Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
22Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
BioInitiative - A Rationale for a Biologically-based Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Radiation [BLACKMAN et al (Org ), 2007]

BioInitiative - A Rationale for a Biologically-based Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Radiation [BLACKMAN et al (Org ), 2007]

Ratings:

4.7

(10)
|Views: 1,275 |Likes:
Published by fischumi
Scientists and physicians from academic centres and independent organizations in the USA, Europe and Asia, came together in mid-2007 to form the Bioinitiative Working Group. The group's goal was to document proposals for safer standards regarding public exposure to electromagnetic fields based on their comprehensive review of the literature. In its Report, which reviewed several hundreds of studies in this area, substantial evidence is cited for human disease-associations with electromagnetic fields (cell phones, transmission towers, power lines and Wi-Fi) - particularly leukemia and brain tumours. The group makes its evidence-based recommendations to the Public, Governments and Industry in terms of immediately revising current "exposure standards" to come into line with more contemporary research -- particularly with regard to children, pregnant women, and occupational exposures.
Scientists and physicians from academic centres and independent organizations in the USA, Europe and Asia, came together in mid-2007 to form the Bioinitiative Working Group. The group's goal was to document proposals for safer standards regarding public exposure to electromagnetic fields based on their comprehensive review of the literature. In its Report, which reviewed several hundreds of studies in this area, substantial evidence is cited for human disease-associations with electromagnetic fields (cell phones, transmission towers, power lines and Wi-Fi) - particularly leukemia and brain tumours. The group makes its evidence-based recommendations to the Public, Governments and Industry in terms of immediately revising current "exposure standards" to come into line with more contemporary research -- particularly with regard to children, pregnant women, and occupational exposures.

More info:

Published by: fischumi on Apr 03, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/08/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
Release Date: August 31, 2007
BioInitiative Report:
A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public ExposureStandard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF)
Organizing Committee:
Carl Blackman, USAMartin Blank, USAMichael Kundi, AustriaCindy Sage, USA
Participants:
David Carpenter, USAZoreh Davanipour, USADavid Gee, Denmark Lennart Hardell, SwedenOlle Johansson, SwedenHenry Lai, USAKjell Hansson Mild, SwedenEugene Sobel, USAZhengping Xu and Guangdin Chen, China
Research AssociateS. Amy Sage, USA
 
PREFACE
The Organizing Committee thanks the participants of the BioIniativeWorking Group for their integrity and intellectual courage in dealingwith this controversial and important topic; and for devoting the timeand energy to produce their chapters. The information andconclusions in each chapter are the responsibilities of the authors ofthat chapter.The Group has produced what the authors hope will be a benchmarkfor good science and public health policy planning. It documentsbioeffects, adverse health effects and public health conclusions aboutimpacts of non-ionizing radiation (electromagnetic fields includingextremely-low frequency ELF-EMF and radiofrequency/microwaveor RF-EMF fields).Societal decisions about this body of science have global implications.Good public health policy depends on acting soon enough, but notwithout cause, and with enough information to guide intelligentactions. To a great degree, it is the definition of the standard ofevidence used to judge the scientific reports that shapes this debate.Disagreement about when the evidence is sufficient to take action hasmore to do with the outcome of various reviews and standard-settingproceedings than any other single factor. Whatever “standard of
1
 
evidence” is selected to assess the strength of the science will deeplyinfluence the outcome of decisions on public policy.We are at a critical juncture in this world-wide debate. The answerslie not only in the various branches of science; but necessarily dependon the involvement of public health and policy professionals, theregulatory, legal and environmental protection sectors, and thepublic sector.This has been a long-term collaboration of international scientistsemploying a multi-disciplinary approach to problem assessment andsolving. Our work has necessarily relied on tools and approachesacross the physical, biological and engineering sciences; and those ofthe environmental scientist and public health professional. Onlywhen taken together can we see the whole and begin to take stepsthat can prevent possible harm and protect future generations.
Signed: Signed:David Carpenter, MD Cindy Sage, MACo-Editor Co-EditorBioInitiative Report BioInitiative Report
2

Activity (22)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
CityGypsy added this note
THANK YOU fischumi for posting this important document which i needed for my arsenal of battle gear in my fight against SMART METERS in California. Also, THANK YOU stop-radiation for the comment you left about the bogus Biopro cell phone chips, which I will add to the list of things needing more research.
MA-Doc liked this
Kit Sum liked this
RestyMaglalang liked this
Danister liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->