Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
20140824 to EWOV2004-317-570 COMPLAINT Etc-Re GWMWater - Re 2305224 Creditcollect 369335-Suplement 10

20140824 to EWOV2004-317-570 COMPLAINT Etc-Re GWMWater - Re 2305224 Creditcollect 369335-Suplement 10

Ratings: (0)|Views: 4|Likes:
How many persons may have suffered ill-health or even death because of “untreated water” supplied through their taps?
How many persons may have suffered ill-health or even death because of “untreated water” supplied through their taps?

More info:

Categories:Types, Presentations
Published by: Gerrit Hendrik Schorel-Hlavka on Aug 24, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/24/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
Page
1
 Page 1 24-8-2014 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INDEPENDENT
 Consultant (Constitutionalist)
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1
st
 edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD
 ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE
: You may order books in the
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series
 by making a reservation, by fax 0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com 
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Energy and Water Ombudsman Victoria
 24-8-2014
5 Cc:
Chairman Peter Vogel (And other members of the Board of Directors) GWMWater
 info@gwmwater.org.au Ref: 2305224 Credit Collect creditcollect@creditcollect.com.au Ref 369335
Ref;
20140824-to EWOV 2004/317 COMPLAINT etc-Re GWMWater - Re 2305224 creditcollect 369335
 – 
 
10
Supplement 10
 
Sir, first of all I like to thank Mr
Jonathan Surtees, Lead Conciliator regarding his 14 August 2014 correspondence. However, as it appears toomit some issues I will seek to compliment some details for consideration.
15
In recent weeks a woman happen to mention to me that her adult son had been travelling into the coutry and had been refilling his water bottle at petrol stations and then had fallen so severely ill that at one stage she thought he was dying. It reminded me on that in April 1992 my sister and our 86 year uncle arrived in Berruiwillock, and the
20
next day our uncle had died. First I asked if it could have been jet lag but the medical reported ruled this out. I now question if his death may have related to the untreated water that is supplied to Berriwillock. I have made a submuission to a Federal authority that in my view where it can be established that due to the failure of staff and/or directors of a water supplier a person dies from unrtreated water then there should  be a min imum period of 10 years imprisonment . We cannot have that water suppliers can flaunt the
Safe
25
Water Act 200
 and other legal requirements while hypocritically issueing infringement notices upon customers. Finers against water suppliers will likely be charged back against inn ocent customers and so fininf staff and/or boardmembers themselves may have a better effect.
I view that what should be done is a comprehensive investigation as to illnesses and deaths of  people if they may be associated with drinking untreated water. It may resolve some unexplained 30 deaths, even regarding people who visited country area
s where untreated water is supplied.
.
I will give an example how things may be different then assumed originally. With the Titanic it was always assumed that an iceberg cause so severe damages that it cause the 35 Titanic to sink, however it is since established that poor quality of rivets actually resulted to the Titanic sinking.
Using ship parts and sample steel from the underwater wreckage of the
Titanic 
, a team of metallurgists
40
and naval architects tested the integrity of these materials. Initial test revealed that the steel used for the hull passed the standards of that era. The investigating team narrowed their focus to the rivets that were used to hold together the steel hull.
Titanic 
 needed 3,000,000 rivets to piece together the outer hull made of three centimeter-thick steel plates. Investigators found out that the rivets were not made of pure steel. The rivets were formed by means of melting metal slugs with steel, thereby, weakening
45
the integrity of the rivets.
 
 
Page
2
 Page 2 24-8-2014 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INDEPENDENT
 Consultant (Constitutionalist)
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1
st
 edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD
 ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE
: You may order books in the
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series
 by making a reservation, by fax 0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com 
Had the rivets were not compromised, the hull could have withstand 14,000 pounds of impact. The naval engineers replicated the rivets used in the Titanic. After producing the replica of the rivets, the investigators tested them and they snapped just after applying 7,000 pounds of pressure.
END QUOTE
The wreckage of MH17 seems to show that as like with the Titanic the rivet system failure that 5 may actually have caused more harm then realised so far. The question is if this, as I view likely, is with all Boeings in particular with Boeing 777 then need those countersank rivets to be replaced? Consider the huge associated cost of doing so! Then again, consider how not a missile itself may have caused MH17 to go down but the weakness in the panels and rivets of MH17. 10 The document dealing with this and other issues (including images to prove it) can be downloaded from:
The above link is to my investigation that may expose that not a missile but the weakness in 15 rivets and panels may have been the real cause of MH17 crashing, and the may eventuate, if not already did so, with other planes, due to the weakness in rivets and plates. As such, unexplained deaths or other deaths may have been overlooked as to any connection with
untreated water
 and I view it is essential that a comprehensive and throughout investigation is conducted in that regard. 20 A person already suffering ill health may have had
untreated water
 as so to say the final straw that broke the camel
s back. I am slowly unearthing past newsletters from GWMWater and it is clear it provided a pipeline to Berriwillock, but somehow seemed not to bother about treating the water supply. This even so Wonthaggi Desalination Plant is costing taxpayers a lot of money being mothballed. As such it is 25 not a lack of
treated water
 but a deliberate refusal by GWMWater to supply
treated water 
! In my view this is a criminal conduct where this defies not just the
Safe Water Act 2003 
 but also other water related legislative provisions.
30
www.theage.com.au › 
QUOTE
 by Henrietta Cook - Mar 27, 2014 -
“A full
desalinated water
 order for 2014-15 would cost Melbourne families an extra $114 ... Conservatives battle to take control of the
Victorian
 . 35
 
$613m for desalination plant, no water ordered
40
Victoria Date March 27, 2014
State Political Reporter at The Age 
 
Victorians will pay $613 million for the desalination plant this year, despite not a drop of water ever being
45
ordered from the plant.
 
 
Page
3
 Page 3 24-8-2014 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INDEPENDENT
 Consultant (Constitutionalist)
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1
st
 edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD
 ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE
: You may order books in the
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series
 by making a reservation, by fax 0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com 
 
Water Minister Peter Walsh said a recent refinancing of the desaliniation plant would save Victorian families $187 million on their water bills. He announced on Thursday that for the third consecutive year, he would not order any water from the Wonthaggi plant, which was built under the former Brumby Labor government.
“Total contract costs, without ordering water, still stand at $18.3 billion over 2
7 years but this is a $1.2 billion
5
improvement on the deal Labor signed
 –
 a deal they tried to hide from Melbourne households." He said Melbourne's water supplies were at 74 per cent and there was no need to order any water from the plant.
 A full desalinated water order for 2014-15 would cost Melbourne families an extra $114 million and would be a waste of money given the healthy dam levels.
10
The multi-billion dollar desalination plant was commissioned by the Labor government in 2007 and has been criticised for being too expensive. Mr Walsh said changes to the previous contract, including new electricty arrangements and the withholding of payments because the project was late, had saved Victorians $1.2 billion. In 2013-14 the plant cost taxpayers about $632 million.
15
END QUOTE
While GWMwater claimed
Water quality improvements
 reality is that as the 2004 bill showed the
untreated water
 marking, as did bills prior to this also. Meaning a compensation 20 must be backdated for as long GWMWater and its predecessor Grampians Water failed to  provide drinking water fit for human consumption. Not to do so means that water suppliers can deliberately defy legal provisions and get away with it. By this undermine also government  policies, as well as unduly leaves the health, wellbeing and lives at risk. 25

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->