CARICOM: “sasod honoured with Red Ribbon Award?”
I refer to the story “sasod hon
oured with Red Rib
bon at International AISA Conference” (SN 7 23 14) and would
appreciate the opportunity to comment.
The ink has barely dried the damning indictment of the ‘gay’ lifestyle in the online story “
Double murder and
suicide rock ‘gay’ community : –Suspect’s mother unaware son ‘was into boys
), but SN’s tragic crusade in defending the indefensible
on behalf of sasod must, it seems, go on as if nothing happened. This is a meaningless award, but significant in its publicity from the fact that it was included in a "release from the CARICOM Secretariat" ... and that it ignores the fact, truth, detail and evidence in the CDC's 2010 report "
CDC Fact Sheet: HIV and AIDS Among Gay and Bisexual Men
(rather than a ‘human rights’)
response to a behaviour-based pathology that is wreaking personal and societal havoc. The CDC summarizes the impact of 4% of the population
(its ‘gay’ segment)
on the United States as follows: 1.
While CDC estimates that MSM account for just 4 percent of the U.S. male population aged 13 and older, the rate of new HIV diagnoses among MSM in the U.S. is more than 44 times that of other men (range: 522
989 per 100,000 MSM vs. 12 per 100,000 other men). 2.
MSM are the only risk group in the U.S. in which new HIV infections are increasing. While new infections have declined among both heterosexuals and injection drug users, the annual number of new HIV infections among MSM has been steadily increasing since the early 1990s. 3.
MSM account for more than half of all new HIV infections in the U.S. each year (53%, or an estimated 28,700 infections). 4.
MSM account for nearly half of the more than one million people living with HIV in the U.S. (48%, or an estimated 532,000 total persons). What are the facts for Guyana?
Why won’t CARICOM, or sasod, address the impact of the LGBT
-pathologies on an unsuspecting world? We addressed the failure of the CARICOM Secretariat and PANCAP to consider the social-policy implications of being blindly led by "gay rights" groups in the on-line article "
The Case Against PANCAP and the Decriminalization of Homosexuality