• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • 6
    CommentGo Back
Download
 
December 2009Dear Congressman,I watched your September 3, 2009 Town Hall meeting on You Tube this week, andwould like to address four comments you made as follows:
1)“I voted for NAFTA. I voted for every free trade bill that came through. I believe the business of a free society is to down walls, not put them up.” 2)“Obama told us who he was before he ran … Marxism” 3)“Don’t believe what you hear on the internet” 
4)
“You move the Congress more than I can”.
#1 Nafta: “I voted for NAFTA. I voted for every free trade bill that came through.” 
I find it very interesting that you say the Republicans and Democrats think so differentlyon issues, however, both parties seem to be in bed on the subject of NAFTA, FreeTrade, and allowing the bankers to do as they please which is all destroying Americaand our Sovereignty. Those are three big issues that neither party is correcting. WHY?Clinton passed NAFTA in 1994, and Bush renewed Fast Track in 2002. So it is obviousthat both parties work together on major issues that are passed from administration toadministration, regardless of which party wins. I find this interesting (just like the warshave been continued under Obama, when Bush started them). Do we have a two-partysystem, or do the majority of Congressmen work for the elite?I have studied how the European Union evolved. It was developed incrementally over decades, and the people were lied to all along the way. I believe that NAFTA is onestepping stone towards a much different agenda, and that Congress was lied to as towhat the real agenda was behind this legislation. Now we’re seeing the fall out, andCongressmen who voted for NAFTA don’t see it nor are they trying to stop it.In this document I include some of my research that I hope you will read.
#2 Obama Comment
- In your town hall meeting you said the following: “He got asignificant amount of votes from this area and he told us who he was before he ran.” Hesaid
“when I went to college I didn’t select the routine friends, I sought out asfriends Marxists Professors.”
But then I hear you say in the town hall meeting howyou think a communist/socialist country, China, should be world leader? While Idisagree with both issues, I see your statements are disjointed.
Marxism is justanother form of Communism
. So you agree with one but not the other? Well, Sir, Idon’t agree with either. It’s just another form of doublespeak which our leaders havebecome proficient in, when they should be proficient in many other areas which aretruthful.http://rationalrevolution.net/war/communism_and_marxism.htm
 
#3 Internet Comment
-
“Don’t believe what you hear on the internet”
. I could saysomething similar “Don’t believe what your politicians tell you because many are boughtand manipulated into voting for legislation they should never have voted for.” Yes, justlike in the media, there are things on the internet that are untrue, but these days I findmore truth on the internet than in the Main Stream Media, or coming out of Washington.I’m sure you would agree, being you mentioned in the meeting that much of what youdo isn’t shown in the media.If it were not for the internet, the people would have had NO SAY on any of thesethings. It has been a tool that we use because we seem to have no other voice inWashington. You should be thankful it exists if you believe “we can make more of adifference in Washington than you”.I see you use You Tube to get your message out. That is over the internet. So, Iwouldn’t be so quick to condemn the internet because even our Congressmen are nowusing it also. We have other Congressmen like Rockefeller who think “it should havenever been invented”. You and I know that statement was made because the peoplehave been awakened through the internet. So, therefore you should be thankful for theinternet if you indeed want the peoples help to change the direction of this country.
#4 You told us in the meeting that “you move the Congress more than I can”.
However, we can do nothing when our politicians vote the wrong way on legislation anddon’t look into the ramifications or other agendas hidden behind “good sounding”legislation they pass. We need to know that you are listening to the right voices in DCand not just “going along to get along” by towing the party line! When everyone votesthe same, somebody isn’t thinking, IMO!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------NAFTA – Information you should read:Sir James Goldsmith speech to the Senate in 1995:
“On January 1, 1995, the WTO replaced The Global Agreement on Tariffsand Trade (GATT) which had regulated global trade tariffs since 1947.Three months before, Sir James Goldsmith, a British billionaire gave aspeech to the US Senate in which he warned about the effect global freetrade would have on Western employment and wage levels. He argued thatGATT and the theories on which it is based were flawed. If implemented, itwould impoverish and destabilize the industrialized world while at the sametime cruelly ravaging the third world.”
(NOTE: This is indeed what is happening before our eyes.)
 
The Real NAFTA Score (2008):
http://www.citizen.org/documents/NAFTA_USTR_Debunk_web.pdf 
The New American:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/files/MergerInTheMaking.pdf http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/world-mainmenu-26/europe-mainmenu-35/1061-eu-us-integration-unattractive-union
“It is now clear that European nations were deceived into joining an economic union that became a political union, yet our leaders still seek a similar economic union with the EU.” 
MONNET DOCTRINE says:
http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/03/030901-01.pdf http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/03/030901-01.pdf 
“Economic integration must precede political integration” 
“The Great Deception” by Christopher Booker and Richard North:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0826480144http://www.ukip-bradford.org.uk/greatdeception.html
In"The Great Deception" two British authors, Christopher Booker and Richard North, describe the decades-long process of creating the European Union as: "a slow-motion coup d’état, the most spectacular coup d’état in history 
That is precisely what the EU’s architects intended it to become; but they didn’ttell that to the people of Europe when they first began promoting what they called“the project”after World War II.
1)
It was launched as the European Coal and Steel Community
2)
Soon after expanded into the European Economic Community (EEC), better known as the Common Market, to promote trade and ease of travel.3)Gradually, as more political integration took place, the EEC became theEuropean Community, or EC.4)Finally, it changed names once again, from EC to EU.Now in America, the NAFTA/SPP architects are copying the EU slow-motion coupd’état blueprint — but on an accelerated schedule.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...

uploaded a new revision for this document (#6)

12 / 08 / 2009

uploaded a new revision for this document (#5)

12 / 08 / 2009

uploaded a new revision for this document (#4)

12 / 07 / 2009

uploaded a new revision for this document (#3)

12 / 07 / 2009

uploaded a new revision for this document (#2)

12 / 07 / 2009

uploaded a new revision for this document (#1)

12 / 07 / 2009
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...