Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Does Wilson need a sales tax increase?

Does Wilson need a sales tax increase?

Ratings: (0)|Views: 39 |Likes:
The Wilson County commissioners are asking voters to approve a sales-tax increase on May 6. This report identifies $23.2 million in revenue and savings the county could use to meet its needs — more than 11 times the amount that the proposed tax increase would produce.

Authors: Dr. Michael Sanera, Terry Stoops, and Joseph Coletti
The Wilson County commissioners are asking voters to approve a sales-tax increase on May 6. This report identifies $23.2 million in revenue and savings the county could use to meet its needs — more than 11 times the amount that the proposed tax increase would produce.

Authors: Dr. Michael Sanera, Terry Stoops, and Joseph Coletti

More info:

Published by: John Locke Foundation on Dec 12, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/24/2012

pdf

text

original

 
or Truth 
The John Locke Foundation
is a501(c)(3) nonprot, nonpartisan researchinstitute dedicated to improving public policy debate in North Carolina. Viewpoints expressed by authors do not necessarilyrefect those o the sta or board o the Locke Foundation.
200 W. Morgan, #200Raleigh, NC 27601
phone:
919-828-3876
fax:
919-821-5117www.johnlocke.org
regional
brief 
Does Wilson Need aSales-Tax Increase?
County already has $23.2 millionin available funds
D
r
. M
ichael
S
 anera 
, J
oSeph
c
oletti
, t
erry
S
toopS
 A 
pril
2008
No. 52
e
xecutive
S
uMMary
By a vote of 5 to 2, the Wilson County commissioners decidedto ask county residents to approve a sale-tax increase on May 6.Complicating matters, the county is in the process of revaluation of property and setting a new property tax rate.The commissioners are not expected to set the new property taxrate until after the May 6 sales-tax vote. The uncertainty has some Wilson County residents worrying that they may soon face a prop-erty tax rate increase and, if passed, a sales-tax increase.This
 Regional Brief 
nds that Wilson County’s problems are not cre
-
ated by a lack of funding. The $23.2 million in savings and revenuesidentied in this report total more than 11 times the amount that
the proposed sales-tax increase is estimated to produce (see Figure
1). If the county used this money instead, it could delay a sales-taxincrease for over 11 years.County revenues have grown 31 percent faster than populationand ination since Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 (see Figure 3). The totalamount of revenue for FY 2006 was over $16.7 million more thanin FY 2001. By FY 2006, the average family of four was paying $872 more in taxes than in FY 2001. It would take a 48 percent
The authors thank John Locke Foundation research intern Clint Atkins for his assistance with this report.
 
does wilson county need a sales-tax increase?regional brief
Figure 1. Wilson County Projected Revenue and Savings
increase in family income (current dollars)
to match the increase in revenues that the
county has received over the last ve years.
1
If Wilson County were to adjust its revenuestream for only population and inationincreases, the county’s revenues wouldincrease 36.2 percent over the next ten
 years.
2
 Wilson County schools are not under-
funded. Over the last ve years, studentpopulation has increased by three percent,while local spending, adjusted for ination,has decreased by four percent. State spend
-
ing adjusted for ination is up eight percent
and federal spending is up six percent (see
Figure 2).If the school district has facility needs, thecounty commission and school board need
to show taxpayers how they would spend
the $23.9 million in state money provided
for capital improvements over the next ten years.
 Wilson County beneted from the Medic
-aid swap more than many North Carolina
counties. While 23 counties are receiving only the state’s promised “hold harmless”amount of $500,000 a year for ten years,
 Wilson County receives nearly $2.1 millionthe rst full year and a total of over $33.4million over ten years (see Figure 1).From FY 2004 to FY 2006, Wilson Countygave almost $3.9 million in incentives to afew selected private businesses.
3
This prac-
tice is unfair to the hundreds of businesses
in the county who are, at times, forced to
compete with tax-subsidized businesses.
B
 ackgrounD
In its 2007 session, the North Carolina Gen
-
eral Assembly relieved all counties of paying 
the portion of Medicaid expenses that had
been forced on counties, in exchange for the
half-cent sales tax that the counties leviedto help pay those expenses.
4
In addition, the
legislature voted to give counties the optionto ask voters to approve new tax increases.
Options include increasing the sales tax by
one-quarter cent, tripling the land-transfer
tax rate from 0.2 to 0.6 percent, or not hik 
-ing taxes at all. The legislature also requiredcounties to put those tax increases to an advi-
sory vote of the people. If voters approved,county commissioners were allowed butnot required to increase taxes. If both taxincreases were on the same ballot and both
Revenue Gains1 year10 years
Gain from Medicaid swap (FY 2008-09)$2,088,695$33,404,955Estimated school capital (Avg based on projections)$2,359,096$23,903,628
Potential Savings
Eliminate economic incentive giveaways (2004-2006 Avg)$1,295,224$12,952,240
Revenue Growth
Revenue in excess of population and inflation (FY2006)$16,725,195$167,251,945
 TOTAL$22,468,210$237,512,768Fund balance in excess of state requirement (FY 2007)$738,779$738,779
Potential extra availability$23,206,989 $238,251,547Revenue from Sales Tax Increase$2,061,140 $27,463,061
 
 
John locke foundationdoes wilson county need a sales-tax increase?
were approved, commissioners could impose
only one tax increase, not both.In November 2007, there were 27 coun
-ties that put sales-tax or land-transfer tax
increases on the ballots for voter approval,and ve of those counties put both taxincreases on the ballots. Alexander Countypassed a sales-tax increase in January 2008. All told, there have already been 33 separate votes (16 over land-transfer tax increases and17 over sales-tax increases). Voters defeated27 of the 33 requests for tax increases. Vot
-
ers rejected all 16 of the land-transfer taxincreases and 11 of the sales-tax increases.In the May 6 election, 24 counties haveput tax increases on the ballot, 20 propos
-ing sales-tax increases and four proposing 
land-transfer tax increases. Six of the coun
-ties that saw tax increases voted down in
November are asking voters to vote again fora tax increase in May (Cumberland, Gates,Greene, Henderson, Hertford, and Moore).There is no limit to the number of times that
county commissioners can place a proposed
tax increase on the ballot, or how much taxmoney commissions can spend on public“education” campaigns requesting that voters
approve the tax increase.
p
uBlic
S
chool
S
penDing
5
By far, counties spend more money on public
education than on any other area. Total localgovernment spending in North Carolina
on public education was $2.68 billion — or$1,934 per pupil — for the 2006-07 school
 year. Nearly 25 percent of all expenditures
on public schools come from local tax rev
-
enue. Given the amount of taxpayer money
involved, sympathetic appeals for schoolfunding should not come at the expense of 
sound scal policy.County governments and school boards
should hold expenditures of local tax dollars
for education and additions to public school
personnel in proportion to changes in their
school populations. In Wilson County, fromacademic years 2002-03 to 2006-07, there
was a three percent increase in student popu-lation. At the same time, there was a six per-cent increase in personnel and a four percent
Figure 2. Wilson County Student Population, Personnel, andSpending, 2002-07
Total Personnel:+6%Local PPE: –4%FederalPPE: +6%State PPE: +8%ExceptionalChildren: –9%ADM:+3%-10%-8%-6%-4%-2%0%2%4%6%8%10%
Notes: ADM stands for Average Daily Membership of students. PPE stands forPer-Pupil Expenditures. All PPE gures have been adjusted for ination.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->