 9,343
432.00 10,966 412.2 19,378 48,242 12,028
433.00 12,320 432.2 11,636 59,878 13,437
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Cv=2.47 (C=3.09)
3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 5.72 cfs @ 2.91 fps)
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Peak Elev=431.79'
Storage=45,921 cf
47.88 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
8.13 cfs @ 12.75 hrs
9.88 cfs @ 12.75 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Total
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
Orifice
Riser
Orifice
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 677.9 2,358 13,483 36,557
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.895 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Peak Elev=394.00'
Storage=11,128 cf
9.57 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
5.67 cfs @ 12.42 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
14.33 cfs @ 12.39 hrs 14.33 cfs @ 12.39 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
5.67 cfs @ 12.42 hrs 5.67 cfs @ 12.42 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
12.88 cfs @ 12.73 hrs 12.88 cfs @ 12.73 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
10.33 cfs @ 12.73 hrs 10.33 cfs @ 12.73 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
below 25.00 cfs
2.29 cfs @ 12.12 hrs 2.29 cfs @ 12.12 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
below 10.00 cfs
1.60 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 1.60 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
3.40 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 3.40 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
below 21.86 cfs
51.83 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
21.86 cfs @ 11.90 hrs
29.97 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
below 11.29 cfs
29.27 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
11.29 cfs @ 11.90 hrs
17.98 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
below 1.14 cfs
2.74 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
1.14 cfs @ 11.95 hrs
1.60 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 2.38 cfs
5.78 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
2.38 cfs @ 11.95 hrs
3.40 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.86"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=59
3.04 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
3.5 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.93"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=69
3.70 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.28"
Tc=11.7 min
CN=63
8.41 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
11.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.78"
Tc=11.1 min
CN=94
51.92 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
10.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.67"
Tc=10.2 min
CN=93
31.49 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.17"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=62
10.91 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
23.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.65"
Tc=23.1 min
CN=57
1.04 cfs @ 12.34 hrs
8.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=5.27"
Tc=8.2 min
CN=81
2.51 cfs @ 12.11 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=7.14"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=97
2.94 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=7.02"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=96
6.20 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=2.22 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
17.55 cfs @ 12.55 hrs 17.51 cfs @ 12.58 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=3.55 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
17.57 cfs @ 12.54 hrs 17.55 cfs @ 12.55 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Inflow
Discarded
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Peak Elev=434.19'
Storage=135,900 cf
33.15 cfs @ 11.90 hrs
0.76 cfs @ 6.45 hrs
25.90 cfs @ 12.54 hrs
Total
Discarded
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
434
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
424
423
422
421
420
419
Exfiltration
Initial Tailwater
Culvert
425.00 3,379 255.7 0 0 3,379
426.00 4,256 281.7 3,809 3,809 4,523
428.00 6,226 328.9 10,420 14,229 6,896
430.00 8,466 371.0 14,635 28,864 9,343
432.00 10,966 412.2 19,378 48,242 12,028
433.00 12,320 432.2 11,636 59,878 13,437
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Cv=2.47 (C=3.09)
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Peak Elev=432.10'
Storage=49,397 cf
53.70 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
12.11 cfs @ 12.63 hrs
11.56 cfs @ 12.63 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Total
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
Orifice
Riser
Orifice
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 677.9 2,358 13,483 36,557
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.895 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Peak Elev=394.03'
Storage=11,856 cf
10.91 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
6.97 cfs @ 12.38 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
22.93 cfs @ 12.49 hrs 22.93 cfs @ 12.49 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6.97 cfs @ 12.38 hrs 6.97 cfs @ 12.38 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
20.68 cfs @ 12.52 hrs 20.68 cfs @ 12.52 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
12.27 cfs @ 12.60 hrs 12.27 cfs @ 12.60 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
below 25.00 cfs
2.51 cfs @ 12.11 hrs 2.51 cfs @ 12.11 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
below 10.00 cfs
1.80 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 1.80 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
3.82 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 3.82 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
below 21.86 cfs
55.44 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
21.86 cfs @ 11.90 hrs
33.58 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
below 11.29 cfs
31.49 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
11.29 cfs @ 11.90 hrs
20.20 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
below 1.14 cfs
2.94 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
1.14 cfs @ 11.90 hrs
1.80 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 2.38 cfs
6.20 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
2.38 cfs @ 11.90 hrs
3.82 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Date: 07/03/14
Date Revised:
Chckd. By: TDH
2.91 acft 126,716 cf
126,716 cf 1 hrmin
48 hr 3600 minsec
0.73 cfs
(@ 14.5 in/hr) 0.00034 ft/sec
15.0 ft
150 ft
15.1 ft
BottomAreaProvided: 2,250 sf
InfiltrationRate: 0.76 cfs
StorageVolumeProvided: 2,250 sfx 15.1 ft= 33,975 cf( 0.78 acft)
126,716 cf 33,975 cf= 92,741 cf( 2.13 acft)
3 Chambersx 33,975 cf= 101,925 cf( 2.34 acft)
4 Chambersx 33,975 cf= 135,900 cf( 3.12 acft)
2,250 sfx 12.67 ft= 28,508 cfx
4.00 Chambers= 114,030 cf( 2.62 acft)
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Costco Wholesale Store and Fueling Facility
Crompond Road
1yrStormVolume:
minimumflowrate:
x
Infiltration System Storage Volume/Infiltration Rate
StorageVolumeBelowOutletPipe:
cfs
EquivalentBottomArea:
= 2,185 sf
= 0.73
InfiltrationVaultBottomWidth:
TotalStorageVolumeProvided:
InfiltrationVaultBottomLength:
InfiltrationVaultDepth:
AdditionalStorageVolumeRequired:
AdditionalStorageVolumeProvided:
Q:\PROJECTS160\165213\SWM\Infiltrationrate7.31.13.xlsx7/9/20144:04PM 1of1
ES A-1
Project No. 165213
3 INCREASED RAINFALL INTENSITY ANALYSIS
TRCEngineers,Inc.
Design
Point
FEIS Existing
Conditions
(cfs)
FEIS Proposed
Conditions
(cfs)
% Dec. (-)/
% Inc. (+)
1 30.83 26.74 -13%
2 25.20 24.09 -4%
2c 10.28 7.52 -27%
3 14.49 13.5 -7%
4 16.35 2.59 -84%
5 6.73 1.88 -72%
Design
Point
FEIS Existing
Conditions
(cfs)
FEIS Proposed
Conditions
(cfs)
% Dec. (-)/
% Inc. (+)
1 50.51 73.21 45%
2 41.15 67.79 65%
2c 26.67 39.62 49%
3 19.14 26.23 37%
4 21.08 3.25 -85%
5 8.09 2.48 -69%
NRCC 50-yr Peak Discharge Runoff Rate
Comparison Table (7.7 in Rainfall)
NRCC 100-yr Peak Discharge Runoff Rate
Comparison Table (9.22 in Rainfal)
Q:\PROJECTS160\165213\SWM\HydroCAD\MaxRainfallTables05.20.14.xlsx7/10/20149:47AM 1of1
1aS
DA-E1a
1bS
DA-E1b
2aS
DA-E2a
2cS
DA-E2c
3S
DA-E3
4S
DA-E4
5S
DA-E5
6S
Sub DA-6 Pavt
8S
Sub Area DA-8
2aR
Reach #2
2cR
Reach #1
2cP
Wetland Ponding
Area
1L
Design Point 1
2cL
Design Point 2c
2L
Design Point 2
3L
Design Point 3
4L
Design Point 4
5L
Design Point 5
8L
Design Point 8
Routing Diagram for 13-12-06-Pre Development Calculations
HydroCAD10.00 s/n 06251 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Subcat Reach Pond
Link
13-12-06-Pre Development Calculations
Area
(acres)
CN Description
0.160 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B (2aS)
5.880 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1aS, 1bS, 2aS, 2cS, 3S, 4S, 5S)
1.160 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (1bS, 4S, 5S)
0.110 86 Fallow, bare soil, HSG B (4S)
0.340 85 Gravel roads, HSG B (1bS, 2aS, 4S)
2.610 98 Paved parking, HSG B (1aS, 1bS, 2aS, 2cS, 3S, 4S)
0.560 98 Paved parking, HSG C (5S)
0.890 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers, HSG C (6S, 8S)
9.320 55 Woods, Good, HSG B (1aS, 1bS, 2aS, 2cS, 3S, 4S)
1.250 70 Woods, Good, HSG C (1aS, 1bS, 2aS, 4S)
Type III 24-hr 50-NRCC Rainfall=7.70" 13-12-06-Pre Development Calculations
Type III 24-hr 50-NRCC Rainfall=7.70"
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
50-NRCC Rainfall=7.70"
Runoff Depth=2.90"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=58
3.13 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
12.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.65"
Tc=12.1 min
CN=65
4.95 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
20.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.33"
Tc=20.1 min
CN=62
15.97 cfs @ 12.29 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.22"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=61
14.17 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
19.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.10"
Tc=19.7 min
CN=69
14.49 cfs @ 12.27 hrs
16.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.66"
Tc=16.1 min
CN=74
16.35 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=7.10"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=95
4.52 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=7.46"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
2.21 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=7.46"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
4.35 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow Area = 4.770 ac, 0.21% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.86" for 50-NRCC event
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=1.81 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
10.29 cfs @ 12.34 hrs
10.06 cfs @ 12.39 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=2.96 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
10.28 cfs @ 12.33 hrs 10.29 cfs @ 12.34 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 388.9 2,358 13,483 61,089
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.835 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Peak Elev=394.09'
Storage=13,279 cf
14.17 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
10.28 cfs @ 12.33 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
30.83 cfs @ 12.32 hrs 30.83 cfs @ 12.32 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
10.28 cfs @ 12.33 hrs 10.28 cfs @ 12.33 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
25.20 cfs @ 12.34 hrs 25.20 cfs @ 12.34 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
14.49 cfs @ 12.27 hrs 14.49 cfs @ 12.27 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 25.00 cfs
16.35 cfs @ 12.22 hrs 16.35 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 16.00 cfs
6.73 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 6.73 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow Area = 0.590 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 7.46" for 50-NRCC event
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
4.35 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 4.35 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.02"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=58
4.43 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
12.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.90"
Tc=12.1 min
CN=65
6.69 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
20.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.52"
Tc=20.1 min
CN=62
21.96 cfs @ 12.28 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.40"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=61
19.61 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
19.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=5.40"
Tc=19.7 min
CN=69
19.14 cfs @ 12.27 hrs
16.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.03"
Tc=16.1 min
CN=74
21.08 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=8.62"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=95
5.43 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=8.98"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
2.65 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=8.98"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=98
5.22 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=2.31 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
23.96 cfs @ 12.21 hrs
19.40 cfs @ 12.25 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Max Vel=3.92 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
26.67 cfs @ 12.20 hrs
23.96 cfs @ 12.21 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 388.9 2,358 13,483 61,089
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.835 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Peak Elev=394.30'
Storage=13,483 cf
19.61 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
26.67 cfs @ 12.20 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
50.51 cfs @ 12.25 hrs 50.51 cfs @ 12.25 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
26.67 cfs @ 12.20 hrs 26.67 cfs @ 12.20 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
41.15 cfs @ 12.26 hrs 41.15 cfs @ 12.26 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
19.14 cfs @ 12.27 hrs 19.14 cfs @ 12.27 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 25.00 cfs
21.08 cfs @ 12.22 hrs 21.08 cfs @ 12.22 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 16.00 cfs
8.09 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 8.09 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow Area = 0.590 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 8.98" for 100-NRCC event
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
5.22 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 5.22 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
1aS
DA-P1a
1bS
DA-P1b
2aS
DA-P2a
2b-1S
DA-P2b-1
2b-2S
DA-P2b-2
2cS
DA-P2c
3S
DA-P3
4S
DA-P4
6S
Sub DA-6
8S
Sub DA-8
2aR
Reach #2
2cR
Reach #1
1P
Infiltration
Basin/Detention
Chambers
2b-2P
Detention Pond
2cP
Wetland Ponding
Area
1L
Design Point 1
2cL
Design Point 2c
2L
Design Point 2
3L
Design Point 3
4L
Design Point 4
5L
Design Point 5
8L
Design Point 8
SG-1L
StormGate-2b1
SG-2L
StormGate-2b2
SG-3L
StormGate-6
SG-4L
StormGate-8
Routing Diagram for 14-07-03-Post-NRCC-w-spillway
HydroCAD10.00-12 s/n 06251 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Subcat Reach Pond
Link
Appendix D-Rainfall Intensity Q:\PROJ ECTS160\165213\SWM\HydroCAD\SWPPP Calcs\
14-07-03-Post-NRCC-w-spillway
Area
(acres)
CN Description
2.740 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1aS, 1bS, 2aS, 2b-1S, 2b-2S, 2cS, 3S)
1.320 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (2b-1S, 4S, 6S, 8S)
9.670 98 Paved parking, HSG B (1aS, 1bS, 2b-1S, 2b-2S)
1.230 98 Paved parking, HSG C (2b-1S)
1.340 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers, HSG C, Offsite, Existing (2b-1S, 6S, 8S)
0.640 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers, HSG C, Offsite, Proposed (2b-1S, 6S, 8S)
0.060 98 Paved roads w/curbs & storm sewers, HSG C, Offsite Proposed (4S)
0.080 98 Paved roads, HSG C, Offsite existing (4S)
4.580 55 Woods, Good, HSG B (1aS, 2aS, 2cS, 3S)
1.270 70 Woods, Good, HSG C (1aS, 1bS, 2aS)
14-07-03-Post-NRCC-w-spillway
Pipe Listing (all nodes)
Line# Node
Number
In-Invert
(feet)
Out-Invert
(feet)
Length
(feet)
Slope
(ft/ft)
n Diam/Width
(inches)
Height
(inches)
Inside-Fill
(inches)
1 1P 431.67 430.78 30.0 0.0297 0.013 36.0 22.0 0.0
2 2b-2P 423.83 415.38 88.0 0.0960 0.013 18.0 0.0 0.0
3 2b-2P 423.65 421.00 29.0 0.0914 0.013 18.0 0.0 0.0
Type III 24-hr 50-NRCC Rainfall=7.70" 14-07-03-Post-NRCC-w-spillway
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.00"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=59
3.21 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
3.5 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.10"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=69
3.86 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.43"
Tc=11.7 min
CN=63
8.82 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
11.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.98"
Tc=11.1 min
CN=94
53.18 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
10.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.87"
Tc=10.2 min
CN=93
32.37 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.33"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=62
11.46 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
23.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=2.79"
Tc=23.1 min
CN=57
1.10 cfs @ 12.34 hrs
8.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=5.46"
Tc=8.2 min
CN=81
2.59 cfs @ 12.11 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=7.34"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=97
3.02 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=7.22"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=96
6.37 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=2.36 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
20.86 cfs @ 12.53 hrs
20.68 cfs @ 12.55 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Vel=3.75 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
20.88 cfs @ 12.53 hrs 20.86 cfs @ 12.53 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Inflow
Discarded
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Peak Elev=435.09'
Storage=135,900 cf
33.08 cfs @ 11.90 hrs
0.76 cfs @ 6.30 hrs
32.40 cfs @ 12.50 hrs
Total
Discarded
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
30 25 20 15 10 5 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
435
434
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
424
423
422
421
420
419
Exfiltration
Initial Tailwater
Culvert
425.00 3,379 255.7 0 0 3,379
426.00 4,256 281.7 3,809 3,809 4,523
428.00 6,226 328.9 10,420 14,229 6,896
430.00 8,466 371.0 14,635 28,864 9,343
432.00 10,966 412.2 19,378 48,242 12,028
433.00 12,320 432.2 11,636 59,878 13,437
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Cv=2.47 (C=3.09)
4=Riser (Weir Controls 0.14 cfs @ 0.40 fps)
8=Riser (Weir Controls 0.15 cfs @ 0.40 fps)
9=Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir (Weir Controls 0.10 cfs @ 0.40 fps)
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Peak Elev=432.27'
Storage=51,214 cf
57.29 cfs @ 12.16 hrs
14.50 cfs @ 12.55 hrs
12.65 cfs @ 12.55 hrs
0.10 cfs @ 12.55 hrs
Total
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
Orifice
Riser
Orifice
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 677.9 2,358 13,483 36,557
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.895 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Peak Elev=394.04'
Storage=12,165 cf
11.46 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
7.52 cfs @ 12.37 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
26.74 cfs @ 12.47 hrs 26.74 cfs @ 12.47 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
7.52 cfs @ 12.37 hrs 7.52 cfs @ 12.37 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
24.09 cfs @ 12.50 hrs 24.09 cfs @ 12.50 hrs
Inflow Area = 0.550 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth =61.20" for 50-NRCC event
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
13.50 cfs @ 12.54 hrs 13.50 cfs @ 12.54 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
below 25.00 cfs
2.59 cfs @ 12.11 hrs 2.59 cfs @ 12.11 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
below 16.00 cfs
1.88 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 1.88 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
3.99 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 3.99 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
below 21.79 cfs
56.70 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
21.79 cfs @ 11.90 hrs
34.91 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
below 11.29 cfs
32.37 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
11.29 cfs @ 11.90 hrs
21.08 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
below 1.14 cfs
3.02 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
1.14 cfs @ 11.90 hrs
1.88 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 2.38 cfs
6.37 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
2.38 cfs @ 11.90 hrs
3.99 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.8 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.15"
Tc=11.8 min
CN=59
4.51 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
3.5 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=5.40"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=69
5.09 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
11.7 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.65"
Tc=11.7 min
CN=63
12.05 cfs @ 12.17 hrs
11.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=8.50"
Tc=11.1 min
CN=94
64.08 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
10.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=8.37"
Tc=10.2 min
CN=93
39.08 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
12.4 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=4.52"
Tc=12.4 min
CN=62
15.75 cfs @ 12.18 hrs
23.1 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=3.90"
Tc=23.1 min
CN=57
1.56 cfs @ 12.33 hrs
8.2 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=6.90"
Tc=8.2 min
CN=81
3.25 cfs @ 12.11 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=8.86"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=97
3.62 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
6.0 Direct Entry,
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type III 24-hr
Runoff Depth=8.74"
Tc=6.0 min
CN=96
7.65 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Length=385.0' Slope=0.0156 '/'
Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Max Vel=3.44 fps
n=0.030
L=385.0'
S=0.0156 '/'
62.87 cfs @ 12.27 hrs
59.46 cfs @ 12.31 hrs
Reach 2aR: Reach #2
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
2
1
0
Length=140.0' Slope=0.0268 '/'
Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Max Vel=5.24 fps
n=0.030
L=140.0'
S=0.0268 '/'
64.19 cfs @ 12.26 hrs
62.87 cfs @ 12.27 hrs
Reach 2cR: Reach #1
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
D
e
p
t
h

(
f
e
e
t
)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Inflow
Discarded
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Peak Elev=436.50'
Storage=135,900 cf
33.08 cfs @ 11.85 hrs
0.76 cfs @ 5.30 hrs
39.38 cfs @ 12.30 hrs
Total
Discarded
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
436
435
434
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
424
423
422
421
420
419
Exfiltration
Initial Tailwater
Culvert
425.00 3,379 255.7 0 0 3,379
426.00 4,256 281.7 3,809 3,809 4,523
428.00 6,226 328.9 10,420 14,229 6,896
430.00 8,466 371.0 14,635 28,864 9,343
432.00 10,966 412.2 19,378 48,242 12,028
433.00 12,320 432.2 11,636 59,878 13,437
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32
Cv=2.47 (C=3.09)
2=Orifice (Passes <2.60 cfs potential flow)
3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Passes <20.15 cfs potential flow)
4=Riser (Passes <32.56 cfs potential flow)
6=Orifice (Passes <9.50 cfs potential flow)
7=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Passes <6.45 cfs potential flow)
8=Riser (Passes <32.56 cfs potential flow)
9=Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir (Weir Controls 20.94 cfs @ 2.26 fps)
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
105
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Peak Elev=432.82'
Storage=57,641 cf
95.21 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
24.42 cfs @ 12.29 hrs 24.69 cfs @ 12.29 hrs
21.52 cfs @ 12.29 hrs
Total
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
433
432
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
Orifice
Riser
Orifice
393.10 2,614 242.4 0 0 2,614
393.25 5,663 348.6 606 606 7,609
393.50 12,197 560.1 2,181 2,787 22,903
393.75 15,682 618.0 3,476 6,263 28,333
394.00 23,478 687.3 4,862 11,125 35,534
394.10 23,674 677.9 2,358 13,483 36,557
Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1.00 1.10 1.20
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.030 3.568 7.767 13.895 21.886 32.098
44.644 59.694 77.415 97.968 121.511 148.196
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Peak Elev=394.41'
Storage=13,483 cf
33.91 cfs @ 12.28 hrs
39.62 cfs @ 12.26 hrs
Primary
Stage-Discharge
Discharge (cfs)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
394
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
73.21 cfs @ 12.31 hrs 73.21 cfs @ 12.31 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
39.62 cfs @ 12.26 hrs 39.62 cfs @ 12.26 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
67.79 cfs @ 12.31 hrs 67.79 cfs @ 12.31 hrs
Inflow Area = 0.550 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth =79.30" for 100-NRCC event
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
26.23 cfs @ 12.30 hrs 26.23 cfs @ 12.30 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
3
2
1
0
below 25.00 cfs
3.25 cfs @ 12.11 hrs 3.25 cfs @ 12.11 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
2
1
0
below 16.00 cfs
2.48 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 2.48 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
5
4
3
2
1
0
5.27 cfs @ 12.09 hrs 5.27 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
below 21.79 cfs
67.60 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
21.79 cfs @ 11.85 hrs
45.81 cfs @ 12.15 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
below 11.29 cfs
39.08 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
11.29 cfs @ 11.85 hrs
27.79 cfs @ 12.14 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
4
3
2
1
0
below 1.14 cfs
3.62 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
1.14 cfs @ 11.85 hrs
2.48 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Inflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
F
l
o
w

(
c
f
s
)
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
below 2.38 cfs
7.65 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
2.38 cfs @ 11.80 hrs
5.27 cfs @ 12.09 hrs
Project No. 165213
4 OFFSITE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
Project: Costco Site Plan Project No.: 165213
Yorktown, NY
SWM Date: 2/24/14
Subject: Highway Widening CN Summary Comp. By: J LM
Chckd. By: TDH
DA-4 (1) 4.08 0.45 77 73
DA-5 (2) 0.62 0.00 70 na
DA-6 (3) 38.93 38.93 78 78
DA-7 (3) 55.79 55.79 81 81
DA-8 (4) 10.99 10.99 86 87
TOTAL 110.41 106.16 na na
Notes:
(2) DA-5 is rerouted to, and treated by the Onsite Stormwater Management System. (0.62 Acres
becomes part of DA-P2b-1)
(4) The addition of the proposed impervious area results in a slight increase to the CN and a
corresponding slight increase in peak runoff rates. However, because there is an overall decrease
in the total drainage area, overall proposed peak runoff rates are reduced to below existing levels
and stormwater abatement is not required.
(3) The addition of the proposed impervious area results in no increase to the CN. Therefore we
conclude that there is no appreciable increase in peak runoff rates, and stormwater abatement is
not required.
(Contributing to Route 202/35 & Old Crompond Road Right-of-Way)
Drainage Area
Designation
Existing Drainage Area
(ac)
Proposed Drainage Area
(ac)
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Existing CN
Summary of Offsite Dranage Conditions
Proposed CN
(1) Since the drainage area is significantly reduced there will be a decrease in stormwater
discharge, and stormwater abatment is not required. (3.63 acres becomes part of DA-P2b-1)
Date: 8/3/12
Chckd. By: TDH
Pre-Development
Subarea DA-E4
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
98 0.53 52
B 69 1.98 137
B 85 0.29 25
C 79 0.82 65
C 69 0.14 10
98 0.20 20
C 79 0.02 2
C 69 0.10 7
Total = 4.08 316
total product 316
total area 4.08
Frequency yr 1 10 100
Rainfall in 3.00 5.00 7.50
S 2.92 2.92 2.92
Runoff, Q in 1.09 2.66 4.86
CN (weighted) = =
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-E4
conditions)
CN Worksheet - TR55
CN
(Use P and CN with table 2-1, fig 2-1, or eqns. 2-3 and 2-4)
Open Space Good
Open Space Good (Onsite)
Impervious
Open Space Fair
2. Runoff
Impervious (Onsite)
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 77
Open Space Fair (Onsite)
Gravel (Onsite)
Open Space Fair (Onsite)
Date: 8/3/12
Chckd. By: TDH
Pre-Development
Subarea DA-E5
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
98 0.16 16
0
98 0.40 39
B 55 0.03 2
C 79 0.03 2
Total = 0.62 43
total product 43
total area 0.62
Rainfall in 3.00 5.00 7.50
S 4.35 4.35 4.35
Runoff, Q in 0.70 2.01 4.01
Open Space (Fair Condition)(offsite)
Open Space (Fair Condition)(offsite)
CN (weighted) = =
conditions)
Impervious
2. Runoff
CN
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
DA-E5
Soil Name
Date: 8/3/12
Chckd. By: TDH
Pre-Development
Subarea DA-E6
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
C Impervious (TSP, 202, and Mohansic) 98 2.59 254
C 80 9.91 793
C 79 7.46 590
C 73 18.97 1385
Total = 38.93 3021
total product 3021
total area 38.93
Rainfall in 3.00 5.00 7.50
S 2.89 2.89 2.89
Runoff, Q in 1.11 2.68 4.88
Woods (fair includes TSP Lawn Area)
1/2 Acre Residential District
1 Acre Residential District
2. Runoff
CN (weighted) = =
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 78
CN
CN Worksheet - TR55
conditions)
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-E6
Soil Name
Date: 8/3/12
Chckd. By: TDH
Pre Development
Subarea DA-E7
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
C Impervious (TSP, Route 202) 98 4.83 473
C 1/2 Acre Residential District 80 3.77 302
C 1 Acre Residential District 79 4.00 316
C Open Space/Park (fair) 79 34.16 2699
C Open Space/TSP Lawn (fair) 79 9.03 713
Total = 55.79 4503
total product 4503
total area 55.79
Rainfall in 3.00 5.00 7.50
S 2.39 2.39 2.39
Runoff, Q in 1.30 2.96 5.24
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
CN Worksheet - TR55
DA-E7
conditions)
CN
81
2. Runoff
CN (weighted) = =
CN (weighted) = 80.7 Use CN=
Date: 8/3/12
Chckd. By: TDH
Pre Development
Subarea DA-E8
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
C Business Urban District 94 0.38 36
C Open Space (fair, TSP Lawn) 79 6.58 520
Total = 10.99 950
total product 950
total area 10.99
Rainfall in 3.00 5.00 7.50
S 1.56 1.56 1.56
Runoff, Q in 1.70 3.52 5.90
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-E8
conditions)
CN
CN Worksheet - TR55
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 86
2. Runoff
CN (weighted) = =
Date: 2/24/14
Chckd. By: TDH
Post Development
Subarea DA-P4
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
98 0.06 6
98 0.08 8
B 61 0.31 19
Total = 0.45 33
total product 33
total area 0.45
Rainfall in 3.00 5.00 7.50
3.79 3.79 3.79
Runoff, Q in 0.83 2.24 4.32
CN Worksheet - TR55
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-P4
conditions)
CN
Impervious (Onsite)
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 73
2. Runoff
CN (weighted) = =
Date: 2/24/14
Chckd. By: TDH
Post Development
DA-P5 Shifted to Onsite Drainage Area Subarea DA-P5
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
C 98 0.00 0
C 79 0.00 0
Total = 0.00 0
total product 0
total area 0.00
Rainfall in 3.00 5.00 7.50
S 0.00 0.00 0.00
Runoff, Q in 0.00 0.00 0.00
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 0.0
2. Runoff
CN (weighted) = =
CN (weighted) = 0.0
CN
Impervious
Open Space
conditions)
CN Worksheet - TR55
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-P5
Date: 2/24/14
Chckd. By: TDH
Post Development
Subarea DA-P6
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
C Impervious (TSP, 202, and Mohansic) 98 2.73 268
C Woods (fair includes TSP Lawn Area) 73 18.83 1375
Total = 38.93 3024
total product 3024
total area 38.93
Rainfall in 3.00 5.00 7.50
S 2.87 2.87 2.87
Runoff, Q in 1.11 2.68 4.90
Soil Name CN
77.7
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-P6
CN Worksheet - TR55
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 78
2. Runoff
CN (weighted) = =
CN (weighted) =
conditions)
Date: 2/24/14
Chckd. By: TDH
Post Development
Subarea DA-P7
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
C Open Space/Park (fair) 79 34.16 2699
C Open Space/TSP Lawn (fair) 79 8.96 708
Total = 55.79 4504
total product 4504
total area 55.79
Rainfall in 3.00 5.00 7.50
S 2.39 2.39 2.39
Runoff, Q in 1.30 2.96 5.24
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-P7
conditions)
CN
CN Worksheet - TR55
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 81
2. Runoff
CN (weighted) = =
Date: 2/24/14
Chckd. By: TDH
Post Development
Subarea DA-P8
Area Product
(acres) CN x Area
C Business Urban District 94 0.38 36
C Open Space (fair, TSP Lawn) 79 6.28 496
Total = 10.99 956
total product 956
total area 10.99
Rainfall in 3.00 5.00 7.50
S 1.49 1.49 1.49
Runoff, Q in 1.74 3.57 5.96
TRC Engineers, Inc.
Use CN= 87
2. Runoff
CN (weighted) = =
CN
conditions)
CN Worksheet - TR55
Proposed Costco
Yorktown, New York
DA-P8
Project No. 165213
APPENDIX E
STORM DRAIN LINE CALCULATIONS
1. STORM PIPE DESIGN
2. HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE (HGL) ANALYSIS
Project No. 165213
1 STORM PIPE DESIGN
Project No. 165213
2 HGL ANALYSIS
Project No. 165213
APPENDIX F
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. TECTONIC SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT DATED
JUNE 3, 2013
2. TECTONIC SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT DATED
APRIL 30, 2014
Project No. 165213
1 TECTONIC SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT DATED JUNE 3, 2013

An Equal Opportunity Employer
PLANNING . ENGINEERING . CONSTRUCTION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

(845) 534-5959 FAX: (845) 534-5999
Mountainville, NY (800) 829-6531
CORPORATE OFFICE
PO Box 37, 70 Pleasant Hill Road
Mountainville, NY 10953 www.tectonicengineering.com
Retail Store Construction Co., Inc., c/o
MDI Associates, Inc.
735 Carter Street
New Canaan, CT 06840

Attn: Mr. Ken Walter
VIA REGULAR & ELECTRONIC MAIL: (kenharpwal@aol.com)

June 3, 2013

RE: W.O. # 5352.03
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION (REVISED)
OFFSITE UTILITIES AND INFILTRATION SYSTEM
TOWN OF YORKTOWN, NEW YORK

Dear Mr. Walter:

Tectonic Engineering and Surveying Consultants P.C. (Tectonic) has completed a
supplemental subsurface investigation and geotechnical engineering evaluation for the
proposed development of the site located off of Crompond Road in the Town of Yorktown,
New York. The purposes of this investigation was to document the subsurface conditions
and to evaluate the infiltration rates of in-situ soils within the proposed area of the infiltration
system, as well as exposing and documenting the water line along Crompond Road. This
report provides a summary of our investigation and presents our findings.

1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES

The geotechnical investigation was performed for Retail Store Construction Co., Inc., c/o MDI
Associates, Inc., herein referred to as the Client. The scope of our supplemental
geotechnical investigation consisted of the following:

Inspection and logging of twenty-four (24) test pits to depths ranging from
approximately 2 to 16 feet below existing grade and the performance of nine (9) in-situ
soil infiltration tests at various locations within the proposed infiltration area.

Inspection and logging of twenty-five (25) hydroexcavation test pits for the purpose for
locating the top of the water line along Crompond Road.

Full-time inspection by a geotechnical engineer to locate the test locations on-site,
locate the existing water main during hydroexcavation activities, perform visual
inspection, and perform the infiltration tests.

Preparation of this letter report presenting the results of the subsurface investigation
and field tests.
Costco Yorktown Page 2 June 3, 2013

2.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The project site is located on the north side of Crompond Road (US Route 202) immediately
west of the Taconic State Parkway in the Town of Yorktown, Westchester, New York. The
existing conditions of the project site are shown on a survey drawing entitled Survey of
Property at 3200 & 3220 Crompond Road, Prepared for Retail Store Construction Co., Inc.
dated April 26, 2002 by J. Henry Carpenter & Co. The project site currently consists of four
individual properties that will be combined and developed as one parcel. The combined area
of the four properties is 18.751 acres. The ground surface across all four properties generally
trends downward from east to west, with a high elevation of approximately +476 feet in the
southeast corner and a low elevation of approximately +386 feet near the southwest corner.

Based on our review of the drawing entitled Preliminary Site Plan, drawing CSP-9 by TRC
Engineers, Inc., we understand that the proposed construction will include a new Costco
Wholesale building, parking and driveway areas, a gas station area, stormwater management
ponds, retaining walls, and significant site grading.

3.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

The subsurface investigation consisted of logging of twenty-four (24) test pits, designated as
BINF-1 through BINF 14, BINF-X1.5, BINF-X3, BINF-X5, BINF-X9.5, and TP-1 (R) through
TP-6 (R) and the performance of nine (9) infiltration tests designated as BINF-5, BINF-6,
BINF-12, TP-1 (R), and TP-2 (R). The test pit and infiltration tests were performed at
locations provided by TRC Engineers, Inc. (TRC). Several locations were not accessible
during the investigation and were relocated at the direction of TRC. Test pits TP-1 (R)
through TP-6 (R) were performed along Crompound Road, as part of a preliminary
investigation. Infiltration tests for TP-3 (R), TP-5 (R), and TP-6 (R) were not performed
because of unsuitable soil conditions encountered, which consisted of very low permeability
fine grained soils. Test pit TP-4 (R) was abandoned after excavating to 3 feet below existing
ground surface, when excavation equipment damaged an unmarked, live water service line.
The test pits were excavated to depths ranging from approximately 2 to 16 feet below the
existing ground surface.

The infiltration testing was conducted in general conformance with the New York State
Stormwater Management Design Manual, Appendix D. The infiltration tests were performed
over two day periods (January 9 and 10 and March 14 and 15, 2013). The test holes were
excavated to depths ranging from approximately 1 to 7 feet below existing ground surface
and pre-soaked for 24 hours, and the infiltration tests were administered on the second day.
The test pit and infiltration test locations are shown on the attached Test Pit and Infiltration
Test Location Plans (Figures 1, 2 and 3).

The existing water main along Crompound Road was located through the use of
hydroexcavation. The location (station and offset from baseline) and elevation of the top of
the water main pipe exposed within the hydroexcavation was measured at twenty-five (25)
locations, designated WTP 1 through WTP 6, WTP 8 through WTP 15, WTP 15A, WTP 15B,
WTP 16A, WTP 16A1, WTP 16B, WTP 17, WTP 19, WTP 20, WTP 21, WTP 22, and WTP
23. While on site, it was determined by representatives of the Town of Yorktown Heights

Water Department that locations WTP-18, WTP-18A, and WTP-18B were situated on an
abandoned water main, thus hydroexcavation was unable to determine the water main depth
at these locations. The hydroexcavation locations are shown on the attached Stationing &
Test Pit Stakeout Sketch (SU-103 and SU-106).

All excavation and infiltration testing was observed on a full-time basis by a geotechnical
engineer, operating under the purview of a New York State licensed Professional Engineer.
The geotechnical engineer prepared logs, and administered and recorded the results of
infiltration tests. The test pits were completely backfilled to match the existing ground surface
upon completion.

4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

The subsurface conditions at the test pit locations typically consist of areas of existing fill and
native soil. In previously undeveloped areas, the native soils are overlain by a layer of
topsoil. The existing fill found at the site is the result of previous development and is most
prevalent at locations in the northern area of the investigation and along Crompound Road.
The fill in the northern area of the site consists primarily of organic materials such as wood
chips, mulch and peat soil, which is highly organic. The fill along Crompound Road consists
primarily of coarse to fine gravel with varying amounts of sand and silt. The native soil
underlying the topsoil or fill generally consists of silty, gravelly sand or silty, clayey, sandy
gravel. Sparse to many boulders and cobbles were generally encountered within the test
pits. Bedrock was encountered at depths ranging from 2.5 to 16 feet below the existing
ground surface. Groundwater was encountered in test pit BINF-7 at a depth of 3.5 feet.
Mottling of the soil was encountered within test pits BINF-1, BINF-X1.5, and BINFX-9.5 at
depths ranging from 4 to 5 feet below the existing ground surface. Mottling typically indicates
the presence of seasonally high groundwater. Seepage of groundwater was encountered
within test pits BINF-2, BINF-8, and BINF-10 at depths ranging from 4 to15.6 feet during the
investigation. Please see the attached test pit and infiltration test logs for additional
information.

Table 1
Test Pit Summary Results
Test Pit #

Fill Depth
(ft)
Groundwater
Depth (ft)
Bedrock Depth
(ft)
Additional
Comments
TP-1 (R) 2.0 N/E N/E -
TP-2 (R) 3.0 N/E N/E -
TP-3 (R) N/E N/E N/E
Unsuitable (low
permeability) soil
conditions
encountered
TP-4 (R)

3.0

N/E N/E
Abandoned at 3 feet
after encountering
an unmarked, live
water service line

TP-5 (R) N/E N/E N/E
Unsuitable (low
permeability) soil
conditions
encountered
TP-6 (R) 1.5 N/E N/E
Unsuitable (low
permeability) soil
conditions
encountered
BINF-1 N/E 5.0
1
N/E
Unsuitable (low
permeability) soil
conditions
encountered
BINF-2 N/E 5.0
2
N/E -
BINF-7 N/E 3.5 N/E -
BINF-8 N/E 4.0
2
N/E -
BINF-X1.5 3.5 3.5
1
N/E
Unsuitable (low
permeability) soil
conditions
encountered
BINF-X3 N/E N/E N/E -
BINF-X5 3.0 N/E N/E -
BINF-X9.5 4.0 4.0
1
N/E
Unsuitable (low
permeability) soil
conditions
encountered
BINF-3 5.0 N/E 9.0 -
BINF-4 5.0 N/E 10.0 -
BINF-5 N/E N/E N/E -
BINF-9 N/E N/E 2.5 to 4.5
3
-
BINF-10 3.0 15.6
2
16 -
BINF-13 4.0 N/E 7.5 -
BINF-14 2.5 N/E 3.5 to 6
4
-

Notes: 1) Soil mottling observed, groundwater not encountered.
2) Encountered groundwater seepage at this depth.
3) Encountered bedrock slopes downward to the east.
4) Encountered bedrock slopes downward to the west.


5.0 INFILTRATION TESTS

Infiltration tests were performed in accordance with the New York State Stormwater
Management Design Manual, Appendix D: Infiltration Testing Requirements. All test holes
were excavated down to approximately 1 to 7 feet below existing grade as per TRCs request
and pre-soaked for a period of 24-hours. After the pre-soak was completed, a length of 4-inch
PVC was placed in each test hole and filled with water. The water relative to the top of the
casing was monitored over one-hour, and the difference in head was measured and
recorded. This procedure was performed four times at each test location. The last reading for
each test was used as the stabilized rate for that location. The infiltration test results are
presented in the table below. Please see the attached test pit and infiltration test logs for
additional information.

Table 2
Infiltration Test Results
Infiltration
Test #
Stabilized
Infiltration
Rate (in/hr)
Description of Soil Type SOIL USCS
BINF-1 15.00 in/hr
Brown medium to fine Sand,
some Gravel, little Silt, sparse
Cobbles and Boulders
SM
BINF-2

16.00 in/hr

and Gravel, some Silt, sparse
SM
BINF-5 14.50 in/hr
Light brown coarse to fine
Sand and Silt, some Gravel,
few Cobbles and Boulders
SM
BINF-6

16.00 in/hr

Grey-brown coarse to fine
Sand, some coarse to fine
Gravel, little Silt, few Cobbles
and Boulders
SM
BINF-7

19.00 in/hr

and Gravel, little Silt, sparse
SM
BINF-8 19.00 in/hr
and Gravel, little Silt, sparse
SM
BINF-12

19.00 in/hr

Grey coarse to fine Sand,
some coarse to fine Gravel,
little Silt, few Cobbles and
Boulders
SM
TP-1 (R) 2.50 in/hr
Brown coarse to fine Sand, and
Gravel, little Silt
SM
TP-2 (R) 8.50 in/hr
Brown c-f Sand, and c-f Gravel,
little Silt (Fill)
SM


6.0 HYDROEXCAVATION

Hydroexcavation was performed at the locations specified by TRC to determine the elevation
of the top of the existing water main. The hydroexcavation results are presented in the table
below.

Table 3
Hydroexcavation Summary
Location
Surface Elevation
(ft)
Top of Pipe Elevation
(ft)
WTP 1 311.83 308.11
WTP 2 328.83 324.68
WTP 3 331.87 327.85
WTP 4 333.78 329.02
WTP 5 338.86 334.24
WTP 6 369.56 365.04
WTP 8 375.96 371.81
WTP 9 378.18 375.40
WTP 10 379.98 375.16
WTP 11 387.90 383.54
WTP 12 388.54 384.67
WTP 13 427.23 422.90
WTP 14 424.98 421.48
WTP 15 434.98 431.73
WTP 15A 445.33 439.50
WTP 15B 431.78 428.86
WTP 16A 451.95 448.70
WPT 16A1 451.67 445.17
WTP 16B 438.57 434.00
WTP 17 462.73 458.48
WTP 19 515.00 509.60
WTP 20 514.90 509.40
WTP 21 514.50 509.70
WTP-22 513.80 509.60
WTP-23 512.60 507.30

7.0 LIMITATIONS

Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily
exercised under similar circumstances by reputable geotechnical engineers and geologists
practicing in this or similar situations. The interpretation of the field data is based on good
judgment and experience. However, no matter how qualified the geotechnical engineer or
detailed the investigation, subsurface conditions cannot always be predicted beyond the
points of actual sampling and testing. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to
the professional advice included in this report.


This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Retail Store Construction Co., Inc., c/o
MDI Associates, Inc., for the specific application to the proposed construction described in
this report. The recommendations contained in this report are intended for design purposes
only. Contractors and others involved in the construction of this project are advised to make
an independent assessment of the subsurface and groundwater conditions for the purpose of
establishing quantities, schedules and construction techniques.

Tectonic appreciates this opportunity to assist you with this project, and looks forwards to
future opportunities. Please feel free to contact the undersigned at your convenience should
you have any questions, remarks, or require additional information.

TECTONIC ENGINEERING & SURVEYING CONSULTANTS P.C.

Mark Stier, P.E.
Senior Vice President

JJK/MAS/DTC G:\Mountainville\Geotechnical\5300s\5352.02 Costco Yo!to"n A##itional\5352.03\$e%ot\5352.03 &eo'2.#oc(

Attachments: Test Pit and Infiltration Test Location Plans, Figures 1 though 3
Stationing & Test Pit Stakeout Sketch, SU-103 and SU-106
Test Pit and Infiltration Test Logs

W.O. No. Date: 3/14/2013
Project:
Location:
Client: Depth to Seepage: NE Inspector:
Contractor: Depth to Groundwater: NE Surface Elevation:
Equipment: Depth to Bedrock: NE Datum:
0.9
M GM 2
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
TP-1 ( R )
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
MDI Associates, Inc. John Kenney
Profex Inc. 460'
CASE 580 See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
8" Topsoil
Dk Bwn c-f GRAVEL, some c-f Sand, little Silt (Fill)
Bwn c-f SAND, and c-f Gravel, little Silt
End of Test Pit @ 4'
PARTICLE PROPORTION PROPORTION
MOISTURE
SIZE (exclusive of boulders & cobbles) (boulders & cobbles)
Boulder: 10"(+) Sand: No.200 Sieve-3/16" trace: 0-10% 0-10% D: dry
Cobble: 3-10" Silt/Clay: No.200 Sieve (-) little: 10-20% 10-35% M: moist
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 3/14/2013
Project:
Location:
0.9
M SM 3
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
TP-2 ( R )
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 470'
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
12" Topsoil
Bwn c-f SAND, and c-f Gravel, little Silt (Fill)
Uncovered dead cable
Bwn c-f SAND, some c-f Gravel, little Silt and waterline
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 3/14/2013
Project:
Location:
0.9
M SM 4'
D GC
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
TP-3 ( R )
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 516'
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
10" Topsoil
Bwn c-f SAND, and c-f Gravel, some Silt
Brown CLAY & SILT, and c-f Gravel, little m-f Sand
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 3/14/2013
Project:
Location:
0.8
M GM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
TP-4 ( R )
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 513'
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
8" Topsoil
Grey c-f GRAVEL, and c-f Sand, little Silt (Fill)
End of Test Pit @ 3' (Hit unmarked water service line)
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 3/14/2013
Project:
Location:
0.8
M GM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
TP-5 ( R )
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 507'
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
8" Topsoil
Brown CLAYEY SILT, and c-f Gravel, little m-f Sand
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 3/14/2013
Project:
Location:
0.8
M GM 1.5
M GM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
TP-6 ( R )
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 505'
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
8" Topsoil
Gy c-f GRAVEL, some c-f Sand, little Silt (Debris) (Fill)
Brown CLAYEY SILT, and c-f Gravel, little m-f Sand
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 3/6/2013
Project:
Location:
Client: Depth to Seepage: 6' Inspector:
0.8
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-1
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 420'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
8" Topsoil
Bwn m-f SAND, some c-f Gravel, little Silt, sparse Cobbles/ Mottling observed
Boulders at 5'
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 3/6/2013
Project:
Location:
0.5
M SM 6
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-2
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 420'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
6" Topsoil
Bwn m-f SAND, and c-f Gravel, some Silt, sparse Cobbles/
Boulders
Gy Same
(Groundwater seepage @ 5')
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 3/6/2013
Project:
Location:
Contractor: Depth to Groundwater: 3.5' Surface Elevation:
0.8
M/W SM 5
W SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-7
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 420'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
8" Topsoil
Bwn m-f SAND, and c-f Gravel, little Silt, sparse Cobbles/
Boulders
Gy Same
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 3/6/2013
Project:
Location:
0.8
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-8
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 420'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
8" Topsoil
Bwn m-f SAND, and c-f Gravel, little Silt, sparse Cobbles/
Boulders
(Groundwater seepage @ 4')
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/11/2013
Project:
Location:
0.5
M SM
3
M GP
3.67
M GM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-X1.5
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 419'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
6" Topsoil
Bwn m-f SAND, and c-f Gravel, little Silt (FILL)
8" Gy c-f GRAVEL for septic (FILL)
Gy-bwn-or m-f GRAVEL, little m-f Sand, little Silt (mottled)
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/11/2013
Project:
Location:
M GM
2
M GM
3.5
M GM
sparse:
few:
many:
Gy c-f GRAVEL, little c-f Sand (many Cobbles and Boulders
present)
some: 20-35%
and: 35-50%
Boulder: 10"(+)
Cobble: 3-10"
Gravel: 3/16"-3"
Sand: No.200 Sieve-3/16"
Silt/Clay: No.200 Sieve (-)
Profex Inc.
Costco Yorktown
Yorktown, NY
trace: 0-10%
little: 10-20%
Bwn c-f GRAVEL, some m-f Sand, little Silt
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
SAMPLES
Or c-f GRAVEL, some m-f Sand, little Silt
TEST PIT
See Remarks
417'
John Kenney
BINF-X3
PARTICLE PROPORTION
(800) 829-6531
5352.03
REMARKS
MOISTURE
D: dry
M: moist
W: wet
PROPORTION
(boulders & cobbles)
0-10%
10-35%
CAT315C
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
DESCRIPTION
OF
MATERIAL
35-65%
SIZE (exclusive of boulders & cobbles)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/11/2013
Project:
Location:
1.5
M SM
2.5
M GP
3
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-X5
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 416'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
18" Topsoil
Bwn c-f SAND, some c-f Gravel, little Silt (FILL)
6" Gy c-f GRAVEL for septic (FILL)
Bwn c-f SAND, and c-f Gravel, little Silt
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/11/2013
Project:
Location:
M SM
3.5
M GP
4
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-X9.5
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 423'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
Gy c-f SAND, and c-f Gravel, little Silt (FILL)
(Organics present in lower 6")
6" Gy c-f Gravel for septic (FILL)
Bwn m-f SAND, little c-f Gravel, little Silt (mottled)
(many Cobbles and Boulder present)
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/9/2013
Project:
Location:
Equipment: Depth to Bedrock: 9' Datum:
M SM
5
M SM
7.5
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-3
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 425'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
Dk bwn c-f SAND, and c-f Gravel, little Silt (FILL)
Lgt bwn c-f SAND, and Silt, some c-f Gravel
Gy-bwn c-f SAND, and Silt, some c-f Gravel
Rock encountered @ 9'
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/9/2013
Project:
Location:
M SM
5
M SM
7
M SM
(bedrock fragments)
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-4
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 426'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
(Blk Organics present in lower 6")
Bwn c-f SAND, some Silt, little c-f Gravel
Rock at 10'
Gy-bwn c-f SAND, some c-f Gravel, some Silt
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/9/2013
Project:
Location:
0.5
M SM
3
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-5
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 422
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
6" Topsoil
Lgt bwn c-f SAND, and Silt, some c-f Gravel (few Cobbles
and Boulders)
Gy-bwn Same
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/9/2013
Project:
Location:
0.5
M SM
3
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-6
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 425'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
6" Topsoil
Bwn c-f SAND, and Silt, some c-f Gravel (sparse Cobbles and
Boulders)
Gy-bwn c-f SAND, some c-f Gravel, little Silt (few Cobbles and
Boulders)
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/9/2013
Project:
Location:
Equipment: Depth to Bedrock: 2.5' - 4.5' Datum:
M SM
1.5
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-9
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 426'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
Bwn c-f SAND, some Silt (few Cobbles)
Gy c-f SAND, little Silt (sparse Cobbles)
Rock encountered to 2.5' - 4.5' (Sloping downward to the East)
End of Test Pit @ 4.5'
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/9/2013
Project:
Location:
Client: Depth to Seepage: 15.6' Inspector:
M SM
3
M SM
5
M SM
14
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-10
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 429'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
(Organic material present in lower 2')
Bwn c-f SAND, some c-f Gravel, little Silt (sparse Boulders and
Cobbles)
Tn-bwn Same
Bwn Same (few Boulders & Cobbles)
(Groundwater seepage @ 15.6')
Rock @ 16'
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/9/2013
Project:
Location:
0.5
M SM
3
M SM
6
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-11
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 424'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
6" Topsoil
Dk bwn c-f SAND, and c-f Gravel, some Silt (few Cobbles &
Boulders)
Bwn Same
Lgt bwn Same
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/9/2013
Project:
Location:
1
M SM
3
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-12
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 427'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
12" Topsoil
Bwn c-f SAND, some c-f Gravel, little Silt (few Cobbles and
Boulders)
Gy Same
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/10/2013
Project:
Location:
Equipment: Depth to Bedrock: 7.5' Datum:
M SM
2.5
M SM
4
M ML
5
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-13
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 425'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
Bwn SILT, some f Sand
Dk bwn c-f SAND, and c-f Gravel (few Cobbles & Boulders)
Rock @ 7.5'
End of Test Pit @ 7.5
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 1/10/2013
Project:
Location:
Equipment: Depth to Bedrock: 3.5' - 6' Datum:
M SM
2.5
M SM
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.03 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
BINF-14
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Profex Inc. 427'
CAT315C See Remarks
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
Bwn c-f SAND, some c-f Gravel, little Silt
Rock encountered @ 3.5' - 6' (Sloping downward to the West)
MOISTURE
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
and: 35-50%
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
70 Pleasant Hill Rd
Mountainville, NY 10953
(845) 534-5959
W! No" #ot No" $ate"
%lient"
P&o'e(t"
P&o'e(t )n*inee&"
+ns,e(to&"
Pe&(olation -est #o(ation" (see &eve&se)
Weat.e& %onditions" -e/,e&atu&e" 30
-)0- -)0- -)0- -+M) 0-12#)
H!#) H!#) H!#) R1-)
No $)P-H $+1
-P-1 ( R ) 43 44 55
+n6ilt&ation
(in7.)
3.25 3 2.5 2.5
-P-5 ( R ) 53 44
85
+n6ilt&ation
(in7.)
8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5
(-o 2e %o/,leted !n 2a(8 o6 0.eet)
+ndi(ate No&t. +ndi(ate Nea&est Road9a:
+ndi(ate P&o,e&t: #ines +ndi(ate !66-0ets 6&o/ 5 1d'a(ent P&o,e&t: #ines
%!MM)N-0"
Sketch Requirements
-+M) 1"00"00 1"00"00 1"00"00 1"00"00
0-1R- 8"59 1M 9"59 1M 11"00 1M 15"00 PM
%!MM)N-0"
;+N+0H 9"59 1M 10"59 1M 15"00 PM 1"00 PM
-+M) 1:00:00 1:00:00 1:00:00 1:00:00
0-1R- 8"55 1M 9:55 AM 10"55 1M 11"55 1M
(-+M) ;!R 14 $R!P +N W1-)R #)<)#)
;+N+0H 9"55 1M 10:55 AM 11"55 1M 15"55 PM
P)R%!#1-+!N -)0- R=N0
INFILTRATION TEST DATA
535503 371575013
M$+ 1sso(iates, +n(
%ost(o Yo&8to9n
Ma&8 1 0tie&, P)
>o.n ?enne:
Plan lo(ation ,&ovided @: -R% )n*inee&s, +n(
%loud:
TECTONIC
70 Pleasant Hill Rd
(845) 534-5959
%lient"
P&o'e(t"
P&o'e(t )n*inee&"
+ns,e(to&"
-)0- -)0- -)0- -+M) 0-12#)
H!#) H!#) H!#) R1-)
No $)P-H $+1
2+N;-7 353 44 19
+n6ilt&ation
(in7.)
18.5 19 19 19
2+N;-8 43 44
19
+n6ilt&ation
(in7.)
19.5 19 19 19
%!MM)N-0"
Sketch Requirements
-+M) 1"00"00 1"00"00 1"00"00 1"00"00
0-1R- 9"05 1M 10"0A 1M 11"07 1M 15"11 PM
%!MM)N-0" 0ee,a*e o@se&ved at @otto/ o6 test .ole ,&io& to ,&esoa8in* -est ,it eB(avated ad'a(ent to ,e&(olation
test on t.is da: to /onito& ,ossi@le .i*. *&ound9ate& level, /easu&ed to @e at a de,t. o6 353
;+N+0H 10"05 1M 11"0A 1M 15"07 PM 1"11 PM
-+M) 1:00:00 1:00:00 1:00:00 1:00:00
0-1R- 9"13 1M 10:14 AM 11"14 1M 15"15 PM
(-+M) ;!R 14 $R!P +N W1-)R #)<)#)
;+N+0H 10"13 1M 11:14 AM 15"14 PM 1"15 PM
P)R%!#1-+!N -)0- R=N0
535503 37775013
M$+ 1sso(iates, +n(
%ost(o Yo&8to9n
Ma&8 1 0tie&, P)
>o.n ?enne:
%loud:
TECTONIC
70 Pleasant Hill Rd
(845) 534-5959
%lient"
P&o'e(t"
P&o'e(t )n*inee&"
+ns,e(to&"
-)0- -)0- -)0- -+M) 0-12#)
H!#) H!#) H!#) R1-)
No $)P-H $+1
2+N;-1 43 44 15
+n6ilt&ation
(in7.)
16 15 14.5 15
2+N;-5 43 44
1A
+n6ilt&ation
(in7.)
19 17.5 17 16
%!MM)N-0"
Sketch Requirements
-+M) 1"00"00 1"00"00 1"00"00 1"00"00
0-1R- 9"07 1M 10"07 1M 11"08 1M 15"14 PM
%!MM)N-0"
;+N+0H 10"07 1M 11"07 1M 15"08 PM 1"14 PM
-+M) 1:00:00 1:00:00 1:00:00 1:00:00
0-1R- 9"11 1M 10:11 AM 11"15 1M 15"15 PM
(-+M) ;!R 14 $R!P +N W1-)R #)<)#)
;+N+0H 10"11 1M 11:11 AM 15"15 PM 1"15 PM
P)R%!#1-+!N -)0- R=N0
535503 37775013
M$+ 1sso(iates, +n(
%ost(o Yo&8to9n
Ma&8 1 0tie&, P)
>o.n ?enne:
%loud:
TECTONIC
70 Pleasant Hill Rd
(845) 534-5959
%lient"
P&o'e(t"
P&o'e(t )n*inee&"
+ns,e(to&"
-)0- -)0- -)0- -+M) 0-12#)
H!#) H!#) H!#) R1-)
No $)P-H $+1
2+N;-5 53 44 145
+n6ilt&ation
(in7.)
16 16 15 14.5
2+N;-A 53 44
1A
+n6ilt&ation
(in7.)
18.5 16.5 16 16
0"00"00
;+N+0H
0-1R-
-+M)
;+N+0H
0-1R-
%!MM)N-0"
9"44 1M 10"4A 1M 11"47 1M 15"48 PM
0:00:00
P)R%!#1-+!N -)0- R=N0
535503 171075013
M$+ 1sso(iates, +n(
%ost(o Yo&8to9n
Ma&8 1 0tie&, P)
>o.n ?enne:
%lea&
(-+M) ;!R 14 $R!P +N W1-)R #)<)#)
9"40"00 10:41:00 11"45"00 15"43 PM
1:00:00 1:00:00 1:00:00 1:00:00 0:00:00
8"40"00 9:41:00 10"45"00 11"43 1M
%!MM)N-0"
Sketch Requirements
1"00"00 1"00"00 1"00"00 1"00"00 0"00"00
8"44 1M 9"4A 1M 10"47 1M 11"48 1M
-+M)
TECTONIC
70 Pleasant Hill Rd
(845) 534-5959
%lient"
P&o'e(t"
P&o'e(t )n*inee&"
+ns,e(to&"
-)0- -)0- -)0- -+M) 0-12#)
H!#) H!#) H!#) R1-)
No $)P-H $+1
2+N;-15 73 44 19
+n6ilt&ation
(in7.)
20.5 18.5 19 19
+n6ilt&ation
(in7.)
0-1R-
-+M)
;+N+0H
0-1R-
-+M)
535503
Ma&8 1 0tie&, P)
>o.n ?enne:
M$+ 1sso(iates, +n(
%ost(o Yo&8to9n
171075013
%lea&
P)R%!#1-+!N -)0- R=N0
(-+M) ;!R 14 $R!P +N W1-)R #)<)#)
9"47"00
0:00:00
8"47"00
11"51"00 15"55 PM
10"51"00 11"55 1M 9:48:00
10:48:00
1:00:00 1:00:00 1:00:00 1:00:00 0:00:00
%!MM)N-0"
;+N+0H
Sketch Requirements
%!MM)N-0"
0"00"00 0"00"00 0"00"00 0"00"00 0"00"00 0"00"00
TECTONIC
Project No. 165213
2 TECTONIC SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT DATED APRIL 30, 2014

An Equal Opportunity Employer
PLANNING . ENGINEERING . CONSTRUCTION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

(845) 534-5959 FAX: (845) 534-5999

Mountainville, NY (800) 829-6531

CORPORATE OFFICE

PO Box 37, 70 Pleasant Hill Road


www.tectonicengineering.com

Retail Store Construction Co., Inc., c/o
735 Carter Street
New Canaan, CT 06840

Attn: Mr. Ken Walter
VIA REGULAR & ELECTRONIC MAIL: (kenharpwal@aol.com)

April 30, 2014

RE: W.O. # 5352.04
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
US ROUTE 202/ N.Y. ROUTE 35
TOWN OF YORKTOWN, NEW YORK

Dear Mr. Walter:

Tectonic Engineering and Surveying Consultants P.C. (Tectonic) has completed a
subsurface investigation and geotechnical engineering evaluation associated with the
proposed subsurface infiltration system located off of Old Crompond Road and Crompond
Road in the Town of Yorktown, New York. The purpose of this investigation was to
document the subsurface conditions and evaluate the feasibility of the soils for the proposed
infiltration systems. This report provides a summary of our investigation and presents our
findings.

1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES

The geotechnical investigation was performed for Retail Store Construction Co., Inc., c/o
MDI Associates, Inc., herein referred to as the Client. The scope of our geotechnical
investigation consisted of the following:

Inspection and logging of two (2) test pits to depths ranging from approximately
5.5 to 11 feet below existing grade within the proposed infiltration area.

Full-time inspection by a geotechnical engineer and engineering geologist to
locate the test locations on-site and to perform visual inspections of the test pit
excavation.

Preparation of this letter report presenting the results of the subsurface
investigation and field tests.
Costco Yorktown Heights 5352.04 Page 2 April 30, 2014

2.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The proposed stormwater detention systems are located in two areas along Crompond
Road (US Route 202) and Old Crompond Road. Test pit TP-BINF-X18 is located
approximately 325 feet northeast of the Route 202, Old Crompond Road intersection. The
test pit is located in a wooded area approximately 33 feet northeast of Old Crompond Road.
The topography within this vicinity slopes downwards towards the east to a section of
wetlands. Test pit TP-BINF-X21 is located on the south side of Crompond Road (US Route
202) east of the Taconic State Parkway, on the corner of Strang Boulevard and Crompond
Road. The location is slightly wooded and the topography gradual slope downwards
towards the south.

3.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

The subsurface investigation consisted of the excavation and logging of two test pits
designated as TP-BINF-X18 and TP-BINF-X21. The test pits were performed at locations
provided by TRC. The test pits were excavated to depths ranging from approximately 5.5 to
11 feet below the existing ground surface. The test pit locations are shown on the attached
Test Pit Location Plan (Figure 1).

All excavations were observed on a full-time basis by a geotechnical engineer and
engineering geologist, operating under the purview of a New York State licensed
Professional Engineer. The geotechnical engineer and engineering geologist prepared field
logs and recorded the results of the test pit excavations. The test pits were backfilled with
the excavated soils and restored to match the existing ground surface upon completion.

4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

The subsurface conditions within TP-BINF-X18 consisted of a thin layer of topsoil overlying
native glacial till soils. The glacial till soil consisted of brown coarse to fine sand and silt,
with little fine gravel and sparse cobbles throughout. The till extended to the test pits
termination depth of roughly 5.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater seepage was
encountered at a depth of approximately 4 feet below existing grade, which corresponds to
a surface elevation of roughly +397.00.

The subsurface conditions within TP-BINF-X21 consisted of a thin layer of topsoil overlying
brown coarse to fine sand with little clayey silt, little fine gravel with sparse cobbles and
boulders to a depth of approximately 5 feet below existing grade. At this depth, the soil
transitioned to a brown coarse to fine sand and silty clay to the test pits termination depth of
11 feet below existing grade. Mottling was observed at a depth of roughly 2 feet below
existing grade and groundwater seepage was encountered at approximately 5 feet below
existing grade, which corresponds to a surface elevation of +512 and +509, respectively.

W.O. No. Date: 4/3/2014
Project:
Location:
Client: Depth to Seepage: 4.0' Inspector:
M SM
4.5'
W
sparse:
few:
many:
TP-BINF-X18
Backhoe
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
DESCRIPTION
OF
MATERIAL
Yorktown, NY
Retail Store Construction Co., Inc.,
REMARKS
35-65%
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
MOISTURE
D: dry
M: moist
W: wet
PROPORTION
0-10%
10-35%
TEST PIT
401
Adam Watson
Profex
Costco Yorktown
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
SAMPLES
Bwn SILTY CLAY
PARTICLE PROPORTION
(800) 829-6531
5352.04
Bwn c-f SAND, and Silt, little f Gravel, sparse cobbles
Depth of Groundwater
some: 20-35%
and: 35-50%
Boulder: 10"(+)
Cobble: 3-10"
Gravel: 3/16"-3"
Sand: No.200 Sieve-3/16"
Silt/Clay: No.200 Sieve (-)
trace: 0-10%
little: 10-20%
End of Test Pit @ 5.5'
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
W.O. No. Date: 4/4/2014
Project:
Location:
Contractor: Depth to Groundwater: 5' Surface Elevation:
M SM 2'
5'
7'
sparse:
few:
many:
5352.04 TEST PIT
Costco Yorktown
TP-BINF-X21
Yorktown, NY
(800) 829-6531
Retail Store Construction Co., Inc., Chris Ferri
Profex +/-514
Backhoe
SAMPLES
U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
o
i
l

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
a

C
h
a
n
g
e

(
f
t
.
)
S
a
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
OF
MATERIAL
Bwn c-f SAND, little Clayey Silt, little f Gravel, sparse cobbles Mottling @ 2'
and boulders encountered
Groundwater
Bwn c-f SAND, and Silty Clay, sparse cobbles and boulders
were encountered
D: dry
Cobble: 3-10" Silt/Clay: No.200 Sieve (-) little: 10-20% 10-35%
PROPORTION PROPORTION
MOISTURE
PARTICLE
and: 35-50%
Boulder: 10"(+) Sand: No.200 Sieve-3/16" trace: 0-10% 0-10%
seepage @ 5'
Gravel: 3/16"-3" some: 20-35% 35-65% W: wet
M: moist
TECTONIC
CON118-7/01
Project No. 165213
APPENDIX G
MAINTENANCE INSPECTION CHECKLIST
1. STORMWATER POND/WETLAND OPERATION, MAINTENANCE,
AND MANAGEMENT INSPECTION CHECKLIST
2. SAND/ORGANIC FILTER OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND
MANAGEMENT INSPECTION CHECKLIST
3. BIORETENTION OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND
4. OPEN CHANNEL OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND
G-1

Stormwater Pond/Wetland Operation, Maintenance and
Management Inspection Checklist

Project ___________________________________________________________________________
Location: ___________________________________________________________________________
Site Status: ___________________________________________________________________________

Date: ___________________________________________________________________________
Time: ___________________________________________________________________________

Inspector: ___________________________________________________________________________

Maintenance Item

Satisfactory/
Unsatisfactory

Comments

1. Embankment and emergency spillway (Annual, After Major Storms)

1. Vegetation and ground cover adequate

2. Embankment erosion

3. Animal burrows

4. Unauthorized planting

5. Cracking, bulging, or sliding of dam

a. Upstream face

b. Downstream face

c. At or beyond toe

downstream

upstream

d. Emergency spillway

6.Pond, toe & chimney drains clear and functioning

7.Seeps/leaks on downstream face

8.Slope protection or riprap failure

9. Vertical/horizontal alignment of top of dam As-Built

Appendix G: Maintenance Inspection Checklists
New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual Appendix G

G-2

Maintenance Item

Satisfactory/
Unsatisfactory

Comments
10. Emergency spillway clear of obstructions and debris

11. Other (specify)

2. Riser and principal spillway (Annual)

Type: Reinforced concrete ______
Corrugated pipe _______
Masonry _______
1. Low flow orifice obstructed

2. Low flow trash rack.
a. Debris removal necessary

b. Corrosion control

3. Weir trash rack maintenance
a. Debris removal necessary

b. corrosion control

4. Excessive sediment accumulation insider riser

5. Concrete/masonry condition riser and barrels
a. cracks or displacement

b. Minor spalling (<1" )

c. Major spalling (rebars exposed)

d. Joint failures

e. Water tightness

6. Metal pipe condition

7. Control valve
a. Operational/exercised

b. Chained and locked

8. Pond drain valve
a. Operational/exercised

b. Chained and locked

9. Outfall channels functioning

10. Other (specify)


G-3

Maintenance Item

Satisfactory/
Unsatisfactory

Comments

3. Permanent Pool (Wet Ponds) (monthly)

1. Undesirable vegetative growth

2. Floating or floatable debris removal required

3. Visible pollution

4. Shoreline problem

5. Other (specify)

4. Sediment Forebays

1.Sedimentation noted

2. Sediment cleanout when depth < 50% design depth

5. Dry Pond Areas

1. Vegetation adequate

2. Undesirable vegetative growth

3. Undesirable woody vegetation

4. Low flow channels clear of obstructions

5. Standing water or wet spots

6. Sediment and / or trash accumulation

7. Other (specify)

6. Condition of Outfalls (Annual , After Major Storms)

1. Riprap failures

2. Slope erosion

3. Storm drain pipes

4.Endwalls / Headwalls

5. Other (specify)

7. Other ( Monthly)

1. Encroachment on pond, wetland or easement area


G-4

Maintenance Item

Satisfactory/
Unsatisfactory

Comments

2. Complaints from residents

3.Aesthetics
a. Grass growing required

b. Graffiti removal needed

c. Other (specify)

4. Conditions of maintenance access routes.

5. Signs of hydrocarbon build-up

6. Any public hazards (specify)

8. Wetland Vegetation (Annual)

1. Vegetation healthy and growing
Wetland maintaining 50% surface area coverage of
wetland plants after the second growing season.
(If unsatisfactory, reinforcement plantings needed)

2. Dominant wetland plants:
Survival of desired wetland plant species
Distribution according to landscaping plan?

3. Evidence of invasive species

4. Maintenance of adequate water depths for desired
wetland plant species

5. Harvesting of emergent plantings needed

6. Have sediment accumulations reduced pool volume
significantly or are plants choked with sediment

7. Eutrophication level of the wetland.

8. Other (specify)

Comments:


G-5
Actions to be Taken:

G-8
Sand/Organic Filter Operation, Maintenance
and Management Inspection Checklist

Project:
Location:
Site Status:

Date:

Time:

Inspector:

MAINTENANCE ITEM

SATISFACTORY /
UNSATISFACTORY

COMMENTS

1. Debris Cleanout (Monthly)

Contributing areas clean of debris

Filtration facility clean of debris

Inlet and outlets clear of debris

2. Oil and Grease (Monthly)

No evidence of filter surface clogging

Activities in drainage area minimize oil
and grease entry

3. Vegetation (Monthly)

Contributing drainage area stabilized

No evidence of erosion

Area mowed and clipping removed

4. Water Retention Where Required (Monthly)

Water holding chambers at normal
pool

No evidence of leakage

5. Sediment Deposition (Annual)
G-9

MAINTENANCE ITEM

SATISFACTORY /
UNSATISFACTORY

COMMENTS

Filter chamber free of sediments

Sedimentation chamber not more than
half full of sediments

6. Structural Components (Annual)

No evidence of structural deterioration

Any grates are in good condition

No evidence of spalling or cracking of
structural parts

7. Outlet/Overflow Spillway (Annual)

Good condition, no need for repairs

No evidence of erosion (if draining into
a natural channel)

8. Overall Function of Facility (Annual)

Evidence of flow bypassing facility

No noticeable odors outside of facility

Comments:


G-10
Bioretention Operation, Maintenance and

Project:
Location:
Site Status:

Date:

Time:

Inspector:

MAINTENANCE ITEM

SATISFACTORY /
UNSATISFACTORY

COMMENTS


Bioretention and contributing areas
clean of debris

No dumping of yard wastes into
practice

Litter (branches, etc.) have been
removed


Plant height not less than design
water depth

Fertilized per specifications

Plant composition according to
approved plans

No placement of inappropriate plants

Grass height not greater than 6 inches


3. Check Dams/Energy Dissipaters/Sumps (Annual, After Major Storms)

No evidence of sediment buildup

G-11
MAINTENANCE ITEM

SATISFACTORY /
UNSATISFACTORY

COMMENTS

Sumps should not be more than 50%
full of sediment

No evidence of erosion at downstream
toe of drop structure

4. Dewatering (Monthly)

Dewaters between storms

No evidence of standing water

5. Sediment Deposition (Annual)

Swale clean of sediments

Sediments should not be > 20% of
swale design depth

6. Outlet/Overflow Spillway (Annual, After Major Storms)

Good condition, no need for repair


No evidence of any blockages

7. Integrity of Filter Bed (Annual)

Filter bed has not been blocked or
filled inappropriately

G-12
Comments:


G-13
Open Channel Operation, Maintenance, and

Project:
Location:
Site Status:

Date:

Time:

Inspector:

MAINTENANCE ITEM

SATISFACTORY/
UNSATISFACTORY

COMMENTS


Contributing areas clean of debris

2. Check Dams or Energy Dissipators (Annual, After Major Storms)

No evidence of flow going around
structures

No evidence of erosion at downstream
toe

Soil permeability

Groundwater / bedrock


Mowing done when needed

Minimum mowing depth not exceeded


Fertilized per specification

4. Dewatering (Monthly)

Dewaters between storms

G-14

MAINTENANCE ITEM

SATISFACTORY/
UNSATISFACTORY

COMMENTS

5. Sediment deposition (Annual)

Clean of sediment

6. Outlet/Overflow Spillway (Annual)

Good condition, no need for repairs


Comments:


Project No. 165213
APPENDIX H
VORTECHS 9000 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
AND MAINTENANCE GUIDE
Project No. 165213
APPENDIX I
SAMPLE STORM WATER CONTROL
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Project No. 165213
Sample Storm Water Control Facility
Maintenance Agreement

Whereas, the Municipality of the Town of Yorktown ("Municipality") and the
____________________________ ("facility owner") want to enter into an agreement to
provide for the long term maintenance and continuation of storm water control measures
approved by the Municipality for the below named project, and

Whereas, the Municipality and the facility owner desire that the storm water control
measures be built in accordance with the approved project plans and thereafter be
maintained, cleaned, repaired, replaced and continued in perpetuity in order to ensure
optimum performance of the components. Therefore, the Municipality and the facility owner
agree as follows:

1. This agreement binds the Municipality and the facility owner, its successors and assigns,
to the maintenance provisions depicted in the approved project plans, which are attached
as Schedule A of this agreement.

2. The facility owner shall maintain, clean, repair, replace and continue the storm water
control measures depicted in Schedule A as necessary to ensure optimum performance of
the measures to design specifications. The storm water control measures shall include,
but shall not be limited to, the following: drainage ditches, swales, dry wells, infiltrators,
drop inlets, pipes, culverts, soil absorption devices, storm water ponds and wetlands,
bioretention and rain gardens, tree boxes, green roofs, storm water planters, rain tanks
and cisterns, and porous pavement.

3. The facility owner shall be responsible for all expenses related to the maintenance of the
storm water control measures and shall establish a means for the collection and
distribution of expenses among parties for any commonly owned facilities.

4. The facility owner shall provide for the periodic inspection of the storm water control
measures, at the frequency recommended in the Design Manual, to determine the
condition and integrity of the measures. Such inspection shall be performed by a
Professional Engineer licensed by the State of New York. The inspecting engineer shall
prepare and submit to the Municipality within 30 days of the inspection, a written report
of the findings including recommendations for those actions necessary for the
continuation of the storm water control measures.

5. The facility owner shall not authorize, undertake or permit alteration, abandonment,
modification or discontinuation of the storm water control measures except in accordance
with written approval of the Municipality.

Project No. 165213
6. The facility owner shall undertake necessary repairs and replacement of the storm water
control measures at the direction of the Municipality or in accordance with the
recommendations of the inspecting engineer.

7. The facility owner shall provide to the Municipality within 30 days of the date of this
agreement, a security for the maintenance and continuation of the storm water control
measures in the form of (a Bond, letter of credit or escrow account).

8. This agreement shall be recorded in the Office of the County Clerk, County of
Westchester together with the deed for the common property and shall be included in the
offering plan and/or prospectus approved pursuant to ______________.

9. If ever the Municipality determines that the facility owner has failed to construct or
maintain the storm water control measures in accordance with the project plan or has
failed to undertake corrective action specified by the Municipality or by the inspecting
engineer, the Municipality is authorized to undertake such steps as reasonably necessary
for the preservation, continuation or maintenance of the storm water control measures
and to affix the expenses thereof as a lien against the property.

10. This agreement is effective ____________.

Project No. 165213
APPENDIX J
CORRESPONDENCE
1
Morgan, Jessie
From: Galasso, Mary <MGalasso@dep.nyc.gov>
Sent: Friday, J une 14, 2013 9:30 AM
To: Holmes, Thomas; Garcia, Cynthia; 'mgianetta@dep.nyc.gov'
Cc: Panayotou, Nick; Hanzlik, Christopher; Soukas, Alexandra; Giannetta, Matthew
Subject: RE: Costco - 3.21.2013 Meeting Notes
Tom,
Again,sorryforthedelay.Cynthia,MattandIwentthroughyoudraftnotes.Basedonourdiscussion,DEPoffersthe
followingcomments:
Item#1intheTRCmemorandum:TheattachedTable1comparesrainfalldatafrompreviouslypublished
TP40andNortheastRegionalClimateCenter(NRCC)datapublishedinJanuary2013.Atpresent,DEP
criteriaforstormwateranalysesareprovidedinChapter4oftheNewYorkStateStormwater
ManagementDesignManual(DesignManual).TheseincludeTP40valuesforthe10and100year
designstorms,NRCCdataending2003forthe1year,24hourstorm,anddatapublishedbyDECin2000
forthe90%storm.
Item#3.b:AnypracticeincludedonthelistofNewYorkStateVerifiedProprietaryStormwater
ManagementPracticesmaybeusedforpretreatmentprovidedappropriatedesigncriteriaare
incorporated.Thelistcanbeviewedwww.dec.ny.gov/chemical/29089.html.
Item#4.a:Thepollutantloadinganalysismaybecarriedforthinaccordancewithanyofseveral
publishedsources.TheDECpublicationReducingtheImpactsofStormwaterRunoffformNew
Developmentisoneofthesesources.Othersinclude,butarenotlimitedto,TerreneInstitute
publicationsandvariousNURPbasedpublications.
Item#4.b:Designpointsproposedforpollutantloadinganalysiswerediscussed,butnotfinalizedduring
ourmeeting.
Item4.d:DEPrecommendedthatarangeofpollutantremovalratesassociatedwithtreatmentpractices
bepresentedinthepollutantloadinganalysisandthatTRCprovideinformationdemonstratingwhythe
practicesaremorelikelytoperformatthehighendofthatrange.
Item5:Stormwatercreditsoroffsetsarenotgenerallyacceptableforachievingrunoffreductionfrom
newdevelopment.Therunoffreductionmeasuresshouldtargetrunofffromnewdevelopmentcloseto
thesourceofthatrunoff.Furthermore,itmustbenotedthatstormwaterpollutionpreventionplansthat
incorporatebankingorcreditsarenotconsideredtobeinconformancewithtechnicalstandards.
Item7:Conceptually,asandfilterfortreatmentofrunofffromthevicinityofafuelingstationis
acceptable.Whetherornotthepracticemeetsregulatoryrequirementswilldependondesignand
locationofthepractice.
Item10:TheDEISshoulddiscusshowthermalimpactswillbemitigatedbyinfiltration.
Item11/Item14:ItisunclearwhatismeantbycoordinationofCostcosprojectwithDOTsproject.More
detailshouldbeprovidedregardingwhichDOTprojectandwhattypeofcoordinationisanticipated.
2
Furthermore,DEPwillconsideranyoffsiteworkproposedbytheapplicantaspartoftheproject.This
wouldincludeworkonDOTproperty.
Pleasecallmeat(914)7734440ifyouhaveanyquestions.
Thanks,
Mary
_______________________________________________________
Mary P. Galasso | Associate Project Manager | NYC Environmental Protection
Bureau of Water Supply | Regulatory & Engineering Programs
(O) (914) 773-4440 | mgalasso@dep.nyc.gov
From: Holmes, Thomas [mailto:THolmes@trcsolutions.com]

Sent: Wednesday, J une 12, 2013 4:48 PM
To: Galasso, Mary; Garcia, Cynthia; 'mgianetta@dep.nyc.gov'
Cc: Panayotou, Nick; Hanzlik, Christopher; Soukas, Alexandra
Subject: Costco - 3.21.2013 Meeting Notes
HiMary,
Hopealliswell.InpreparingresponsestotheFEIS,werefertoourMarchmeetingwithDEP.BeforewefinalizeFEIS
responses,wewanttoconfirmwithyouthatweareinagreementwiththeoutcomedescribedinourMeetingNotes
thatweresenttoyouforyourcomment/confirmation.Seeemailchainbelow.Ialsoattachacopyforyour
convenience.IwillbeoutoftheofficenextweeksoinmyabsencepleasecoordinatewithChrisHanzlik.
Thanks,
Tom Holmes
Project Manager
TRC Engineers, Inc.
7 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532
T: 914.592.4040 ext 264| F: 914.592.5046
From: Galasso, Mary [mailto:MGalasso@dep.nyc.gov]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 4:04 PM
To: Holmes, Thomas; Garcia, Cynthia; 'mgianetta@dep.nyc.gov'
Cc: Panayotou, Nick; Hanzlik, Christopher; Mark Chertok (mchertok@sprlaw.com); Michael Bogin (mbogin@sprlaw.com)
Subject: RE: Costco - 3.21.2013 Meeting Notes
ThanksTom,
MattandIlookedthroughtheminutesandhaveafewquestions.IwouldliketocheckwithCyndibeforeforwarding
themincaseshehasanythingtoadd.IsMondayOK?
From: Holmes, Thomas [mailto:THolmes@trcsolutions.com]

Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 12:15 PM
3
To: Galasso, Mary; Garcia, Cynthia; 'mgianetta@dep.nyc.gov'
Cc: Panayotou, Nick; Hanzlik, Christopher; Mark Chertok (mchertok@sprlaw.com); Michael Bogin (mbogin@sprlaw.com)
Subject: Costco - 3.21.2013 Meeting Notes
Mary,MattandCindy:
WeappreciatetheopportunitytohavemetwithyouatourMarch21
st
meetingrelativetotheCostcoProject.Attached
isadraftcopyofourmeetingnotesforyourreviewandcomment.Thenotesrepresentourunderstandingasthemain
pointsofdiscussion.Pleaseindicateifyouareinagreementorifyouhaveadditionsorrequireclarification.
Wellplantomeetwithyouagainwhenwereachthenextlevelofdesign.
Thanks,welookforwardtoourcontinueddialogue.
Tom Holmes
Thomas D. Holmes
Project Manager

7 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532
T: 914.592.4040 ext 264| F: 914.592.5046
Follow us on LinkedInorTwitter | www.trcsolutions.com

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

TRC Engineers, Inc.
7 Skyline Drive
Hawthorne, NY 10532

Main 914.592.4040
Fax 914.592.5046

ENVIRONMENTAL ENERGY REAL ESTATE INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL ENERGY REAL ESTATE INFRASTRUCTURE
DRAFT Memorandum

To: Distribution

Date: April 1, 2013

From: Nick Panayotou

Project No.: 165213
CC: Chris Hanzlik, Tom Holmes

Subject: DEP Meeting
Costco
Yorktown, NY

On Thursday, March 21, 2013, TRC met with DEP representatives to discuss their SEQR comment
letters dated 11/21/12 and 12/3/12, as well as to discuss modifications to the Site Plans which TRC is
proposing to help address DEP comments. It was explained that TRCs goal is to infiltrate the entire
water quality storm event (1-year storm) and to reduce impact on the Wetlands A buffer. The
following is a summary of the significant points of discussion:

1. Based upon the public comments received as part of the FEIS, TRC requested clarification
regarding which rainfall values should be utilized in the stormwater management design.
Essentially, TRC used the standard TP-40 rainfall values whereas some of the commentators
suggested using more recently developed NRCC rainfall values. DEP staff indicated that
based upon the current regulations, the following rainfall values should be used:

a. For the one-year storm, use a rainfall value of 3.0 inches.
b. For all other storms, use the TP-40 values.

DEP indicated that doing so would conform to current regulations in effect. Comparison of
TP-40 and NRCC rainfall values is shown on the attached Table No. 1.

2. Infiltration Facility - DEP staff indicated the following criteria should be used in the design of
the infiltration facility:

a. The facility should be sized based upon total 1-year storm volume without assuming
credit for exfiltration.

b. Care must be taken to avoid compacting soil within and around the bottom of the
infiltration facility during construction.

Memorandum/Project No. 165213
April 1, 2013
Page 2 of 6
c. The proposed retaining wall design shall not compromise the infiltration design. DEP
was concerned that the retaining wall drainage system could intercept and convey
infiltrated stormwater to the surface.

d. DEP indicated that the infiltration system must be designed to be an off-line practice
and shall not be used to provide stormwater attenuation.

TRC will review its design and will comply with DEPs criteria.

3. Pre-treatment TRC requested clarification regarding acceptable measures to be used for the
pre-treatment of stormwater in advance of the infiltration chamber. The following methods
were determined to be acceptable:

a. Given the high infiltration rate, a pre-treatment sediment chamber must be sized to
contain 100% of the design volume to be treated.

b. As an alternate, flow-based mechanical treatment devices can be utilized.

c. The SWPPP must address appropriate maintenance measures for the selected option.

4. Pollutant Loading DEP suggested the following pollutant loading criteria:

a. The pollutant loading must be carried forth in accordance with NYSDEC publication
entitled, Reducing the Impacts of Stormwater Runoff from New Development.

b. TRC should evaluate pollutant loading at several design points. TRC selected design
points are shown on the attached Exhibit.

c. TRC will also analyze pollutant loading on a global basis, calculating pre- and post-
development from the entire site.

d. It was noted that if TRC selected the high pollutant removal rates associated with a
particular practice, an adequate maintenance program to achieve those removal rates
must be demonstrated.

5. The DEP indicated that the application of stormwater credits to satisfy Runoff Reduction
Volume (RRv) cannot be used for developer-based improvements to State roadways. Thus,
TRCs proposal to provide on-site RRv to account for remote off-site requirements as part of
the Highway Improvement project is not acceptable. Thus, TRC will look at alternate
methods of providing RRv requirements for those remote areas.

6. The DEP indicated they would consider accepting the minimum RRv requirements applied to
each remote drainage area for the offsite improvements.

April 1, 2013
Page 3 of 6
7. TRCs proposal to incorporate a sand filter for WQ treatment of runoff from the fueling
station (hot spot) conforms to DEP requirements. TRC proposes to design a sand filter off-
line with bypass of higher storms to the storm drainage system.

8. Site Plan amendments will be employed to reduce impact on Wetlands A buffer.

9. It was agreed to use a worst-case condition assuming multiple family zoning to assess growth-
inducing impacts of properties along the route of the proposed off-site sewer. Although this
has been done for several parameters identified by the Town, the EIS discussion will be
expanded to address stormwater-related impacts.

10. Assuming infiltration is adopted for design of the full water quality storm, DEP agreed that
there would be no need to analyze thermal impacts.

11. TRC will contact the DOT to coordinate the Costco projects design with that of the DOTs
project to retrofit the existing pond located north of the Costco site.

12. The DEP requested that the FEIS contain a more detailed narrative covering project phasing.
The existing narrative will be expanded to demonstrate that compliance with the 5-acre
maximum disturbance requirement is feasible. In the final documents, including the final
SWPP and final Site Plans, more detailed supporting information shall be provided.

13. The DEP suggested using erosion control blankets to stabilize slopes greater than 3 horizontal
to 1 vertical.

14. TRC is preparing a proposal to determine if there is a benefit to develop a Town-Sponsored
Storm Water Management Facility just north of the site. If there proves to be a benefit, TRC
will prepare documents required to secure necessary approvals. The design and approval
process will be carried forth in sync with the approval of the on-site Proposal.

15. A follow-up meeting with DEP will be scheduled to continue review of the various items
noted herein.

April 1, 2013
Page 4 of 6
Distribution:
All attendees

DEP attendees - Mary Galasso, Matt Gianetta, Cynthia Garcia
TRC attendees - Nick Panayotou, Tom Holmes, Chris Hanzlik

Non-attendee distribution:
Mr. W. Breslin
Mr. R. Rosenberg
Mr. E. Braun
Ms. B. Evans
M. Chertok, Esq.
Mr. Mike Bogin

Q:\PROJECTS160\165213\Memo\Mtg notes - DEP_3-21-13.docx

April 1, 2013
Page 5 of 6
TABLE 1
24-hr Rainfall Comparison
Design
Storm
Rainfall Data in DEIS, NRCC Rainfall Data,
Previously Published in TP-40 Published in January 2013
(in.) (in.)
1 yr 2.80* 2.77*
2 yr 3.50 3.37
10 yr 5.00 5.09
25 yr 6.00 6.44
50 yr 7.00 7.70
100 yr 7.50 9.22
*NYCDEP recommended the use of 3.0" Rainfall for the 1 yr storm.
Northeast Regional Climate Center

April 1, 2013
Page 6 of 6

Project No. 165213
APPENDIX K
SPDES GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES
FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, GP-0-10-001
NEW YORK STATE
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
SPDES GENERAL PERMIT
FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES
from
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
Permit No. GP-O-IO-00 I
Issued Pursuant to Article 17, Titles 7.8 and Article 70
of the Environmental Conservation Law
Effective Date: January 29, 2010
William R. Adriance
Chief Pennit Administrator
Expiration Date: January 28, 2015
Address: NYS DEC
Div. Environmental Permits
625 Broadway, 4th Floor
Albany, N.Y. 12233-1750
I
2

PREFACE

Pursuant to Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), stormwater discharges from
certain construction activities are unlawful unless they are authorized by a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit or by a state permit program. New
Yorks State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) is a NPDES-approved
program with permits issued in accordance with the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL).

This general permit (permit) is issued pursuant to Article 17, Titles 7, 8 and Article 70
of the ECL. An owner or operator may obtain coverage under this permit by submitting a Notice
of Intent ("NOI") to the Department. Copies of this permit and the NOI for New York are available
by calling (518) 402-8109 or at any New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(the Department) regional office (see Appendix G).They are also available on the Departments
website at:
http://www.dec.ny.gov/

An owner or operator of a construction activity that is eligible for coverage under this
permit must obtain coverage prior to the commencement of construction activity. Activities that fit
the definition of construction activity, as defined under 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(x), (15)(i), and
(15)(ii), constitute construction of a point source and therefore, pursuant to Article 17-0505 of the
ECL, the owner or operator must have coverage under a SPDES permit prior to commencing
construction activity. They cannot wait until there is an actual discharge from the construction site
to obtain permit coverage.

*Note: The italicized words/phrases within this permit are defined in Appendix A.
3

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
SPDES GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES

FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I. PERMIT COVERAGE AND LIMITATIONS ....................................................................... 5
A. Permit Application .................................................................................................................... 5
B. Maintaining Water Quality ........................................................................................................ 5
C. Eligibility Under This General Permit ...................................................................................... 5
D. Activities Which Are Ineligible for Coverage Under This General Permit .............................. 6
Part II. OBTAINING PERMIT COVERAGE .................................................................................. 7
A. Notice of Intent (NOI) Submittal .............................................................................................. 7
B. Permit Authorization ................................................................................................................. 8
C. General Requirements For Owners or Operators With Permit Coverage ................................. 9
D. Permit Coverage for Discharges Authorized Under GP-0-08-001 ......................................... 11
E. Change of Owner or Operator ................................................................................................. 11
Part III. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) ................................... 11
A. General SWPPP Requirements ............................................................................................... 11
B. Required SWPPP Contents ..................................................................................................... 14
C. Required SWPPP Components by Project Type ..................................................................... 18
Part IV. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS ............................................. 18
A. General Construction Site Inspection and Maintenance Requirements .................................. 18
B. Owner or Operator Maintenance Inspection Requirements .................................................... 18
C. Qualified Inspector Inspection Requirements ......................................................................... 19
Part V. TERMINATION OF PERMIT COVERAGE ..................................................................... 22
A. Termination of Permit Coverage ............................................................................................. 22
Part VI. REPORTING AND RETENTION OF RECORDS ........................................................... 24
A. Record Retention ..................................................................................................................... 24
B. Addresses ................................................................................................................................ 24
Part VII. STANDARD PERMIT CONDITIONS ........................................................................... 24
A. Duty to Comply ....................................................................................................................... 24
B. Continuation of the Expired General Permit ........................................................................... 25
C. Enforcement ............................................................................................................................ 25
D. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity Not a Defense ..................................................................... 25
E. Duty to Mitigate ...................................................................................................................... 25
F. Duty to Provide Information .................................................................................................... 25
G. Other Information ................................................................................................................... 25
H. Signatory Requirements .......................................................................................................... 26
I. Property Rights ......................................................................................................................... 27
J . Severability ............................................................................................................................... 27
K. Denial of Coverage Under This Permit ................................................................................... 28
L. Proper Operation and Maintenance ......................................................................................... 28
M. Inspection and Entry ............................................................................................................... 28
N. Permit Actions......................................................................................................................... 29
O. Definitions ............................................................................................................................... 29
P. Re-Opener Clause .................................................................................................................... 29
Q. Penalties for Falsification of Forms and Reports .................................................................... 29
R. Other Permits........................................................................................................................... 29
APPENDIX A .................................................................................................................................. 30
APPENDIX B .................................................................................................................................. 35
APPENDIX C .................................................................................................................................. 37
APPENDIX D .................................................................................................................................. 42
APPENDIX E .................................................................................................................................. 43
APPENDIX F................................................................................................................................... 45

4

5

Part I. PERMIT COVERAGE AND LIMITATIONS

A. Permit Application - This permit authorizes stormwater discharges to surface waters
of the State from the following construction activities identified within 40 CFR Parts
122.26(b)(14)(x), 122.26(b)(15)(i) and 122.26(b)(15)(ii), provided all of the eligibility
provisions of this permit are met:

1. Construction activities involving soil disturbances of one (1) or more acres;
including disturbances of less than one acre that are part of a larger common
plan of development or sale that will ultimately disturb one or more acres of
land; excluding routine maintenance activity that is performed to maintain the
original line and grade, hydraulic capacity or original purpose of a facility;

2. Construction activities involving soil disturbances of less than one (1) acre
where the Department has determined that a SPDES permit is required for
stormwater discharges based on the potential for contribution to a violation of a
water quality standard or for significant contribution of pollutants to surface
waters of the State.

3. Construction activities located in the watershed(s) identified in Appendix D that
involve soil disturbances between five thousand (5000) square feet and one (1)
acre of land.

B. Maintaining Water Quality - It shall be a violation of this permit and the ECL for any
discharge to either cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards as
contained in Parts 700 through 705 of Title 6 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules
and Regulations of the State of New York, such as:

1. There shall be no increase in turbidity that will cause a substantial visible
contrast to natural conditions;

2. There shall be no increase in suspended, colloidal or settleable solids that will
cause deposition or impair the waters for their best usages; and

3. There shall be no residue from oil and floating substances, nor visible oil film,
nor globules of grease.

C. Eligibility Under This General Permit
1. This permit may authorize all discharges of stormwater from construction
activity to surface waters of the State and groundwaters except for ineligible
discharges identified under subparagraph D. of this Part.

2. Except for non-stormwater discharges explicitly listed in the next paragraph,
this permit only authorizes stormwater discharges from construction activities.

6

(Part I. C)
3. Notwithstanding paragraphs C.1 and C.2 above, the following non-stormwater
discharges may be authorized by this permit: discharges from fire fighting
activities; fire hydrant flushings; waters to which cleansers or other components
have not been added that are used to wash vehicles or control dust in accordance
with the SWPPP, routine external building washdown which does not use
detergents; pavement washwaters where spills or leaks of toxic or hazardous
materials have not occurred (unless all spilled material has been removed) and
where detergents are not used; air conditioning condensate; uncontaminated
groundwater or spring water; uncontaminated discharges from construction site
de-watering operations; and foundation or footing drains where flows are not
contaminated with process materials such as solvents. For those entities
required to obtain coverage under this permit, and who discharge as noted in
this paragraph, and with the exception of flows from fire fighting activities,
these discharges must be identified in the SWPPP. Under all circumstances, the
owner or operator must still comply with water quality standards in Part I.B.

D. Activities Which Are Ineligible for Coverage Under This General Permit - All of
the following are not authorized by this permit:

1. Discharges after construction activities have been completed and the site has
undergone final stabilization;

2. Discharges that are mixed with sources of non-stormwater other than those
expressly authorized under subsection C.3. of this Part and identified in the
SWPPP required by this permit;

3. Discharges that are required to obtain an individual SPDES permit or another
SPDES general permit pursuant to Part VII, subparagraph K of this permit;

4. Discharges from construction activities that adversely affect a listed, or
proposed to be listed, endangered or threatened species, or its critical habitat;

5. Discharges which either cause or contribute to a violation of water quality
standards adopted pursuant to the ECL and its accompanying regulations;

6. Construction activities for residential, commercial and institutional projects
that:

a. are tributary to waters of the state classified as AA or AA-s; and

7

(Part I. D. 6)
b. disturb one or more acres of land with no existing impervious cover and
where the Soil Slope Phase is identified as an E or F on the USDA Soil
Survey for the County in which the disturbance will occur.

7. Construction activities for linear transportation projects and linear utility
projects that:
a. are tributary to waters of the state classified as AA or AA-s; and

b. disturb two or more acres of land with no existing impervious cover and
where the Soil Slope Phase is identified as an E or F on the USDA Soil
Survey for the County in which the disturbance will occur.

8. Construction activities that adversely affect a property that is listed or is eligible
for listing on the State or National Register of Historic Places (Note: includes
Archeological sites), unless there are written agreements in place with the NYS
Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) or other
governmental agencies to mitigate the effects, or there are local land use
approvals evidencing the same.

Part II. OBTAINING PERMIT COVERAGE

A. Notice of Intent (NOI) Submittal

1. An owner or operator of a construction activity that is not subject to the
requirements of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4 must first develop
a SWPPP in accordance with all applicable requirements of this permit and then
submit a completed NOI form to the address below in order to be authorized to
discharge under this permit. The NOI form shall be one which is associated
with this permit, signed in accordance with Part VII.H. of this permit.

NOTICE OF INTENT
NYS DEC, Bureau of Water Permits
625 Broadway, 4
th
Floor
Albany, New York 12233-3505

2. An owner or operator of a construction activity that is subject to the
requirements of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4 must first develop
a SWPPP in accordance with all applicable requirements of this permit and then
have its SWPPP reviewed and accepted by the MS4 prior to submitting the NOI
to the Department. The owner or operator shall have the MS4 SWPPP
Acceptance form signed by the principal executive officer or ranking elected
official from the regulated, traditional land use control MS4, or by a duly
authorized representative of that person, and then submit that form along with
the NOI to the address referenced under Notice of Intent (NOI) Submittal.
8

(Part II. A.2)

This requirement does not apply to an owner or operator that is obtaining
permit coverage in accordance with the requirements in Part II.E. (Change of
Owner or Operator).

3. The owner or operator shall have the SWPPP preparer sign the SWPPP
Preparer Certification statement on the NOI prior to submitting the form to the
Department.

4. As of the date the NOI is submitted to the Department, the owner or operator
shall make the NOI and SWPPP available for review and copying in accordance
with the requirements in Part VII.F. of this permit.

B. Permit Authorization

1. An owner or operator shall not commence construction activity until their
authorization to discharge under this permit goes into effect.

2. Authorization to discharge under this permit will be effective when the owner
or operator has satisfied all of the following criteria:

a. project review pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act
(SEQRA) have been satisfied, when SEQRA is applicable,

b. where required, all necessary Department permits subject to the Uniform
Procedures Act (UPA) (see 6 NYCRR Part 621) have been obtained,
unless otherwise notified by the Department pursuant to 6 NYCRR
621.3(a)(4). Owners or operators of construction activities that are
required to obtain UPA permits must submit a preliminary SWPPP to
the appropriate DEC Regional Office in Appendix F at the time all other
necessary UPA permit applications are submitted. The preliminary
SWPPP must include sufficient information to demonstrate that the
construction activity qualifies for authorization under this permit,

c. the final SWPPP has been prepared, and

d. an NOI has been submitted to the Department in accordance with the
requirements of this permit.

3. An owner or operator that has satisfied the requirements of Part II.B.2 above
will be authorized to discharge stormwater from their construction activity in
accordance with the following schedule:
9

(Part II. B. 3)
a. For construction activities that are not subject to the requirements of a
regulated, traditional land use control MS4:

i. Five (5) business days from the date the Department receives
a complete NOI for construction activities with a SWPPP
that has been prepared in conformance with the technical
standards referenced in Parts III.B.1, 2 and/or 3, or

ii. Sixty (60) business days from the date the Department
receives a complete NOI for construction activities with a
SWPPP that has not been prepared in conformance with the
technical standards referenced in Parts III.B.1, 2 or 3.

b. For construction activities that are subject to the requirements of a
regulated, traditional land use control MS4:

i. Five (5) business days from the date the Department receives
a complete NOI and signed MS4 SWPPP Acceptance
form,

4. The Department may suspend or deny an owners or operators coverage under
this permit if the Department determines that the SWPPP does not meet the
permit requirements.

5. Coverage under this permit authorizes stormwater discharges from only those
areas of disturbance that are identified in the NOI. If an owner or operator
wishes to have stormwater discharges from future or additional areas of
disturbance authorized, they must submit a new NOI that addresses that phase
of the development, unless otherwise notified by the Department.

C. General Requirements For Owners or Operators With Permit Coverage

1. The owner or operator shall ensure that the provisions of the SWPPP are
implemented from the commencement of construction activity until all areas of
disturbance have achieved final stabilization and the Notice of Termination
(NOT) has been submitted to the Department in accordance with Part V. of this
permit. This includes any changes made to the SWPPP pursuant to Part III.A.4.

2. The owner or operator shall maintain a copy of the General Permit (GP-0-10-
001), NOI, NOI Acknowledgment Letter, SWPPP, MS4 SWPPP Acceptance
form and inspection reports at the construction site until all disturbed areas have
achieved final stabilization and the NOT has been submitted to the Department.

10

(Part II. C. 2)
The documents must be maintained in a secure location, such as a job trailer,
on-site construction office, or mailbox with lock. The secure location must be
accessible during normal business hours to an individual performing a
compliance inspection.

3. The owner or operator of a construction activity shall not disturb greater than
five (5) acres of soil at any one time without prior written authorization from the
Department or, in areas under the jurisdiction of a regulated, traditional land
use control MS4, the MS4 (provided the MS4 is not the owner or operator of
the construction activity). At a minimum, the owner or operator must comply
with the following requirements in order to be authorized to disturb greater than
five (5) acres of soil at any one time:

a. The owner or operator shall have a qualified inspector conduct at least
two (2) site inspections in accordance with Part IV.C. every seven (7)
calendar days, for as long as greater than five (5) acres of soil remain
disturbed. The two (2) inspections shall be separated by a minimum of
two (2) full calendar days.

b. In areas where soil disturbance activity has been temporarily or
permanently ceased, temporary and/or permanent soil stabilization
measures shall be installed and/or implemented within seven (7) days
from the date the soil disturbance activity ceased. The soil stabilization
measures selected shall be in conformance with the most current version
of the technical standard, New York State Standards and Specifications
for Erosion and Sediment Control.

c. The owner or operator shall prepare a phasing plan that defines
maximum disturbed area per phase and shows required cuts and fills.

d. The owner or operator shall install any additional site specific practices
needed to protect water quality.

e. The owner or operator shall include the requirements above in their
SWPPP.

4. The Department may suspend or revoke an owners or operators coverage
under this permit at any time if the Department determines that the SWPPP does
not meet the permit requirements.
11

(Part II. C)
5. For construction activities that are subject to the requirements of a regulated,
traditional land use control MS4, the owner or operator shall notify the MS4 in
writing of any planned amendments or modifications to the post-construction
stormwater management practice component of the SWPPP required by Part
III.A. 4. and 5. of this permit. Unless otherwise notified by the MS4, the owner
or operator shall have the SWPPP amendments or modifications reviewed and
accepted by the MS4 prior to commencing construction of the post-construction
stormwater management practice.

D. Permit Coverage for Discharges Authorized Under GP-0-08-001

1. Upon renewal of SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from
Construction Activity (Permit No. GP-0-08-001), an owner or operator of
construction activity with coverage under GP-0-08-001, as of the effective date
of GP-0-10-001, shall be authorized to discharge in accordance with GP-0-10-
001 unless otherwise notified by the Department.

E. Change of Owner or Operator

1. When property ownership changes or when there is a change in operational
control over the construction plans and specifications, the original owner or
operator must notify the new owner or operator, in writing, of the requirement
to obtain permit coverage by submitting a NOI with the Department. Once the
new owner or operator obtains permit coverage, the original owner or operator
shall then submit a completed NOT with the name and permit identification
number of the new owner or operator to the Department at the address in Part
II.A.1.. If the original owner or operator maintains ownership of a portion of
the construction activity and will disturb soil, they must maintain their coverage
under the permit.

Permit coverage for the new owner or operator will be effective as of the date
the Department receives a complete NOI, provided the original owner or
operator was not subject to a sixty (60) business day authorization period that
has not expired as of the date the Department receives the NOI from the new
owner or operator.

Part III. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)

A. General SWPPP Requirements

1. The SWPPP shall be prepared prior to the submittal of the NOI. The NOI shall
be submitted to the Department prior to the commencement of construction
activity.

12

(Part III. A)
2. The SWPPP shall describe the erosion and sediment control practices and where
required, post-construction stormwater management practices that will be used
and/or constructed to reduce the pollutants in stormwater discharges and to
assure compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. In addition, the
SWPPP shall identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be
expected to affect the quality of stormwater discharges.

3. All SWPPPs that require the post-construction stormwater management practice
component shall be prepared by a qualified professional that is knowledgeable
in the principles and practices of stormwater management and treatment.

4. The owner or operator must keep the SWPPP current so that it at all times
accurately documents the erosion and sediment controls practices that are being
used or will be used during construction, and all post-construction stormwater
management practices that will be constructed on the site. At a minimum, the
owner or operator shall amend the SWPPP:

a. whenever the current provisions prove to be ineffective in minimizing
pollutants in stormwater discharges from the site;

b. whenever there is a change in design, construction, or operation at the
construction site that has or could have an effect on the discharge of
pollutants; and

c. to address issues or deficiencies identified during an inspection by the
qualified inspector, the Department or other regulatory authority.

5. The Department may notify the owner or operator at any time that the SWPPP
does not meet one or more of the minimum requirements of this permit. The
notification shall be in writing and identify the provisions of the SWPPP that
require modification. Within fourteen (14) calendar days of such notification, or
as otherwise indicated by the Department, the owner or operator shall make the
required changes to the SWPPP and submit written notification to the
Department that the changes have been made. If the owner or operator does not
respond to the Departments comments in the specified time frame, the
Department may suspend the owners or operators coverage under this permit.

6. Prior to the commencement of construction activity, the owner or operator must
identify the contractor(s) and subcontractor(s) that will be responsible for
installing, constructing, repairing, replacing, inspecting and maintaining the
erosion and sediment control practices included in the SWPPP; and the
contractor(s) and subcontractor(s) that will be responsible for constructing the
post-construction stormwater management practices included in the SWPPP.
13

(Part III. A. 6)
The owner or operator shall have each of the contractors and subcontractors
identify at least one person from their company that will be responsible for
implementation of the SWPPP. This person shall be known as the trained
contractor. The owner or operator shall ensure that at least one trained
contractor is on site on a daily basis when soil disturbance activities are being
performed.

The owner or operator shall have each of the contractors and subcontractors
identified above sign a copy of the following certification statement below
before they commence any construction activity:

"I hereby certify that I understand and agree to comply with the terms and
conditions of the SWPPP and agree to implement any corrective actions
identified by the qualified inspector during a site inspection. I also
understand that the owner or operator must comply with the terms and
conditions of the most current version of the New York State Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System ("SPDES") general permit for stormwater
discharges from construction activities and that it is unlawful for any person
to cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards. Furthermore,
I understand that certifying false, incorrect or inaccurate information is a
violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the State of New York and
could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceedings. "

In addition to providing the certification statement above, the certification page
must also identify the specific elements of the SWPPP that each contractor and
subcontractor will be responsible for and include the name and title of the person
providing the signature; the name and title of the trained contractor responsible for
SWPPP implementation; the name, address and telephone number of the
contracting firm; the address (or other identifying description) of the site; and the
date the certification statement is signed. The owner or operator shall attach the
certification statement(s) to the copy of the SWPPP that is maintained at the
construction site. If new or additional contractors are hired to implement measures
identified in the SWPPP after construction has commenced, they must also sign the
certification statement and provide the information listed above.

7. For projects where the Department requests a copy of the SWPPP or inspection
reports, the owner or operator shall submit the documents in both electronic
(PDF only) and paper format within five (5) business days, unless otherwise
notified by the Department.

8. The SWPPP must include documentation supporting the determination of
permit eligibility with regard to Part I.D.8. (Historic Places or Archeological
Resource). At a minimum, the supporting documentation shall include the
following:

14

(Part III. A. 8)
a. Information on whether the stormwater discharge or construction
activities would have an effect on a property (historic or archeological
resource) that is listed or eligible for listing on the State or National
Register of Historic Places;

b. Results of historic resources screening determinations conducted.
Information regarding the location of historic places listed, or eligible
for listing, on the State or National Registers of Historic Places and
areas of archeological sensitivity that may indicate the need for a survey
can be obtained online by viewing the New York State Office of Parks,
Recreation and Historic Places (OPRHP) online resources located on
their web site at: http://nysparks.state.ny.us/shpo/online-tools/ (using The
Geographic Information System for Archeology and National Register).
OPRHP can also be contacted at: NYS OPRHP, State Historic
Preservation Office, Peebles Island Resources Center, P.O. Box 189,
Waterford, NY 12188-0189, phone: 518-237-8643;

c. A description of measures necessary to avoid or minimize adverse
impacts on places listed, or eligible for listing, on the State or National
Register of Historic Places. If the owner or operator fails to describe
and implement such measures, the stormwater discharge is ineligible for
coverage under this permit; and

d. Where adverse effects may occur, any written agreements in place with
OPRHP or other governmental agency to mitigate those effects, or local
land use approvals evidencing the same.

B. Required SWPPP Contents

1. Erosion and sediment control component - All SWPPPs prepared pursuant to
this permit shall include erosion and sediment control practices designed in
conformance with the most current version of the technical standard, New York
State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control. Where
erosion and sediment control practices are not designed in conformance with
this technical standard, the owner or operator must demonstrate equivalence to
the technical standard. At a minimum, the erosion and sediment control
component of the SWPPP shall include the following:

a. Background information about the scopeof theproject, including the
location, type and size of project;
15

(Part III. B. 1)
b. A site map/construction drawing(s) for the project, including a general
location map. At a minimum, the site map shall show the total site area;
all improvements; areas of disturbance; areas that will not be disturbed;
existing vegetation; on-site and adjacent off-site surface water(s),
wetlands and drainage patterns that could be affected by the construction
activity; existing and final slopes; locations of different soil types with
boundaries; material, waste, borrow or equipment storage areas located
on adjacent properties; and location(s) of the stormwater discharge(s);

c. A description of the soil(s) present at the site, including an identification
of the Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG);

d. A construction phasing plan and sequence of operations describing the
intended order of construction activities, including clearing and
grubbing, excavation and grading, utility and infrastructure installation
and any other activity at the site that results in soil disturbance;

e. A description of the minimum erosion and sediment control practices to
be installed or implemented for each construction activity that will result
in soil disturbance. Include a schedule that identifies thetiming of initial
placement or implementation of each erosion and sediment control
practice and the minimum time frames that each practice should remain
in place or be implemented;

f. A temporary and permanent soil stabilization plan that meets the
requirements of the most current version of the technical standard, New
York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment
Control, for each stage of the project, including initial land clearing and
grubbing to project completion and achievement of final stabilization;

g. A site map/construction drawing(s) showing the specific location(s),
size(s), and length(s) of each erosion and sediment control practice;

h. The dimensions, material specifications, installation details, and
operation and maintenance requirements for all erosion and sediment
control practices. Include the location and sizing of any temporary
sediment basins and structural practices that will be used to divert flows
from exposed soils;
16

(Part III. B. 1)
i. A maintenance inspection schedule for the contractor(s) identified in
Part III.A.6., to ensure continuous and effective operation of the erosion
and sediment control practices. The maintenance inspection schedule
shall be in accordance with the requirements in the most current version
of the technical standard, New York State Standards and Specifications
for Erosion and Sediment Control;

j. A description of thepollution prevention measures that will be used to
control litter, construction chemicals and construction debris from
becoming a pollutant source in the stormwater discharges;

k. A description and location of any stormwater discharges associated with
industrial activity other than construction at the site, including, but not
limited to, stormwater discharges from asphalt plants and concrete
plants located on the construction site; and

l. Identification of any elements of the design that are not in conformance
with the requirements in the most current version of the technical
standard, New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and
Sediment Control. Include the reason for the deviation or alternative
design and provide information which demonstrates that the deviation or
alternative design is equivalent to the technical standards.

2. Post-construction stormwater management practice component - All
construction projects identified in Table 2 of Appendix B as needing post-
construction stormwater management practices shall prepare a SWPPP that
includes practices designed in conformance with the most current version of the
technical standard, New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual
(Design Manual). If the Design Manual is revised during the term of this
permit, an owner or operator must begin using the revised version of the Design
Manual to prepare their SWPPP six (6) months from the final revision date of
the Design Manual.

Where post-construction stormwater management practices are not designed in
conformance with this technical standard, the owner or operator must
demonstrate equivalence to the technical standard.

At a minimum, the post-construction stormwater management practice
component of the SWPPP shall include the following:

a. Identification of all post-construction stormwater management practices
to be constructed as part of the project;
17

(Part III. B. 2)

b. A site map/construction drawing(s) showing the specific location and
size of each post-construction stormwater management practice;

c. The dimensions, material specifications and installation details for each
post-construction stormwater management practice;

d. Identification of any elements of the design that are not in conformance
with the Design Manual. Include the reason for the deviation or
alternative design and provide information which demonstrates that the
deviation or alternative design is equivalent to the technical standards;

e. A hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for all structural components of the
stormwater management control system;

f. A detailed summary (including calculations) of the sizing criteria that
was used to design all post-construction stormwater management
practices. At a minimum, the summary shall address the required design
criteria from the applicable chapter of the Design Manual; including the
identification of and justification for any deviations from the Design
Manual, and identification of any design criteria that are not required
based on the design criteria or waiver criteria included in the Design
Manual; and

g. An operations and maintenance plan that includes inspection and
maintenance schedules and actions to ensure continuous and effective
operation of each post-construction stormwater management practice.
The plan shall identify the entity that will be responsible for the long
term operation and maintenance of each practice.

3. Enhanced Phosphorus Removal Standards - All construction projects identified
in Table 2 of Appendix B that are located in the watersheds identified in
Appendix C shall prepare a SWPPP that includes post-construction stormwater
management practices designed in conformance with the Enhanced Phosphorus
Removal Standards included in the Design Manual. At a minimum, the post-
construction stormwater management practice component of the SWPPP shall
include items 2.a - 2.g. above.
18

(Part III. C)
C. Required SWPPP Components by Project Type - Unless otherwise notified by the
Department, owners or operators of construction activities identified in Table 1 of
Appendix B are required to prepare a SWPPP that only includes erosion and sediment
control practices designed in conformance with Part III.B.1. Owners or operators of the
construction activities identified in Table 2 of Appendix B shall prepare a SWPPP that also
includes post-construction stormwater management practices designed in conformance
with Part III.B.2 or 3.

Part IV. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS

A. General Construction Site Inspection and Maintenance Requirements

1. The owner or operator must ensure that all erosion and sediment control
practices and all post-construction stormwater management practices identified
in the SWPPP are maintained in effective operating condition at all times.

2. The terms of this permit shall not be construed to prohibit the State of New
York from exercising any authority pursuant to the ECL, common law or
federal law, or prohibit New York State from taking any measures, whether
civil or criminal, to prevent violations of the laws of the State of New York, or
protect the public health and safety and/or the environment.

B. Owner or Operator Maintenance Inspection Requirements

1. The owner or operator shall inspect, in accordance with the requirements in the
most current version of the technical standard, New York State Standards and
Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, the erosion and sediment
controls identified in the SWPPP to ensure that they are being maintained in
effective operating condition at all times.

2. For construction sites where soil disturbance activities have been temporarily
suspended (e.g. winter shutdown) and temporary stabilization measures have
been applied to all disturbed areas, theowner or operator can stop conducting
the maintenance inspections. Theowner or operator shall begin conducting the
maintenance inspections in accordance with Part IV.B.1. as soon as soil
disturbance activities resume.

3. For construction sites where soil disturbance activities have been shut down
with partial project completion, the owner or operator can stop conducting the
maintenance inspections if all areas disturbed as of the project shutdown date
have achieved final stabilization and all post-construction stormwater
management practices required for the completed portion of the project have
been constructed in conformance with the SWPPP and are operational.

19

(Part IV. C)
C. Qualified Inspector Inspection Requirements - The owner or operator shall have a
qualified inspector conduct site inspections in conformance with the following
requirements:

[Note: The trained contractor identified in Part III.A.6. cannot conduct the qualified
inspector site inspections unless they meet the qualified inspector qualifications included in
Appendix A. In order to perform these inspections, the trained contractor would have to be
a:
Licensed Professional Engineer,
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC),
Registered Landscape Architect, or
Someone working under the direct supervision of, and at the same company as,
the licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect, provided
they have received four (4) hours of Department endorsed training in proper erosion
and sediment control principles from a Soil and Water Conservation District, or
other Department endorsed entity].

1. A qualified inspector shall conduct site inspections for all construction activities
identified in Tables 1 and 2 of Appendix B, with the exception of:

a. the construction of a single family residential subdivision with 25% or
less impervious cover at total site build-out that involves a soil
disturbance of one (1) or more acres of land but less than five (5) acres
and is not located in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C and not
directly discharging to one of the 303(d) segments listed in Appendix E;

b. the construction of a single family home that involves a soil disturbance
of one (1) or more acres of land but less than five (5) acres and is not
located in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C and not directly
discharging to one of the 303(d) segments listed in Appendix E;

c. construction on agricultural property that involves a soil disturbance of
one (1) or more acres of land but less than five (5) acres; and

d. construction activities located in the watersheds identified in Appendix
D that involve soil disturbances between five thousand (5000) square
feet and one (1) acre of land.

2. Unless otherwise notified by the Department, the qualified inspector shall
conduct site inspections in accordance with the following timetable:

a. For construction sites where soil disturbance activities are on-going, the
qualified inspector shall conduct a site inspection at least once every
seven (7) calendar days.

20

(Part IV. C. 2)
b. For construction sites where soil disturbance activities are on-going and
the owner or operator has received authorization in accordance with
Part II.C.3 to disturb greater than five (5) acres of soil at any one time,
the qualified inspector shall conduct at least two (2) site inspections
every seven (7) calendar days. The two (2) inspections shall be separated
by a minimum of two (2) full calendar days.

c. For construction sites where soil disturbance activities have been
temporarily suspended (e.g. winter shutdown) and temporary
stabilization measures have been applied to all disturbed areas, the
qualified inspector shall conduct a site inspection at least once every
thirty (30) calendar days. The owner or operator shall notify the
Regional Office stormwater contact person (see contact information in
Appendix F) or, in areas under the jurisdiction of a regulated, traditional
land use control MS4, the MS4 (provided the MS4 is not the owner or
operator of the construction activity) in writing prior to reducing the
frequency of inspections.

d. For construction sites where soil disturbance activities have been shut
down with partial project completion, thequalified inspector can stop
conducting inspections if all areas disturbed as of the project shutdown
date have achieved final stabilization and all post-construction
stormwater management practices required for the completed portion of
the project have been constructed in conformance with the SWPPP and
are operational. The owner or operator shall notify the Regional Office
stormwater contact person (see contact information in Appendix F) or,
in areas under the jurisdiction of a regulated, traditional land use
control MS4, the MS4 (provided the MS4 is not the owner or operator
of the construction activity). in writing prior to the shutdown. If soil
disturbance activities are not resumed within 2 years from the date of
shutdown, the owner or operator shall have the qualified inspector
perform a final inspection and certify that all disturbed areas have
achieved final stabilization, and all temporary, structural erosion and
sediment control measures have been removed; and that all post-
construction stormwater management practices have been constructed in
conformance with the SWPPP by signing the Final Stabilization and
Post-Construction Stormwater Management Practice certification
statements on the NOT. The owner or operator shall then submit the
completed NOT form to the address in Part II.A.1..
21

(Part IV. C. 3)
3. At a minimum, the qualified inspector shall inspect all erosion and sediment
control practices to ensure integrity and effectiveness, all post-construction
stormwater management practices under construction to ensure that they are
constructed in conformance with the SWPPP, all areas of disturbance that have
not achieved final stabilization, all points of discharge to natural surface
waterbodies located within, or immediately adjacent to, the property boundaries
of the construction site, and all points of discharge from the construction site.

4. The qualified inspector shall prepare an inspection report subsequent to each
and every inspection. At a minimum, the inspection report shall include and/or
address the following:

a. Date and time of inspection;

b. Name and title of person(s) performing inspection;

c. A description of the weather and soil conditions (e.g. dry, wet, saturated)
at the time of the inspection;

d. A description of the condition of the runoff at all points of discharge
from the construction site. This shall include identification of any
discharges of sediment from the construction site. Include discharges
from conveyance systems (i.e. pipes, culverts, ditches, etc.) and overland
flow;

e. A description of the condition of all natural surface waterbodies located
within, or immediately adjacent to, the property boundaries of the
construction site which receive runoff from disturbed areas. This shall
include identification of any discharges of sediment to the surface
waterbody;

f. Identification of all erosion and sediment control practices that need
repair or maintenance;

g. Identification of all erosion and sediment control practices that were not
installed properly or are not functioning as designed and need to be
reinstalled or replaced;

h. Description and sketch of areas that are disturbed at the time of the
inspection and areas that have been stabilized (temporary and/or final)
since the last inspection;
22

(Part IV. C 4)

i. Current phase of construction of all post-construction stormwater
management practices and identification of all construction that is not in
conformance with the SWPPP and technical standards;

j. Corrective action(s) that must be taken to install, repair, replace or
maintain erosion and sediment control practices; and to correct
deficiencies identified with the construction of the post-construction
stormwater management practice(s); and

k. Digital photographs, with date stamp, that clearly show the condition of
all practices that have been identified as needing corrective actions. The
qualified inspector shall attach paper color copies of the digital
photographs to the inspection report being maintained onsite within
seven (7) calendar days of the date of the inspection. The qualified
inspector shall also take digital photographs, with date stamp, that
clearly show the condition of the practice(s) after the corrective action
has been completed. The qualified inspector shall attach paper color
copies of the digital photographs to the inspection report that documents
the completion of the corrective action work within seven (7) calendar
days of that inspection.

5. Within one business day of the completion of an inspection, the qualified
inspector shall notify the owner or operator and appropriate contractor or
subcontractor identified in Part III.A.6. of any corrective actions that need to be
taken. The contractor or subcontractor shall begin implementing the corrective
actions within one business day of this notification and shall complete the
corrective actions in a reasonable time frame.

6. All inspection reports shall be signed by the qualified inspector. Pursuant to
Part II.C.2., the inspection reports shall be maintained on site with the SWPPP.

Part V. TERMINATION OF PERMIT COVERAGE

A. Termination of Permit Coverage

1. An owner or operator that is eligible to terminate coverageunder this permit
must submit a completed NOT form to the address in Part II.A.1. The NOT
form shall be one which is associated with this general permit, signed in
accordance with Part VII.H.

2. An owner or operator may terminate coverage when one or more the following
conditions have been met:
23

(Part V. A. 2)
a. Total project completion - All construction activity identified in the
SWPPP has been completed; and all areas of disturbance have achieved
final stabilization; and all temporary, structural erosion and sediment
control measures have been removed; and all post-construction
stormwater management practices have been constructed in
conformance with the SWPPP and are operational;

b. Planned shutdown with partial project completion - All soil disturbance
activities have ceased; and all areas disturbed as of the project shutdown
date have achieved final stabilization; and all temporary, structural
erosion and sediment control measures have been removed; and all post-
construction stormwater management practices required for the
completed portion of the project have been constructed in conformance
with the SWPPP and are operational;

c. A new owner or operator has obtained coverage under this permit in
accordance with Part II.E.

3. For construction activities meeting subdivision 2a. or 2b. of this Part, the owner
or operator shall have the qualified inspector perform a final site inspection
prior to submitting the NOT. The qualified inspector shall, by signing the Final
Stabilization and Post-Construction Stormwater Management Practice
certification statements on the NOT, certify that all disturbed areas have
achieved final stabilization; and all temporary, structural erosion and sediment
control measures have been removed; and that all post-construction stormwater
management practices have been constructed in conformance with the SWPPP.

4. For construction activities that are subject to the requirements of a regulated,
traditional land use control MS4 and meet subdivision 2a. or 2b. of this Part,
the owner or operator shall also have the MS4 sign the MS4 Acceptance
statement on the NOT. The owner or operator shall have the principal executive
officer, ranking elected official, or duly authorized representative from the
regulated, traditional land use control MS4, sign the MS4 Acceptance
statement. The MS4 official, by signing this statement, has determined that it is
acceptable for the owner or operator to submit the NOT in accordance with the
requirements of this Part. The MS4 can make this determination by performing
a final site inspection themselves or by accepting the qualified inspectors final
site inspection certification(s) required in Part V.3.

5. For construction activities that require post-construction stormwater
management practices and meet subdivision 2a. of this Part, the owner or
operator must, prior to submitting the NOT, ensure one of the following:

24

(Part V. A. 5)
a. the post-construction stormwater management practice(s) and any right-
of-way(s) needed to maintain such practice(s) have been deeded to the
municipality in which the practice(s) is located,

b. an executed maintenance agreement is in place with the municipality
that will maintain the post-construction stormwater management
practice(s),

c. for post-construction stormwater management practices that are
privately owned, the owner or operator has modified their deed of
record to include a deed covenant that requires operation and
maintenance of the practice(s) in accordance with the operation and
maintenance plan,

d. for post-construction stormwater management practices that are owned
by a public or private institution (e.g. school, college, university), or
government agency or authority, the owner or operator has policy and
procedures in place that ensures operation and maintenance of the
practices in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan.

Part VI. REPORTING AND RETENTION OF RECORDS

A. Record Retention - The owner or operator shall retain a copy of the NOI, NOI
Acknowledgment Letter, SWPPP, MS4 SWPPP Acceptance form and any inspection
reports that were prepared in conjunction with this permit for a period of at least five (5)
years from the date that the site achieves final stabilization. This period may be extended
by the Department, in its sole discretion, at any time upon written notification.

B. Addresses - With the exception of the NOI, NOT, and MS4 SWPPP Acceptance form
(which must be submitted to the address referenced in Part II.A.1), all written
correspondence requested by the Department, including individual permit applications,
shall be sent to the address of the appropriate Department Regional Office listed in
Appendix F.

Part VII. STANDARD PERMIT CONDITIONS

A. Duty to Comply - The owner or operator must comply with all conditions of this
permit. All contractors and subcontractors associated with the project must comply with
the terms of the SWPPP. Any non-compliance with this permit constitutes a violation of
the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the ECL and is grounds for an enforcement action against
the owner or operator and/or the contractor/subcontractor; permit revocation, suspension
or modification; or denial of a permit renewal application. Upon a finding of significant
non-compliance with this permit or the applicable SWPPP, the Department may order an
immediate stop to all construction activity at the site until the non-compliance is remedied.
25

(Part VII. A)
The stop work order shall be in writing, shall describe the non-compliance in detail, and
shall be sent to the owner or operator.

B. Continuation of the Expired General Permit - This permit expires five (5)
years from the effective date. However, coverage may be obtained under the expired
general permit, which will continue in force and effect, until a new general permit is issued.
Unless otherwise notified by the Department in writing, an owner or operator seeking
authorization under the new general permit must submit a new NOI in accordance with the
terms of such new general permit.

C. Enforcement - Failure of the owner or operator, its contractors, subcontractors, agents
and/or assigns to strictly adhere to any of the permit requirements contained herein shall
constitute a violation of this permit. There are substantial criminal, civil, and administrative
penalties associated with violating the provisions of this permit. Fines of up to $37,500 per
day for each violation and imprisonment for up to fifteen (15) years may be assessed
depending upon the nature and degree of the offense.

D. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity Not a Defense - It shall not be a defense for an owner
or operator in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce
the construction activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit.

E. Duty to Mitigate - The owner or operator and its contractors and subcontractors shall
take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit
which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment.

F. Duty to Provide Information - The owner or operator shall make available to the
Department for review and copying or furnish to the Department within five (5) business
days of receipt of a Department request for such information, any information requested for
the purpose of determining compliance with this permit. This can include, but is not limited
to, the NOI, NOI Acknowledgment Letter, SWPPP, MS4 SWPPP Acceptance form,
executed maintenance agreement, and inspection reports. Failure to provide information
requested by the Department within the request timeframe shall be a violation of this
permit.

The NOI, SWPPP and inspection reports required by this permit are public documents that
the owner or operator must make available for review and copying by any person within
five (5) business days of the owner or operator receiving a written request by any such
person to review the NOI, SWPPP or inspection reports. Copying of documents will be
done at the requesters expense.

G. Other Information - When the owner or operator becomes aware that they failed to
submit any relevant facts, or submitted incorrect information in the NOI or in any other
report, or have made substantive revisions to the SWPPP (e.g. the scope of the project
changes significantly, the type of post-construction stormwater management practice(s)
26

(Part VII. G)
changes, there is a reduction in the sizing of the post-construction stormwater management
practice, or there is an increase in the disturbance area or impervious area), which were not
reflected in the original NOI submitted to the Department, they shall promptly submit such
facts or information to the Department. Failure of the owner or operator to correct or
supplement any relevant facts within five (5) business days of becoming aware of the
deficiency shall constitute a violation of this permit.

H. Signatory Requirements

1. All NOIs and NOTs shall be signed as follows:

a. For a corporation these forms shall be signed by a responsible corporate
officer. For the purpose of this section, a responsible corporate officer
means:

i. a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the
corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any
other person who performs similar policy or decision-making
functions for the corporation; or

ii. the manager of one or more manufacturing, production or
operating facilities, provided the manager is authorized to make
management decisions which govern the operation of the
regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of
making major capital investment recommendations, and
initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure
long term environmental compliance with environmental laws
and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary
systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and
accurate information for permit application requirements; and
where authority to sign documents has been assigned or
delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate
procedures;

b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship these forms shall be signed by a
general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or

c. For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency these forms
shall be signed by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected
official. For purposes of this section, a principal executive officer of a
Federal agency includes:

i. the chief executive officer of the agency, or
27

(Part VII. H. 1. c)
ii. a senior executive officer having responsibility for the overall
operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency (e.g.,
Regional Administrators of EPA).

2. The SWPPP and other information requested by the Department shall be signed
by a person described in Part VII.H.1. or by a duly authorized representative of
that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if:

a. The authorization is made in writing by a person described in Part
VII.H.1.;

b. The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having
responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or
activity, such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a
well field, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an
individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental
matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be
either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position)
and,

c. The written authorization shall include the name, title and signature of
the authorized representative and be attached to the SWPPP.

3. All inspection reports shall be signed by the qualified inspector that performs
the inspection.

4. The MS4 SWPPP Acceptance form shall be signed by the principal executive
officer or ranking elected official from the regulated, traditional land use
control MS4, or by a duly authorized representative of that person.

It shall constitute a permit violation if an incorrect and/or improper signatory
authorizes any required forms, SWPPP and/or inspection reports.

I. Property Rights - The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights of
any sort, nor any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property
nor any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State or local laws or
regulations. Owners or operators must obtain any applicable conveyances, easements,
licenses and/or access to real property prior to commencing construction activity.

J. Severability - The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this
permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held
invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this
permit shall not be affected thereby.

28

(Part VII. K)
K. Denial of Coverage Under This Permit

1. At its sole discretion, the Department may require any owner or operator
authorized by this permit to apply for and/or obtain either an individual SPDES
permit or another SPDES general permit. When the Department requires any
discharger authorized by a general permit to apply for an individual SPDES
permit, it shall notify the discharger in writing that a permit application is
required. This notice shall include a brief statement of the reasons for this
decision, an application form, a statement setting a time frame for the owner or
operator to file the application for an individual SPDES permit, and a deadline,
not sooner than 180 days from owner or operator receipt of the notification
letter, whereby the authorization to discharge under this general permit shall be
terminated. Applications must be submitted to the appropriate Regional Office.
The Department may grant additional time upon demonstration, to the
satisfaction of the Regional Water Engineer, that additional time to apply for an
alternative authorization is necessary or where the Department has not provided
a permit determination in accordance with Part 621 of this Title.

2. Any owner or operator authorized by this permit may request to be excluded
from the coverage under this permit by applying for an individual permit or
another general permit. In such cases, the owner or operator shall submit an
individual application or an alternative general permit application in accordance
with the requirements of this general permit, 40 CFR 122.26(c)(1)(ii) and 6
NYCRR Part 621, with reasons supporting the request, to the Department at the
address for the appropriate Department Office (see addresses in Appendix
F).The request may be granted by issuance of an individual permit or another
general permit at the discretion of the Department.

3. When an individual SPDES permit is issued to a discharger authorized to
discharge under a general SPDES permit for the same discharge(s), the general
permit authorization for outfalls authorized under the individual SPDES permit
is automatically terminated on the effective date of the individual permit unless
termination is earlier in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 750.

L. Proper Operation and Maintenance - The owner or operator shall at all times
properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and
related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the owner or operator to achieve
compliance with the conditions of this permit and with the requirements of the SWPPP.

M. Inspection and Entry - The owner or operator shall allow the Department or an
authorized representative of EPA, the State, or, in the case of a construction site which
discharges through an MS4, an authorized representative of the MS4 receiving the
discharge, upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by
law, to:

29

(Part VII. M)
1. Enter upon the owners or operator's premises where a regulated facility or
activity is located or conducted or where records must be kept under the
conditions of this permit;

2. Have access to and copy at reasonable times, any records that must be kept
under the conditions of this permit; and

3. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities or equipment (including monitoring
and control equipment).

N. Permit Actions - At the Departments sole discretion, this permit may, at any time, be
modified, suspended, revoked, or renewed. The filing of a request by the owner or operator
for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, termination, a notification of planned
changes or anticipated noncompliance does not limit, diminish and/or stay compliance with
any terms of this permit.

O. Definitions - Definitions of key terms are included in Appendix A of this permit.

P. Re-Opener Clause

1. If there is evidence indicating potential or realized impacts on water quality due
to any stormwater discharge associated with construction activity covered by
this permit, the owner or operator of such discharge may be required to obtain
an individual permit or alternative general permit in accordance with Part
VII.K. of this permit or the permit may be modified to include different
limitations and/or requirements.

2. Permit modification, suspension or revocation will be conducted in accordance
with 6 NYCRR Part 621, 6 NYCRR 750-1.18, and 6 NYCRR 750-1.20.

Q. Penalties for Falsification of Forms and Reports Article 17 of the ECL provides for
a civil penalty of $37,500 per day per violation of this permit. Articles 175 and 210 of the
New York State Penal Law provide for a criminal penalty of a fine and/or imprisonment
for falsifying forms and reports required by this permit.

R. Other Permits Nothing in this permit relieves the owner or operator from a
requirement to obtain any other permits required by law.
30

APPENDIX A

Definitions

Alter Hydrology from Pre to Post-Development Conditions - means the post-development peak
flow rate(s) has increased by more than 5% of the pre-developed condition for the design storm of
interest (e.g. 10 yr and 100 yr).

Combined Sewer - means a sewer that is designed to collect and convey both sewage and
stormwater.

Commence (Commencement of) Construction Activities - means the initial disturbance of soils
associated with clearing, grading or excavation activities; or other construction related activities
that disturb or expose soils such as demolition, stockpiling of fill material, and the initial
installation of erosion and sediment control practices required in the SWPPP. See definition for
Construction Activity(ies) also.

Construction Activity(ies) - means any clearing, grading, excavation, filling, demolition or
stockpiling activities that result in soil disturbance. Clearing activities can include, but are not
limited to, logging equipment operation, the cutting and skidding of trees, stump removal and/or
brush root removal. Construction activity does not include routine maintenance that is performed
to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of a facility.

Direct Discharge (to a specific surface waterbody) - means that runoff flows from a construction
site by overland flow and the first point of discharge is the specific surface waterbody, or runoff
flows from a construction site to a separate storm sewer system and the first point of discharge
from the separate storm sewer system is the specific surface waterbody.

Discharge(s) - means any addition of any pollutant to waters of the State through an outlet or point
source.

Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) - means chapter 43-B of the Consolidated Laws of the
State of New York, entitled the Environmental Conservation Law.

Final Stabilization - means that all soil disturbance activities have ceased and a uniform,
perennial vegetative cover with a density of eighty (80) percent over the entire pervious surface
has been established; or other equivalent stabilization measures, such as permanent landscape
mulches, rock rip-rap or washed/crushed stone have been applied on all disturbed areas that are not
covered by permanent structures, concrete or pavement.

General SPDES permit - means a SPDES permit issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 750-1.21
authorizing a category of discharges.

Groundwater - means waters in the saturated zone. The saturated zone is a subsurface zone in
31

which all the interstices are filled with water under pressure greater than that of the atmosphere.
Although the zone may contain gas-filled interstices or interstices filled with fluids other than
water, it is still considered saturated.

Impervious Area (Cover) - means all impermeable surfaces that cannot effectively infiltrate
rainfall. This includes paved, concrete and gravel surfaces (i.e. parking lots, driveways, roads,
runways and sidewalks); building rooftops and miscellaneous impermeable structures such as
patios, pools, and sheds.

Larger Common Plan of Development or Sale - means a contiguous area where multiple
separate and distinct construction activities are occurring, or will occur, under one plan. The term
plan in larger common plan of development or sale is broadly defined as any announcement or
piece of documentation (including a sign, public notice or hearing, marketing plan, advertisement,
drawing, permit application, State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) application,
zoning request, computer design, etc.) or physical demarcation (including boundary signs, lot
stakes, surveyor markings, etc.) indicating that construction activities may occur on a specific plot.

For discrete construction projects that are located within a larger common plan of development or
sale that are at least 1/4 mile apart, each project can be treated as a separate plan of development or
sale provided any interconnecting road, pipeline or utility project that is part of the same common
plan is not concurrently being disturbed.

Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) - a conveyance or system of conveyances (including
roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made
channels, or storm drains):
i. Owned or operated by a State, city, town, borough, county, parish, district, association,
or other public body (created by or pursuant to State law) having jurisdiction over
disposal of sewage, industrial wastes, stormwater, or other wastes, including special
districts under State law such as a sewer district, flood control district or drainage
district, or similar entity, or an Indian tribe or an authorized Indian tribal organization,
or a designated and approved management agency under section 208 of the CWA that
discharges to surface waters of the State;
ii. Designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater;
iii. Which is not a combined sewer; and
iv. Which is not part of a Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) as defined at 40 CFR
122.2.

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) - means the national system for the
issuance of wastewater and stormwater permits under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
(Clean Water Act).

NOI Acknowledgment Letter - means the letter that the Department sends to an owner or
operator to acknowledge the Departments receipt and acceptance of a complete Notice of Intent.
This letter documents the owners or operators authorization to discharge in accordance with the
general permit for stormwater discharges from construction activity.

32

Owner or Operator - means the person, persons or legal entity which owns or leases the property
on which the construction activity is occurring; and/or an entity that has operational control over
the construction plans and specifications, including the ability to make modifications to the plans
and specifications.

Pollutant - means dredged spoil, filter backwash, solid waste, incinerator residue, sewage,
garbage, sewage sludge, munitions, chemical wastes, biological materials, radioactive materials,
heat, wrecked or discarded equipment, rock, sand and industrial, municipal, agricultural waste and
ballast discharged into water; which may cause or might reasonably be expected to cause pollution
of the waters of the state in contravention of the standards or guidance values adopted as provided
in Parts 700 et seq of this Title.

Qualified Inspector - means a person that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of
erosion and sediment control, such as a licensed Professional Engineer, Certified Professional in
Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC), Registered Landscape Architect, or other Department
endorsed individual(s).

It can also mean someone working under the direct supervision of, and at the same company as,
the licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect, provided that person has
training in the principles and practices of erosion and sediment control. Training in the principles
and practices of erosion and sediment control means that the individual working under the direct
supervision of the licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect has received
four (4) hours of Department endorsed training in proper erosion and sediment control principles
from a Soil and Water Conservation District, or other Department endorsed entity. After receiving
the initial training, the individual working under the direct supervision of the licensed Professional
Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect shall receive four (4) hours of training every three (3)
years.

It can also mean a person that meets the Qualified Professional qualifications in addition to the
Qualified Inspector qualifications.

Note: Inspections of any post-construction stormwater management practices that include
structural components, such as a dam for an impoundment, shall be performed by a licensed
Professional Engineer.

Qualified Professional - means a person that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of
stormwater management and treatment, such as a licensed Professional Engineer, Registered
Landscape Architect or other Department endorsed individual(s). Individuals preparing SWPPPs
that require the post-construction stormwater management practice component must have an
understanding of the principles of hydrology, water quality management practice design, water
quantity control design, and, in many cases, the principles of hydraulics in order to prepare a
SWPPP that conforms to the Departments technical standard. All components of the SWPPP that
involve the practice of engineering, as defined by the NYS Education Law (see Article 145), shall
be prepared by, or under the direct supervision of, a professional engineer licensed to practice in
the State of New York.

33

Regulated, Traditional Land Use Control MS4 - means a city, town or village with land use
control authority that is required to gain coverage under New York State DECs SPDES General
Permit For Stormwater Discharges from Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer Systems (MS4s).

Routine Maintenance Activity - means construction activity that is performed to maintain the
original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of a facility, including, but not
limited to:
Re-grading of gravel roads or parking lots,
Stream bank restoration projects (does not include the placement of spoil material),
Cleaning and shaping of existing roadside ditches and culverts that maintains the
approximate original line and grade, and hydraulic capacity of the ditch,
Cleaning and shaping of existing roadside ditches that does not maintain the
approximate original grade, hydraulic capacity and purpose of the ditch if the changes to
the line and grade, hydraulic capacity or purpose of the ditch are installed to improve
water quality and quantity controls (e.g. installing grass lined ditch),
Placement of aggregate shoulder backing that makes the transition between the road
shoulder and the ditch or embankment,
Full depth milling and filling of existing asphalt pavements, replacement of
concrete pavement slabs, and similar work that does not expose soil or disturb the bottom
six (6) inches of subbase material,
Long-term use of equipment storage areas at or near highway maintenance
facilities,
Removal of sediment from the edge of the highway to restore a previously existing
sheet-flow drainage connection from the highway surface to the highway ditch or
embankment,
Existing use of Canal Corp owned upland disposal sites for the canal, and
Replacement of curbs, gutters, sidewalks and guide rail posts.

State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) - means the system established
pursuant to Article 17 of the ECL and 6 NYCRR Part 750 for issuance of permits authorizing
discharges to the waters of the state.

Surface Waters of the State - shall be construed to include lakes, bays, sounds, ponds,
impounding reservoirs, springs, rivers, streams, creeks, estuaries, marshes, inlets, canals, the
Atlantic ocean within the territorial seas of the state of New York and all other bodies of surface
water, natural or artificial, inland or coastal, fresh or salt, public or private (except those private
waters that do not combine or effect a junction with natural surface or underground waters), which
are wholly or partially within or bordering the state or within its jurisdiction. Waters of the state
are further defined in 6 NYCRR Parts 800 to 941.

Temporary Stabilization - means that exposed soil has been covered with material(s) as set forth
in the technical standard, New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment
Control, to prevent the exposed soil from eroding. The materials can include, but are not limited to,
mulch, seed and mulch, and erosion control mats (e.g. jute twisted yarn, excelsior wood fiber
mats).
34

Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) - A TMDL is the sum of the allowable loads of a single
pollutant from all contributing point and nonpoint sources. It is a calculation of the maximum
amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive on a daily basis and still meet water quality
standards, and an allocation of that amount to the pollutant's sources. A TMDL stipulates
wasteload allocations (WLAs) for point source discharges, load allocations (LAs) for nonpoint
sources, and a margin of safety (MOS).

Trained Contractor - means an employee from the contracting (construction) company, identified
in Part III.A.6., that has received four (4) hours of Department endorsed training in proper erosion
and sediment control principles from a Soil and Water Conservation District, or other Department
endorsed entity. After receiving the initial training, thetrained contractor shall receive four (4)
hours of training every three (3) years.

It can also mean an employee from the contracting (construction) company, identified in Part
III.A.6., that meets the qualified inspector qualifications (e.g. licensed Professional Engineer,
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC), Registered Landscape Architect,
or someone working under the direct supervision of, and at the same company as, the licensed
Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect, provided they have received four (4)
hours of Department endorsed training in proper erosion and sediment control principles from a
Soil and Water Conservation District, or other Department endorsed entity).

The trained contractor will be responsible for the day to day implementation of the SWPPP.

Uniform Procedures Act (UPA) Permit - means a permit required under 6 NYCRR Part 621 of
the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL), Article 70.

Water Quality Standard - means such measures of purity or quality for any waters in relation to
their reasonable and necessary use as promulgated in 6 NYCRR Part 700 et seq.

35

APPENDIX B

Required SWPPP Components by Project Type

Table 1
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THAT REQUIRE THE PREPARATION OF A SWPPP
THAT ONLY INCLUDES EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS
The following construction activities that involve soil disturbances of one (1) or more acres of land, but less
than five (5) acres:

Single family home not located in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C and not directly
discharging to one of the 303(d) segments listed in Appendix E
Single family residential subdivisions with 25% or less impervious cover at total site build-out
and not located in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C and not directly discharging to one
of the 303(d) segments listed in Appendix E
Construction of a barn or other agricultural building, silo, stock yard or pen.
The following construction activities that involve soil disturbances of one (1) or more acres of land:

Installation of underground, linear utilities; such as gas lines, fiber-optic cable, cable TV,
electric, telephone, sewer mains, and water mains
Environmental enhancement projects, such as wetland mitigation projects, stormwater retrofits
and stream restoration projects
Bike paths and trails
Sidewalk construction projects that are not part of a road/ highway construction or
reconstruction project
Slope stabilization projects
Slope flattening that changes the grade of the site, but does not significantly change the runoff
characteristics
Spoil areas that will be covered with vegetation
Land clearing and grading for the purposes of creating vegetated open space (i.e. recreational
parks, lawns, meadows, fields), excluding projects that alter hydrology from pre to post
development conditions
Athletic fields (natural grass) that do not include the construction or reconstruction of
impervious area and do not alter hydrology from pre to post development conditions
Demolition project where vegetation will be established and no redevelopment is planned
Overhead electric transmission line project that does not include the construction of permanent
access roads or parking areas surfaced with impervious cover
Structural practices as identified in Table II in the Agricultural Management Practices Catalog
for Nonpoint Source Pollution in New York State, excluding projects that involve soil
disturbances of less than five acres and construction activities that include the construction or
reconstruction of impervious area
The following construction activities that involve soil disturbances between five thousand (5000) square feet
and one (1) acre of land:

All construction activities located in the watersheds identified in Appendix D that involve soil
disturbances between five thousand (5000) square feet and one (1) acre of land.

36

Table 2
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THAT REQUIRE THE PREPARATION OF A SWPPP
THAT INCLUDES POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
The following construction activities that involve soil disturbances of one (1) or more acres of land:

Single family home located in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C or directly discharging
to one of the 303(d) segments listed in Appendix E
Single family residential subdivisions located in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C or
directly discharging to one of the 303(d) segments listed in Appendix E
Single family residential subdivisions that involve soil disturbances of between one (1) and five
(5) acres of land with greater than 25% impervious cover at total site build-out
Single family residential subdivisions that involve soil disturbances of five (5) or more acres of
land, and single family residential subdivisions that involve soil disturbances of less than five (5)
acres that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale that will ultimately disturb
five or more acres of land
Multi-family residential developments; includes townhomes, condominiums, senior housing
complexes, apartment complexes, and mobile home parks
Airports
Amusement parks
Campgrounds
Cemeteries that include the construction or reconstruction of impervious area (>5% of disturbed
area) or alter the hydrology from pre to post development conditions
Commercial developments
Churches and other places of worship
Construction of a barn or other agricultural building(e.g. silo) and structural practices as
identified in Table II in the Agricultural Management Practices Catalog for Nonpoint Source
Pollution in New York State that include the construction or reconstruction of impervious area,
excluding projects that involve soil disturbances of less than five acres.
Golf courses
Institutional, includes hospitals, prisons, schools and colleges
Industrial facilities, includes industrial parks
Landfills
Municipal facilities; includes highway garages, transfer stations, office buildings, POTWs and
water treatment plants
Office complexes
Sports complexes
Racetracks, includes racetracks with earthen (dirt) surface
Road construction or reconstruction
Parking lot construction or reconstruction
Athletic fields (natural grass) that include the construction or reconstruction of impervious area
(>5% of disturbed area) or alter the hydrology from pre to post development conditions
Athletic fields with artificial turf
Permanent access roads, parking areas, substations, compressor stations and well drilling pads,
surfaced with impervious cover, and constructed as part of an over-head electric transmission line
project , wind-power project, cell tower project, oil or gas well drilling project or other linear
utility project
All other construction activities that include the construction or reconstruction of impervious area
and alter the hydrology from pre to post development conditions, and are not listed in Table 1

37

APPENDIX C

Watersheds Where Enhanced Phosphorus Removal Standards Are Required

Watersheds where owners or operators of construction activities identified in Table 2 of
Appendix B must prepare a SWPPP that includes post-construction stormwater
management practices designed in conformance with the Enhanced Phosphorus Removal
Standards included in the technical standard, New York State Stormwater Management
Design Manual (Design Manual).

Entire New York City Watershed located east of the Hudson River - Figure 1
Onondaga Lake Watershed - Figure 2
Greenwood Lake Watershed -Figure 3
Oscawana Lake Watershed Figure 4

Figure 1 - New York City Watershed East of the Hudson

38

Figure 2 - Onondaga Lake Watershed

39

40

Figure 3 - Greenwood Lake Watershed

41

igure 4 - Oscawana Lake Watershed F

APPENDIX D
42

Watersheds where owners or operators of construction activities that involve soil
disturbances between five thousand (5000) square feet and one (1) acre of land must obtain
coverage under this permit.

Entire New York City Watershed that is located east of the Hudson River - See Figure 1 in
Appendix C

43

List of 303(d) segments impaired by pollutants related to construction activity (e.g. silt, sediment
or nutrients). Owners or operators of single family home and single family residential subdivision
construction activities that involve soil disturbances of one or more acres of land, but less than 5
acres, and directly discharge to one of the listed segments below shall prepare a SWPPP that
includes post-construction stormwater management practices designed in conformance with the
most current version of the technical standard, New York State Stormwater Management Design
Manual (Design Manual).

COUNTY WATERBODY COUNTY WATERBODY
APPENDIX E

Albany Ann Lee (Shakers) Pond, Stump Pond
Albany Basic Creek Reservoir
Bronx Van Cortlandt Lake
Broome Whitney Point Lake/Reservoir
Broome Beaver Lake
Broome White Birch Lake
Chautauqua Chautauqua Lake, North
Chautauqua Chautauqua Lake, South
Chautauqua Bear Lake
Chautauqua Chadakoin River and tribs
Chautauqua Lower Cassadaga Lake
Chautauqua Middle Cassadaga Lake
Chautauqua Findley Lake
Clinton Great Chazy River, Lower, Main Stem
Columbia Kinderhook Lake
Columbia Robinson Pond
Dutchess Hillside Lake
Dutchess Wappinger Lakes
Dutchess Fall Kill and tribs
Dutchess Rudd Pond
Erie Rush Creek and tribs
Erie Ellicott Creek, Lower, and tribs
Erie Beeman Creek and tribs
Erie Murder Creek, Lower, and tribs
Erie South Branch Smoke Cr, Lower, and tribs
Erie Little Sister Creek, Lower, and tribs
Essex Lake George (primary county listed as Warren)
Genesee Black Creek, Upper, and minor tribs
Genesee Tonawanda Creek, Middle, Main Stem
Genesee Tonawanda Creek, Upper, and minor tribs
Genesee Little Tonawanda Creek, Lower, and tribs
Genesee Oak Orchard Creek, Upper, and tribs
Genesee Bowen Brook and tribs
Genesee Bigelow Creek and tribs
Greene Schoharie Reservoir
Greene Sleepy Hollow Lake
Herkimer Steele Creek tribs
Kings Hendrix Creek
Lewis Mill Creek/South Branch and tribs
Livingston Conesus Lake
Livingston J aycox Creek and tribs
Livingston Mill Creek and minor tribs
Monroe Genesee River, Lower, Main Stem
Monroe Genesee River, Middle, Main Stem
Monroe Black Creek, Lower, and minor tribs
Monroe Buck Pond
Monroe Long Pond
Monroe Cranberry Pond
Monroe Mill Creek and tribs
Monroe Shipbuilders Creek and tribs
Monroe Minor tribs to Irondequoit Bay
Monroe Thomas Creek/White Brook and tribs
Nassau Glen Cove Creek, Lower, and tribs
Nassau LI Tribs (fresh) to East Bay
Nassau East Meadow Brook, Upper, and tribs
Nassau Hempstead Bay
Nassau Hempstead Lake
Nassau Grant Park Pond
Niagara Bergholtz Creek and tribs
Oneida Ballou, Nail Creeks
Onondaga Ley Creek and tribs
Onondaga Onondaga Creek, Lower and tribs
Onondaga Onondaga creek, Middle and tribs
Onondaga Onondaga Creek, Upper, and minor tribs
Onondaga Harbor Brook, Lower, and tribs
Onondaga Ninemile Creek, Lower, and tribs
Onondaga Minor tribs to Onondaga Lake
Ontario Honeoye Lake
Ontario Hemlock Lake Outlet and minor tribs
Ontario Great Brook and minor tribs
Oswego Lake Neatahwanta
Putnam Oscawana Lake
Putnam Lake Carmel
Queens J amaica Bay, Eastern, and tribs (Queens)
Queens Bergen Basin
Queens Shellbank Basin
Rensselaer Snyders Lake
Richmond Grasmere, Arbutus and Wolfes Lakes
Saratoga Dwaas Kill and tribs
Saratoga Tribs to Lake Lonely
Saratoga Lake Lonely
Saratoga Schuyler Creek and tribs
Schenectady Collins Lake

44

APPENDIX E
ntd.
Y COUNTY WATERBODY

List of 303(d) segments impaired by pollutants related to construction activity, co

COUNTY WATERBOD
Schoharie Engleville Pond
ake Salubria
teuben Smith Pond
uffolk Millers Pond
Suffolk Mattituck (Marratooka) Pond
Suffolk Tidal tribs to West Moriches Bay
Suffolk Canaan Lake
Suffolk Lake Ronkonkoma
Tompkins Cayuga Lake, Southern End
Tompkins Owasco Inlet, Upper, and tribs
Ulster Ashokan Reservoir
Ulster Esopus Creek, Upper, and minor tribs
Warren Lake George
Warren Tribs to L.George, Village of L George
Warren Huddle/Finkle Brooks and tribs
Warren Indian Brook and tribs
Warren Hague Brook and tribs
Washington Tribs to L.George, East Shore of Lake George
Washington Cossayuna Lake
Wayne Port Bay
Wayne Marbletown Creek and tribs
Westchester Peach Lake
Westchester Mamaroneck River, Lower
Westchester Mamaroneck River, Upper, and minor tribs
Westchester Sheldrake River and tribs
Westchester Blind Brook, Lower
Westchester Blind Brook, Upper, and tribs
Westchester Lake Lincolndale
Westchester Lake Meahaugh
Wyoming J ava Lake
Wyoming Silver Lake
Schoharie Summit Lake
St. Lawrence Black Lake Outlet/Black Lake
Steuben L

S
S

Note: The list above identifies those waters from the final New York State 2008 Section 303(d)
List of Impaired Waters Requiring a TMDL/Other Strategy, dated May 26, 2008, that are
impaired by silt, sediment or nutrients.
45

APPENDIX F

LIST OF NYS DEC REGIONAL OFFICES

Region COVERING THE
FOLLOWING
COUNTIES:
DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL
PERMITS (DEP)
PERMIT ADMINISTRATORS
DIVISION OF WATER
(DOW)

WATER (SPDES) PROGRAM
1
NASSAU AND SUFFOLK 50 CIRCLE ROAD
STONY BROOK, NY
) 444-0365
11790-3409 11790
50 CIRCLE ROAD
STONY BROOK, NY
TEL. (631 TEL. (631) 444-0405

2
NX, KINGS, NEW YORK BRO ,
QUE
1 HUNTERS POINT P
40 21ST ST.
LONG ISLAND CITY 07
TEL. (718) 482-4997
ST ST.
CITY, NY 11101-5407
82-4933
ENS AND RICHMOND 47-
LAZA, 1 HUN
47-40 21
, NY 11101-54

LONG I

SLAND
TEL. (718) 4
TERS POINT PLAZA,

3
UT
ROCKLAND, SULLIVA
D CHESS, ORANGE, PUTNAM,
N LSTER
AND WESTCHESTER
, U
21 SOUTH PUTT CO
NEW PALTZ, NY 12
TEL. (845) 256-3059
E 1W RNERS ROAD 100 HILLSIDE AVENUE, SUIT
561-1696 WHITE PLAINS, NY 10603
TEL. (914) 428 - 2505

4
ALBANY, COLUMBIA, DELAW
RE
ARE,
S
CH OHARIE
1150 NORTH WEST
TADY, NY 1
) 357-2069
DY, NY 12306-2014
7-2045
G ENE, MONTGOMERY,
OT , R L ,
SCHENEC
TEL. (518 EGO ENSSE AER
ENECTADY AND SCH S

COTT ROAD 1130 NORTH WESTCOTT ROAD
12306-20 4 SCHENECTA
TEL. (518) 35
5
NTON, ESSEX, FRANK CLI LIN,
FUL RATOGA,
A TON
1115 STATE ROUTE
RAY BROOK, NY 12
TEL. (518) 897-1234
E ROAD,

TON, HAMILTON, SA
HING W RREN AND WAS
86, PO B X 296 232 GOLF COURS O
977-0296 PO BOX 220
WARRENSBURG, NY 12885-0220
TEL. (518) 623-1200

6
HERKIMER, JEFFERSON,
LEWIS, ONEIDA AND 31
ST. LAWRENCE WATERTOW
315) 785-
STATE OFFICE B
7 WASHINGTO
N, N
224 793-2554
UILDING STATE OFFICE BUILDING
N STREET

207 GENESEE STREET
Y 13601-3787 UTICA, NY 13501-2885
TEL. ( 5 TEL. (315)
7
BR
CH NANGO, CORTLAND, SYRAC
O
E
A
M
1
) 426-743
2400
-7500
OME, CAYUGA, 615 ERIE BLVD. W
M DISON, ONONDAGA,
USE, NY
TEL. (315
OSWEGO, TIOGA AND
TO PKINS
EST 615 ERIE BLVD. WEST
NY 13204- 3204-2400 SYRACUSE,
426 8 TEL. (315)
8
C MUNG, GENESEE, HE
IV
NT
SCH
TE
YAT
ST AVON
AVON, NY 14414-
TEL. (585) 226-246
T AVON-LIMA RD.
14414-9519
2466
L INGSTON, MONROE,
O ARIO, ORLEANS,
UYLER, SENECA,
S UBEN, WAYNE AND
ES
6274 EA -LIMA ROAD 6274 EAS
9519 AVON, NY
) 226- 6 TEL. (585
9
EGANY, CATTARAUGUS,
RIE,
270 M
BUF
ALL

ICHIGAN A
FALO, NY 14
TEL. (716) 851-716
HIGAN AVE.
3-2999

CHAUTAUQUA, E
NIAGARA AND WYOMING
VENUE 270 MIC
203-2999 BUFFALO, NY 1420
6) 851-7070 5 TEL. (71

Project No. 165213
APPENDIX L
MS4 SWPPP ACCEPTANCE FORM
Page 1 of 2
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Division of Water
MS4 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Acceptance Form
for
Construction Activities Seeking Authorization Under SPDES General Permit
*(NOTE: Attach Completed Form to Notice Of Intent and Submit to Address Above)
I. Project Owner/Operator Information
1. Owner/Operator Name:
2. Contact Person:
3. Street Address:
4. City/State/Zip:
II. Project Site Information
5. Project/Site Name:
6. Street Address:
7. City/State/Zip:
III. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Review and Acceptance Information
8. SWPPP Reviewed by:
9. Title/Position:
10. Date Final SWPPP Reviewed and Accepted:
IV. Regulated MS4 Information
11. Name of MS4:
12. MS4 SPDES Permit Identification Number: NYR20A
13. Contact Person:
14. Street Address:
15. City/State/Zip:
16. Telephone Number:
(NYS DEC - MS4 SWPPP Acceptance Form - J anuary 2010)
Retail Stores Construction Company
Robert Rosenberg
500 Old County Road
Garden City, NY 11530
Costco Wholesale
Route 202/35 (Crompond Road)
Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Town of Yorktown
Town Engineer
Town of Yorktown
Sharon Robinson
1974 Commerce Street
Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
(914) 962-5722
Page 2 of 2
MS4 SWPPP Acceptance Form - continued
V. Certification Statement - MS4 Official (principal executive officer or ranking elected official) or Duly
Authorized Representative
I hereby certify that the final Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the construction project
identified in question 5 has been reviewed and meets the substantive requirements in the SPDES General Permit
For Stormwater Discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s).
Note: The MS4, through the acceptance of the SWPPP, assumes no responsibility for the accuracy and adequacy
of the design included in the SWPPP. In addition, review and acceptance of the SWPPP by the MS4 does not
relieve the owner/operator or their SWPPP preparer of responsibility or liability for errors or omissions in the
plan.
Printed Name:
Title/Position:
Signature:
Date:
VI. Additional Information
Project No. 165213
APPENDIX M
NOTICE OF INTENT
Fax ( Owner / Oper at or )
- -
Page 1 of 14
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Division of Water
NOTICE OF INTENT
All sections must be completed unless otherwise noted. Fai l ur e t o compl et e al l i t ems may
r esul t i n t hi s f or mbei ng r et ur ned t o you, t her eby del ayi ng your cover age under t hi s
Gener al Per mi t . Appl i cant s must r ead and under st and t he condi t i ons of t he per mi t and
pr epar e a St or mwat er Pol l ut i on Pr event i on Pl an pr i or t o submi t t i ng t hi s NOI . Appl i cant s
ar e r esponsi bl e f or i dent i f yi ng and obt ai ni ng ot her DEC per mi t s t hat may be r equi r ed.
-IMPORTANT-
RETURN THIS FORM TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE
OWNER/OPERATOR MUST SIGN FORM
Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity Under State
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) General Permit # GP-0-10-001
Owner/Operator Information
Owner / Oper at or Cont act Per son Last Name ( NOT CONSULTANT)
Owner / Oper at or Cont act Per son Fi r st Name
Owner / Oper at or Mai l i ng Addr ess
Ci t y
St at e Zi p
-
Phone ( Owner / Oper at or )
- -
Emai l ( Owner / Oper at or )
Owner / Oper at or ( Company Name/ Pr i vat e Owner Name/ Muni ci pal i t y Name)
NYR
( f or DEC use onl y)
FED TAX I D
-
( not r equi r ed f or i ndi vi dual s)
6154147110
R e t a i l S t o r e C o n s t r u c t i o n C o mp a n y
R o s e n b u r g
R o b e r t
5 0 0 O l d C o u n t r y R o a d
G a r d e n C i t y
N Y 1 1 5 3 0
9 1 4 7 4 1 7 4 0 0
r r o s e n b u r g @b r e s l i n r e a l t y . c o m
1. Pr ovi de t he Geogr aphi c Coor di nat es f or t he pr oj ect si t e i n NYTM Uni t s. To do t hi s you
must go t o t he NYSDEC St or mwat er I nt er act i ve Map on t he DEC websi t e at :
www.dec.ny.gov/imsmaps/stormwater/viewer.htm
Zoomi nt o your Pr oj ect Locat i on such t hat you can accur at el y cl i ck on t he cent r oi d of
your si t e. Once you have l ocat ed your pr oj ect si t e, go t o t he t ool boxes on t he t op and
choose " i " ( i dent i f y) . Then cl i ck on t he cent er of your si t e and a new wi ndow cont ai ni ng
t he X, Y coor di nat es i n UTM wi l l pop up. Tr anscr i be t hese coor di nat es i nt o t he boxes
bel ow. For pr obl ems wi t h t he i nt er act i ve map use t he hel p f unct i on.
X Coordinates (Easting) Y Coordinates (Northing)
Project Site Information
Pr oj ect / Si t e Name
St r eet Addr ess ( NOT P. O. BOX)
Ci t y/ Town/ Vi l l age ( THAT I SSUES BUI LDI NG PERMI T)
St at e Zi p
-
Count y
Name of Near est Cr oss St r eet
Di st ance t o Near est Cr oss St r eet ( Feet ) Pr oj ect I n Rel at i on t o Cr oss St r eet
North South East West
Page 2 of 14
2. What i s t he nat ur e of t hi s const r uct i on pr oj ect ?
New Construction
Redevelopment with increase in impervious area
Redevelopment with no increase in impervious area
Sect i on- Bl ock- Par cel
Tax Map Number s
Si de of St r eet
North South East West
DEC Regi on
Tax Map Number s
0739147113
C o s t c o Wh o l e s a l e a n d F u e l i n g F a c i l i t y
R o u t e 2 0 2 / 3 5 ( C r o mp o n d R o a d )
Y o r k t o w n H e i g h t s
N Y 1 0 5 9 8 We s t c h e s t e r 3
O l d C r o mp o n d R o a d
5 0
2 6 . 1 8 - 1 - 1 7 2 6 . 1 9 - 1 - 1
5 9 8 4 8 2 4 5 7 1 7 7 4
3. Sel ect t he pr edomi nant l and use f or bot h pr e and post devel opment condi t i ons.
SELECT ONLY ONE CHOICE FOR EACH
Page 3 of 14
Existing Land Use
FOREST
PASTURE/ OPEN LAND
CULTI VATED LAND
SI NGLE FAMI LY HOME
SI NGLE FAMI LY SUBDI VI SI ON
TOWN HOME RESI DENTI AL
MULTI FAMI LY RESI DENTI AL
I NSTI TUTI ONAL/ SCHOOL
I NDUSTRI AL
COMMERCI AL
ROAD/ HI GHWAY
RECREATI ONAL/ SPORTS FI ELD
BI KE PATH/ TRAI L
LI NEAR UTI LI TY
PARKI NG LOT
OTHER
Future Land Use
SI NGLE FAMI LY HOME
SI NGLE FAMI LY SUBDI VI SI ON
TOWN HOME RESI DENTI AL
MULTI FAMI LY RESI DENTI AL
I NSTI TUTI ONAL/ SCHOOL
I NDUSTRI AL
COMMERCI AL
MUNI CI PAL
ROAD/ HI GHWAY
RECREATI ONAL/ SPORTS FI ELD
BI KE PATH/ TRAI L
LI NEAR UTI LI TY ( wat er , sewer , gas, et c. )
PARKI NG LOT
CLEARI NG/ GRADI NG ONLY
DEMOLI TI ON, NO REDEVELOPMENT
WELL DRI LLI NG ACTI VI TY *( Oi l , Gas, et c. )
OTHER
Pre-Development Post-Development
4. I n accor dance wi t h t he l ar ger common pl an of devel opment or sal e,
ent er t he t ot al pr oj ect si t e ar ea; t he t ot al ar ea t o be di st ur bed;
exi st i ng i mper vi ous ar ea t o be di st ur bed ( f or r edevel opment
act i vi t i es) ; and t he f ut ur e i mper vi ous ar ea const r uct ed wi t hi n t he
di st ur bed ar ea. ( Round t o t he near est t ent h of an acr e. )
Number of Lot s
*Note: f or gas wel l dr i l l i ng, non- hi gh vol ume hydr aul i c f r act ur ed wel l s onl y
Total Site
Area
.
Total Area To
Be Disturbed
.
Existing Impervious
Area To Be Disturbed
.
Future Impervious
Area
.
5. Do you pl an t o di st ur b mor e t han 5 acr es of soi l at any one t i me? Yes No
6. I ndi cat e t he per cent age of each Hydr ol ogi c Soi l Gr oup( HSG) at t he si t e.
A B C D
% % %
%
7. I s t hi s a phased pr oj ect ?
Yes No
8. Ent er t he pl anned st ar t and end
dat es of t he di st ur bance
act i vi t i es.
-
Start Date
/ /
End Date
/ /
2682147112
2 4 3 1 6 5 2 5 1 1 8
7 0 2 4 6
0 9 0 1 2 0 1 4 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 5
Page 4 of 14
Name
9. I dent i f y t he near est sur f ace wat er body( i es) t o whi ch const r uct i on si t e r unof f wi l l
di schar ge.
9a. Type of wat er body i dent i f i ed i n Quest i on 9?
Wet l and / St at e J ur i sdi ct i on On Si t e ( Answer 9b)
Wet l and / St at e J ur i sdi ct i on Of f Si t e
Wet l and / Feder al J ur i sdi ct i on On Si t e ( Answer 9b)
Wet l and / Feder al J ur i sdi ct i on Of f Si t e
St r eam/ Cr eek On Si t e
St r eam/ Cr eek Of f Si t e
Ri ver On Si t e
Ri ver Of f Si t e
Lake On Si t e
Lake Of f Si t e
Ot her Type On Si t e
Ot her Type Of f Si t e
9b. How was t he wet l and i dent i f i ed?
Regul at or y Map
Del i neat ed by Consul t ant
Del i neat ed by Ar my Cor ps of Engi neer s
Ot her ( i dent i f y)
10. Has t he sur f ace wat er body( i es) i n quest i on 9 been i dent i f i ed as a
303( d) segment i n Appendi x E of GP- 0- 10- 001?
11. I s t hi s pr oj ect l ocat ed i n one of t he Wat er sheds i dent i f i ed i n
Appendi x C of GP- 0- 10- 001?
Yes No
Yes No
12. I s t he pr oj ect l ocat ed i n one of t he wat er shed
ar eas associ at ed wi t h AA and AA- S cl assi f i ed
wat er s?
If no, skip question 13.
Yes No
13. Does t hi s const r uct i on act i vi t y di st ur b l and wi t h no
exi st i ng i mper vi ous cover and wher e t he Soi l Sl ope Phase i s
i dent i f i ed as an E or F on t he USDA Soi l Sur vey?
If Yes, what is the acreage to be disturbed?
Yes No
.
14. Wi l l t he pr oj ect di st ur b soi l s wi t hi n a St at e
r egul at ed wet l and or t he pr ot ect ed 100 f oot adj acent
ar ea?
Yes No
3213147113
u n n a me d s t r e a m t r i b u t a r y t o S h e r r y B r o o k
0 3
15. Does t he si t e r unof f ent er a separ at e st or msewer
syst em( i ncl udi ng r oadsi de dr ai ns, swal es, di t ches,
cul ver t s, et c) ?
16. What i s t he name of t he muni ci pal i t y/ ent i t y t hat owns t he separ at e st or msewer
syst em?
Yes No Unknown
17. Does any r unof f f r omt he si t e ent er a sewer cl assi f i ed
as a Combi ned Sewer ?
Yes No Unknown
21. Has t he r equi r ed Er osi on and Sedi ment Cont r ol component of t he
SWPPP been devel oped i n conf or mance wi t h t he cur r ent NYS
St andar ds and Speci f i cat i ons f or Er osi on and Sedi ment Cont r ol
( aka Bl ue Book) ?
22. Does t hi s const r uct i on act i vi t y r equi r e t he devel opment of a
SWPPP t hat i ncl udes t he post - const r uct i on st or mwat er management
pr act i ce component ( i . e. Runof f Reduct i on, Wat er Qual i t y and
Quant i t y Cont r ol pr act i ces/ t echni ques) ?
If No, skip questions 23 and 27-39.
23. Has t he post - const r uct i on st or mwat er management pr act i ce component
of t he SWPPP been devel oped i n conf or mance wi t h t he cur r ent NYS
St or mwat er Management Desi gn Manual ?
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Page 5 of 14
18. Wi l l f ut ur e use of t hi s si t e be an agr i cul t ur al pr oper t y as
def i ned by t he NYS Agr i cul t ur e and Mar ket s Law?
Yes No
Yes No
20. I s t hi s a r emedi at i on pr oj ect bei ng done under a Depar t ment
appr oved wor k pl an? ( i . e. CERCLA, RCRA, Vol unt ar y Cl eanup
Agr eement , et c. )
Yes No
19. I s t hi s pr oper t y owned by a st at e aut hor i t y, st at e agency,
f eder al gover nment or l ocal gover nment ?
3644147111
T o w n o f Y o r k t o w n
Page 6 of 14
SWPPP Pr epar er
Cont act Name ( Last , Space, Fi r st )
Mai l i ng Addr ess
Ci t y
St at e Zi p
-
Phone
- -
Fax
- -
Emai l
Signature
Date
/ /
First Name
Last Name
MI
SWPPP Preparer Certification
24. The St or mwat er Pol l ut i on Pr event i on Pl an ( SWPPP) was pr epar ed by:
Professional Engineer (P.E.)
Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD)
Registered Landscape Architect (R.L.A)
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC)
Owner/Operator
Other
I her eby cer t i f y t hat t he St or mwat er Pol l ut i on Pr event i on Pl an ( SWPPP) f or
t hi s pr oj ect has been pr epar ed i n accor dance wi t h t he t er ms and condi t i ons of
t he GP- 0- 10- 001. Fur t her mor e, I under st and t hat cer t i f yi ng f al se, i ncor r ect
or i naccur at e i nf or mat i on i s a vi ol at i on of t hi s per mi t and t he l aws of t he
St at e of New Yor k and coul d subj ect me t o cr i mi nal , ci vi l and/ or
admi ni st r at i ve pr oceedi ngs.
6582147115
T R C E n g i n e e r s , I n c .
P a n a y o t o u , N i c k i t a s
7 S k y l i n e D r i v e
H a w t h o r n e
N Y 1 0 5 3 2
9 1 4 5 9 2 4 0 4 0 9 1 4 5 9 2 5 0 4 6
n p a n a y o t o u @t r c s o l u t i o n s . c o m
N i c k i t a s F
P a n a y o t o u
26. Sel ect all of t he er osi on and sedi ment cont r ol pr act i ces t hat wi l l be
empl oyed on t he pr oj ect si t e:
Page 7 of 14
Biotechnical
Brush Matting
Wattling
Other
25. Has a const r uct i on sequence schedul e f or t he pl anned management
pr act i ces been pr epar ed?
Yes No
Brush Matting
Dune Stabilization
Grassed Waterway
Mulching
Protecting Vegetation
Recreation Area Improvement
Seeding
Sodding
Straw/Hay Bale Dike
Streambank Protection
Temporary Swale
Topsoiling
Vegetating Waterways
Vegetative Measures
Check Dams
Construction Road Stabilization
Dust Control
Earth Dike
Level Spreader
Perimeter Dike/Swale
Pipe Slope Drain
Portable Sediment Tank
Rock Dam
Sediment Basin
Sediment Traps
Silt Fence
Stabilized Construction Entrance
Storm Drain Inlet Protection
Straw/Hay Bale Dike
Temporary Access Waterway Crossing
Temporary Stormdrain Diversion
Temporary Swale
Turbidity Curtain
Water bars
Temporary Structural
Debris Basin
Diversion
Grade Stabilization Structure
Land Grading
Lined Waterway (Rock)
Paved Channel (Concrete)
Paved Flume
Retaining Wall
Riprap Slope Protection
Rock Outlet Protection
Streambank Protection
Permanent Structural
3317147118
E x c a v a t i o n D e w a t e r i n g , C o n c r e t e Wa s t e
P i t , E r o s i o n C o n t r o l B l a n k e t s
Page 8 of 14
Post-construction Stormwater Management Practice (SMP) Requirements
Important: Completion of Questions 27-39 is not required
if response to Question 22 is No.
27. I dent i f y al l si t e pl anni ng pr act i ces t hat wer e used t o pr epar e t he f i nal si t e
pl an/ l ayout f or t he pr oj ect .
Preservation of Undisturbed Areas
Preservation of Buffers
Reduction of Clearing and Grading
Locating Development in Less Sensitive Areas
Roadway Reduction
Sidewalk Reduction
Driveway Reduction
Cul-de-sac Reduction
Building Footprint Reduction
Parking Reduction
28. Pr ovi de t he t ot al Wat er Qual i t y Vol ume ( WQv) r equi r ed f or t hi s pr oj ect ( based on
f i nal si t e pl an/ l ayout ) .
Total WQv Required
. acre-feet
29. I dent i f y t he RR t echni ques ( Ar ea Reduct i on) , RR t echni ques( Vol ume Reduct i on) and
St andar d SMPs wi t h RRv Capaci t y i n Tabl e 1 ( See Page 9) t hat wer e used t o r educe
t he Tot al WQv Requi r ed( #28) .
Al so, pr ovi de i n Tabl e 1 t he t ot al i mper vi ous ar ea t hat cont r i but es r unof f t o each
t echni que/ pr act i ce sel ect ed. For t he Ar ea Reduct i on Techni ques, pr ovi de t he t ot al
cont r i but i ng ar ea ( i ncl udes per vi ous ar ea) and, i f appl i cabl e, t he t ot al i mper vi ous
ar ea t hat cont r i but es r unof f t o t he t echni que/ pr act i ce.
Note: Redevel opment pr oj ect s shal l use Tabl es 1 and 2 t o i dent i f y t he SMPs used
t o t r eat and/ or r educe t he WQv r equi r ed. I f r unof f r educt i on t echni ques wi l l not
be used t o r educe t he r equi r ed WQv, ski p t o quest i on 33a af t er i dent i f yi ng t he
SMPs.
27a. I ndi cat e whi ch of t he f ol l owi ng soi l r est or at i on cr i t er i a was used t o addr ess t he
r equi r ement s i n Sect i on 5. 1. 6( " Soi l Rest or at i on" ) of t he Desi gn Manual
( 2010 ver si on) .
Al l di st ur bed ar eas
Compact ed ar eas
wi l l be r est or ed i n accor dance wi t h t he Soi l
Rest or at i on r equi r ement s i n Tabl e 5. 3 of t he Desi gn Manual ( see page 5- 22) .
wer e consi der ed as i mper vi ous cover when cal cul at i ng t he
WQv Required, and t he compact ed ar eas wer e assi gned a post - const r uct i on
Hydr ol ogi c Soi l Gr oup ( HSG) desi gnat i on t hat i s one l evel l ess per meabl e
t han exi st i ng condi t i ons f or t he hydr ol ogy anal ysi s.
1520147112
2 7 9
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
Conservation of Natural Areas (RR-1)
Sheetflow to Riparian
Tree Planting/Tree Pit (RR-3)
Disconnection of Rooftop Runoff (RR-4)
Vegetated Swale (RR-5)
Rain Garden (RR-6)
Stormwater Planter (RR-7)
Rain Barrel/Cistern (RR-8)
Porous Pavement (RR-9)
Green Roof (RR-10)
Infiltration Trench (I-1)
Infiltration Basin (I-2)
Dry Well (I-3)
Underground Infiltration System (I-4)
Bioretention (F-5)
Dry Swale (O-1)
Micropool Extended Detention (P-1)
Wet Pond (P-2)
Wet Extended Detention (P-3)
Multiple Pond System (P-4)
Pocket Pond (P-5)
Surface Sand Filter (F-1)
Underground Sand Filter (F-2)
Perimeter Sand Filter (F-3)
Organic Filter (F-4)
Shallow Wetland (W-1)
Extended Detention Wetland (W-2)
Pond/Wetland System (W-3)
Pocket Wetland (W-4)
Wet Swale (O-2)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
............................
..................................
....................................
.............................................
.....................................
................................
...................................
.........................................
.........................................
.............................
.....................................
..........................................
...............................................
................................................
RR Techniques (Area Reduction)
Total Contributing
Impervious Area(acres)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
..........
..........
..
.........................................
............................................
.....................................
....................................
........................................
.....................................
......................................
................................................
........................
............................................
...............................................
Table 1 - Runoff Reduction (RR) Techniques
and Standard Stormwater Management
Practices (SMPs)
RR Techniques (Volume Reduction)
Standard SMPs with RRv Capacity
Standard SMPs
Page 9 of 14
Total Contributing
Area (acres)
.
.
.
.
Buffers/Filters Strips (RR-2)
.
............................................
2281147117
7 9 7 0 1 5
1 2 7 3
.
31. I s t he Tot al RRv pr ovi ded ( #30) gr eat er t han or equal t o t he
t ot al WQv r equi r ed ( #28) .
If Yes, go to question 36.
If No, go to question 32.
Yes No
Total RRv provided
32. Pr ovi de t he Mi ni mumRRv r equi r ed based on HSG.
[ Mi ni mumRRv Requi r ed = ( P) ( 0. 95) ( Ai ) / 12, Ai =( S) ( Ai c) ]
Minimum RRv Required
.
acre-feet
30. I ndi cat e t he Tot al RRv pr ovi ded by t he RR t echni ques ( Ar ea/ Vol ume Reduct i on) and
St andar d SMPs wi t h RRv capaci t y i dent i f i ed i n quest i on 29.
acre-feet
32a. I s t he Tot al RRv pr ovi ded ( #30) gr eat er t han or equal t o t he
Mi ni mumRRv Requi r ed ( #32) ?
If No, the sizing criteria has not been met. Contact Regional
Office stormwater contact person to discuss next steps.
Note: Use t he space pr ovi ded i n quest i on #39 t o summar i ze t he
speci f i c si t e l i mi t at i ons and j ust i f i cat i on f or not r educi ng 100%
of WQv r equi r ed ( #28) . A det ai l ed eval uat i on of t he speci f i c
si t e l i mi t at i ons and j ust i f i cat i on f or not r educi ng 100%of t he
WQv r equi r ed ( #28) must al so be i ncl uded i n t he SWPPP.
Yes No
Page 10 of 14
Hydrodynamic
Wet Vault
Media Filter
Other
Alternative SMP
.
.
.
.
...............................................
..................................................
...............................................
..................
Table 2 - Alternative SMPs
(DO NOT INCLUDE PRACTICES BEING
USED FOR PRETREATMENT ONLY)
Note: Redevel opment pr oj ect s whi ch do not use RR t echni ques, shal l
use quest i ons 28, 29, 33 and 33a t o pr ovi de SMPs used, t ot al
WQv r equi r ed and t ot al WQv pr ovi ded f or t he pr oj ect .
Total Contributing
Impervious Area(acres)
Pr ovi de t he name and manuf act ur er of t he Al t er nat i ve SMPs ( i . e.
pr opr i et ar y pr act i ce( s) ) bei ng used f or WQv t r eat ment .
Name
Manuf act ur er
3859147119
2 9 0 5
. acre-feet
CPv Provided
acre-feet .
CPv Required
36. Pr ovi de t he t ot al Channel Pr ot ect i on St or age Vol ume ( CPv) r equi r ed and
pr ovi ded or sel ect wai ver ( 36a) , i f appl i cabl e.
Page 11 of 14
35. I s t he sumof t he RRv pr ovi ded ( #30) and t he WQv pr ovi ded
( #33a) gr eat er t han or equal t o t he t ot al WQv r equi r ed ( #28) ?
If No, the sizing criteria has not been met. Contact
Regional Office stormwater contact person to discuss next steps.
.
34. Pr ovi de t he sumof t he Tot al RRv pr ovi ded ( #30) and
t he WQv pr ovi ded ( #33a) .
Yes No
33a. I ndi cat e t he Tot al WQv pr ovi ded ( i . e. WQv t r eat ed) by t he SMPs
i dent i f i ed i n quest i on #33 and St andar d SMPs wi t h RRv Capaci t y i dent i f i ed
i n quest i on 29.
.
WQv Provided
acre-feet
Note: For t he st andar d SMPs wi t h RRv capaci t y, t he WQv pr ovi ded by each pr act i ce
= t he WQv cal cul at ed usi ng t he cont r i but i ng dr ai nage ar ea t o t he pr act i ce
- RRv pr ovi ded by t he pr act i ce. ( See Tabl e 3. 5 i n Desi gn Manual )
33. I dent i f y t he St andar d SMPs i n Tabl e 1 and, i f appl i cabl e, t he Al t er nat i ve SMPs i n
Tabl e 2 t hat wer e used t o t r eat t he r emai ni ng
t ot al WQv( =Tot al WQv Requi r ed i n 28 - Tot al RRv Pr ovi ded i n 30) .
Al so, pr ovi de i n Tabl e 1 and 2 t he t ot al i mper vi ous ar ea t hat cont r i but es r unof f
t o each pr act i ce sel ect ed.
Note: Use Tabl es 1 and 2 t o i dent i f y t he SMPs used on Redevel opment pr oj ect s.
Si t e di schar ges di r ect l y t o t i dal wat er s
Reduct i on of t he t ot al CPv i s achi eved on si t e
36a. The need t o pr ovi de channel pr ot ect i on has been wai ved because:
or a f i f t h or der or l ar ger st r eam.
t hr ough r unof f r educt i on t echni ques or i nf i l t r at i on syst ems.
. CFS CFS .
Post-development Pre-Development
Total Extreme Flood Control Criteria (Qf)
. CFS . CFS
Post-development Pre-Development
Total Overbank Flood Control Criteria (Qp)
37. Pr ovi de t he Over bank Fl ood ( Qp) and Ext r eme Fl ood ( Qf ) cont r ol cr i t er i a or
sel ect wai ver ( 37a) , i f appl i cabl e.
2152147114
2 9 0 5 2 9 0 5
3 1 1 6 1 4 6 8
6 9 0 8 4 6 8 2
Page 12 of 14
39. Use t hi s space t o summar i ze t he speci f i c si t e l i mi t at i ons and j ust i f i cat i on
f or not r educi ng 100%of WQv r equi r ed( #28) . ( See quest i on 32a)
Thi s space can al so be used f or ot her per t i nent pr oj ect i nf or mat i on.
38. Has a l ong t er mOper at i on and Mai nt enance Pl an f or t he
post - const r uct i on st or mwat er management pr act i ce( s) been
devel oped?
I f Yes, I dent i f y t he ent i t y r esponsi bl e f or t he l ong t er m
Oper at i on and Mai nt enance
Yes No
37a. The need t o meet t he Qp and Qf cr i t er i a has been wai ved because:
Si t e di schar ges di r ect l y t o t i dal wat er s
Downst r eamanal ysi s r eveal s t hat t he Qp and Qf
cont r ol s ar e not r equi r ed
or a f i f t h or der or l ar ger st r eam.
1373147118
R e t a i l S t o r e C o n s t r u c t i o n C o mp a n y
Ai r Pol l ut i on Cont r ol
Coast al Er osi on
Hazar dous Wast e
Long I sl and Wel l s
Mi ned Land Recl amat i on
Sol i d Wast e
Navi gabl e Wat er s Pr ot ect i on / Ar t i cl e 15
Wat er Qual i t y Cer t i f i cat e
DamSaf et y
Wat er Suppl y
Fr eshwat er Wet l ands/ Ar t i cl e 24
Ti dal Wet l ands
Wi l d, Sceni c and Recr eat i onal Ri ver s
St r eamBed or Bank Pr ot ect i on / Ar t i cl e 15
Endanger ed or Thr eat ened Speci es( I nci dent al Take Per mi t )
I ndi vi dual SPDES
SPDES Mul t i - Sect or GP
Ot her
None
44. I f t hi s NOI i s bei ng submi t t ed f or t he pur pose of cont i nui ng or t r ansf er r i ng
cover age under a gener al per mi t f or st or mwat er r unof f f r omconst r uct i on
act i vi t i es, pl ease i ndi cat e t he f or mer SPDES number assi gned.
42. I s t hi s pr oj ect subj ect t o t he r equi r ement s of a r egul at ed,
t r adi t i onal l and use cont r ol MS4?
(If No, skip question 43)
Yes No
43. Has t he " MS4 SWPPP Accept ance" f or mbeen si gned by t he pr i nci pal
execut i ve of f i cer or r anki ng el ect ed of f i ci al and submi t t ed al ong
wi t h t hi s NOI ?
Yes No
41. Does t hi s pr oj ect r equi r e a US Ar my Cor ps of Engi neer s
Wet l and Per mi t ?
If Yes, Indicate Size of Impact.
Yes No
.
Page 13 of 14
40. I dent i f y ot her DEC per mi t s, exi st i ng and new, t hat ar e r equi r ed f or t hi s
pr oj ect / f aci l i t y.
8867147113
N Y R
N Y R
Owner/Operator Certification
I have r ead or been advi sed of t he per mi t condi t i ons and bel i eve t hat I under st and t hem. I al so
under st and t hat , under t he t er ms of t he per mi t , t her e may be r epor t i ng r equi r ement s. I her eby cer t i f y
t hat t hi s document and t he cor r espondi ng document s wer e pr epar ed under my di r ect i on or super vi si on. I am
awar e t hat t her e ar e si gni f i cant penal t i es f or submi t t i ng f al se i nf or mat i on, i ncl udi ng t he possi bi l i t y of
f i ne and i mpr i sonment f or knowi ng vi ol at i ons. I f ur t her under st and t hat cover age under t he gener al per mi t
wi l l be i dent i f i ed i n t he acknowl edgment t hat I wi l l r ecei ve as a r esul t of submi t t i ng t hi s NOI and can
be as l ong as si xt y ( 60) busi ness days as pr ovi ded f or i n t he gener al per mi t . I al so under st and t hat , by
submi t t i ng t hi s NOI , I am acknowl edgi ng t hat t he SWPPP has been devel oped and wi l l be i mpl ement ed as t he
f i r st el ement of const r uct i on, and agr eei ng t o compl y wi t h al l t he t er ms and condi t i ons of t he gener al
per mi t f or whi ch t hi s NOI i s bei ng submi t t ed.
Owner/Operator Signature
Date
/ /
Print First Name
Print Last Name
MI
Page 14 of 14
9366147118
Wi l b u r
B r e s l i n

Volume 4 Composite

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Volume 4 Composite

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Proposed Costco Wholesale Store and Fueling Facility

E. Stormwater Management (Part 1)

Wetlands WQvProvided= acft

Infiltration WQvProvided= 2.91 acft

Filters WQvProvided= acft

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

Reach 2aR: Reach #2

Reach 2cR: Reach #1

From: Holmes, Thomas [mailto:THolmes@trcsolutions.com]

From: Holmes, Thomas [mailto:THolmes@trcsolutions.com]

You might also like