PANCAP uses the astonishingly naive imperative that it will facilitate "access" by members of the homosexual community to PLWHA treatment, forgetting that most HIV/AIDS treatment in the Caribbean is anonymous anyway, and that the homosexuality community is associated with a phenomenal and disproportionate incidence of disease (in 1987 responsible for more than 50% of the USA's cases of syphillis, while only representing 2% of the population). The mental disorder, and its definitive manifestation sodomy, fuels the spread of HIV/AIDS.
One of the major objectives of this exercise will be to expose readers in the Caribbean to the solid evidence hitherto avoided, and to show that almost every argument posted by pro-gay or gay-militant contributors will, upon closer examination, be seen to have engaged in outright lies, twisted logic, wholesale efforts at deception, or some subtle combination of the three.
PANCAP\u2019s education in this regard should begin by noting the words of homosexual activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen outlined in the law review \u201cCrafting Bi/Homosexual Youth\u201d, by Judith Reisman, (ht t p: / / www.re gent .edu/ news/ l awrevi ew/ art i cl es/ 14_2R ei sm an.doc ; 14 REGENT U. L. REV. 283, 326 (2002)
\u201cTo hide the fact that most AIDS children appear to be infected by bi/homosexuals, the "World AIDS Day" artfully reports that "16% of adolescents with AIDS, aged 13 through 19 . . . have been infected through heterosexual contact,\u201d rather than that 84% of AIDS children are infected by male bi/homosexual sex abuse."
"The political proposals advanced by an increasingly aggressive group of gay activists ... merit and demand serious discussion and rational analysis. Unfortunately, gay rights proposals have often received neither. The seriousness of the issues has not been matched by a seriousness of analysis. There has been a curious inversion: a high level of public policy interest; a low level of public policy debate." (Magnuson, p. 137)
reflect the true evidence, and the views, of a majority of the population in the Caribbean:
First the wider issues...
Gay militants in the homosexual community should be exposed for what they are, sellers of fake goods whose mission seems to be nothing less than the destruction of Christianity and the Judeo-Christian ethic.
Under the guise of \u201cfacilitating access to treatment for MSMs\u201d what PANCAP will essentially be doing is to propose to the Caribbean people a new schema of \u201cgay rights\u201d and \u201cboy-girl-child-prostitutes rights\u201d. Essential reading is the book by lawyer and author Roger Magnuson (\u201cAre Gay Rights Right:
to other human rights legislation. If human rights laws have provided protection to other minorities, why should society not add one more group to those protected from discrimination? Hitching their wagon to the broadly based support Americans have traditionally given civil rights laws, gay rights advocates have made surprising progress in the past decade.
The human rights analogy, though popular and politically understandable, cannot withstand careful analysis. Adding homosexual behaviour to a list of classes that includes racial and religious minorities makes no sense. The tenuous balance of social interests represented by these laws is reflected in the few, and carefully chosen, classes they protect. Relief has been given only in extraordinary circumstances.
(1) A demonstrable pattern of discrimination \u2026
(2) \u2026 based on criteria that are arbitrary and irrational \u2026
(3) \u2026 causing substantial injury \u2026
(4) \u2026 to a class of people with an unchangeable or immutable status \u2026
(5) \u2026 which has no element of moral fault.\u201d
Secondly, the entire Western world, and those nations that have adopted the Judeo-Christian ethic, should acknowledge the evidence, both secular and Biblical, against homosexuality and gay militancy ... and thereafter repeal the destructive inroads on various creation-structures that gay-militancy has been directly responsible for in our culture: attacks on marriage, manhood, womanhood, family ...
\u201cWhen protecting one\u2019s inalienable and civil rights, the government must discern between liberty and license. This requires that rights attach to persons because of their humanity, not because of their behaviors, and certainly not those behaviors that Western legal and moral tradition has regarded as inimical to the "Laws of Nature and of Nature\u2019s God," as stated in the Declaration.
Yet, today some advocate granting "rights" to behaviors hostile to the most fundamental forms of self-government\u2014family, church, and community. This is especially the case with homosexual activists, who ironically seek to hijack the moral capital of the civil rights movement.\u201d
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?