Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FREQUENCY HOPPING
DEPLOYMENT
PROCESS
Review 0.2
December 1998
Abstract:
The present document describes the steps and actions required to deploy Synthesiser
Frequency Hopping in a GSM system.
ANDC
Frequency Hopping Deployment Process
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SIGN-OFF FORM...................................................................................................................................4
HISTORY OF REVISIONS...................................................................................................................5
1. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................6
2. PREREQUISITES...............................................................................................................................7
2.1. COVERAGE OPTIMISATION...............................................................................................7
2.2. TOPOLOGY OPTIMISATION..............................................................................................10
2.3. NEW FREQUENCY PLAN DESIGN....................................................................................10
3. DEPLOYMENT STRATEGY.........................................................................................................12
3.1. INITIAL DEPLOYMENT.....................................................................................................12
3.2. HOPPING EXPANSION.......................................................................................................14
4. OPTIMISATION...............................................................................................................................15
TABLE OF FIGURES
SIGN-OFF FORM
HISTORY OF REVISIONS
0.2 24/12/98 Fernando Sancho Roberto García Changes in the structure and
explaining comments
1. INTRODUCTION
The present document describes the process that must be followed to implement Frequency
Hopping in a system.
These activities are essential prerequisites for a successful performance of a frequency
hopping network and, although could be also helpful in standard fixed frequency networks, they are
more critical when frequency hopping is enabled because of the tight reuses associated to it.
The initial state of the network is assumed to be a system with fixed frequency plan, and the
list of steps will include actions carried out at different stages of the system:
• Preliminary actions before Frequency Hopping implementation
• Frequency Hopping activation
• Optimisation and monitoring phases after the deployment
This document will propose a method of deployment, and describes the list of steps with
some aspects to be considered. Additional information and details required to carry out some of the
mentioned activities can be found in the following available documents:
[1] “Network optimisation based on CTP” by ANDC
[2] “Frequency hopping for capacity and quality improvement” by ANDC
[3] “Capacity enhancement with SFH 1x1” by ANDC
2. PREREQUISITES
Database
Performance
Optimisation
Monitoring
(HO & PC)
Design BCCH
and Hopping
Plans
Figure 1: Diagram of activities for frequency hopping deployment
A set of actions need to be performed before the configuration of frequency hopping in the
cells, in order to ensure good performance and ensure successful performance of the system.
Overshooting Communication
Interference
Hole
Overlap
• Coverage holes: Places with no coverage or low level coverage, where there is no
dominant server are potential spots of bad quality. In an environment with tight reuse
pattern, and hence higher noise (interference) level, a clear dominant server cell needs
to be identified everywhere. This points need to be identified and new sites can be
required to provide extra coverage.
• Excessive Overlap: Cells covering an area bigger than the zone where they are
dominant and serving, are radiating useless power to areas where other cells are serving.
When the same frequencies are reused in all the sites (1x3 reuse) or even in all the cells
(1x1 pattern), this unnecessary overlap is directly translated into interference.
• Cell Over-shooting: Particularly harmful are the situations where the signal of a
cell reaches areas far away from the site with high level, causing downlink interference,
and receiving uplink interference from mobiles far away. In the cases where the level is
The objectives of this coverage adjustment plan are the following ones:
• Reduce the global interference level in the system and permit tighter reuse patterns.
• Improve the in-building penetration, focusing the power radiated in a limited and
well-defined area. The coverage in these scenarios will improve at the same time that the
quality.
• Avoid undesired over-shooting effects.
• Balance the carried traffic between neighbour cells because the area to be covered
between them is divided with the same weight per cell.
A methodology to optimise the coverage of the cells, pointing out all the problems listed
below and suggesting a method to correct them, has been developed based on CTP tool. A
detailed description of the process is included in the document reference [1].
As a consequence of the redesign of the network structure, by adding new sites, reducing the
height of some antennae, changing the antenna type, down-tilting them, etc. it is necessary to check
two particular aspects:
• When the antennae are down-tilted and the coverage is limited and concentrated in
a determined area, the power transmitted by the BTS can be increased to the maximum
value because the energy is focussed to the useful coverage area. The path-balance of
the cells, particularly the ones modified in the coverage optimisation phase, needs to be
checked in order to decide the power adjustment required to have the cells well
balanced.
• The redefinition of the coverage areas will require modifications in the neighbour
topology. The neighbour lists of the cells need to be optimised in order to exclude
neighbours that are useless after the coverage optimisation.
Call trace data analysis with CTP tool and neighbour statistics will supply the information
required to carry out these activities.
One of the most important tasks required to deploy frequency hopping is to redesign a new
frequency plan. The implementation of frequency hopping requires particular aspects to be
considered whilst doing the frequency plan. Figure 4 describes the methodology involved.
n channels m channels
TCH BCCH
A A
C C
B B D
FE
I G
H J
L
K
For the case of synthesiser frequency hopping, the first action is to separate the spectrum
available for the frequency plan into two different sub-bands that will be dedicated independently for
BCCHs and hopping groups. The different behaviour of the fixed frequencies and the frequency
hopping justifies this distribution:
• The frequency reuse used for hopping and non-hopping carriers is different, being
tighter the hopping pattern. The frequency planning is easier having different groups of
frequencies to implement the two reuse patterns.
• Features very useful for hopping like power control and discontinuous transmission
are not available on BCCH carriers, so the frequencies used for BCCH will be
permanently on the air with maximum power. The interference that these carriers can
3. DEPLOYMENT STRATEGY
This chapter refers to the real implementation of frequency hopping in the network: The
BCCH and hopping plans previously designed are implemented in the system.
Normally the vast deployment of frequency hopping is initiated in a representative area and
after performance evaluation and introduction of possible corrections over standard parameters if
required, this initial zone is expanded. Some indications about this initial implementation and further
expansion will be given next.
At the deployment stage, the following aspects need to have been covered:
• Definition of the objectives expected with frequency hopping implementation.
• Definition of evaluation criteria to assess the quality and performance of the
hopping system.
• Benchmarking of the reference system (configuration before hopping
implementation).
• Preparation of the new databases with the changes required by the hopping system.
As mentioned before, the fist contact with frequency hopping is normally the
implementation in a test scenario configured by a representative area within the network. This initial
deployment will allow to customise hopping parameters to the specific characteristics of the network.
Figure 5 represents the situation.
The main requirement for this area is to be representative of the whole system (city, region,
etc.) in order to have the possibility to extrapolate the results to the entire network. The intention is to
reproduce the same situation at low scale, so the characteristics of the selected area must be the same
as the ones of the system. Some valuable indications can be:
After the first implementation of frequency hopping in a selected area, the experience and
knowledge acquired will be used to expand the area and deploy the hopping in bigger areas.
As the size of the area with hopping becomes bigger, the gains and benefits will be higher,
because the border effects will be minimised. The normal process is to expand the hopping area with
homogeneous configuration to defined geographical areas (cities, regions, etc.).
Apart from the benefits in terms of quality and performance achieved with the expansion of
hopping, it is important the reduction in planning work, because the whole area uses the same
pattern, so there is no co-existence of different patterns.
4. OPTIMISATION
The process described for introduction of frequency hopping, provided that it is correctly
done, guarantees a good performance of the system with significant improvements in quality and
advantages for capacity.
In spite of that, any irregularity in the network will introduce a disturbance in the hopping
scheme, so impacting in a certain degree the performance. At this point, optimisation tasks can be
required to improve the quality. The most common modifications introduced at this point are:
• Frequency changes on BCCH carriers.
• Modifications of the hopping groups by increasing the number of frequencies in the
list.
• Changes in the assignment of the hopping groups to the cells.
• Modifications in the quality thresholds for handovers and power control.
Higher improvement of the performance can be achieved by enabling specific features
designed for frequency hopping systems:
• Separate RxQual thresholds for hopping and non-hopping carriers
• Priority per carrier.
• Specific SDCCH placement
These activities are described more in detail in references [1], [2] and [3].
The process described in this document is the result of a vast experience obtained from
different frequency hopping networks. The activities that normally are required in a hopping system
have been put sequentially in the right order to achieve a quicker and secure deployment of this
technique in a live network.
Coverage optimisation can be considered the most critical and important task. Uncontrolled
radiation causes an important increase in the interference of the system that degrades the quality and
limits the capacity increase possibilities. To have the interference under control through down-tilt
optimisation and antenna changes is a guarantee for success of the frequency hopping system.
The other important aspect is the frequency planning. A clean and well-done frequency plan
will determine directly the quality of the system.
It is strongly recommended to follow the steps described, specially the prerequisites to
accomplish before the deployment, in order to get the maximum benefit of this powerful technique.