Human Rights Alert
(NGO)
2014-09-13 Human Right Alert (NGO):
Appendix
to UPR Submission - United States - 22nd session
Large-scale fraud in IT systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?
Executive Summary
Wide segments of the people of the United States today hold that the US government has undergone a transformation over the past couple of decades, and the US Constitution is no longer in force and effect. Instant submission documents that the US Constitution was indeed voided or suspended, and that the implementation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems inthe US courts was a key event in this regard, which enables widespread judicial corruption and disregard of the law of theUnited States and the US Constitution. At the same time, such IT systems provide unique evidence of systemic judicial corruption, fraud on the courts, and abuse of Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights.
Allegations:
1. The IT systems of the US courts enable the routine conduct of simulated (sham/fake) litigation and the publication of simulated judicial records; 2. Under such circumstances, the rule of law and the US Constitution are effectively voided, access to the courts is effectively denied; 3, Such conditions should be considered unannounced regime change; 4. Such conditions amount to violation of any article of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite; 5. Corruption of the US courts and the legal profession is a central cause of the current socio-economic crisis in the United States and beyond.
Evidence:
IT system analysis documents: a) IT Systems were developed and implemented with no lawful authority; b) Identity of the servers of the US courts is unverified; c) No valid electronic signatures were implemented; d) Invalid, fraudulent authentication and service instruments and procedures were implemented (NEF/NDA); e) A “double books” system was implemented; f) Invalid authorities and permissions were implemented; g) The systems affect discrimination in access to the courts; h) Appearance of attorneys, who are not authorized as Counsel of Record, is enabled; i) Universalfailure to docket summonses - a critical failure in integrity; j) Adulteration and deletion of court records; k) Inexplicable, unreasonable differences among the IT systems of the various courts.Case studies document the employment of such systems in the conduct of simulated litigation affecting abuse of the rights of Liberty and property, as well as other Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights. Today, such corruption is particularly noted in cases, originating in corruption of judges and other government officers, and in fraud by the banking industry on individuals, on shareholders, on taxpayers, and on an entire nation (Argentina).
Conclusions:
1. Through the implementation and operation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems, the US courts today routinely conduct simulated litigation, unlawfully deprive the liberty and property of individuals, and place the banks abovethe law. Such conduct amounts to Organized State-corporate Crime. 2. Such conduct amounts to serious violation of fundamental Human Rights of the people of the United States. 3. Such conduct is also central to the current socio-economic crisis, failing banking regulation, and the “Foreclosure Crisis”, which resulted in vast increase in poverty and homelessness. 4. The validity of any legal and judicial records, originating in the United States, and the validity of any litigation in the US courts should be considered dubious. 5. The international community should reassess the nature of the current regime in the United States, particularly relative to serious violations of the Human Rights of the people of the US . 6. Efforts to address conditions, which have been established in the US, and to restore the force and effect of the USConstitution and US law, are likely be protracted and meet stark resistance by powerful US security, legal, and financial interest groups.
Recommendations:
Emerging from current conditions would require a fundamental and comprehensive corrective process in the US at a time, when the political process itself is undermined by corruption of the US courts: 1. The large-scale fraud in the US courts, which in fact implicates each and every US sitting judge, would likely require an approach such as a Truth and Reconciliation Commission, or a Second Constitutional Convention. 2. Due to the central role of the Administrative Office of the US Courts in implementing the fraudulent IT systems of the US courts, the Office should be restructured or closed. 3. Measures, similar to those taken a century ago, under similar circumstances through enactmentof the
Salary Act
(1919), which placed the clerks of the US courts under the direct authority of the Attorney General, should be considered. 4. US legal and computing experts should be employed in an initiative to restore the integrity of theIT systems of the US courts under accountability to the US Congress, with the goal of making such system as transparentas possible to the public at large. 5. In nations, where the separation of branches is established by law, the courts must not be permitted to develop and implement their own IT systems. 6. Human Rights and internet activists must keep a watchful eye on the validity and integrity of IT systems of the courts and prisons.
Human Right Alert (NGO): UPR Submission - United States 22nd session
Appendix
:
Large-scale fraud in IT systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?
1/165 TOC:2
Digitally signed by Joseph Zernik, PhD Date: 2014.09.13 22:24:03 +03'00'
Human Right Alert (NGO): UPR Submission - United States 22nd session
Appendix
:
Large-scale fraud in IT systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?
2/165 TOC:2
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
A. Human Rights Alert (NGO)
B. Allegations
1. Specific allegations
2. Simulated records, simulated litigation - organized state-corporate crime
6 a) Definition7 b) Judges are not covered by immunity in simulated litigation7 c) Simulated litigation - racketeering, organized state-corporate crime, and trans-national organized crime8 d) Automated "Index of Judicial Corruption"8
C. Evidence
1. IT system analysis
9 a) Systems developed, implemented with no lawful authority11 b) Servers of unverified identity12 c) Invalid implementation of electronic signatures 17 d) Invalid implementation of authentication and service procedures32 e) Establishing of “double books” systems33 f) Invalid implementation of authorities and permissions33 g) Discrimination in access to the courts 34 h) Appearance of attorneys, unauthorized as Counsel of Record34 i) Universal failure to docket summonses.38 j) Adulterated and missing of court records39 k) PACER and CM/ECF - inter-court survey41 l) IT systems of the US Supreme Court43 2
. Case studies
43 a)
Fine v Sheriff of LA County
Sieverding et al v. United States Government
Netsphere Inc et al v Baron et al
Borrower Dianne Hill
Borrower William Parsley
Zernik v Connor et al
Zernik v Melson et al
SEC v Bank of America Corporation
McGarry v Geriatric Facilities of Cape Code, Inc et al
Maid of the Mist Corporation et al v Windsor
NML Capital v Republic of Argentina
Lewis et al v Gleason et al
Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al
Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al
Citizens United v Federal Election Commission
Citizens United v Federal Election Commission
D. National authorities, civil society organizations, experts, media
1. Office of Attorney General, US Department of Justice, FBI
2. Banking Regulators
3. US Congress
4. The judiciary
With only 5% of the world’s population, the U.S. has 25% of the world’s prison population – that makes us the world’s largest jailer.
ACLU [
]
... a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences.
Paul Krugman, Economics Nobel prize winner [
I think it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the US court system in US history. I can't think of one where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases.
Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School [
]
The US “has no functioning democracy”
Former US President Jimmy Carter [
]
A. Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Figure 1.
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Right Alert (NGO): UPR Submission - United States 22nd session
Appendix
:
Large-scale fraud in IT systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?
3/165 TOC:2
Table of Contents (continued)
Page Section100
7. Civil society organizations
8. Media
E. Compliance with relevant US law
1. Habeas Corpus
2. First Amendment - the right to file papers in court
3. First Amendment - the right to access court records
4.Rules Enabling Act
5. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure -duties of the clerk
6. Authentication and certification of judicial records, Legal Process
7. Electronic Signatures
F. Compliance with relevant treaties and conventions
1. Basel Accords - international banking regulation
2. Hague Apostille Convention (196x)
3. UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime
G. Retaliation against anti-judicial corruption activists
1. General
2. Retaliation against Dr Zernik, author of instant submission
H. Historical perspective - Robber Baron Revival Era.
I. Conclusions
J. Recommendations
K. References
Reward Your Curiosity
Everything you want to read.
Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.
No Commitment. Cancel anytime.