Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
2014-08-18 State of Israel v Rafi Rotem (1074-02-13) in the Tel Aviv Magistrate Court - Notice of evidence of perversion of justice and fraud on the court, served on Supreme Court Presiding Justice Asher Grunis and Tel Aviv Magistrate Court Presiding Judge Zivah Hadassi Herman // מדינת ישראל נ רפי רותם ( 1074-02-13 ) בבית המשפט השלום ת"א - הודעה על ראיות לשיבוש הליכי משפט והונאה בבית המשפט, הומצאה לנשיא בית המשפט העליון אשר גרוניס ונשיאת בית המשפט השלום ת"א זיוה הדסי הרמן.

2014-08-18 State of Israel v Rafi Rotem (1074-02-13) in the Tel Aviv Magistrate Court - Notice of evidence of perversion of justice and fraud on the court, served on Supreme Court Presiding Justice Asher Grunis and Tel Aviv Magistrate Court Presiding Judge Zivah Hadassi Herman // מדינת ישראל נ רפי רותם ( 1074-02-13 ) בבית המשפט השלום ת"א - הודעה על ראיות לשיבוש הליכי משפט והונאה בבית המשפט, הומצאה לנשיא בית המשפט העליון אשר גרוניס ונשיאת בית המשפט השלום ת"א זיוה הדסי הרמן.

Ratings: (0)|Views: 18|Likes:
Attached please find a copy of the records in the court file in reference, as
inspected and copied on July 17, 2014 from the party terminal and/or office of the
clerk terminal of the Tel Aviv Magistrate Court. With the records also please find
analysis, outlined below, which provides evidence of lack of integrity and validity
of the records and in court procedures in this case:
1. No attorney ever filed a Power of Attorney certificate.
2. Attorneys from the Public Defender's office appeared as Counsel for Defendant,
in disregard of the Criminal Court Procedures Act of the State of Israel,
pertaining to the appointment of public defender and his replacement by the
Court.
3. One such counsel, Attorney Sadeh, provided preliminary agreement, without
the Defendant's knowledge, to conduct trial with no appearance of witnesses for
the prosecution.
4. Five (5) records of minutes and decisions by Judge Predalsky are listed as
entered, but none is listed as served on the parties by the Court.
5. Two hearings are listed under "Arraignment", but in neither was the pleading of
the Defendant "Guilty", or "Not guilty", recorded. With it, in a later hearing,
Judge Predalsky states, "If the Defendant continues his denial of the charges we
have to set up a trial date".
6. Almost a year and a half after the filing of the Indictment, the Defendant and
his counsel (if there is any) were not given full access to the evidence, held by
the Prosecution.
7. The electronic court file includes hyperlinks to seven (7) external investigation
files of the Tel Aviv police, which are inaccessible to the Defendant, in
disregard of the Criminal Court Procedures Act, which prohibits the filing in
court of evidence, unless the Defendant or his counsel were given reasonable
opportunity to inspect it.
Combined, the evidence must raise serious concerns regarding perversion of
justice and fraud on the court in this case.
Moreover, such conduct is likely to be perceived as continuation of what was
previously described by Israeli media as the "decade-long abuse" of Mr Rotem -
the Tax Authority whistle-blower - by the Israeli courts. [i,ii,iii]
מצורפים להודעה זאת הכתבים בתיק בית המשפט שבנידון, כפי שהועתקו ביום ה 17- ליולי,
2014 , ממסוף גישת בעלי דין ו/או מסוף המזכירות בבית המשפט השלום ת"א. יחד עם
הכתבים מצורפת גם בדיקה של הכתבים והליכים בבית המשפט בתיק זה, שתקצירה להלן:
1) אף לא ייפוי כוח אחד נרשם על ידי באי הכוח שהופיעו בתיק זה.
2) עורכי דין מן הסנגוריה הציבורית הופיעו כבאי כוחו של הנאשם והוחלפו תוך התעלמות
מהוראות חוק סדר הדין הפלילי לעניין מינויים והחלפתם של סנגורים על ידי בית המשפט.
3) אחד מעורכי הדין האלה, עו"ד שדה, נתן הסכמה ראשונית, ללא ידיעת הנאשם, לניהול
משפט בו יתקבלו ראיות ללא הופעת עדים.
4) חמישה ( 5) כתבי פרוטוקולים והחלטות על ידי השופטת פרדלסקי נרשמו בתיק זה, אך
לא נרשמה המצאת אף אחד מכתבים אלה לצדדים.
5) שני דיונים נרשמו תחת הכותרת "הקראה", אך באף אחד מהם לא נרשם אם הנאשם
הודה או כפר בסעיפי כתב האישום. יחד עם זאת, אומרת השופטת פרדלסקי בדיון מאוחר
יותר, שאם הנאשם ימשיך לכפור באישומים, יהיה צורך לקבוע מועד למשפט.
6) כמעט שנה וחצי לאחר הגשת כתב האישום, הנאשם ובאי כוחו (אם יש כאלה) עדיין לא
קבלו גישה לכל חומר הראיות.
7) התיק האלקטרוני מראה שבעה ( 7) קישורי רשת לתיקי חקירה של משטרת מחוז ת"א,
אך קישורים אלה אינם נגישים לנאשם, לעומת זאת, חוק סדר הדין הפלילי אומר שלא יוגשו
ראיות לבית המשפט אם לא ניתנה לנאשם או לבא כוחו הזדמנות סבירה לעיין בהם.
יחדיו, הראיות מעלות חשש כבד לשיבוש הליכי משפט והונאה בבית המשפט בתיק זה.
בנוסף, התנהלות זאת תיחשב קרוב לודאי כהמשך מה שתואר בעבר על ידי התקשורת
כ"עשור שבתי המשפט מתעמרים בלוחם הצדק", מר רפי רותם - חושף השחיתויות ברשות
[i-iii] . המסים
Attached please find a copy of the records in the court file in reference, as
inspected and copied on July 17, 2014 from the party terminal and/or office of the
clerk terminal of the Tel Aviv Magistrate Court. With the records also please find
analysis, outlined below, which provides evidence of lack of integrity and validity
of the records and in court procedures in this case:
1. No attorney ever filed a Power of Attorney certificate.
2. Attorneys from the Public Defender's office appeared as Counsel for Defendant,
in disregard of the Criminal Court Procedures Act of the State of Israel,
pertaining to the appointment of public defender and his replacement by the
Court.
3. One such counsel, Attorney Sadeh, provided preliminary agreement, without
the Defendant's knowledge, to conduct trial with no appearance of witnesses for
the prosecution.
4. Five (5) records of minutes and decisions by Judge Predalsky are listed as
entered, but none is listed as served on the parties by the Court.
5. Two hearings are listed under "Arraignment", but in neither was the pleading of
the Defendant "Guilty", or "Not guilty", recorded. With it, in a later hearing,
Judge Predalsky states, "If the Defendant continues his denial of the charges we
have to set up a trial date".
6. Almost a year and a half after the filing of the Indictment, the Defendant and
his counsel (if there is any) were not given full access to the evidence, held by
the Prosecution.
7. The electronic court file includes hyperlinks to seven (7) external investigation
files of the Tel Aviv police, which are inaccessible to the Defendant, in
disregard of the Criminal Court Procedures Act, which prohibits the filing in
court of evidence, unless the Defendant or his counsel were given reasonable
opportunity to inspect it.
Combined, the evidence must raise serious concerns regarding perversion of
justice and fraud on the court in this case.
Moreover, such conduct is likely to be perceived as continuation of what was
previously described by Israeli media as the "decade-long abuse" of Mr Rotem -
the Tax Authority whistle-blower - by the Israeli courts. [i,ii,iii]
מצורפים להודעה זאת הכתבים בתיק בית המשפט שבנידון, כפי שהועתקו ביום ה 17- ליולי,
2014 , ממסוף גישת בעלי דין ו/או מסוף המזכירות בבית המשפט השלום ת"א. יחד עם
הכתבים מצורפת גם בדיקה של הכתבים והליכים בבית המשפט בתיק זה, שתקצירה להלן:
1) אף לא ייפוי כוח אחד נרשם על ידי באי הכוח שהופיעו בתיק זה.
2) עורכי דין מן הסנגוריה הציבורית הופיעו כבאי כוחו של הנאשם והוחלפו תוך התעלמות
מהוראות חוק סדר הדין הפלילי לעניין מינויים והחלפתם של סנגורים על ידי בית המשפט.
3) אחד מעורכי הדין האלה, עו"ד שדה, נתן הסכמה ראשונית, ללא ידיעת הנאשם, לניהול
משפט בו יתקבלו ראיות ללא הופעת עדים.
4) חמישה ( 5) כתבי פרוטוקולים והחלטות על ידי השופטת פרדלסקי נרשמו בתיק זה, אך
לא נרשמה המצאת אף אחד מכתבים אלה לצדדים.
5) שני דיונים נרשמו תחת הכותרת "הקראה", אך באף אחד מהם לא נרשם אם הנאשם
הודה או כפר בסעיפי כתב האישום. יחד עם זאת, אומרת השופטת פרדלסקי בדיון מאוחר
יותר, שאם הנאשם ימשיך לכפור באישומים, יהיה צורך לקבוע מועד למשפט.
6) כמעט שנה וחצי לאחר הגשת כתב האישום, הנאשם ובאי כוחו (אם יש כאלה) עדיין לא
קבלו גישה לכל חומר הראיות.
7) התיק האלקטרוני מראה שבעה ( 7) קישורי רשת לתיקי חקירה של משטרת מחוז ת"א,
אך קישורים אלה אינם נגישים לנאשם, לעומת זאת, חוק סדר הדין הפלילי אומר שלא יוגשו
ראיות לבית המשפט אם לא ניתנה לנאשם או לבא כוחו הזדמנות סבירה לעיין בהם.
יחדיו, הראיות מעלות חשש כבד לשיבוש הליכי משפט והונאה בבית המשפט בתיק זה.
בנוסף, התנהלות זאת תיחשב קרוב לודאי כהמשך מה שתואר בעבר על ידי התקשורת
כ"עשור שבתי המשפט מתעמרים בלוחם הצדק", מר רפי רותם - חושף השחיתויות ברשות
[i-iii] . המסים

More info:

Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on Aug 18, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/11/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
Human Rights Alert
 (NGO)
 
(NGO)
י כזל
 
גייסדאה
 
Joseph Zernik, PhD
נרצ
 
ףסו
'
רד
 PO Box 334!, "e# $%i%, &sre#
ד
()334!*() +-333- -.34/x012i#56o
[
 ה תירבע
]
August 17, 2014Presiding Justice Asher GrunisSupreme Court of the State of IsraelShaare !ishpat Street, Jerusalem" certified mailPresiding Judge #i$a %adassi %erman&el A$i$ !agistrate Court1 'eit(mann Street, &el A$i$" certified mail
RE:
 State of Israel v Rafi Rotem
 (1074-02-13) in the Tel Ai !agistrate "#urt - N#ti$e #% ei&en$e #% 'erersi#n #% usti$e an& %rau& #n the $#urt
)our *ritten response *ithin 14 das is +indl reuested-.ear Presiding Justice Grunis and Presiding Judge %adassi %erman/Attached please find a cop of the records in the court file in reference, as inspected and copied on Jul 17, 2014 from the part terminal andor office of the cler+ terminal of the &el A$i$ !agistrate Court- 'ith the records also please find analsis, outlined elo*, *hich pro$ides e$idence of lac+ of integrit and $alidit of the records and in court procedures in this case/
1-
 o attorne e$er filed a Po*er of Attorne certificate-
2-
Attornes from the Pulic .efender3s office appeared as Counsel for .efendant,in disregard of the
Criminal Court Procedures Act 
 of the State of Israel,  pertaining to the appointment of pulic defender and his replacement  the Court-
-
5ne such counsel, Attorne Sadeh, pro$ided preliminar agreement, *ithout the .efendant3s +no*ledge, to conduct trial *ith no appearance of *itnesses for the prosecution-
4-
6i$e 89 records of minutes and decisions  Judge Predals+ are listed as entered, ut none is listed as ser$ed on the parties  the Court-
8-
&*o hearings are listed under :Arraignment:, ut in neither *as the pleading of the .efendant :Guilt:, or :ot guilt:, recorded- 'ith it, in a later hearing, Judge Predals+ states, :If the .efendant continues his denial of the charges *eha$e to set up a trial date:-
;-
Almost a ear and a half after the filing of the Indictment, the .efendant and his counsel if there is an9 *ere not gi$en full access to the e$idence, held  the Prosecution-
7-
&he electronic court file includes hperlin+s to se$en 79 e<ternal in$estigation files of the &el A$i$ police, *hich are inaccessile to the .efendant, in
1;
Digitally signed by Joseph Zernik, PhD Date: 2014.08.17 14:42:28 +03'00'
 
2014-08-18 By certified mail RC057693644IL z2014-08-18 By certified mail RC057693595IL jz
 
disregard of the
Criminal Court Procedures Act,
*hich prohiits the filing in court of e$idence, unless the .efendant or his counsel *ere gi$en reasonale opportunit to inspect it-Comined, the e$idence must raise serious concerns regarding per$ersion of  =ustice and fraud on the court in this case-!oreo$er, such conduct is li+el to e percei$ed as continuation of *hat *as  pre$iousl descried  Israeli media as the :decade>long ause: of !r ?otem > the &a< Authorit *histle>lo*er >  the Israeli courts- @
i
,
,
6urthermore, the 1B count indictment in this case is mostl deri$ed from allegations of $iolations of the penal code of the State of Israel, relati$e to/ a9 Insulting a pulic ser$ice person, 9 %arassment through *ire communications- %o*e$er, it should e noted that !r ?otem3s alleged conduct, from *hich the indictment originates, *as in part related to his efforts to gain ual Protection under the Da*- Such protection has een consistentl denied for o$er 12 ears, under patronage of the courts- 5ther parts of the alleged conduct too+ place duringa series of incidents, descried  media as retaliator false arrests  the &el A$i$Police- @
,
$
 .uring such incidents !r ?otem *as often +ept hand and leg cuffed for hours, humiliated, andor eaten- &o the est of m +no*ledge, to this date, none of the Israel Police personnel, in$ol$ed in such indictments, has een held accountale-&herefore, under such circumstances, the indictment andor criminal prosecution of !r ?otem  the &el A$i$ Police, the same agenc *hich has engaged in his ause and intimidation, should e deemed in material contradiction *ith the fundamental principles of Justice and 6air &rial- 5$erall, the conduct of the case in reference in the &el A$i$ !agistrate Court should e deemed serious $iolations of the %uman ?ights of .efendant ?afi ?otem- &he other aspect of the ?afi ?otem affair is the refusal of la* enforcement agencies to in$estigate his *histle>lo*ing allegations of corruption of senior officers in the &a< Authorit- !a=or part of such allegations is related to the closing or disappearance of ta< in$estigation files of enormous sums, relati$e to the income and assets of the a$erage citi(en in Israel- &he aorted in$estigations *ere related to tcoons, organi(ed crime figures, and persons and corporations related to the ruling part-Comined, the aorted ta< in$estigations, the refusal to in$estigate the allegations of corruption in the &a< Authorit, and the persecution of !r ?otem for o$er a decade, all appear to ser$e the interests of the same parties- Ender such circumstances, it is not surprising that ?afi ?otem is often percei$ed as the poster>child of go$ernment corruption in the State of Israel in general, and the central role of the =ustice sstem in such corruption in particular-It should also e noted/
1-
&he records in the case in reference also pro$ide additional e$idence for the fraud inherent in the implementation and operation of et %a!ishpat > the casemanagement and pulic access sstem of the district and magistrate courts in the State of Israel- &he E %uman ?ights Council Periodic ?e$ie* report on %uman ?ights in the State of Israel 2019 noted :lac+ of integrit: in the sstem- @
,
,
,
 %o*e$er, the case in reference pro$ides direct e$idence for the emploment of et %a!ishpat as a tool for depri$ation of %uman ?ights-
2-
"oth Presiding Judge %adassi %erman and :Chief Cler+: ?ahamim Asher of the &el A$i$ !agistrate Court ha$e so far failed to respond on a reuest for
2;
 
 presenting the appointment record of !r Asher as :Chief Cler+:- @
<
 &here is a reasonale foundation to suspect that !r Asher is onl an impostor, *ho appears as :Chief Cler+: *ith no la*ful appointment- &he %uman ?ights AlertG59 sumission, *hich *as incorporated into the E %uman ?ights Council Periodic ?e$ie* report on %uman ?ights in the State of Israel 2019, noted similar conditions in the Supreme Court and the district courts in Israel- @
'ith it, it should e noted that the Israeli courts themsel$es ruled that a court *ith no la*ful office of the cler+ is an incompetent court- &he case in reference pro$ides e$idence for the outcome of such circumstances in the depri$ation of %uman ?ights-A 201 media inter$ie* *ith former Israeli Attorne General !enachem !a(u( descries the &a< Authorit scandal as the closest to organi(ed crime in go$ernment- @
 And alread a 200B report  the ES Amassador to Israel James Cunningham descries the effecti$e merger of organi(ed crime and go$ernment agencies in Israel- @
%o*e$er, oth did not consider the courts part of such  phenomenon- In contrast, there is good reason for concern that the case in reference *ould e deemed direct e$idence for the central role of the courts and the =ustice and la* enforcement sstems in Israel in the e$olution of *hat is referred to in criminolog as :state organi(ed crime:-&rul,Joseph #erni+, Ph.%uman ?ights Alert G595ccup&DFCC/ Acti$ists, media, nesset, legal professionals HHHH  &he %uman ?ights Alert G59 sumission to the %uman ?ights Council of the Enited ations *as incorporated into the 2010 Periodic ?e$ie* ?eport regarding %uman ?ights in the Enited States, *ith the note/ :corruption of the courts and thelegal profession and discrimination  la* enforcement in California:-  &he %uman ?ights Alert G59 sumission to the %uman ?ights Council of the Enited ations *as incorporated into the 201 Periodic ?e$ie* ?eport regarding %uman ?ights in Israel, *ith the note/ :lac+ of integrit of the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel-:
*+N,:
"elo*

-!+7
סו
8
ו
*9 .-4
ס נור
8
ר
:* ;
ו
9<= 7>:?= )
 
@ *
 
:
נ
;
ו
9<= 7>:?= )
 
@A
 
9:
ור
+7>:?
ר
<: '
ר
A
ו
:
ר
 
ר
*
וד
@;?
ר
=
סד
= =
ו
C *() A
ו
9:= 7>:?= )
 
@ )*
 
:
נ
*() A
ו
9:= 7>:?= )
 
@
;

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->