2
the appendices or a more detailed explanation o the methodology and the state data sets used in this ranking). PFIEuses direct assessments o parental attitudes, but that kind o data is not available or North Carolina’s 115 schooldistricts. Thus, the
Parent Friendly
ranking uses indirect assessments to determine i each o the state’s school systemsoers educational conditions that the average parent would fnd satisactory.The
Parent Friendly
ranking also includes enrollment, demographic, and per-pupil expenditure data or eachschool district (see Table 2, beginning on page 6). There is neither a strong nor a consistent relationship between theseactors and district perormance in the
Parent Friendly
ranking.
1. Administrators
PFIE reported that only 51 percent o parents with children assigned to a public school said that they were “verysatisfed” with the way school sta interacts with parents. The
Parent Friendly
ranking uses two data points to assessschool interaction with parents. First, it includes the percentage o teachers that “strongly agreed” or “agreed” thatschool leadership communicates clear expectations to students and parents. Second, it examines the total number o consultants, clerical sta, and “other” proessionals as a percentage o total sta. This data point provides a compara-tive measure o the size o the school district bureaucracy, which is an indication o the accessibility o school and dis-trict administrators. As a rule, large school and district bureaucracies typically make it difcult or concerned parentsto obtain necessary inormation or discuss concerns with decision makers.
2. Teachers
According to PFIE, 61 percent o parents with children assigned to a public school reported that they were “verysatisfed” with the teachers their student had during the year. The three data points in the
Parent Friendly
rankinginclude the ollowing: 1) the number o teachers that taught in the school district in 2006-07 as a percentage o thetotal number o teachers or the 2007-08 school year; 2) the percentage o teachers that let their teaching positions;and 3) the number o vacant positions as a percentage o the total number o teachers. Those actors assess stabilityand continuity in the teacher workorce, key prerequisites or any school district seeking to employ an experienced,high-quality teaching sta. Given the ongoing debate about the validity o traditional measures o teacher quality, theParent Friendly ranking o teachers does not include years o experience, certifcation status, and graduate training.
3. Saety
According to PFIE, only 58 percent o parents with children assigned to a public school reported that they were“very satisfed” with order and discipline at the school. Obviously, parents want their children to attend sae and or-derly schools that minimize disruptions in the educational process. The
Parent Friendly
ranking uses one data point tomeasure order and discipline among schools in the district — the number o reported acts o school crime and violenceper 1,000 students.
4. Academic achievement
PFIE reported that 58 percent o parents with children assigned to a public school said that they were “very sat-isfed” with academic standards at the school. Parents want their children to attend schools that maintain high aca-demic standards rom kindergarten through twelth grade. To assess elementary and middle school perormance, the
Parent Friendly
ranking examines end-o-grade reading and math test scores or students in grades 3-8. Graduationrates and SAT scores are used to measure the academic perormance o high school students. The ranking also utilizesa measure o district-wide perormance: the percentage o student subgroups (e.g., race and ethnicity, disability, eco-nomic disadvantage, etc.) that met profciency requirements on state tests. This measure is also known as Adequate Yearly Progress or AYP targets met under the ederal No Child Let Behind law.
Add a Comment