Page1Riley = Wolffe Reports68mFIRST PAGE (Both):-- DATE OF REPORT FILED SAME-- REPORTED BY: Jamie, Berry SAME-- APPROVED BY : A.L. (name & titlesection; not given. NO DATE EITHER #1: Reports first page nearlyexact. With exception of thecopy/cut & paste incompetentmistakes (say incompetent becauseif otherwise it shows delibrestdeliberate attempts to falsifyreports, evidence all the wayto Jaime Berry’s testimony atmy trial where he swore that aanother person claiming to bemy person makes a recording. Jaime Berryswore it was my voice, layingthe ground work for the judge toGrant that it so therefore[by’ turnsthe recording into my conspiracystatement to lock me into thealleged charges.)PAGE2#2This again is nearly exactsame words only on Wolffe’s, itis split up into 2 small statementswhile Riley’s is a paragraph butstill presumes the wording in theexact same order.#3 On their second pages, bothright in the middle, the sectionnames are changed but the topicis exactly the same, even thoughthe section width was changed togive the appearance of being differentreports.#4While Riley’s Proffer statements &Wolffe’s Proffer statements begin tosplit ways, mostly only in thefact that both point thefinger at others.But still, examples of copy/cut & paste incompetence continuallyappear.A perfect example exist[s] onRiley’s 5 of 12 & Wolffe’s 4 of 7.PAGE3#4(

CONT)

This is an important one asit leads to more importantissues. Riley’s 12 pages to Wolffe’s7 pages. Riley’s is choke fullof details. Whiles Wolffe’s reportas offered against me lacks details &where present again are exactlythe same statements nearly perfectly word for word.The level of details given by Riley & Wolffe can be shownhere, again with the copy /cut & paste incompetence.This is a very important issueas it is Wollfe’s report is thereport lacking detail & it should be NOTED that Wolffe gave manystatements at several proffers &at court as testimonies. It has been even noted by the U.S.Marshals’ themselves in their own reports confronting Wolffe aboutthe numerous inconsistencies. Wolffe justifying them as being fearfullor forgetting & coercion.PAGE4#5 EXACL EXACTLY THE SAME#6 EXACTLY THE SAME WORDING AGAINBUT WITH same copy/cut & pasteaction. & again Wolffe’s. lacking details,which we I figure to is to helpconceal his inconsistence. It isalso important to note no time frames given

†

(Due to these blatant examples of incompetence or falsified statementsI believe that if Patti were to beshown her “reported” report she