• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
SCONUL Focus 46 2009
63
Library awaydays – homewins or owngoals?
Daren Mansfeld
Academic Subject Librarian,University o LincolnTel: 01522 886094E-mail: dmansfeld@lincoln.ac.uk
Love them or loathe them, away days have become an integral part o the library calendar.Last summer the University o Lincoln held anaway day event comprised o a morning address-ing matters that arose rom a sta survey andthen the launch o a learning landscapes agenda– essentially a game o two halves. Away dayscan orm a crucial part o employee engagementi used wisely – any organisation’s plan in usingaway days is to boost morale and ultimately pro-ductivity. At their worst, away days can be embar-rassing and can reinorce a negative opinion o theorganisation; at best, they can transorm organi-sational perormance and inject resh enthusiasminto a project or team. The rst-ever study o theeectiveness o away days, by the Chartered Insti-tute o Management and the Advanced Instituteor Management Research, concluded, accordingto Nick Pandya, that ‘our in 10 managers on suchcorporate outings believe that the rendezvousthey attended had either no impact or a nega-tive impact on a range o measurable businessoutcomes’.
1
Away days oten all short o expecta-tions, and even o their basic objectives, becauseo a lack o preparation and because o resistancerom those involved.
2
Without doubt the notiono an away day can induce eelings o despair,particularly when they are traditionally associatedwith go-karting or paint-balling – activities thatare not suitable or everyone. Games can easily be perceived as articial exercises that annoyemployees and may elicit their most unpleasantcharacteristics.
3
So, how can organisers create anaway day which contributes towards organisa-tional learning, inspires motivation and is reward-ing or all participants … without turning it into apantomime?As team development is essentially about inclu-sion, Peter Fleming has argued or the importance
 
64
SCONUL Focus 46 2009
in team building o removing barriers via ree-fowing conversation.
4
While clustered aroundteam-building activities, each employee shouldeel equally valued – at least or the day. Inworking together to solve problems, sta oughtto eel empowered through meaningul engage-ment. Stimulating discussion around importantmatters, in a sae, welcoming environment whereemployees are comortable in expressing theiropinions, without ear o retribution, naturallycreates a productive environment where trust can be generated.An eective away day is the hallmark o aorward-thinking organisation, according to Julia Vowler, ‘At Bucknall Austin, which wasshortlisted or the construction, agriculture andmining Best Places to Work Award, unding is setaside or team events, and an open atmosphere isencouraged in meetings.’
5
Dan Collins, ounder oteam-building motivational activities and event-organiser Fresh Tracks, advises that an away dayhas to start with clear objectives.
6
Location andvenue, rereshments, adequate acilities, ambi-ence and ease o access are important actors that build towards a successul day. Candour, relaxa-tion, a change o scene, avoiding an overcrowdedprogramme and giving plenty o notice are othergood tips. As well as providing plenty o eedbackabout the day, acting upon the recommendationsand ormulating an implementation plan is vitalso that participants acquire a sense o ownership.Being away rom the normal working environ-ment helps people to view key questions rom theoutside, and hopeully achieve greater objectiv-ity. Firstly, organisers need to identiy the reasonwhy the away day is necessary; although it seemsobvious, this rationale helps to ocus activities. Asta survey at the University o Lincoln identiedthree areas in the library that required attention:1 Improving communication2 Improving your Personal DevelopmentReview3 Improving career development.The morning o our away day was based uponthe innovative concept o the World Caé, whichclaims to be a ‘
conversational process
based on a seto
integrated design principles
that reveal a deeper
living network pattern
through which we co-evolveour collective uture’.
7
Such orums host con-stantly evolving conversations around impor-tant questions, as a means to share purpose andachieve common aims, where conversations ‘linkand build on each other as people move betweengroups, cross-pollinate ideas, and discover newinsights into the questions or issues that are mostimportant in their lie, work, or community’.
8
 To address the three issues arising rom our stasurvey, three groups were asked to debate eachissue or twenty minutes beore turning to thenext topic, to identiy a list o possible solutions:an arrangement that created lively discussion andworthwhile debate. Our library away day wassuccessul because there was sucient time todebate each topic, and it was eectively managed by the chairs o each group so that everyone hada chance to speak. I other World-Caé-inspiredaway days were organised with the same demo-cratic ethos then I’m condent the library wouldcontinue to score home wins, rather than owngoals.
B
iBliography 
Collins, D., ‘Away days or away daze?’,
Training Journal
, May (2007), p 41Emery, R.,
Staff communication in libraries
, London:Linnet Books, 1973Fleming, P., ‘Metaphors o resistance’,
 ManagementCommunication Quarterly
, 19 (1) (2005), pp 45–66Pandya, N., ‘Workshops miss their target: team- building exercises like paintballing may be un, but oten ail in their aims’,
The Guardian
(‘Jobsand Money’ section), 13 August 2005, p 17Vowler, J., ‘Away days promote teamworking’,
Computer Weekly
, 17 May 2005, p 28Wilkinson, J.P., ‘The psycho-organizationalapproach to sta communication in libraries’,
 Journal of Academic Librarianship
, 4 (1) (1978), pp21–6World Caé, ‘What is the World Caé?’ Locatedat http://www.theworldcae.com/what.htm[accessed 8 January 2009]Wren, A. ‘Team–building: more than just anotherwork jolly?’,
The Independent, The World of Work
, 26May 2005, p 5
r
eferences
1 N. Pandya, ‘Workshops miss their target:team-building exercises like paintballing may be un, but oten ail in their aims’,
The Guard-ian
(‘Jobs and Money’ section), 13 August2005), p 17
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...