darwin jakarta manila melbourne oceania perth qc sydney
South Asia
india mumbai
United States
arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee united states urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester
West Asia
armenia beirut israel palestine
Topics
biotech
Process
fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer IMC technlogy byMirandIMC Geeks admin
More Evidence of UK Intelligence Services Criminally Involved* Mysterious disappearance of evidentiary documentation from both the Guardian Newspaper and Manchester County Court. On March 24th 2005, I hadprovided the Guardian with an earlier version of the documentation file (letters) referred to in Section B. The documentation disappeared from their verysecure offices in Manchester. There is a letter from their Editor that accepts receipt of this documentation, apologises for the loss and is unable toexplain it. On March 16th 2006 I filed these papers in the Court on another matter. At a Hearing that was adjourned, the Judge noted that thisdocumentation was not with his Court papers; it had disappeared again; this time from a courthouse.* My Telephones tapped - MI5 co-ordinates tapping in UK
–
see evidence on Document handed to police that proves that my landline was being verysophisticatedly tapped in Dec. 2003. The
“
Raymond
”
incident proves that my cell phone was being tapped in May 2004
–
I made a critical commentabout a Grosvenor Trustee in a private call to my daughter using my cell phone to her cell phone. I received a telephone death threat 40 minutes later,and my daughter was intimidated in Aberdeen the following day.* Raymond
’
s Comment re MI5. After the death threat call from Raymond, I called him back on his cell (mobile) phone with witnesses on the line. He wasflustered and had not expected to be called back. He was still using the mobile phone number, which the police would later identify as a stolen phone(see police report). During the call he referred to The Security Organisation, a sometimes-used pseudonym for MI5.* I have been criminally intimidated on 3 occasions after I had made complaints to the Home Office to stop me complaining further (see Section B
–
AnMP wrote PM Blair and the Home Secretary with details of these additional threats). Somebody within the Home Office must have tipped off their ownsecurity agency MI5
–
nobody outside central government excepting my MP knew of the written complaints.* Exceptional sophistication of 6-year campaign of death threats and intimidation
–
too sophisticated for Organised Crime gangs acting alone. ACanadian detective has advised (verbally) that some of the intimidation in Canada have the hallmark of a man with military intelligence operationaltraining.* The prolongation (since 1999) and cost of these threats, together with their international reach is also too sophisticated for Organised Crime Gangsacting alone. Besides OCGs could not likely cause various police services, a cabinet minister, and a judge to participate in a cover up conspiracy as hashappened here.The whole thing bears the hallmark of taxpayer funded intelligence services (MI5, MI6) acting criminally for rogue elements in the establishment, as wasthe original defamation.* Sophisticated misinformation and deception campaigns to deceive and withdraw supporters from me were manufactured. Three misinformationrumours spread; all nonsense, each different and each a story in itself. The Big Lie Technique - The hallmark of a rogue intelligence service (UK presshas reported smear campaigns against innocent citizens as a tactic used by MI5 and MI6 on behalf of their friends)* Their latest smear campaign involved corrupting a junior English Judge to provide a false appearance of credibility to a lie.1. See SECTION D
–
The Crooked English Judge, and note the proof that is available.Which comes first?* Government Ministers or Intelligence Services
–
Whether the politicians were corrupted first and are using the intelligence services to help them; orwhether the intelligence services were corrupted first and are blackmailing or misleading the government. The evidence shows that both are involved.There is so much evidence that the UK Authorities have had to resort to misinformation campaigns and orchestrated smear tactics to avoid dealing withthis issue. _________________________________________________________________________ ++++++ SECTION B
–
EVIDENCE OF A CENTRALLY COORDINATED COVER-UP CONSPIRACY
–
ROLE OF CABINET MINISTER HAZEL BLEARSOn 26th Oct 2004 my wife and I met with PC Bowman of the Didsbury Police and made a complaint regarding four years of criminal intimidation anddeath threats. We discussed the intimidation, and left Mr. Bowman with written and other evidence relating to our complaint and a covering letter thatsummarises it all (see my covering letter to police dated Oct 25th 2004 **). The following week we returned to the police and were told that they wouldnot investigate since the evidence was circumstantial. We were also told that Mr. Bowman had tried hard to get an investigation approved but had beenoverruled by a Police Inspector.I then wrote to the Home Secretary, copying the President ICAEW and my then MP, the Rt. Hon Keith Bradley (my letter dated Nov 6th 2004**). Mr Bradleyoffered to intervene and approached The Home Secretary personally on my behalf and was told that the matter was
“
under investigation
”
by the HomeOffice and he told me so in writing (Mr. Bradley
’
s letters to me dated Nov 24, Dec 6, 2004 & Jan 11, 2005**). This lie told to Mr. Bradley by the HomeSecretary
’
s Office was the first Home Office lie, since as subsequent events show the matter was never being investigated at all, but instead was beingcovered up. Mr Bradley
’
s staff continued to chase the Home Office finding, as they told me, great difficulty on this matter. My telephone line was clearlybeing tapped by the intelligence services
–
as I was even being intimidated just for pushing this issue with Mr. Bradley
’
s office on the telephone.Finally Minister Hazel Blears dismissed my complaint on the untruthful grounds that I had never been to the police in the first place (Minister Blears letterto Mr. Bradley Mar 16 2005**). This was clearly contradictory to the facts, as the Police accept, and to the Home Office
’
s previously stated position.Nobody bothered to check the accuracy of this untruthful excuse for dismissing my complaint by either calling me or PC Bowman. Ms. Blears letter wasdated 16 March 2005 ** and I was again intimidated on the same day to STOP (stop complaining, further proof of complicity between the Home Office / intelligence services and the crime gangs).As a follow up, my eldest son in Birmingham was then intimidated with death threats in front of independent witnesses. He reported this to the KingsNorton Police who recorded the threats, took notes, issued a crime number, and began to investigate. The following night a car was smashed into myflat in Manchester. This investigation was also stopped and the police have never returned any of our follow up calls.Mr John Leech MP then passed a letter headed
“
Death Threats & Serious Criminal Intimidation
–
Minister Hazel Blears MP
–
Cover up by the HomeOffice
”
(letter dated June 15 2005**) onto the Prime Minister. Mr. Leech confirmed by letter to me (dated 25 July 2005**) that the Prime Minister had nowreceived the letter. Minister Blears replied on behalf of the Prime Minister on July 12 2005 ** to John Leech MP with the same old canard
–
she said that Ihad never been to the police, and she ducked the questions in Mr. Leech
’
s letter relating to the cover up conspiracy.In the meanwhile (August 2005) Mr. John Leech MP personally contacted the Didsbury, Manchester Police and confirmed that I had in fact met with them.Indeed I subsequently confirmed this at a more recent meeting, and that the Police still have in their possession the detailed 57-page typewrittencomplaint that my wife and I had handed them back on 26th Oct 2004.Meanwhile my eldest son (in Birmingham) is now getting threatened with a helicopter hovering low over his house in the middle of the night and shininga spotlight on his bedroom window. The reason the intelligence services are concerned about him is that he was intimidated in front of independentwitnesses and the death threats are also recorded.On 8th Nov 2005**, Mr. John Leech MP forwarded to the Home Secretary a letter drafted by me on Oct 14th 2005** that is headed
“
RTM Russell
–
Intimidation & Death Threats/Cover up in the Home Office / Letter to the Prime Minister/ Minister Hazel Blears / Gross Abuse of my Human Rights
”
.Minister Blears
’
reply of 18 November 2005** now stated that I had actually reported these incidents to the police in the first place, and that they hadinvestigated them. Please note that the Minister is now for the 1st time admitting that I had gone to the police a year earlier, whereas previously MinisterBlears was stating that I had never gone to the police at all. However she is now introducing a new lie, stating that the police had in fact investigatedwhereas previously she (and the police) had agreed that no investigation had taken place. Indeed the Home Office had known for a year that the purpose
Leave a Comment