Notice PCLOB 2014-04, Sunshine Act Meeting

Comments of the Sunlight Foundation

to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board
regarding Parallel Construction and intelligence sharing activities
conducted under Executive Order 12333 and other legal authorities

August 29, 2014
















Comments prepared by:
Sean Vitka
1

Federal Policy Manager
Sunlight Foundation
Email: svitka@sunlightfoundation.com
Address: 1818 N Street NW Suite 300
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202.742.1520 ext. 273

1
Joy Wang, an intern at the Sunlight Foundation, contributed to these comments.

Notice PCLOB 2014-04, Sunshine Act Meeting
Page | 2

I. The Sunlight Foundation urges the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board
(PCLOB) to investigate Parallel Construction and similar intelligence sharing activities

The Sunlight Foundation is a nonpartisan nonprofit that advocates for open government
globally and uses technology to make government more accountable to all. We do so by creating
tools, open data, policy recommendations, journalism, and grant opportunities that dramatically
expand access to vital government information and increase accountability of public officials.
The Sunlight Foundation is engaged in the ongoing national surveillance debate as it pertains to
government transparency, secret law, and public oversight.
Parallel Construction is a term first publicly reported by Reuters in August 2013.
2
The
term is derived from internal documents reviewed by Reuters that reveal guidance on the
deliberate masking and falsification of investigative history in order to erase investigations
origins.
3
According to the report, the Special Operations Division (SOD), a unit of the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA), distributes information in partnership with two dozen other
agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
Information distributed through this partnership has been used to spark domestic, non-national
security related investigations.
4
The source of the information that triggers the investigation is
not merely concealed, which is common in both national security and certain other contexts, such
as those involving confidential informants. Instead, as described in the Reuters report: Agents
are instructed to then use normal investigative techniques to recreate the information provided

2
See John Shiffman & Kristina Cooke, Exclusive: U.S. directs agents to cover up program used
to investigate Americans, REUTERS, Aug. 5, 2013, http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/05/us-
dea-sod-idUSBRE97409R20130805
3
After an arrest was made, agents then pretended that their investigation began with the traffic
stop, not with the SOD tip, the former agent said. The training document reviewed by Reuters
refers to this process as parallel construction. See id.
4
See id.

Notice PCLOB 2014-04, Sunshine Act Meeting
Page | 3

by SOD.
5

II. There is national uncertainty, confusion, and alarm regarding Parallel Construction

In the year since leaks originating from Edward Snowden began, few processes have
remained as opaque to the public as Parallel Construction and other intelligence sharing
activities. Because of how little is known, Parallel Constructions relationship to intelligence
collected by the Intelligence Community and to other sharing practices is unknown. This has
crippled the publics ability to engage the issue.
In the initial Reuters report, perceptions of the program were in diametric opposition
depending on the observers proximity to the programs. One Harvard Law professor and former
federal judge, Nancy Gertner, told Reuters that she had never heard of anything like this at all,
and that [i]t sounds like they are phonying up investigations.
6
James Felman, a vice chairman
of the criminal justice section of the American Bar Association similarly called it outrageous
and indefensible.
7
Meanwhile, one anonymous senior DEA officials told Reuters that Parallel
[C]onstruction is a law enforcement technique we use everyday, and that Its decades old, a
bedrock concept.
8
However, the Department of Justice, which oversees the DEA, declined to
comment.
9

Indeed, this confusion continues to this day, and is inhibiting the ability of the public to
have critical conversations about civil liberties. In August 2014, The Intercept published a
lengthy investigation into ICREACH, another intelligence-sharing program run by the NSA,

5
Id.
6
Id.
7
Id.
8
Id.
9
Id.

Notice PCLOB 2014-04, Sunshine Act Meeting
Page | 4

with participation from both the DEA and FBI.
10
Reporter Ryan Gallagher found continuing
evidence of this confusion and concern:
A key question, according to several experts consulted by The Intercept, is
whether the FBI, DEA or other domestic agencies have used their access to
ICREACH to secretly trigger investigations of Americans through a controversial
process known as parallel construction.
11


The public cannot adequately engage the national surveillance debate without a clear
understanding of how collected intelligence is ultimately shared among domestic law
enforcement and national security agencies and how it is in turn utilized.
III. Any information that can be used to influence domestic prosecution necessarily impacts
the rights of United States Persons

Parallel Construction is empowered by intelligence sharing activities such as ICREACH
and DICE, an enormous intelligence database operated by SOD that is involved in both
international and domestic investigations. According to the Reuters report,
About 10,000 federal, state and local law enforcement agents have access to the
DICE database, records show. They can query it to try to link otherwise disparate
clues. Recently, one of the DEA officials said, DICE linked a man who tried to
smuggle $100,000 over the U.S. southwest border to a major drug case on the
East Coast.
12


Indeed, according to Reuters, the cross-jurisdiction nature of such databases seems to be
a deliberate feature of the systems:
The DEA has long publicly touted the SOD's role in multi-jurisdictional and
international investigations, connecting agents in separate cities who may be
unwittingly investigating the same target and making sure undercover agents don't

10
See Ryan Gallagher, The Surveillance Engine: How the NSA Built Its Own Secret Google, THE
INTERCEPT, Aug. 25, 2014, https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/08/25/icreach-nsa-cia-secret-
google-crisscross-proton/
11
Id.
12
See Shiffman, supra note 2.

Notice PCLOB 2014-04, Sunshine Act Meeting
Page | 5

accidentally try to arrest each other.
13


This intelligence sharing is extremely dangerous to the civil liberties of United States
Persons. Parallel Construction and similar masking techniques create a permeable barrier
whereby information collected under national security authorities can secretly become the basis
for domestic prosecution. Successful masking, in turn, renders both the information sharing and
the process of disguising investigations origins uncontestable. Regardless of the legal authority
under which information sharing and masking is conducted, it directly affects the privacy and
civil liberties of United States Persons.
IV. Parallel Construction falls within PCLOBs jurisdiction because guidance and
intelligence allegedly originates from surveillance focused on national security

One former federal prosecutor described the illusory nature of these programs legal
authorities to Reuters, referencing the alleged uses of shared information in domestic drug
prosecutions: You can't game the system, said former federal prosecutor Henry E. Hockeimer
Jr. You can't create this subterfuge. These are drug crimes, not national security cases. If you
don't draw the line here, where do you draw it?
14
However, what the public does know about
Parallel Construction confirms that it involves sharing, at a minimum, across the CIA, DEA,
FBI, and NSA.
15

Based on the lack of discussion of Parallel Construction and possible other masking
processes in leaked and unclassified documents, it is unclear whether these processes have been
reviewed by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). Considering that Parallel
Construction is an investigatory and prosecutorial technique, and is therefore principally
concerned with how intelligence is used rather than collected, it may be independent from

13
Id.
14
Id.
15
See id.

Notice PCLOB 2014-04, Sunshine Act Meeting
Page | 6

surveillance authorization procedures under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and its
amending statutes. The principal remaining known legal authority for intelligence collection and
sharing is Executive Order 12333, which PCLOB now seeks comment on.
V. Other oversight avenues, including courts, are unable to adequately investigate
It is critical that PCLOB investigate Parallel Construction and any similar intelligence
sharing and masking techniques conducted under any intelligence-gathering authority. While
PCLOB is uniquely positioned to review information that is otherwise unavailable to the public,
the importance of PCLOBs position is underscored here due to the apparent breakdown of
public oversight.
a. Parallel Construction allegedly involves deceiving courts and prosecutors
Parallel Construction is immune to adversarial oversight if it successfully masks or
withholds the source of information on which a prosecution is based, however the existing
information strongly indicates that this history is also withheld from courts and prosecutors:
Remember that the utilization of SOD cannot be revealed or discussed in any
investigative function," a document presented to agents reads. The document
specifically directs agents to omit the SOD's involvement from investigative
reports, affidavits, discussions with prosecutors and courtroom testimony. Agents
are instructed to then use "normal investigative techniques to recreate the
information provided by SOD."
16


One federal prosecutor described to Reuters being lied to about the source of information
by a DEA agent. Instead of receiving the incriminating intelligence from an informant, as the
prosecutor was originally told, a DEA supervisor intervened and revealed that the tip had
actually come through the SOD and from an NSA intercept.
17
The prosecutor decided not to file

16
Id.
17
Id.

Notice PCLOB 2014-04, Sunshine Act Meeting
Page | 7

charges.
18

Parallel Constructions apparently deliberate misleading of both Defendants and the
courts imperils both basic concepts of due process, right to a fair trial, and oversight by the
public and the courts. If there is any accuracy to the existing reports on Parallel Construction
with regards to withholding investigatory origins from prosecutors and courts, the only source of
information on the subject will be either more leaks or information made public through the
Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board.
VI. Conclusion
For the reasons described above, it is imperative that PCLOB investigate and publish all
government guidance on Parallel Construction and any similar processes conducted to falsify or
obscure intelligence sharing processes.



Respectfully submitted,



Sean Vitka
Federal Policy Manager
Sunlight Foundation
svitka@sunlightfoundation.com
1818 N Street NW Suite 300
Washington, DC 20036

August 29, 2014

18
Id.