LMCENTENO@adams.edu
Office Hours: M-Th, 11-12 and by appointment
ES 332, 719-587-7923
10% Media Coverage of Female Candidates 5% Discussion Points
media coverage of a female candidate and male candidate running for the same
position. The media coverage may be from any reliable, widespread source (if a
television or radio piece, locate the transcript). Compare the media coverage of the two
candidates in a short analysis. Be prepared to discuss. See schedule for due date.
demonstrate that he/she has completed and critically analyzed the readings. (The
lowest grade will be dropped.) These will also serve as points of discussion in class. All
assignments must be typed unless otherwise indicated. Assignments will be graded
based on the depth of analysis. See schedule for specific assignments and due dates
organizational websites (such as that of the WTO), will not be accepted.
Internet sources should come from sites with URLs ending in .gov or
.edu. Avoid .com sites, with the exception of some online journals
such as foreignpolicy.com.
Any phrases,
paraphrases, terms, concepts, facts and/or figures applied from other sources
must be cited correctly. All phrases or sentences that are not in your own
words must be in quotation marks.
Please see the
College\u2019s definition of plagiarism at
http://www2.adams.edu/library/plagiarism/plagiarism.php
Plagiarism will result
in a failing grade for the assignment. Second, or more serious first
offenses will result in a failing grade for the course and notification sent
to the Provost.
McCormick, John P. 2006. \u201cContain the Wealthy and Patrol the Magistrates: Restoring Elite Accountability to Popular Government.\u201dAmerican Political Science Review 100(2): 148-164.
Ancient democracies assumed that law and public policy would not express the
common good unless large numbers of nonwealthy citizens participated in government
by holding office themselves. Wealthy citizens, despite promises to the contrary, were
expected to pursue their own interests, and not those of the general populace on
ascension to office\u2014\u2013a danger exacerbated in electoral systems where the wealthy
monopolize offices. To avoid the \u201caristocratic effect\u201d of election (Manin 1997, 42\u201393),
ancient democracies assigned most magistracies by citizen-wide lotteries or \u201csortitions\u201d
and observed frequent rotation in office (Hansen 1991, 230\u201331; cf. Duxbury 1999). In
keeping with the egalitarian aspirations and distrust of oligarchy characterizing such
Leave a Comment