Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1




|Views: 313|Likes:
Published by Timothy

More info:

Published by: Timothy on Dec 07, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Climategate is here. This is the sea change and it might be the beginning of theend of the massive propaganda about the man-made global warming myth. It'sgreat news, but we have a long way to go of course.
is about howman-made climate scientists have been ousted as trying to exclude contraryviewpoints from important scientific publications.People allegedly hackedthousands of emails and documents from the Climate Research Unit at EastAnglia University last week. It's wrong to hack someone's private work, but theseemails show many references to an agenda to shut down scientific debate onglobal warming via stopping counter evidence from being presented to the public.
These emails date back from 1996 among U.S. and U.K. based scientists. Thesescientists want alternative viewpoints out of the public domain as classified as"disinformation" and "misinformation."
They wanted dissenting views gone fromthe reports in the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change or the IPCC.In one of the emails,Phil Jones, the director of the East Anglia climate center,suggested to climate scientist Michael Mann of Penn State University that: “…We“will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-reviewliterature is!”That's interesting since Jones and Mann are climate scientists. Theyhave authority to review papers and determine whether they are eligible to bepublished by scientific journals. Mann even discussed how todestroy a journalthat had published papers with contrary views, telling his colleagues that hebelieved it had been “hijacked by a few skeptics on the editorial board” who had“staged a coup." “Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climateresearch community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal.” Mannwrote. In another email, Tom Wigley says that the journal in question (or "Climate
Research") encourages false science to stimulate debate.
Wigley is the climatescientist at the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (or in theUCAR). These scientists have influence in the IPCC, which have a role inKyoto and Copenhagen meetings.
Wigley wrote of these things. He also wrotethat a group of 50+ scientists could be gotten together to put their names to aletter to add weight to the claim and hopefully help to remove the editorial board of the journal. Other emails have these scientists refusing to send dissenting data toindependent scientists. This is against the concept of engaging in scientificdebate. Climate scientist Dr. Tim Ball calls this news as contrary to scientificinquiry and it exposing the myth of the hockey stick graph. It's wrong to control thepeer reviewing process in a journal where you ignore data or reject it without realdebate publicly. These small scientists doing this evil are influencing the HadleyCentre (which controls the data on global temperature via the Hadley ClimateResearch Unit. They influence the IPCC by manipulation). The consensus onglobal warming is a myth, because thousands of scientists have different points of view on climate change.
In 2 years, there are over 500 peer reviewed scientificresearch papers on climate change.
 These were written between 2004 and2007. Less than 1/2 of these reports endorsed the "consensus view" of humans mostly contributing to global climate change.
So, evidence isabundant that IPCC connected climate scientists to block dissenting opinion onclimate change, regardless of its scientific merit.
“This is horrible,” said PatMichaels, a climate scientist at the Cato Institute in Washington who isdirectlythreatened with physical violencein the emails. “This is what everyone feared.Over the years, it has become increasingly difficult for anyone who does not viewglobal warming as an end-of-the-world issue to publish papers. This isn’tquestionable practice, this is unethical.” John Christy, a scientist at the Universityof Alabama at Huntsville attacked in the emails for asking that an IPCC reportinclude dissenting viewpoints, said, “It’s disconcerting to realize that legislativeactions this nation is preparing to take, and which will cost trillions of dollars, arebased upon a view of climate that has not been completely scientifically tested.”So, the truth is coming out that climate change is more related to natural forcesplus the sun beyond human intervention.Climate gate has been exposed by many quarters, but not that much by themainstream media. Lord Christopher Monckton want the United Nations to be shutdown and Al Gore to be arrested. The climate change scam has been exposed in2009 like in no other time in history.
He said that these eco-extremists who arethreatening to shut down economies, bankrupt nations, and deepen theproblems of the third world by implementing draconian policies in the name of global warming should be indicted, prosecuted and imprisoned “for a very longtime."
“The fraudsters and racketeers from Al Gore to the people at the University
of East Anglia who have been making their fortune at the expense of taxpayersand the little guy,” should be criminally charged, said Monckton, in response to theclimate gate scandal. “We the people have got to rise up worldwide, found a partyin every country which stands for freedom and make sure we fight thisbureaucratic communistic world government monster to a standstill – they shallnot pass,” he added. Monckton said that the U.N. should be closed. He talked to asenior UN ambassador in Canada who told him the UN has no purpose anymoreand it exists to enrich itself at the expense of the nation it serves (He wants theU.N. to end). Monckton believes that billions of dollars would be saved if theUnited Nations was shut down ending this controversial bureaucracy.
The emailsinvolved in climate gate prove that global warming alarmism was publiclyshown, but behind closed doors, these scientists admitted that theirinformation was suspect (plus they level people like Monckton as correct). So,the science isn't settled, natural climate change is bigger than man'sintervention, and eras in world history have been warmer than today
.Moncktoncriticized the science czar John P. Holdren as promoting a planetary regime, andother draconian population measures as found in his 1997 book of Ecoscience.Monckton exposed how Holdren promoted global cooling alarmism in the 70’s andhow he believes in man-made global warming. The elite use global warming as anexcuse to promote population control without care to how many folks die. It'sabout controlling governments instead of solving real environmental issues.Monckton was the former advisor to Margaret Thatcher. He wants a worldwidefreedom party to promote national sovereignty, promote freedom, havedemocracy, and oppose communism. He said that said that the warmists weresounding more and more desperate and knew that they had been rumbled as aresult of climate gate, which would only make it more urgent for them to try andforce through a binding treaty in Copenhagen. “Every time these people try to takeit away, we in the freedom party will stop them, and I think now is the time,” saidMonckton. So, people like Monckton are once again vindicated about globalwarming hysteria.
*Yet, Monckton isn’t perfect himself. He’s the member of the Order of St. John andhe’s an advisor to Margaret Thatcher.
Monckton is quoted as saying that: "there isonly one way to stop AIDS. That is to screen the entire population regularly and toquarantine all carriers of the disease for life. Every member of the populationshould be blood-tested every month ... all those found to be infected with thevirus, even if only as carriers, should be isolated compulsorily, immediately, andpermanently..."
Of course, I don’t agree with excessive screening or suppressingthe liberties of human beings with AIDS at all.
On December 1, 2009, John Stosselentered the “No Spin Zone” anddeclared, “There hasn’t been warming for the pasteleven years and we have real problems in the world—millions are dying frommalaria, malnutrition, bad hygiene. The idea that we should keep people poor by spending all this money on global warming is an awful idea.”

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Blade2010 liked this
chelseabulldog liked this
chelseabulldog liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->