Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
KEYES|BARNETT v OBAMA (APPEAL) - 5 - Notice of Ruling on Post Judgment Motion and Intent to Prosecute Appeal - Transport Room

KEYES|BARNETT v OBAMA (APPEAL) - 5 - Notice of Ruling on Post Judgment Motion and Intent to Prosecute Appeal - Transport Room

Ratings:

5.0

(1)
|Views: 115|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
12/10/2009 5, Filed (ECF) Appellants Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson Correspondence: Notice of Ruling on Post Judgment Motion and Intent to Prosecute Appeal. Date of service: 12/10/2009 [7159970] (GGK)
12/10/2009 5, Filed (ECF) Appellants Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson Correspondence: Notice of Ruling on Post Judgment Motion and Intent to Prosecute Appeal. Date of service: 12/10/2009 [7159970] (GGK)

More info:

Published by: Jack Ryan on Dec 13, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/21/2009

pdf

text

original

 
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627281
UNITED STATES JUSTICE 
 
FOUNDATION 
GARY G. KREEP; SBN 066482932 “D” Street, Suite 2Ramona, California 92065Tel: (760) 788-6624Fax: (760) 788-6414(Email: usjf@usjf.net)
Attorney for Plaintiffs, Markham Robinsonand Dr. Wiley S. Drake 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NINTH CIRCUITNO. 09-56827
CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, etal.,Defendants)(Dist. Ct. No.:SACV09-00082-DOC(ANx)
)NOTICE OF POST-JUDGMENTRULING AND APPELLANTS’INTENT TO PROSECUTE APPEAL
)))))))))))
NOTICE OF POST-JUDGMENT RULING AND APPELLANTS’INTENT TO PROSECUTE APPEAL
The undersigned represents DR. WILEY DRAKE and MARKHAM ROBINSON,Plaintiffs and APPELLANTS in this matter, and no other party. On December 8, 2009, The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals entered an order with the District Court, instructing theAPPELLANTS to notify the Appellate Court, in writing, of the disposition of a post- judgment motion within five days of the District Court’s ruling on the motion. The order also instructed the APPELLANTS to notify the Appellate Court if they intended to
Case: 09-56827 12/10/2009 Page: 1 of 3 DktEntry: 7159970
 
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282
 prosecute their appeal and to file an amended notice of appeal if they intended to appeal theDistrict Court’s ruling on the post-judgment motion.Pursuant to the Appellate Court’s order, APPELLANTS hereby give notice that, onDecember 4, 2009, the District Court denied the post-judgment motion. The motion was an“Amended Motion for Reconsideration,” which was filed by Plaintiffs’ attorney ORLYTAITZ. APPELLANTS will not be appealing the District Court’s denial of the post- judgment motion.APPELLANTS also hereby give notice that they intend to prosecute the appeal, thenotice of appeal for which they have previously filed. The District Court’s denial of TAITZ’s post-judgment motion does not affect APPELLANTS’ previously filed Notice of Appeal.Date: December 9, 2009Respectfully Submitted,s/GARY G. KREEPUNITED STATES JUSTICE FOUNDATIONAttorney for PLAINTIFFS Dr. Wiley Drake andMarkham Robinson
Case: 09-56827 12/10/2009 Page: 2 of 3 DktEntry: 7159970

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->