Page 33 December 2009
it possible that we are researching intelligent haunt-ings or possible visitations in the wrong manner?Residual hauntings are well documented to be anenergy imprint in time, which, in essence replaysitself over and over. In this case we have energy (e),and time (t), interacting with our three other dimen-sions (x,y,z). This in itself is fairly non conclusive to
what I‟ll be getting to, however, it does demonstrate
theoretically, how multiple dimensions may interactwith one another.Given the pre-established laws and the exampleof dimensional interaction, can we speculate thatintelligent hauntings are not necessarily the voice ofthe dearly departed, who are trapped here due totheir manner of death or other unfortunate circum-stance; but perhaps a form of multi dimensional en-ergy, or being, residing in a parallel universe at-tempting to communicate. EVP researchers have in-dicated precursor sounds, click, pops and others,which have no environmental explanations prior tothe capture of disembodied voices. Is it possible that
these sounds are a “window” of communication
opening and closing?As we are comprised of energy to a certain degree,where does this energy go if not destroyed? The FirstLaw of Thermodynamics clearly states that it cannot.Can one speculate the possibility that it may travel to
one of these “alternate” universes or dimensions just
out of our view? If so, there would have to be a meansof transfer, potentially working both directions allow-ing for communication from one side (dimension/universe) to another or as a form of free travel fromour dimensions to another.
I know for fact that I‟m not alone in my way of thinking, however, as I‟ve been told; this form of radi-
cal thinking is not always popular inside the scientificcommunity. Being one that has never really cared
about popularity, I say it‟s time to step it up a notch or
two, take a giant leap outside the box and take it un-der consideration. If everyone was afraid of poplaropinion, where would we be in life? Think about it.I throw this out for consideration and discussion. It
is not a proven fact, simply one person‟s theory. I
would invite anyone that disagrees with this to write inand let me know your thoughts, however, please keepit professional, factual, and on topic. This is to stimu-late a mental process, not cause arguments. Althoughdebates can be fun too.
Do you have a topic that you are passionate about? Some-thing that you feel should be said?A comment, criticism, or opinion on the field of paranor-mal research or its future?Make your voice heard in the ParaNexus Newsletter.All submissions may be sent to:ddesjadins@paranexus.org
Leave a Comment