In 1949, Fisk received as a charitable gift from American modernist Georgia 0 'Keeffe. Fisk's financial projections show it will face a negative cash position on or before December 15, 2007. Loss of accreditation would likely require Fisk to declare bankruptcy and / or dramatically scale back or cease operations as an educational institution.
In 1949, Fisk received as a charitable gift from American modernist Georgia 0 'Keeffe. Fisk's financial projections show it will face a negative cash position on or before December 15, 2007. Loss of accreditation would likely require Fisk to declare bankruptcy and / or dramatically scale back or cease operations as an educational institution.
In 1949, Fisk received as a charitable gift from American modernist Georgia 0 'Keeffe. Fisk's financial projections show it will face a negative cash position on or before December 15, 2007. Loss of accreditation would likely require Fisk to declare bankruptcy and / or dramatically scale back or cease operations as an educational institution.
IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE
In the Matter of
FISK UNIVERSITY,
as recipient of a gift from No. 05-2994-I11
Georgia O'Keeffe, now
deceased and who made
such gift under the power
granted to her by the Last
‘Will and Testament of
Alfred Stieglitz,
Petitioner.
AMENDED PETITION OF FISK UNIVERSITY
PURSUANT TO THE CY PRES DOCTRINE
‘Comes now the Petitioner, Fisk University (“Fisk”), as recipient of a charitable
gift from Georgia O’Keeffe (“O’Kecffe”), alleging as follows:
INTRODUCTION
1. Fisk, a private, not-for-profit, institution of higher education located in
Nashville, Tennessee, brings this amended petition for modification, under the Court’s cy
_pres power, of restrictions on an att collection donated to Fisk by O'Keeffe.
2. In 1949, Fisk received as a charitable gift from American modernist
O'Keeffe a collection of art comprised of photographs and other artworks from the estate
of her husband, renowned photographer Alfred Stieglitz, as well as certain artworks of
her own (collectively, the “Collection”).
3. In donating the Collection to Fisk, O’Keefié imposed certain conditions,
among them requirements that the Collection be kept intact and that it be displayed to the
public at Fisk to promote of the study of art. For nearly three quarters of a century, Fisk
displayed the Collection according to O’Keeffe’s conditions.
oonsas924)4, Fisk now faces financial circumstances that jeopardize its viability. At
present, Fisk’s financial projections reveal that it will face a negative cash position on or
before December 15, 2007, without an unexpected infusion of cash. Moreover, as
explained later in this petition, Fisk’s financial condition endangers its continued status as.
an accredited institution. Loss of accreditation would likely require Fisk to declare
bankruptey and/or dramatically scale back or cease operations as an educational
institution. ‘These developments would preclude display of the Collection at Fisk.
Additionally in light of its Ginaricial predicament, it will be impractical for Fisk to comply
with the gift conditions by December 15, 2007.
5, Faced with these circumstances, Fisk in 2005 initiated this litigation to
seek permission to sell two paintings from the Collection. ‘The Court declined to grant
Fisk such permission, and set for trial certain counterclaims asserted by the Georgia
O'Keeffe Foundation, substituted now by the Georgia O’Keeffe Museum (“Muscum”).
Before trial, Fisk and the Museum reached a settlement involving the sale of the
Collection's signature piece, O’Keefe’'s Radiator Building, to the Museum for $7.5
million, This settlement was rejected by the Court as not in the best interests of the
people of Tennessee, in light of a written expression of interest in the Collection by Alice
‘Walton, founder of Crystal Bridges - Museum of American Art, Inc. (“Crystal Bridges").
‘The letter from Alice Walton was made to the Attorney General of Tennessee, in the
event the settlement agreement was rejected. ‘The Court found the proposal by Alice
‘Walton more consistent with O’Keeffe’s conditions and donative intent.
6. Fisk and Crystal Bridges have now reached agreement on the terms
proposed by Ms. Walton, Under the agreement (“Agreement”, Exhibit 1), CrystalBridges is to purchase a 50% undivided interest in the Collection for $30 million; Fisk
and Crystal Bridges will jointly own the Collection, which will be kept wholly intact end
made available to the public one-half time at Fisk and one-half time at Crystal Bridges
for study and public appreciation. In addition, the Agreement effectuates O’Keeffe’s
intent that the Collection be properly maintained and safeguarded.
7, While Fisk's financial situation now makes it impractical to comply with
the literal terms of O’Keeffe’s gift, Court approval of the Agreement would allow Fisk to
honor O’Keeffe’s intent as much as is practicable.
PARTI
8, Fisk is a private, not-for-profit, liberal arts institution of higher education,
founded in 1866 and located in Nashville, Tennessee. Fisk is accredited by the Southern
‘Association of Colleges and Schools and is a member of the United Negro College Fund.
9. The Attomey General of Tennessee has an interest in the subject matter of
this petition, under certain Tennessce statutes applicable to charitable bequests.
10. The Georgia O'Keeffe Museum is a not-for-profit corporation organized
‘under the laws of New Mexico and located in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
FACTS
‘The Stieglitz
ill
11, Alfred Stieglitz, acclaimed photographer, collector and dealer of American
modem att, died in New York City on July 13, 1946. In his Last Will and Testament and
Codicil (“Will”), he provided for the disposition of photographs and artworks in his
collection. (Exhibit 2).12, In Article Two of the Will, Stieglitz provided his wife, American
modemist O'Keeffe, with the right, during her lifetime, to transfer his personal property
to non-profit organizations:
“My said wife shall also have the right, during her lifetime, to transfer said
property or any part thereof, without receiving any consideration, to one or
‘mote corporations, such as are described in Article THIRD of this Will,
and as she may select or cause to be incorporated.”
13. In Article Three of the Will, Stieglitz provided that any of his photographs
and artworks not disposed of by O’Keefie during her lifetime be transferred to non-profit
corporations under arrangements allowing public access to promote the study of art:
“Upon the death of my wife . . . I give and bequeath so much of my entire
collection of photographs (including those produced by me) and other
works of art as shall not have been disposed of by my said wife to one or
more corporations . . . such property to be received and held by such
corporation or corporations under such arrangements as will assure to the
public, under reasonable regulations, access thereto to promote the study
of art, but no corporation shall be entitled to share in this bequest any part
of whose net earnings shall inure to the benefit of any private stockholder
or individual or any substantial part of whose activities shall be carrying
on propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation.”
14, The Will was admitted to probate in New York County Surrogate’s Court
‘on September 17, 1946, (Exhibit 3).
15. During the probate process, an issue arose as to whether dispositions under
‘Article Three of the Will could exceed a limit on the value of charitable bequests
imposed by Section 17 of the Decedent Estate Law, thereby rendering the Will invalid.
To resolve the Section 17 issue, O'Keeffe proposed to donate immediately all of
Stieglitz’s photographs and artwork, pursuant to Article Two of the Will, to six non-profit
institutions that met the conditions set forth in Article Three. Such donation would not
exceed the limits of Section 17, and no art would be left to dispose. The institutions werethe Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Art Institute of Chicago, the National Gallery of
Art, the Philadelphia Museum of Art, the Library of Congress and Fisk. (Exhibit 4).
16. The Court found that such disposition eliminated the Article 17 issue, and
approved the disposition. (Exhibit 5 at 48).
k University’s Continuing Legacy of Excellence
17. Sinee its inception in 1866, Fisk has emerged as a celebrated liberal arts
university and a flagship institution among the nation’s historically black colleges and
universities. As Nashville's first university, Fisk is unmatched in the pre-professional
preparation and training of Aftican Americans.
18, Even before regional accreditation was available to African American
institutions, Fisk gained recognition by leading U.S. universities. In 1930, Fisk became
the first African-American institution to gain accreditation by the Southem Association
of Colleges and Schools. Fisk was also the first such institution to be placed on the
approved lists of the Association of American Universities (1933) and the American
Association of University Women (1948). Today, one of every five African-American
doctors, lawyers and dentists is a Fisk graduate,
19, _ In the past two years, despite the school’s financial difficulties, Fisk has
demonstrated its excellence both to the state of Tennessee and the nation. According to a
recent National Science Foundation report, Fisk graduates more African Americans who
g0 on to eam their doctorate degrees in the natural sciences than any school in the nation.
Further, according to the Department of Education, Fisk has an annual economic impact
of $42 million on the city of Nashville. Fisk ranks in the top-fifty baccalaureate
institutions in producing African-American science and engineering doctoral degree