• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Interrater Reliability of the SAVRY
Study SAVRY SAVRYRisk Total ICC Risk Judgment ICCMcEachran, 2001 .83 .72Catchpole & Gretton, 2003 .81 .77Dolan & Rennie, 2008 .97 .88Lodewijks et al., 2008-b .81 .77Meyers & Schmidt, 2008 .97 .95Vilojen, et al., 2008 .91 N/AICC = Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
 
 
Studies of the predictive validity of the SAVRY on institutional orcommunity violent recidivism
Study Design Strength of association
Gammelgård, Eronen, &Kaltiala-Heino (2007)
 Institutional violence
Retrospective studyN = 147 (boys and girls)Violent incidents:Risk Total, AUC = .71**Gammelgård, Weitzman-Henelius, & Kaltiala-Heino(2008)
Community violence
Retrospective studyN = 208 (boys and girls)Violent incidents:Risk Total, AUC = .71**Risk Total, OR =
27.85 (high-low)
Risk Total, OR =
3.83 (mod-low)
Lodewijks, Doreleijers, DeRuiter, & Borum (2008-b)
 Institutional violence
Prospective studyViolent incidents:Risk Total, AUC = .80***
 
N = 66 (boys)Follow-up: 18 monthsRisk Rating, AUC = .86***Aggressive incidents:Risk Total, AUC = .73*Catchpole & Gretton(2003)
Community violence
Retrospective studyN = 66 (90% boys)Follow-up: 12 months postreleaseViolent recidivism:Risk Total, AUC = .73**Dolan & Rennie (2008)
Community violence
Prospective studyN = 99 (boys)Follow-up: 6 months postreleaseViolent recidivism:Risk Total, AUC = .64*Risk Rating, AUC = .64*General recidivism:Risk Total, AUC = .69*Risk Rating, AUC = .69*Fitch (2002)
Community violence
Retrospective studyN = 82 (47 boys, 35 girls)Males: Risk Total,
r 
= .50**:Females: Risk Total,
r 
= .72***Males and females:
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...