Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Errol Stafford Brown, A079 095 690 (BIA Aug. 19, 2014)

Errol Stafford Brown, A079 095 690 (BIA Aug. 19, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 200|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record for further consideration of the respondent’s adjustment application in conjunction with a waiver of inadmissibility under Section 212(h) of the INA. The Board found that although the respondent failed to submit an affidavit of support (Form I-864), medical examination (Form I-693), or evidence of qualifying
relatives, a new hearing was required because the immigration judge did not take testimony in support of the application from respondent or his wife. The decision was issued by Member Elise Manuel.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record for further consideration of the respondent’s adjustment application in conjunction with a waiver of inadmissibility under Section 212(h) of the INA. The Board found that although the respondent failed to submit an affidavit of support (Form I-864), medical examination (Form I-693), or evidence of qualifying
relatives, a new hearing was required because the immigration judge did not take testimony in support of the application from respondent or his wife. The decision was issued by Member Elise Manuel.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Aug 30, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/08/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Golding, Waye C. Sr

S Hiawassee Rd Ste

Orlando FL

Nme: BROWN ERRO STAFORD
  of i
Executive Oce r Immigration Review
Bd  mg Apl Oc  h Ck
5107 Leesburg Pike, S
u
 
t
e 2000 Fal Chc Vna 20530
S/IE Oce f Chef Couse -OR

Law Road Site

Orlando FL

A

ate of ths tce
//4
nclosed is a copy of he Boad's decision and oder i he above-ereced case. closue
 b l l
Sicerey,
D
c
Dona Car hief Cerk
 k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Errol Stafford Brown, A079 095 690 (BIA Aug. 19, 2014)
 
 prmn
f
Jusc
Execuve .ce r Iation Revew

Chh, V

File A079 095 690 Odo, FL
Decsn f e Bard f Imgrat Appels
Da:
I
 re: EOL STFFOD BROW  EMOVA POCEIG PPEAL ON BEHF OF ESPONDENT: Wayne C. Golding Sr, Esqui ON BEHL OF DS: izab G Lg Assist Chf Consl PPLICTION: Adjuent of satu The rspondnt, a av  ctizen of Jc, has appaled om e iaton Judge's Stemer 18, 2012, dcsio dnying s plcation r adjsen of saus ud secon 245(a) of th maon d Naonaly Act, 8 US.C. § 1255(a) n conjncon  a waver  under section 212(h) o e Act, 8 US.C § 182(h). The DS hs ld a bref n oppositon. he ecord will b remded to e maton udg. We riw  Imao Juge's nngs of ct, incldg crdity dtiaons, r c error 8 C.FR. § 1003(d)(3)(). W rvew qusons of aw, nclung wheer th  ps hav me  relevt den of proof, d ssues of sceon ndr a de novo sdd. 8 CF.R. § 100.d)(3)(i) The miaon Jdg dened t rspondnt's application r adjsn of status, nding  he ad not me hs burden of proof in a h fald o prode he rqud afavit of suppor (Fo I86),  rqud ror of medcal xination o I-693), or vdnce of quaing  relativs r poss of adjdcato of t wver
Se
8 C.FR. § 1032(c)(); secon 22(h)()) of  Ac. On appeal, t reondn gues a he should have ben ed a connuc to suplement e rcord d a    e aton ge should have hd e  respot's stiony in support of is appicaton. As t respondent ots on appeal, te rspondnts a ndvid hag a s s r May o 203. For asos at  not sated
t rcod, e hng dat ws moved up y  mos    m o
 
e
o   no
e
 so n so of   appicaion om e rondno s
w
 who was prsen in e couroom a a {.J at 3). T iaton Judge dend te appcaon in  becase h sponden had not  povd a mag cca or bi ceicaes r s cdren (.J at -2). The maon Jdge did noe at the rspondent hd  approd -13 ptto, ld on his bhf by his wf,  but d no consier a n dtining whthe t rspondent had saished a qualng  reative r poss of te ver  at 3
Cite as: Errol Stafford Brown, A079 095 690 (BIA Aug. 19, 2014)
 
' .
 0 05 60  s the responden had imely led his applicaion r adjusen o saus d r he waier o inadmissibiliy, e aion udge should hae alowed he responden d s wess o  presen estimony i support of his aplicaon
See Matter of Interiano-Rsa,
 I&N Dec 4, 6  010) We aee w e maon udges deenaon hat he responden should ae supplemented his appicaion w

eidence o hs quaiing relaies d  e documens required nder e regulaionsHoweer,
i o he nexplan schedule chge o e respondents indidual heng,
 well as e Immiaion Judges iure to he  he respodens tesimony in suppor o his applicaion, a remd is ed Upon remd, i is incumben upon e respoden beng e burden o proof, o suppor hs appcaion wi approrae d necessy eidence,
 we
 o demonsae ha he mes e reief in e exercise o dscreon
I
i o e regoing e lowng order will be eneredOER he record ill be remded o e miaon udge r er proceedngs d eny of a ne order FOR  BO 2
Cite as: Errol Stafford Brown, A079 095 690 (BIA Aug. 19, 2014)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->