Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT shown that high blood pressure, abnormal blood lipid concentra-
Background: Epidemiologic evidence shows an inverse relation tions, and diabetes are major risk factors for cardiovascular dis-
between fish consumption and death from ischemic heart dis- ease (CVD) (2, 3). In turn, these risk factors are strongly linked
ease. This beneficial effect is attributed to n3 fatty acids. to abdominal obesity, inadequate levels of physical activity, and
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the asso- diets high in saturated fat (3–5). Numerous studies reported that
ciation between plasma phospholipid concentrations of the n3 a diet rich in fish and marine mammals protects against CVD
fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (6–11). In fact, populations who consume large amounts of
Am J Clin Nutr 2001;74:603–11. Printed in USA. © 2001 American Society for Clinical Nutrition 603
604 DEWAILLY ET AL
CVD risk factors in a large population with low fish intake. Que- matography with heptane:isopropyl ether:acetic acid (60:40:3,
becers generally consume small quantities of fish; the average by vol) as the developing solvent. After transmethylation with
daily consumption is 15 g (30). In the present study, n3 fatty boron trifluoride:methanol, the fatty acid profile was determined
acids were measured in plasma phospholipids, with particular by capillary gas-liquid chromatography. The fatty acid composi-
attention given to the proportion of EPA and DHA, in a repre- tion of plasma phospholipids was expressed as a percentage of
sentative sample of Quebecers. The first objective was to exam- the total area of all fatty acid peaks from 14:0 to 24:1. In this
ine the association between concentrations of EPA and DHA and study, plasma phospholipid concentrations of fatty acids corre-
fish consumption. The second objective was to verify the rela- spond to relative percentages of total fatty acids by weight.
tions between concentrations of n3 fatty acids and various
CVD risk factors. Blood pressure
Four blood pressure measurements were taken by a trained
survey nurse according to the recommendations of the consensus
SUBJECTS AND METHODS conference on the management of mild hypertension in Canada
(36). Standard mercury sphygmomanometers, 38.1-cm (15-inch)
Study population stethoscopes, and appropriately sized cuffs were used. Pressure
As part of the federal-provincial Canadian Heart Health Ini- readings were taken at the beginning and at the end of both the
tiative, Santé Québec, an organization of the Quebec Health and home interview and the clinical visit. These values are reported
Social Services Ministry, conducted the Heart Health and Nutri- as the arithmetic mean of the 4 readings.
tion Survey among Quebecers. The primary objective of the sur-
vey was to determine the prevalence of CVD risk factors and Lifestyle assessment and anthropometry
participants’ knowledge and awareness of the causes and conse- Using a questionnaire covering diet, smoking, alcohol intake,
quences of these factors (31, 32). The target population of the previous medical history of CVD, and socioeconomic character-
TABLE 1
Relative concentrations of n3 fatty acids in plasma phospholipids according to category of fish intake per week1
Category of fish intake per week All subjects (n = 1460)
0g 1–55 g 56–120 g ≥ 121 g Geometric –x Arithmetic –x
Fatty acid (n = 316) (n = 419) (n = 369) (n = 356) P2 (95% CI) (range)
% by wt of total fatty acids % by wt of total fatty acids
EPA 0.44 ± 0.17a 0.45 ± 0.22a,b 0.48 ± 0.22b 0.53 ± 0.28c 0.0001 0.47 ± 0.23 (0.46, 0.48) 0.52 (0.09–3.69)
DHA 1.04 ± 0.38a
1.13 ± 0.44 b
1.25 ± 0.47 c
1.36 ± 0.63d 0.0001 1.19 ± 0.51 (1.17, 1.21) 1.28 (0.35–4.36)
EPA+DHA 1.51 ± 0.46a 1.60 ± 0.58a 1.76 ± 0.60b 1.92 ± 0.81c 0.0001 1.70 ± 0.65 (1.67, 1.72) 1.79 (0.63–8.05)
AA 6.38 ± 1.36 6.17 ± 1.36 6.24 ± 1.49 6.21 ± 1.51 0.22 6.24 ± 1.43 (6.17, 6.31) 6.40 (2.50–12.15)
EPA:AA 0.068 ± 0.03a 0.072 ± 0.03a,b 0.077 ± 0.04b 0.086 ± 0.04c 0.0001 0.076 ± 0.04 (0.074, 0.077) 0.083 (0.010–0.407)
PUFA, n3 series3 2.31 ± 0.62a 2.36 ± 0.68a 2.53 ± 0.71b 2.70 ± 0.92c 0.0001 2.47 ± 0.76 (2.44, 2.51) 2.57 (1.11–8.87)
PUFA, n6 series4 28.90 ± 3.09a 28.35 ± 2.52a,b 28.15 ± 2.59b 28.25 ± 2.69b 0.002 28.39 ± 2.73 (28.25, 28.53) 28.52 (18.43–39.03)
n3:n6 0.080 ± 0.02a 0.083 ± 0.02a 0.090 ± 0.03b 0.095 ± 0.03c 0.0001 0.087 ± 0.03 (0.086, 0.088) 0.090 (0.038–0.298)
1–
x ± SD. Values in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (Scheffe’s procedure), P < 0.05. EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid
(20:5n3); DHA, docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n3); AA, arachidonic acid (20:4n6); PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids.
2
Obtained by analysis of variance.
3
18:3 + 18:4 + 20:3 + 20:4 + 20:5 + 22:5 + 22:6.
4
18:2 + 18:3 + 20:2 + 20:3 + 20:4 + 22:2 + 22:4 + 22:5.
Our goal in the statistical analysis was to describe plasma the month before the survey. Fifty percent of all subjects had con-
sumed ≤ 55 g fish weekly, and 43.3% of these subjects reported
TABLE 2
Fish intake and relative concentrations of n3 fatty acids in plasma phospholipids according to potential confounding variables1
Relative concentrations of n3 fatty acids
Fish intake EPA DHA EPA+DHA EPA:AA n3:n6
g/wk % by wt of total fatty acids
Sex
Male (n = 722) 87.80 ± 132.62 0.48 ± 0.23 1.15 ± 0.53 1.66 ± 0.66 0.075 ± 0.03 0.087 ± 0.03
Female (n = 738) 77.93 ± 96.2 0.46 ± 0.24 1.23 ± 0.49 1.73 ± 0.64 0.076 ± 0.03 0.087 ± 0.03
P3 0.02 0.07 0.0005 0.04 0.93 0.85
Age (y)
18–34 (n = 784) 75.30 ± 85.8a 0.44 ± 0.17a 1.09 ± 0.34a 1.56 ± 0.43a 0.071 ± 0.03a 0.081 ± 0.02a
35–49 (n = 432) 83.51 ± 172.8a,b 0.49 ± 0.33b 1.23 ± 0.75b 1.75 ± 0.95b 0.077 ± 0.05b 0.089 ± 0.04b
50–74 (n = 244) 90.74 ± 117.3b 0.50 ± 0.25b 1.30 ± 0.54b 1.83 ± 0.70b 0.080 ± 0.04b 0.093 ± 0.03b
P3 0.01 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0002 0.0001
Waist girth
Normal (n = 1296) 81.86 ± 116.4 0.47 ± 0.23 1.19 ± 0.51 1.69 ± 0.65 0.075 ± 0.04 0.087 ± 0.03
Elevated (n = 151) 87.81 ± 112.6 0.52 ± 0.22 1.25 ± 0.51 1.79 ± 0.66 0.079 ± 0.03 0.090 ± 0.03
P3 0.41 0.01 0.09 0.03 0.21 0.09
Smoking status
Smoker (n = 424) 78.04 ± 109.9 0.46 ± 0.18 1.10 ± 0.47 1.59 ± 0.56 0.074 ± 0.03 0.084 ± 0.02
Nonsmoker (n = 1034) 84.34 ± 117.9 0.48 ± 0.25 1.23 ± 0.52 1.74 ± 0.68 0.076 ± 0.04 0.089 ± 0.03
P3 0.19 0.07 0.0001 0.0001 0.45 0.0002
Alcohol intake
EPA+DHA and higher ratios of EPA to AA and of n3 to n6 was 9.1% in men and only 1.9% in women and did not vary
PUFAs than did other alcohol intake groups. However, fish intake significantly according to age. A greater proportion of men than
did not vary significantly according to alcohol intake. Concentra- of women were in the high-risk range for the ratio of total to
tions of EPA and EPA+DHA were higher among subjects who had HDL cholesterol (≥ 6) and for triacylglycerol concentrations
a previous medical history of CVD than in those without such a (≥ 2.3 mmol/L), and the prevalence of both was positively asso-
medical history, but fish intake did not vary significantly accord- ciated with age. High blood pressure was also more prevalent in
ing to a previous medical history of CVD. Subjects using medica- men than in women and was positively associated with age in
tion for hypercholesterolemia had higher concentrations of DHA both sexes. The prevalence of impaired fasting glucose did not
and EPA+DHA than did nonusers (data not shown). Concentra- vary according to sex but was positively associated with age in
tions of EPA, DHA, and EPA+DHA and ratios of n3 to n6 both sexes. Finally, the prevalence of insulin ≥ 90 pmol/L was
PUFAs were also higher among subjects receiving treatment for not significantly different between men and women and did not
high blood pressure (data not shown). The ratio of EPA to AA was vary significantly by age.
significantly lower in subjects being treated for diabetes than in Shown in Table 4 are the regression coefficients ( values)
subjects not being treated (data not shown). Fish intake was higher from the multiple linear regression analysis with CVD risk fac-
among subjects using medication for high blood pressure than tor values as dependant variables and plasma phospholipid con-
among nonusers, whereas no significant difference was found centrations of n3 fatty acids as predictor variables. We found
between groups using or not using medication for hypercholes- positive associations between EPA and total cholesterol, LDL
terolemia and diabetes (data not shown). cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pres-
For subsequent analyses, 290 of the 1460 subjects were sure, and plasma glucose. In parallel, we found positive associa-
excluded because they reported using medication for hypercho- tions between DHA and total cholesterol, the ratio of total to
lesterolemia, high blood pressure, or diabetes. Among the HDL cholesterol, triacylglycerols, systolic blood pressure, and
remaining subjects (n = 1170), the prevalence of high-risk con- plasma glucose and insulin. We found a negative association
centrations of total and LDL cholesterol was 13.6% and 12.6%, between DHA and HDL cholesterol. EPA+DHA was also nega-
respectively, and was positively associated with age but was not tively associated with HDL cholesterol and positively associated
significantly different between men and women (Table 3). In with the other CVD risk factors. The ratio of EPA to AA had pos-
contrast, the prevalence of low HDL-cholesterol concentrations itive associations with total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and
n3 FATTY ACIDS AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE RISK 607
TABLE 3
Prevalence (weighted) of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors according to sex and age1
Men Women
18–34 y 35–49 y 50–74 y All 18–34 y 35–49 y 50–74 y All All subjects
CVD risk factors (n = 368) (n = 93) (n = 124) (n = 585) P2 (n = 361) (n = 127) (n = 97) (n = 585) P2 (n = 1170) P3
% % %
TC ≥ 6.2 mmol/L 6.6 18.6 29.8 15.1 0.001 3.5 11.8 30.7 12.1 0.001 13.6 0.14
LDL ≥ 4.1 mmol/L 8.1 14.3 21.7 12.8 0.001 3.0 10.4 35.7 12.4 0.001 12.6 0.87
HDL ≤ 0.9 mmol/L 7.2 8.5 14.3 9.1 0.08 2.3 1.8 1.1 1.9 0.73 5.4 0.001
TC:HDL ≥ 6 6.9 12.3 13.9 10.0 0.05 1.5 4.9 9.9 4.4 0.001 7.2 0.001
Triacylglycerols ≥ 2.3 mmol/L 11.0 17.1 28.6 16.5 0.001 4.9 8.8 14.0 8.2 0.01 12.2 0.001
SBP/DBP ≥ 140/90 mm Hg 8.0 8.9 37.8 14.5 0.001 1.4 6.5 25.8 8.3 0.001 11.3 0.001
Glucose ≥ 6.1 mmol/L 0.5 5.5 9.0 3.8 0.001 0.7 0.7 8.2 2.3 0.001 3.0 0.12
Insulin ≥ 90 pmol/L 21.8 20.9 26.3 22.5 0.52 19.1 14.3 23.2 18.2 0.12 20.3 0.08
1
TC, total cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.
2
Chi-square test by age.
3
Chi-square test by sex.
systolic blood pressure and a negative association with the ratio odds ratios and comparing subjects in quintiles 2–5 with those in
of total to HDL cholesterol. We found positive associations quintile 1. When modeling the probability of HDL-cholesterol
between the ratio of n3 to n6 PUFAs and CVD risk factors, concentrations ≤ 0.9 mmol/L, the odds ratio for the group with
TABLE 4
Regression coefficients ( values) from multiple linear regression analysis with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor values as dependent variables
and relative concentrations of n3 fatty acids in plasma phospholipids as predictor variables1
n3 Fatty acids (n = 1170)
CVD risk factors Log EPA Log DHA Log EPA+DHA Log EPA:AA Log n3:n6
TC 0.52 (0.0003) 0.51 (0.004) 0.71 (0.0003) 0.43 (0.002) 1.17 (0.0001)
LDL 0.28 (0.03) 0.27 (0.09) 0.37 (0.04) 0.21 (0.09) 0.60 (0.006)
HDL 0.14 (0.004) 0.27 (0.0001) 0.16 (0.02) 0.24 (0.0001) 0.11 (0.16)
Log TC:HDL 0.002 (0.92) 0.13 (0.0001) 0.11 (0.0001) 0.04 (0.02) 0.13 (0.0001)
Log triacylglycerols 0.06 (0.07) 0.32 (0.0001) 0.31 (0.0001) 0.04 (0.17) 0.38 (0.0001)
Log SBP 0.02 (0.007) 0.02 (0.01) 0.03 (0.0008) 0.01 (0.03) 0.05 (0.0001)
Log DBP 0.02 (0.01) 0.01 (0.17) 0.02 (0.03) 0.01 (0.06) 0.03 (0.006)
Log glucose 0.02 (0.005) 0.03 (0.004) 0.04 (0.002) 0.01 (0.13) 0.04 (0.002)
Log insulin 0.01 (0.67) 0.13 (0.0001) 0.12 (0.002) 0.04 (0.19) 0.09 (0.06)
1
One model for each combination of CVD risk factor and n3 fatty acid. Each model included age, sex, waist girth, smoking, alcohol intake, and per-
sonal history of CVD. P values in parentheses. EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; AA, arachidonic acid; TC, total cholesterol;
SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood presssure.
608 DEWAILLY ET AL
FIGURE 1. Odds ratios (95% CIs) of a prevalent high-risk concentration of plasma HDL cholesterol by quintiles of the plasma phospholipid ratio
of eicosapentaenoic acid to arachidonic acid.
thereby reducing the availability of AA in tissue phospholipids knowledge must now be applied to nutrition education programs
(49). In contrast, DHA may not efficiently inhibit AA metabo- promoting fish consumption.
lism (29). Bonaa et al (60) indicated that the increase of HDL
cholesterol after n3 fatty acid intake is positively related with We are grateful to Santé Québec for providing the databases and blood sam-
changes of plasma EPA concentrations and negatively related ples of the Heart Health and Nutrition Survey conducted among Quebecers.
with the increase of DHA, but the underlying mechanisms
remain unexplained. However, Simon et al (63) showed that the REFERENCES
concentrations of DHA in serum phospholipids were inversely 1. Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec. Surveil-
correlated with the risk of ischemic heart disease. Hence, it lance de la mortalité au Québec: années 1993–1995. (Mortality
seems that, when plasma concentrations of AA are taken into surveillance in Quebec, 1993–1995.) Québec: Gouvernement du
Québec, 1996 (in French).
account, the beneficial effect of EPA on the ratio of total to HDL
2. Swales SD, de Bono DP. Cardiovascular risk factors. New York:
cholesterol is more easily detected. Gower Medical Publishing, 1993.
Most studies that examined the effects of n3 fatty acids on 3. Levy D, Wilson PW, Anderson KM, Castelli WP. Stratifying the
blood pressure were done using fish oil supplements. In their patient at risk from coronary disease: new insights from the Fram-
meta-analysis of 31 controlled trials, Morris et al (64) concluded ingham Heart Study. Am Heart J 1990;119:712–7.
that the hypotensive effect of fish oil at high doses might be 4. National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identifica-
strongest in hypertensive subjects and in those with clinical ath- tion, evaluation and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—
erosclerotic disease or hypercholesterolemia. According to the evidence report. Obes Res 1998;6(suppl):S51–209.
Knapp (65), both the amount and type of fat consumed can exert 5. Després JP. Abdominal obesity and the risk of coronary artery dis-
ease. Can J Cardiol 1992;8:561–2.
different effects on blood pressure. Thus, our results suggest that
6. Dyerberg J. Linolenate-derived polyunsaturated fatty acids and pre-
EPA and DHA have no beneficial effect on blood pressure when vention of atherosclerosis. Nutr Rev 1986;44:125–34.
only small quantities of fish are consumed. 7. Holub BJ. Dietary fish oils containing eicosapentaenoic acid and the
24. Nordoy A, Hansen JB. Omega-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular risk 43. Blanchet C, Dewailly É, Ayotte P, Bruneau S, Receveur O, Holub BJ.
factors. In: Galli C, Simopoulos AP, Tremoli E, eds. Effects of fatty Contribution of selected traditional and market food to Nunavik
acids and lipids in health and disease. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, Inuit women diet. Can J Diet Pract Res 2000;61:50–9.
1994:51–4. 44. Sugano M, Hirahara F. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in the food chain
25. Rogers S, James KS, Butland BK. Effects of a fish oil supplement in Japan. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71(suppl):189S–96S.
on serum lipids, blood pressure, bleeding time, haemostatic and rhe- 45. Kris-Etherton PM, Shaffer Taylor D, Yu-Poth S, et al. Polyunsatu-
ological variables. A double blind randomised controlled trial in rated fatty acids in the food chain in the United States. Am J Clin
healthy volunteers. Atherosclerosis 1987;63:137–43. Nutr 2000;71(suppl):179S–88S.
26. Singer P, Wirth M, Voigt S, et al. Blood pressure- and lipid-lower- 46. Iso H, Sato S, Folsom AR, et al. Serum fatty acids and fish intake in
ing effect of mackerel and herring diet in patients with mild essen- rural Japanese, urban Japanese, Japanese American and Caucasian
tial hypertension. Atherosclerosis 1985;56:223–35. American men. Int J Epidemiol 1989;18:374–81.
27. Storlien LH, Kriketos AD, Calvert GD, Baur LA, Jenkins AB. 47. Umemura U, Koike KA, Iso H, et al. Population-based comparative
Fatty acids, triglycerides and syndromes of insulin resistance. study on dietary habits and serum fatty acid compositions. Jpn J
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 1997;57:379–85. Hyg 1993;48:939–54.
28. Dyerberg J, Bang HO, Hjorne N. Fatty acid composition of the plasma 48. Silverman DI, Reis GJ, Sacks FM, Boucher TM, Pasternak RC.
lipids in Greenland Eskimos. Am J Clin Nutr 1975;28:958–66. Usefulness of plasma phospholipid n3 fatty acid levels in predict-
29. Hirai A, Terano T, Saito Y, Tamura Y, Yoshida S. Clinical and ing dietary fish intake in patients with coronary artery disease. Am
epidemiological studies of eicosapentaenoic acid in Japan. In: J Cardiol 1990;66:860–2.
Lands WEM, ed. The AOCS short course on polyunsaturated fatty 49. Holub BJ. Potential health benefits of the omega-3 fatty acids in
acids and eicosanoids. Biloxi, Mississippi: American Oil Chemist’s fish. In: Bligh E, ed. Seafood science and technology. Oxford,
Society, 1987:9–24. United Kingdom: Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd, 1991:40–5.
30. Santé Québec. Rapport de l’enquête québécoise sur la nutrition, 50. Hunter D, Kazda I, Chockalingam A, Fodor J. Fish consumption and
1990. (Report of the Nutrition Survey among Quebecers, 1990.) Mon- cardiovascular mortality in Canada: an inter-regional comparison.
tréal: Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec, Am J Prev Med 1988;4:5–10.
Gouvernement du Québec, 1995:121–4 (in French). 51. Nestel PJ. Fish oil and cardiovascular disease: lipids and arterial
65. Knapp HR. Fatty acids and hypertension. In: Galli C, Simopoulos AP, and glucose intolerance: reduced triglyceridemia, total cholesterol
Tremoli E, eds. Effects of fatty acids and lipids in health and dis- and increased HDL-C without glycemic alterations. Atherosclerosis
ease. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1994:9–14. 1998;137:419–27.
66. Friedberg C, Janssen M, Heine R, Grobbee D. Fish oil and glycemic 71. Axelrod L, Camuso J, Williams E, Kleinman K, Briones E,
control in diabetes. A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 1998;21:494–500. Schoenfield D. Effects of a small quantity of n–3 fatty acids on
67. Jensen T. Fatty acids and diabetes mellitus. In: Galli C, Simopoulos AP, cardiovascular risk factors in NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1994;17:
Tremoli E, eds. Effects of fatty acids and lipids in health and dis- 17–44.
ease. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1994:15–20. 72. Puhakainen I, Ahola I, Yki-Jarvinen H. Dietary supplementation
68. Friday KE, Childs MT, Tsunehara CH, Fujimoto WY, Bierman EL, with n3 fatty acids increases gluconeogenesis from glycerol but
Ensinck JW. Elevated plasma glucose and lowered triglyceride not hepatic glucose production in patients with non-insulin-depen-
levels from omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in type II diabetes. dent diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61:121–6.
Diabetes Care 1989;12:276–81. 73. Health and Welfare Canada. Nutrition recommendations: the report of
69. Borkman M, Chisholm DJ, Furler SM, et al. Effects of fish oil the Scientific Review Committee. Ottawa: Government of Canada,
supplementation on glucose and lipid metabolism in NIDDM. Dia- 1990.
betes 1989;38:1314–9. 74. Simopoulos A, Leaf A, Salem N. Essentiality of and recommended
70. Sirtori CR, Crepaldi G, Manzato E, et al. One-year treatment with dietary intakes for omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids. Ann Nutr Metab
ethyl esters of n3 fatty acids in patients with hypertriglyceridemia 1999;43:127–30.