Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
12 Angry Men

12 Angry Men

Ratings: (0)|Views: 299|Likes:
Published by Aaron Merrill
12 Angry Men
12 Angry Men

More info:

Published by: Aaron Merrill on Dec 05, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/14/2013

pdf

text

original

 
12 Angry Men
Every man put on trial is considered innocent until proven guilty.In 12 Angry Men this theory can almost be considered false to the jurors involved in this murder case. But one man can be creditedwith sticking to the innocent until proven guilty theory that mostlikely saved a man’s life. This juror must show 11 other jurors thathe can prove with enough valid evidence that this boy is bewrongfully accused of killing his father. Reginald Rose shows ushow that one mans integrity can prove to make a big difference ina kid’s life. Juror #8 can be credited with saving someone’s life.Under intense and hostile scrutiny juror #8 is the only juror tovote not guilty on the stabbing death of a boy’s father. #8 doesn’tbelieve straight out that this boy is innocent of this crime. #8believes that it would wrong to send a boy off to be executedwithout discussing it first. Jurors #3 and #10 are the most hostileof the jurors. They believe deep down that this boy killed hisfather. They believe that everything they heard in the courtroomholds true and they don’t really want to see this kid live anylonger. Juror #8 still had reasonable doubt about the murder. Hedoesn’t want to vote guilty until he has enough evidence that thisboy did indeed kill his father. Many different points are madeabout the boy who supposedly stabbed his father, that are crossexamined well by juror #8 who still stands alone at not guilty. Allof the evidence that the 11 jurors found contains flaws in them.For instance the woman who supposedly witnessed the stabbingwasn’t wearing her glasses. Also the stab wound in the boysfather was made so that a taller man or boy could have made thattype of wound with a switchblade knife. When these key pieces of evidence becomes clearer to the 11 jurors we start to see jurorsquestioning there own guilty vote. #9 is the second juror to voteguilty, because he too has some reasonable doubt. As moreevidence is put on the table the 12 jurors come together and

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Kshtj Aakash liked this
Melissa Nagle liked this
Andrei Morariu liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->