below for this picture - it is too big to put on here. These rings may be functional (they do seemtoo low but note the key and pouch suspended from the lady's waist on the extreme right) or theymay be purely decorative. Another purpose might be (much as bells and spurs in other times) as'jinglers' to make a noise when moving.That evidence seems fairly compelling but doubts remain - why are they so crudely made. Part of the reason for this may be that they were simply cast in multiple moulds, often on a local basis,and only received a rudimentary clean up with a file to remove the roughest edges. Here we mustbe careful to define the type - observant readers will have noted that there is an interloper in myfirst picture - the ring in the top row, third from left is a different type - more rounded in profileand much smoother in finish. This one may have had an entirely different purpose and does infact appear to be more like the ones in the painting.Other uses may be as links in leather harness and as suspension rings for curtains and hangingfabrics. Both of these suggestions are feasible possibilities and in the case of harness I think distinctly so. You might also consider that rings sewn into the top hem of a hanging fabric forsuspension by hooks would not need to be particularly well finished off. As to dating we havethe evidence of manufacture by hand suggesting a pre-industrial age and of course paintings.Other evidence comes from our own hobby and indeed from this forum. This picture was postedby MARTYN and as soon as I saw it I thought of the close dating of the group as all the artefactsin it appear to be of the 16th-17thC. Does this give us an approximate date for the rings?
Leave a Comment