IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
GREGORY S. HOLLISTER,et al. )Case Below 08-2254 JRAppellants,))v.)
) Consolidating No. 09-5161Barry Soetoro, et al., )Appellees.)
MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE REPLY BRIEF
Appellants hereby move the court to substitute the Appellants’ Reply Brief ofSeptember 18, 2009, filed inadvertently in the court’s ECF “Training” sectorrather than in its live data base,in lieu of the Reply Brief filed as anaccompaniment to former counsel Joyce’s “Emergency” Motion of September 22,2009.In advance of Counsel’s first online filing in this court, his assistant went tothe ‘training’ section to determine its various aspects, and differences between thissite and those other courts in which counsel’s assistant has filed electronically.When she went to the site to file the Appellants’ Reply brief on September 18,2009, unbeknownst to her, she was returned to the‘training’ rather than ‘live’sector, andfiled accordingly. She received an acknowledgement of docketingactivity, and obtained a PACER docket sheet; she and the undersigned believed thefiling was completed.
Page 1 / 3
Case: 09-5080 Document: 1218426 Filed: 12/01/2009 Page: 1