Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Pedro Cordero-Cordero, A205 569 129 (BIA June 30, 2014)

Pedro Cordero-Cordero, A205 569 129 (BIA June 30, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 5|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record because the immigration judge declined to grant voluntary departure without explaining difference between pre-conclusion and post-conclusion voluntary departure. The decision was written by Member Sharon Hoffman.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record because the immigration judge declined to grant voluntary departure without explaining difference between pre-conclusion and post-conclusion voluntary departure. The decision was written by Member Sharon Hoffman.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Aug 04, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/04/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Zoila
M
Gomez, Esq Law Oices of oila
M
Gomez 170 Common Street Suite 101 Lawrence
MA
01840
 m  
Executive Oce r Immigration Reviw
Board of Imgraton Appeals Oce of the Clek
507
lesburg Pik. St
2000
Fas Ch1ch Vgn
2030
HSICE Office of Chief Counsel BOS P.O. Box 8728 oston
MA
02114 Name: CORDEROCORDERO PEDRO
A
205-569-129 Date of this notice: 6/302014
Encosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-rerenced case. Encosre
P b: H, h
Sincerel,
D
c
f
Donna Carr Che Clerk
schwrzA
 k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Pedro Cordero-Cordero, A205 569 129 (BIA June 30, 2014)
 
U.S Depaent of Justice
·Executive Oce
r
Imiaon Revew Decson of he Board of Imaon Appals Fas Church. Vrgna
20530
File: A205 69 129 -Boston, MA
In re: PEDRO COERO-OR DERO 
N MOVAL PROEEDNGS APPEAL Date ON BEHALF OF SPONDENT Zoila M. Gomez, Esquire APIATION Cotiuace; voluary depre
JUN 3 0 
2014 
The respondet, a ative d citizen of Mexico has appeaed om the Iiation Judges decision dated March 2, 2013. The Immiation Judge deied he respodet's request r voluy deparure, d ordered the respondent removed to Mexico The record will be remanded to he Immiation udge. The Bod reviews an Immitio Judges ndings of ct, icluding nings as to the credibii of testimony, under the "clely erroneous standard. 8 .F.R. § 003.(d)(3)(i). The Board reviews questions of law, discretio, ad judgment and all other issues in appeals om decisions of Imigratio Judges de novo 8 F.R § 003(d)(3)(ii)
Matter of A-S-B-,
24 &N Dec 493 (BI 2008). Upo revew of the record, at he Mrch 12, 2013 hearig, at which the respondent appeed pro se, he Imiation udge declined to grat he respondent vontary depure wihout t explaiing te dierence ewee precoclusion d postconclusion vontary depaure under sections 240B(a) and () of the Immiation and Nationaity Ac, 8 US. §229c(a) d
()  See Matter of ArgelesCampos,
22 I&N Dec. 81, 817 (BIA 1999)
Matter of Cordova
22 I&N Dec. 966 {BIA 999). The Imiation Judge concluded that the respodent declined to request voluntary depaure based o the respondets satemet hat he wished r  addional continuce to seek legal representatio (Tr. at 8).
1
Uder these circumstances, we conclude at a remd is warrated r the Imigration udge to provide the respodet wth a opporuty to pusue volutay deprre, eiter precoclusion or postconclusion and her r the Immigratio Judge to adequatey advise he respodet regrdig te dierence eween the two
1
We note that the respondent has not estblished a due process vioatio om te deia of a right to cose e record reects that the mgratio Judge, s required, infoed the respodet of s ight to conse d provided im wit a list of peowho ave idicated eir avaiaiity to represet lies in proceedigs o a pro oo basis (r. at 1 ). 8 U.S. § 362 8 F.R § 240.(a). The respodet had adequate oppoy to rein counse d he has not established preudice because he has ot shown prima cie eligibiliy r y relief other than volutry dearure, whch he wi be able to pursue on remand.
 See Perera v. Holder
50 F.3d 25 (1st Cir. 2014) (requirig a showing of preudice to suppor a due process caim). he respodent is ot precluded om seekng other relief ere the Iiatio Judge, provided hat the sands r reopening e met.
 See Matter of Patel
6 I&N Dec. 600 (BIA 1978)
Matter of M-D
24 &N Dec. 38 (BIA 2007)
Cite as: Pedro Cordero-Cordero, A205 569 129 (BIA June 30, 2014)
 
 A205 5� 2
 s of vounary deparure.
 See Maer of Cordova supra
a 70 n holding ha an Immiaion Judge mus advise a responden of he rms of reief r hich he or she is appenly eigile, incuding volun depure). Accordingly he llong order l e enered. OER e record is remded o he Imiaion Cour r rher proceedings consisen ih he regoing decision 2
Cite as: Pedro Cordero-Cordero, A205 569 129 (BIA June 30, 2014)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->