A higher than average number of schools in Lancashire,and also across the country, have reported disappointing writing results at Key Stage Two this summer. Once clerical errors and ‘dodgy marking’ have been eliminated as causes, schools are often left feeling where did we go wrong? Having supported many schools in scrutinising their scripts at the end of the summer term,the Lancashire Literacy Consultants made a number of observations. A large number of scripts demonstrated a heavy reliance on rather technical and formulaic approaches to writing which are promoted by some high profile commercially produced schemes. If writing results at your school were lower than expected, it may be useful to analyse your scripts asking the following questions.Have pupils paid sufficient attention to the content
•
or ‘text message’? Pupils’ first consideration must be ‘what am I trying to say about… (these trainers/this busy place)?’ Have pupils thought about the audience and purpose
•
for the writing as stated in the task? In many scripts seen, pupils had become distracted by trying to impress markers with their attempted use of highly sophisticated sentence structures, connectives and vocabulary. This seems to be particularly evident in writing from more able girls.Have pupils used complex sentences appropriately?
•
Whilst variety in sentence construction is desirable,overuse of complex sentences with a range of openers will negatively affect the general flow of the writing. Writing becomes disjointed and, as ideas within paragraphs remain underdeveloped, this has a negative affect on the text structure and organisation mark. Are sentence openers matched to text type, purpose
•
and audience? Contrived or inappropriate openers should be avoided. In one example taken from the longer task - a non chronological report - one pupil had written Bouncing high, I bounced up into the clouds. In this example and several similar ones seen,there is a definite sense of the pupil’s aim being to include a sentence with an ‘ing’ opener rather than to communicate meaning appropriately.Has vocabulary been selected according to text
•
type, purpose and audience? The use of ambitious vocabulary should be encouraged but always with understanding of meaning.Was punctuation selected to match text type, purpose
•
and audience? In many instances, there was an apparent preoccupation with demonstrating the ability to use a range of punctuation and this was ultimately detrimental to the composition and effect of the piece.Ways to develop writing: Children need to hear written language read aloud.
•
Are all pupils read to in school every day? Promote the daily read aloud programme across the school – novels, short stories, poems, newspaper reports, persuasive letters, plays, diaries, information texts…See the Talk for Writing materials for ways to
•
develop effective approaches to the teaching of writing (Ref:00761-2008DVD-EN) Use the Text Types Guidance from Support for
•
Writing when planning to inform the appropriate use of vocabulary, sentence types and connectives.This is a web based resource which forms part of the Primary Framework for Literacy.See Steps in Learning –including the classroom
•
examples -also from the Support for Writing materials. These support the teaching of specific writing skills and, more importantly, the application of these in context.Promote explicit discussion of purpose and audience
•
when reading and writing texts and return to it when evaluating writing.Ensure the explicit teaching of writing through
•
regular and frequent shared writing, including teacher demonstration. This continues to be one of the most powerful ways of teaching writing.Finally…First and foremost, writing is about communicating
•
ideas. Developing writing skills is essential if young writers are to do this effectively.Successful,creative and enthusiastic young writers have been taught not only the skills but also how to use them to create desired effects.
Where did we go wrong? KS2 Writing Results 2009